Document ZJ3BQDj30Ogx4LO5O0yjgdDRL

INTERROGATORY NO. 7; With respect to each corporation, company, business or joint venture identified in response to Interrogatory No. 6 state: (a) The type of business, conducted by such related company; (b) The past and present business relationship(s) between said related company and Defendant; (c) The nature of the products or services which Defendant has sold to, or purchased from, said related company; (d) Whether or not said related company advertises or has advertised products or services supplied by Defendant; (e) Whether or not said related company sells or has sold Defendant's products or services within the State of Illinois and, if so, the approximate value of those sales from 1930 to date; (f) Whether or not said related company pays taxes of any type to the State of Illinois or to any political subdivision thereof and, if so, the type of taxes paid; (g) Whether or not Defendant controls or has controlled, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, said related company's advertising; and, (h) The identity of any past or present officer or director of Defendant who, at any time, served as an officer or director of said related company. ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Abex objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, compound, vague and ambiguous and calls for speculation. Pursuant to the Court's April 13, 2000 Order, Abex's answer to this interrogatory is limited to the years between 1930 and 1980. Abex also objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the term "related company" is vague and ambiguous and calls for speculation. Subject to and without waiving these objections, and insofar as it understands this -16-