Document ZnJVxGBvjDqXg0YVZzdQG8Zed

Industrial Health 2004, 42, 435-439 Original Article Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Parts of Japan in Relationship to Asbestos Exposure Takumi KISHIMOTO1*, Shinji OZAKI1, Katsuya KATO1, Hideyuki NISHI1 and Kenichi GENBA1 'Department of Occupational Pulmonary Diseases, Okayama Rousai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Okayama 702-8055, Japan Received January 7, 2004 and accepted September 10, 2004 Abstract: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is induced by asbestos exposure. Many reports have described this situation in America and European countries, but a few have been published in Japan. In this study malignant pleural mesothelioma cases in hospitals located in an area facing the Seto Inland Sea were evaluated. A total of 106 patients were examined with 100 patients having had occupational exposure to asbestos and 6 patients without such histories of asbestos exposure. Ninety seven were male and 9 were female. Ages ranged from 41 to 87 yr with mean of 64.8 5.3 yr. Thirty seven cases showed epithelial type of tumor, 25 biphasic type and 15 showed sarcomatous. The remaining 23 cases had insufficient evidence for typing the tumor. The mean survival rate for all cases was 9.2 11.6 months. Fifty-one patients had occupational histories of shipyard work, 16 patients worked in asbestos cement piping, and the remainder were employed in miscellaneous jobs related asbestos exposure. The duration of asbestos exposure ranged up to 20 yr or longer with the mean of 17.2 8.9 yr and the average latent period for the occurrence of malignant pleural mesothelioma was more than 31 yr with the mean of 37.0 13.3 yr. Quantification of asbestos bodies in the lungs indicated a high concentration in most patients and the major types of asbestos fibers were crocidolite and amosite. Six cases appeared after exposure to chrysotile. These results indicated that ninety four percent of malignant pleural mesothelioma appeared due to the exposure to asbestos including crocidolite and amosite. The remainder may be blamed on exposure to chrysotile. Key words: Malignant pleural mesothelioma, Asbestos exposure, Shipyard, Asbestos cement piping, Chrysotile Introduction Japan has been a major consumer of asbestos since the 1940's and has imported as much as 80,000 tons in 2002. Malignant pleural mesothelioma1* being a disease unique in the sense that it has a latency period of over 20 yr from the first exposure to asbestos, is not so much reported in Japan. There has been a recent increase in the number of patients with malignant mesothelioma in parts of Japan where shipyards and asbestos cement piping factories were located during and after the second World War. In most industrialized *To whom correspondence should be addressed. countries which already stopped using asbestos, many reports2, 3) suggest that the mortality of malignant mesothelioma would increase after a latent period of at least 15 yr or longer. We have already reported that most malignant mesothelioma cases in the Kure area facing to the Seto Inland Sea of Japan appeared due to the exposure to asbestos4-6*. The present study evokes 106 cases (100 cases of occupational exposure and 6 cases without such occupational exposure), who were examined at hospitals located in prefectures facing to the Seto Inland Sea in western Honnshu, the main land of Japan. These prefectures total nearly 10 million in population with shipbuilding and asbestos cement piping work having intensified since during and after World 436 T KISHIMOTO et al. War II. All 100 asbestos-exposed cases are classified by clinical features which are mentioned in the following pages. Material and Methods This study includes 100 cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure and 6 cases without, diagnosed from 1980 to the end of December 1998. The cases were examined within several hospitals in prefectures facing the Seto Inland Sea. The clinical analysis for all asbestos exposed cases were broken down into the following categories. Gender, age, chief complaint, pathological type of tumor, survival time from first visit to hospital to time of death, occupational history, duration of asbestos exposure in years, lapse of time from the first exposure to the appearance of malignant pleural mesothelioma. The pathological diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma was confirmed by the immunohistochemical method using the positive staining of calretinin and cytokeratine and the negative staining of CEA. In the 39 cases in which operation or autopsy were conducted, the amount of asbestos bodies and the number of fibers in the lung were determined according to the Matsuda Method7). That is to say that pulmonary tissue was dissolved in sodium hypochlorite, then filtered in Milipore filter (5 im) and the number of asbestos bodies was counted by lightmicroscope. Asbestos fibers were obtained by the modified Langer's method8) and passed through a Nucleopore filter (0.25 fim) and processed using a transmission electron microscope(JEOL 100-CX). We selected a magnification of x 20,000 and uncoated fibers >0.5 fim long with parallel sides for the majority of their length and a length to width ratio of 5:1 were counted. The counting scheme included either the first 100 asbestos fibers in a completed opening or all fibers in 10 openings from each of 3 grids. Types of asbestos fibers were determined using a transmission electronmicroscope with content of metals being analyzed by an x-ray analyzer. The relative peak heights for seven elements: magnesium, silicon, calcium, sodium, manganese, iron, and aluminum were measured for each fiber9, 10). Values for the relative peakheight percentage of these seven elements were plotted on a Gibbs triangular coordinate diagram. We classified fibers using a discriminate function Union Against Cancer standard analysis11) and major inhalation of asbestos was considered to be a main cause of malignant mesothelioma. Statistical analysis was done using student-t test and p<0.05 was determined to be significant. Table 1. Survival period of cases classified by histological types Histology Epithelial type Biphasic type Sarcomatous type Total No. of cases 26 18 10 54 Survival time(Months) 12.3 5.7* 7.9 5.4 5.5 5.8* 9.2 11.6 *p<0.05. Results The 100 cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma due to occupational exposure to asbestos included 95 male and 5 female cases. Other 6 cases consisted of 2 male and 4 female. Ages ranged from 35 (the youngest) to 87 (the oldest). Five cases were younger than 51 yr of age and the remaining cases were older with a mean age of 64.8 5.3. The mean age of shipyard workers who were diagnosed with mesothelioma was 69.5 9.7 yr, while the mean age of asbestos cement piping workers was 56.9 6.6 yr. Asbestos cement piping workers were statistically younger than shipyard workers (p<0.01). The most common chief complaint reported was chest pain (67 cases), and there were 15 cases with dyspnea, as well as 9 cases with cough. In the remaining 15 cases, a chief complaint could not be ascertained. The pathological type of the tumor tissue consisted of epithelial type (37 cases), 25 cases of biphasic and 15 cases of sarcomatous type. The remaining of 23 cases had insufficient evidence for typing the tumor because tumor tissues of these 23 were obtained by needle biopsy. In examining the rate of survival, the earliest death occurred just 10 d after the first visit to the hospital. The longest period of survival was 60 months. Death occurred within 12 months for 43 cases or 72% of the group, and the mean survival rate for all cases was 9.2 11.6 months. Table 1 shows the survival periods classified by histopathological type. Epithelial type tended to have significantly longer period of survival than that of the sarcomatous type (p<0.05). Occupational histories included 38 cases of commercial shipbuilding, 14 cases from the Japanese naval shipyard in Kure City in Hiroshima Prefecture, sixteen cases of manufacturing asbestos cement pipe and 7 cases in the construction field as listed in Table 2. The findings ofasbestosis in chest x-ray examination or pathology were detected in 14 cases of asbestos cement piping workers. But, only 3 cases were confirmed in shipyard workers. The 6 non-asbestos exposure cases consisted of 4 females and 2 males. Ages ranged from 35 to 71 yr with a mean of 54.2 6.8 yr. As for occupational histories, 4 cases were housekeepers with one Industrial Health 2004, 42, 435-439 ASBESTOS RELATED MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA IN JAPAN 437 Table 2. Occupational histories of malignant pleural mesothelioma Occupational history Shipyards Production of asbestos cement pipe Japanese naval shipyard Construction workers Making and repairment of railroad couch Automobile industry Steel industry Asbestos sprayer Piping worker Boilerman Making and repairment of furnace Casing Guardman Thermal power station Environmental exposure No. of cases 38 16 14 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 100 case being a teacher and the other case being a farmer. Table 3 lists the break down of duration of asbestos exposure in years. Of the cases whose full data were available, nearly half of the cases demonstrated a shorter exposure period to asbestos (under 20 yr), but others exhibited a prolonged period of more than 31 yr with mean of 17.2 8.9 yr. The latent period for the occurrence of malignant pleural mesothelioma ranged from 15 yr to 72 yr. The average latency was 37.0 13.3 yr. Concerning asbestos bodies found, 38 out of 39 cases exceeded 500 bodies per 5 grams of lung wet tissue. This datum is shown in Table 4. This can be classified as occupational asbestos exposure. Over a high- density exposure, 10,000 asbestos bodies per 5 grams of lung wet tissue were found in 23 cases. Cases with asbestos fibers numbering over 1 million per 1 gram of dry lung tissue totaled 38 out of 39 cases examined (Table 4). This evidence also suggests a high-density exposure rate. Actual type of asbestos determined in 39 cases were shown in Table 5. Six cases mainly consisted of chrysotile, 20 cases of crocidolite (the most carcinogenic) and 13 cases of amosite. Chrysotile was detected in 4 cases of construction workers with 2 other cases being piping workers. Furthermore, all 6 cases showed an epithelial type of tumor. Discussion It is well known that a malignant pleural mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos12). A great majority of the male cases were primarily concerned with occupational exposure. Therefore it follows that the overwhelming Table 3. Duration of asbestos exposure and the appearance of malignant pleural mesothelioma after the first exposure to asbestos Duration of asbestos exposure -10 yr 11-20 21-30 31-40 41- No. of cases 19 21 13 12 5 70 o C4 1 The appearance of malignant pleural mesothelioma after the first exposure to asbestos 21-30 31-40 41-50 51- No. of cases 3 16 24 21 9 73 Table 4. Numbers of asbestos bodies or fibers in the lung of cases with malignant pleural mesothelioma No. of asbestos bodies (5 g/wet lung tissue) - 500 501- 1,000 1,001- 10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001- No. of cases 1 5 10 12 11 39 No. of asbestos fibers (1 g/dry lung tissue) -1 x 105 1.1 x 105-1 x 106 1.1 x 106-1 x 107 1.1 x 107- No. of cases 0 1 22 16 39 percentage of malignant mesothelioma cases were male from these various reports. Ninety-five of the 100 cases were male even in the data presented here, whereas 4 of the 6 non-asbestos exposure cases were female. Ninety-four percent of malignant pleural mesothelioma cases had a history of exposure to asbestos. The present study was consistent with that of Spirtas13), most of the malignant pleural mesotheliomas in the men were attributable to exposure to asbestos. In this study, we considered that the school teacher 438 T KISHIMOTO et al. Table 5. Kinds of asbestos fibers detected in 39 cases No. of cases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 6, 7, 8 9, 10, 11, 12 13, 14, 15,16 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25, 26, 27 28, 29 30, 31 32, 33 34, 35 36, 37 38 39 crocidolite 20 16 15 14 13 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 amosite 0 4 4 4 7 18 16 15 14 15 3 1 2 3 chrysotile tremolite 00 01 01 02 00 00 03 02 03 04 14 1 15 3 14 2 12 3 was essentially in the non-asbestos exposure group, but, Lilienfeld14) described 4 malignant mesothelioma cases of school teachers exposed to asbestos (falling from the ceiling). Therefore, we should re-examine whether all 6 cases are to be considered non-asbestos exposure or not. The survival period of this non-exposed group, was a median of 8 months. As for the histological type of this group, the epithelial type had the longest survival (12.3 months) rate and the sarcomotous type had the shortest (5.5 months), these numbers almost mirror the same data as reported by Leigh2). Two cases of epithelial type survived 48 and 60 months due to operation and radiation therapy. Survival of patients with the epithelial type tumor should be considered to be prolonged via radiotherapy or operation if diagnosed in the early stages. It is generally believed that a malignant mesothelioma appears over 20 yr after the first exposure15). Although several reports16, 17) on the case of malignant pleural mesothelioma demonstrate low density exposure over a prolonged period of time (more than 40 yr), our study shows a different view on the tumor since we reveal a higher density exposure but a shorter period of exposure time. Also due to the evidence of the great concentration of asbestos bodies and fibers in the lungs, our study shows that, though exposure to asbestos was for a shorter period, it resulted in a much greater intensity and high density in relationship to time exposed. Asbestosis with high-density exposure to asbestos was detected in 14 out of 16 cases among cement piping workers. Interestingly, the age of asbestos cement piping workers was younger than that of the shipyard workers (whose asbestos exposure volume seemed to be much lower). One of the reasons why asbestos cement piping workers were young, is that they exposed mainly to crocidolite. Our study showed a higher concentration of workers sharring an occupational history of shipbuilding (commercial and/or military) and workers in actual asbestos production or asbestos spraying and jobs within the construction industry. In Japan, recently the majority of asbestos is used in construction materials, automobile and train parts. Therefore workers in these fields are more likely to suffer malignant pleural mesothelioma than in other occupations. Using the criteria of 500 bodies of asbestos to 5 g of lung wet tissue being classified as occupational asbestos exposure as reported by Churg18), 38 cases out of 39 were classified as at high risk of malignant pleural mesothelioma due to occupational exposure. In 39 of cases (39%) examined we could determine that one of three types of asbestos,crocidolite,amosite and chrysotile was the predominant factor in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Either crocidolite, amosite and chrysotile was found to be the main cause of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the present study. According to Kishizuchi's study19), the 2 most dangerous asbestos types in relationship to the cause of malignant pleural mesothelioma are crocidolite and amosite20). Our study also confirm the third type of asbestos, chrysotile, should be considered as a cause of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Although only 6 cases of chrysotile exposure were detected, it proves that we must be aware of the danger of this particular type of asbestos as well as with crocidolite and amosite. In our 6 cases, other 2 asbestos and tremolite contaminated in chrysotile as shown in Table 5. Tremolite has been described to have a carcinogenic potential to cause malignant mesothelioma21). The problem which chrysotile or conterminated tremolite causes malignant mesothelioma has partially been controversial. However, recently chrysotile has been reported to have a higher carcinogenic potency as a potential carcinogen as well as being a cause of malignant mesothelioma22-25). Chrysotile shows less carcinogenicity of malignant mesothelioma than crocidolite, but has nearly eaqual carcinogenicity as amosite26' 27). Chrysotile has a quality to easily go out from the body and the content of asbestos in the lung does not always exhibit the real exposed dose of asbestos28-31). In our study, chrysotile was detected in 4 cases of construction workers. As chrysotile asbestos is widely used in Japan in a variety of applications, from construction to manufacturing, there remains a distinct possibility of increasing malignant pleural mesothelioma cases in the near future. Asbestos has not been used in shipbuilding since 1975, therefore, workers in the two industries of construction and manufacturing asbestos need to be fully examined at an earlier age as well as having more closely scheduled examinations to determine if they are in danger of contracting malignant pleural mesothelioma. Industrial Health 2004, 42, 435-439 ASBESTOS RELATED MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA IN JAPAN 439 References 1) Landrigan PJ (1998) Asbestos: still a carcinogen. N Engl J Med 38, 1618-9. 2) Leigh J, Roggers AJ, Ferguson DA, Mulder HB, Ackad M, Thompson R (1991) Lung asbestos fiber content and mesothelioma cell type, site, and survival. Cancer 68, 135-41. 3) Peto J, Hodgson JH, Mattews FE, Jones JR (1995) Continuing increase in mesothelioma mortality in Britain. Lancet 345, 535-9. 4) Kishimoto T, Okada K, Sato T, Ono T, Ito H (1989) Evaluation of the pleural malignant mesothelioma patients with the relation of asbestos exposure. Environ Res 48, 42-8. 5) Kishimoto T (1992) Cancer due to asbestos exposure. Chest 101, 58-63. 6) Kishimoto T (1992) Intensity of exposure to asbestos in metropolitan Kure city as estimated by autopsied cases. Cancer 69, 2598-602. 7) Matsuda M (1975) A study of the asbestos body: detection of asbestos body from the autopsy lung. Jap J Thorac Dis 13, 40-2 (in Japanese). 8) Langer AM, Selikoff IJ, Sastre A (1971) Chrysotile asbestos in the lungs of persons in New York City. Arch Environ Health 22, 348-61. 9) Rogers AJ (1984) Determination of mineral fibre in human lung tissue by light microscopy and transmission electron microsopy. Ann Occup Hyg 1, 1-12. 10) Roggli VL, McGavaran MH, Subach J, Sybers HD, Greenberg SD (1982) Pulmonary asbestos body counts and electron probe analysis of asbestos body cores in patients with mesothelioma: a study of 25 cases. Cancer 50, 2423-32. 11) Timbrell V, Gibson JC, Webster I (1968) UICC standard reference sample of asbestos. Int J Cancer 3, 406-8. 12) Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P (1960) Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in North West Cape Province. Br J Ind Med 17, 260-71. 13) Spitas R, Heineman EF, Bernstein L,Beebe GW, Keehn RJ, Stark A, Harlow BL, Benichou J (1994) Malignant mesothelioma: attributable risk of asbestos exposure. Occup Environ Med 51, 804-11. 14) Lilienfeld DE (1991) Asbestos-associated pleural mesothelioma in school teachers: a discussion of four cases. Ann NY Acad Sci 643, 454-46. 15) Browne K (1983) The epidemiology of mesothelioma. J Soc Occup Med 33, 190-4. 16) McDonald AD, Case BW, Churg A, Dufresne A, Gibbs GW, Sebastien P, McDonald JC (1997) Mesothelioma in Quebec chrysotile miners and miller: epidemiology and aetiolgy. Ann Occup Hyg 41, 707-19. 17) Bianch C, Brollo A, Ramani L, Bianch T, Giarelli L (2001) Asbestos exposure in malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: a survey of 557 cases. Ind Health 39, 161-7. 18) Churg A (1982) Fiber counting and analysis in the diagnosis of asbestos related diseases. Hum Pathol 13, 381-92. 19) Kishizuchi K, Yonehara S, Inai K (1998) The relationship between asbestos exposure and human malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer. The Lung 6, 378-83 (in Japanese). 20) Stayner LT, Dankovic DA, Lemen RA (1996) Occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and cancer risk: a review of the amphibole hypothesis. Am J Public Health 85, 179-86. 21) Marchevsky AM, Wick MR (2003) Current controversies regarding the role of asbestos exposure in the causation of malignant mesothelioma: the need for the evidence-based approach to develop medicolegal guidelines. Ann Diagnostic Pathol 7, 321-32. 22) Dunnigan J (1988) Linking chrysotile asbestos with mesothelioma. Am J Ind Med 14, 205-9. 23) Woitowitz HJ, Rodelsperger K (1991) Chrysotile asbestos and mesothelioma. Am J Ind Med 19, 551-3. 24) Smith AH, Wright CC (1996) Chrysotile asbestos is the main cause of pleural mesothelioma. Am J Ind Med 30, 252-66. 25) Frank AL, Dodson RF, Williams MG (1998) Carcinogen implications of lack of tremolite in UICC reference chrysotile. Am J Ind Med 34, 314-7. 26) Rees D, Meyer JE, Goodman K, Fourie E, Blignaut C, Chapman R, Bachmann MO (1999) Case-control study of mesothelioma in south Africa. Am J Ind Med 35, 213-22. 27) Landrigan PJ, Nicholson WJ, Suzuki Y, Ladou J (1999) The hazads of chrysotile asbestos: a critical review. Ind Health 37, 271-80. 28) Finkelstein MM, Dufresne A (1999) Interences on the kinetics of asbestos deposition and clearance among chrysotile miners and millers. Am J Ind Med 35, 401-12. 29) Churg A (1994) Deposition and clearance of chrysotile asbestos. Ann Occup Hyg 38, 885-90. 30) Nicholson WJ (2001) The carcinogenicity of chrysotile asbestos--a review. Ind Health 39, 57-64. 31) Berry G (1999) Models for mesothelioma incidence following exposure to fibers in terms of timing and duration of exposure and the biopersistence of the fibers. Inhalation Toxicol 11, 111-30.