Document aJx2pjp2vamOb3L2J5j6Mk2e9

To: From: Sent: Subject: Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@epa.gov] Burhop, Anna Tue 5/23/2017 1:05:17 AM Re: Samantha, We've mostly worked on ozone, "once in always in," new source review, and a handful of other waste rules that are in litigation. Nothing too crazy or unexpected. -anna > On May 22, 2017, at 6:53 PM, Dravis, Samantha <dravis.samantha@epa.gov> wrote: > > Anna, > > Just wanted to check in and see if there are particular rules or actions you think your members would like to hear an update on so I can check up on them? > > I don't think I will give more than probably ten mins of remarks, but hopefully I will be able to answer generally where rules of particular interest are in the process. > > Sent from my iPad > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee do not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission. American Chemistry Council, 700 - 2nd Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, www.americanchemistry.com 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008367-00001