Document aJ92oER7Dqn2N6rRDq91wkZXR

2965154 From: Subject: Date: Attachments: Dear Dear All, 3M Response to CfE - Data Gap Analysis & request for meeting donderdag 4 november 2021 20:57:07 3M Response to CfE - Data Gap Analysis.pdf Following our response to your questionnaire as part of the 2" Call for Evidence, 3M has also prepared a data gap analysis (here attached) based on the summary reports that were provided with the questionnaire. We would be grateful if you could have a look at it and consider this document in addition to the response that has been submitted as part of the consultation. Additionally, | would also like to take the opportunity to ask for a follow-up meeting with you, to discuss the submitted information and respond to any additional questions you might have. As several identified gaps are related to our specialty fluids, in particular the Novec-branded products, | was wondering whether we could also organize a separate meeting to discuss those -- it can be either as part of the F-Gases workstream or separately. Please let me know what you think would be best, and for when could we plan such meetings (a general one and one specific to Novec products). Looking forward to your feedback, and thank you again for the opportunity to comment! Kind regards, Science. Applied to Life." Office: IER ETN Hermeslaan 7 | 1831 Diegem (Brussels) Belgium | Mobile: IEE nmm.com | www.3M.com From: Sent: Sunday 17 October 2021 23:04 To: ChemG <JENEERPbaua.bund.de> <IENERECI mmm.com> Cc: INE Subject: PFAS Restriction -- 2nd Stakeholder consultation - 3M Company submission by email (Important: contains further and more detailed information to the online submission!) Dear Following the online submission by the 3M Company for this 2" Stakeholder consultation on PFAS restriction, please find attached also our email submission (longer version). The online submission refers several times to this email submission for further details and information, so we would appreciate if you could make sure this longer version is received and read by everyone working on this restriction dossier. 2965154 Thank you for the opportunity to submit also by email, and we of course remain at your disposal for any further questions! Kind regards, Science. Applied to Life." SE Hermeslaan 7 | 1831 Diegem (Brussels) Belgium ofce IEEE obi IEEE mm.com | www.3M.com From: ChemG <JEREEP baua.bund.de> Sent: Thursday 29 July 2021 11:38 To: <HEEmn E m.cZ om> Cc: < mmm.com:> Subject: [EXTERNAL] AW: PFAS Restriction -- 2nd Stakeholder consultation launched on 19 July RN: 721 65/03.00854-R Dear Concerning your first question, yes, please clearly mark BCI as such. It will be handled as in the first call for evidence. Concerning the limited characters for providing answers, this was intentionally implemented by us. We would like to receive concise input here and would not like to open the door for position statements. Please consider if it is really necessary to provide longer answers to give valuable input. If this is the case | would ask you to submit them via email to JEEIE2baua.bund.de, but please stick to the questions posed and do not submit any position papers. Best regards, for the German CA baua: Bundesanstalt fiir Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) Bundesstelle fiir Chemikalien Chemikalienbewertung und Risikomanagement Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Federal Office for Chemicals Evaluation of Chemicals and Risk Assessment Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1 -- 25 D -- 44149 Dortmund, Germany hone: ax: e-mail: BEA @baua.bund.de 2965154 Von: o mm.com> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2021 22:42 An: ChemG <IEEE @baua.bund.de> Cc: <JEE1 E m.cS om> Betreff: RE: PFAS Restriction -- 2nd Stakeholder consultation launched on 19 July 721 65/03.00854-R Doc-Nr. 2021/0075641 FG-5.2 Dear Thank you for this email and the link to the studies + public consultation. 3M is planning to submit further information. In this regard we have two questions, where we would appreciate further clarification from your side: 1. How should we report business confidential information (BCI)? In the 1% Call for Evidence you noted that we should clearly mark it as such. Is this still the case, or are there any changes in how you plan to handle BCI? 2. Several cells for providing answers are limited to 1000 characters. Would it be possible to expand those? Thank you in advance for your feedback. Best regards, Science. Applied to Life." Hermeslaan 7 | 1831 Diegem (Brussels) Office | IEKEZSN Mobile: IEEEEmmD .ch om | www.3M.com Belgium From: ChemG <JEEEM @baua.bund.de> Sent: Monday 19 July 2021 09:54 EEX To: ChemG @baua.bund.de> Subject: [EXTERNAL] PFAS Restriction -- 2nd Stakeholder consultation launched on 19 July 2965154 RN: 5.0-721 65/03.00854-R Dear Sir or Madam, On 15 July 2021, the national authorities of Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Denmark formally submitted their intention to prepare a restriction proposal on per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). In addition, we have published today brief summaries of the information we have gathered so far, as well as an accompanying questionnaire. With this new consultation we would like to ensure that the information already available reflects the current market situation as closely as possible, and fill remaining data gaps. We kindly ask all stakeholders to review the published information and submit comments on necessary corrections and/or missing data by 19 September 2021 via this link: https://link.webropolsurveys.com/S/A268AB47DABIDSDA More information on the planned restriction of per- and polyfluorinated substances as well as a downloadable pdf version of the questionnaire can be found here: https://www.reach-clp- biozid-helpdesk.de/EN/Home/German_propsal_restriction/German_restriction.html Kind regards, for the German CA Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Am 15. Juli 2021 haben die nationalen Behrden Deutschlands, der Niederlande, Norwegens, Schwedens und Danemarks auf der Internetseite der Europaischen Chemikalienagentur (ECHA) formal ihre Absicht erklart, einen Beschrankungsvorschlag zu per- und polyfluorierten Stoffen (PFAS) zu erarbeiten. Zusatzlich dazu haben wir heute kurze Zusammenfassungen der bisher gesammelten Informationen sowie einen begleitenden Fragebogen verffentlicht. Mit dieser erneuten Konsultation mochten wir sicherstellen, dass die bereits gesammelten Informationen die aktuelle Marktsituation so gut wie mglich widerspiegeln, und verbleibende Datenliicken schliefRen. Wir fordern alle Stakeholder auf, die veroffentlichten Informationen zu tGberprifen und bis zum 19. September 2021 Kommentare zu notwendigen Korrekturen und/oder fehlenden Daten unter folgendem Link einzureichen: https://link.webropolsurveys.com/S/A268AB47DABIDSDA Weitere Informationen zur geplanten Beschrankung von per- und polyfluorierten Stoffen sowie die Mglichkeit, eine pdf-Version des Fragebogens herunterzuladen, finden Sie hier: -clp-biozid- Mit freundlichen GriRen im Auftrag baua: Bundesanstalt fiir Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) Bundesstelle fiir Chemikalien Chemikalienbewertung und Risikomanagement Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1 -- 25 D -- 44149 Dortmund, Germany 5.1.2e 2965154