Document a45g7vVoe3VR2XVwXKGDRrB9M

Ivfynsaqtp rnciM . R. C. Isham - BIND February 12, 1979 suojra permittee STURGEON, MO., DERAILMENT POSITION STATEMENT C^ TO D. R. Bishop J. T. Nolan VJ. R. Corey P. S . Park J. R. Foehr R. G. Pier T. L. Gossage G . Roush E. II. Ilarbison J. J . Spano J. S`. Metcalf R. A. Stohr J. E. McKee G Young J. C. McPhillips ,V^ If you have any corrections or suggestions to this position statement, please phone extension 4-2621. Also attached is the EPA news release of Sunday, Feb. 11. RCI:smt Att.* R. C. Isham IN . 10 lit.V. H "77 1 /J.Z/ /y ` t* POSITI ON STATEMEM T -- TRACE AMOUNTS OF TCDO XN CRUDE ORTHOCHLOROPHENOL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS TO DE USED ONLY BY MIC PR IN RESPONDING TO DIRECT MEDIA INQUIRIES At the request of the EPA we analyzed a reserve sample of the crude orthochlorophenol involved in the derailment at Sturgeon, Mo. * (Jan. 10, 1979) for tetrachloro dioxin. On Friday, Feb. 9, our analytical chemists reported finding this impurity at a .037 ppm average level in the reserve sample. We informed the EPA of this that evening and contacted the clean-up contractor the next morning. Since this is an extremely low level of tetrachloro dioxin contamina tion, just barely above what equipment can detect, we're sure there was no harm to the citizens of Sturgeon. We have notified the clean-up contractor so he can take the appro priate precautions with his people. The same protective clothing that protects clean-up workers from the crude orthochlorophenol would protect them from the miniscule amounts of tetrachloro dioxin. Q. Is this the same TCDD found at Seveso, Italy? A. Probably not. The 2,3,7,8 isomer of tetrachlorodibenzo-para- dioxin released at Seveso can't be formed directly in our process. The impurity found in our sample is most probably a different isomer which is far less toxic. -more- Page 2 Q. Why did Monsanto wait so long to test its batch sample for TCDD? A, In the past we've analyzed crude orthochlorophenol for TCDD a number of times and never found TCDD. That was using the same analytical equipment which measures for tetrachloro dioxin down to .010 ppm. (three tests). We theorize the TCDD was an impurity in one of the components. Recently another chemical company reported that dioxins are ubiquitous and can be formed a number of ways, for example, by combustion. That is everything from burning leaves to smoking a cigarette may form dioxins. We'll be working to find out how the small amounts of TCDD got in our product and eliminate the contamination. Q. Did Monsanto act quickly when it had this new knowledge on TCDD? A. Very quickly. We learned on the afternoon of Feb. 9 that there were trace amounts of TCDD in our chemical intermediate and informed the EPA that evening. Q. How can you say there was no harm to the citizens of Sturgeon when they were exposed to the vapor clouds for a long period of time? A. We monitored the air soon after the train derailment. The highest concentration of crude orthochlorophenol detected was .085 ppm. So if you percentage the .037 ppm TCDD contamination against the highest known crude orthochlorophenol concentration in the air of .'085 ppm, you get a number so small it's meaningless to express. -more; ..v Page 3 Q. What would be the symptoms of TCDD poisoning? A. The first clinical sign would be chloracne . That's pus-like sacks formed on skin exposed to TCDD. Q. Is Monsanto doing any more'testing of crude orthochlorophenol? . A.- Yes, we're continuing to analyze the product for other production impurities. The EPA had also been sent product from our reserve sample for their own analysis. Q- When will the cleanup be completed? A. It was reported on St. Louis radio on Feb. 9 that the cleanup is 95% complete. t*7e understand the cleanup contractor is taking out all contaminated material down to a 200 ppm level. -oOo-