Document ZJ27n0qn40Kdvy0jRZx50djYV

IN THE COURT OF -COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO Robert Chandler, et al Plaintiffs, vs Case No. 76-CV-11-4900 JUDGE SHOEMAKE Armstrong Cork Company, et al Defendants. ANSWERS OF DEFENDANT JOHNS-MANVILLE SALESCORPORA TO INTERROGATORIES OF PLAINTIFFS In accordance with the provisions of Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, successor by merger with Johns-Manville Products Corporation, hereby answers the Inter rogatories of Plaintiffs served on Defendant's counsel. Defendant reserves the right to amend or supplement its Answers, if it finds that inadvertent omissions or errors have been made, or if additional or more accurate information becomes available. 1. State your correct name, age, residence, business address, occupation and relationship to Defendant, if any. ANSWER: The following Interrogatories are answered by R. B. Von Wald, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Johns- Manville Sales Corporation, Ken-Caryl Ranch, Denver, Colorado. 2. Please state what products of Defendant manufactured, marketed, or distributed between 1952 and August, 1975 contain asbesto ANSWER: See Exhibit A attached hereto for a list of asbestos bearing industrial thermal insulation products setting forth the years of production. 3. For each product listed in answer to the preceeding in terrogatory, please state: a. The time period during which it was manufactured, marketed or distributed. b. The amount of sales of said products and time of said sales to the following entities: .1 Service Products, Inc., Columbus, Ohio .2 McMahon Insulation, .Mansfield, Ohio 3. Earl E. Bright, Columbus, Ohio 4 . Federson Insulation Co., Columbus, Ohio Western Insulation, Odessa, Texas Keene, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio. A__N_S__W__E__R: a. See Exhibit A and Answer to Interrogatory No. 2. b. Defendant is presently searching for records which might enable it to respond to section (b) of this Interrogatory and will supplement its answer accordingly upon conclusion of its investigation. 4. Please state what substance is uded in place of asbestos in any of the products that were previously manufactured, distributed, or sold by Defendant with asbestos in them, but are presently sold without asbestos. ANSWER: The asbestos previously used in thermal insulation products was replaced by a combination of glass and organic fibers. 5. Please state when the substitute for asbestos first became available to Defendant. ANSWER: Defendant began manufacturing and shipping these products in 1972. 6. Did the Defendant at any time between 1952 and August, 1975 make or cause to be made any repairs or alterations of the product or similar products containing asbestos (hereinafter "the product")? ANSWER: Defendant ceased the manufacture of asbestos-containing industrial thermal insulation products in 1974, with the exception of certain accessory items containing locked-in asbestos. See Exhibit A attached hereto. 7. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state and describe each such repair or alteration, including, but not limited to such information as: a. The date of each such repair or alteration b. The nature of the repairs or alterations made c. The names and addresses of the person having custody or control of the originals or copies of records, reports, memoranda, receipts, work orders or other written documents pertaining to the repairs made. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 6 8. Are, or were, any of the ingredients in the product or similar products as marketed and distributed between 1952 and August, 1975, known or potential pulmonary irritants? ANSWER: Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that the form of the question is improper in that the use of the term "pulmonary irritants" is totally lacking in specificity, is totally unrelated to the issues at bar and would require total speculation for response thereto. 9. Please state: a. A complete description, including dates, number of subjects of any tests of safety of products containing asbestos made by the defendant or any laboratory hired by the defendants. b. The name, title, and address of the person in charge of each such test. c. For each such test not done in the Defendant's own laboratory, the name and address of the testing lab oratory. d. The results of each such test. e. The name, title and last-known address of the person or persons who have custody of the records relating to each such test. ANSWER: Defendant is uncertain as to Plaintiff's use of the term "tests of safety". However, in an effort to respond to Plaintiffs' Interrogatory and assuming Plaintiff is seeking information on the relevant issue of the biological effects of asbestos, Defendant submits the following information. Preliminary, the significant difference between "asbestos workers," usually meaning workers in asbestos factories where 100% asbestos fiber is processed, and the "insulation workers," or "insulators," who work with products con taining 15% or less asbestos fiber, must be clearly understood. Those studies involving "insulators" are as follows: -3- In 1968, Johns-Manville joined in the establishment of the Insulation Industry Hygiene Research Program of Mt. Sinai Hospital. The purposes of this study are: (1) To develop improved methods for minimizing inhalation by insulation workers of dust and fumes encountered in their work; (2) To disseminate knowledge of those improved methods of dust and fume control wherever they may be applied advantageously; and (3) To offer cooperation, advice and assistance toward universal adoption of these methods. The Program Director is Irving J. Selikoff, M. D., Director of the Environmental Sciences Laboratory, Mt. Sinai School of Med icine, New York, New York. These studies have not been concluded. Reports have been published from time to time and circulated to the trade through the union and are presumably available to Plaintiff's attorney through the Director of the Program, Dr. Irving J. Selikoff. In 1969-1970 at Defendant's Research and Engineering Center at Manville. New Jersey, tests were conducted for the Insulation Industry Hygiene Research Program by Thomas J. Weeks and Allen F. Burns. A copy of the report on such tests entitled "Performance of Dust Res pirators against a Fibrous Dust" by Messrs. Weeks and Burns, published in American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal (May-June 1970) , is available for copying at the office of Defendant's counsel. Additionally, an epidemiological study of the biological effects of asbestos dust among the Port of Genoa and LaSpezia Arsenal insulation workers, among others, is being conducted by the Clinica del Lavoro, Milano, Italy, under the sponsorship of the Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health, which Institute in turn is funded by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. Defendant is the principal contributor to the funding of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. This study was initiated early in 1968. This study has generated the following: -4- "Research Project: Epidemiological Study on the Biological Effects of Asbestos Dust at the Balangero Mine and among the Port of Genoa and LaSpezia Arsenal Insulation Workers" by Enrico C. Vigliani (June 16, 1972), Report Clinica del Lavoro "Luigi Devoto," a copy of which is available for inspection and copying at the office of Defendant's counsel. Defendant, through its membership in the National Insulation Manufacturers Association, has funded, in part, the studies conducted by Dr. Clark Cooper, et al. at the University of California at Berk eley. The following have been generated by this study: "Industrial Hygiene for Insulation Workers", by J. Leroy Balzer, published in the Journal of Occupational Medicine (January, 1968), a copy of which is available for inspection and copying in the office of Defendant's counsel. . "Environmental Exposures in the Insulation Trade" by J. LeRoy Balzer, published in NICA Outlook (April, 1970), a copy of which is available for inspection and copying in the office of De fendant's counsel. "Evaluation and Control of Asbestos Exposures in the Insulating Trade", by Clark W. Cooper and J. LeRoy Balzer, 2nd International Conference Biological Effects of Asbestos, Dresden, (1968), a copy of which is available for inspection and copying in the office of Defendant's counsel. "Asbestos in Relation to the Type * Fibre and Dose in the Insulation Industry", by W. Clark cooper and J. Miedema, LYON Conference (October, 1972) , a copy of which is available for inspection and copying in the office of Defendant's counsel. The first of the studies under the direction of Dr. Cooper, mentioned above, was published in the Journal of Occupational Medicine (January, 1968) and reported to numerous persons and entities, in cluding the Eleventh Annual Western Industrial Health Conference. The second study directed by Dr. Cooper, referred to above, was published in the National Insulation Contractors Association's magazine Outlook during or about 1970. 10. Please list the name, title and address of each person now or ever in the Defendant's emp_oy who has had a part of his or her duties evaluation or the review of the evaluations of the safety or effectiveness of the product or similar products, and for each such person, outline the specific duties to the Defendant and the dates of these duties. ANSWER: The following individuals have been involved in the field of industrial hygiene as the same relates to the use of asbestos and exposure to asbestos fibers: -5- Hugh M. Jackson Director, Corporate Training and Management Development P. 0. Box 5723 Denver, Colorado 80217 Employed by Johns-Manville since 1937 - cost accountant; Industrial Relations Department; Corporate Safety Engineer. Edmund M. Fenner Director, Environmental Services P. 0. Box 5723 Denver, Colorado 80217 Employed by Johns-Manville since 1940; research engineering project manager; Founding Director, vironmental Control Department. engineer En J. B. Jobe 2800 South University #64 Denver, Colorado 80120 Employed by Johns-Manville since 1936; sales clerk; staff manager; special representative to the aviation industry nationally; Regional Manager for Southern California and operated insulation contract unit; Merchandise Manager of Industrial Insulation Division; Sales Manager, IID: Senior officer in charge of 5 divisions including industrial insulation, packaging and frictions, Dutch Brand, Canada, and the Fibre Division and later International; Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer until retirement in 1973. K. W. Smith, M.D. Last Known Address: 1505 Prince Road Windsor 10, Ontario Previously employed by Canadian Johns-Manville from 1944-46 as Medical Officer at Asbestos, P.Q. Medical Director 1946-51. Medical Director, Johns- Manville Corporation, New York, New York, approximated 1952 until 1966. ' F. J. Solon Vice President - Presidential Assistant Vice President - Economic Affairs P. 0. Box 5723 Denver, Colorado 80217 Employed by Johns-Manville since 1961; Assistant Director, Director and Vice President, Advertising and Public Relations; Vice President Corporate Relations; Vice President Environmental Affairs; Vice President Environmental Relations. William B. Reitze Director, Health, Safety and Environment P. 0. Box 5723 Denver, Colorado 80217 Previously employed by CIBA Corporation in area of toxicology, pharmacology; inspector with U.S. Depart ment of Health; Industrial hygiene health and safety, Johns-Manville since 1969. Clifford Sheckler 838 S. Drive Metedezonk, New Jersey Consultant Previously employed by Johns-Manville as Construction Engineer, Supervisor of Construction, Safety Engineer, Supervisor of Safety and Industrial Hygiene, Corporate Manager of Industrial Health, Manager of Occupational and Environmental Control. Paul Kotin, M.D. Senior Vice President, Health Safety and Environment P. 0. Box 5723 Denver, Colorado 80217 Employed by Johns-Manville since June, 1974. 11. On any occasion did the Defendant consult with any sci entists, physicians, or other technical or medical personnel as to the safety of the product? ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 9. 12. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state, as to each such occasion: a. The date. b. The name, title, occupation and address of each person consulted. c. A full and complete description of the substance of the information which was received. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 9. * 13. On how many occasions prior to August, 1975, was the De fendant advised through his agents or employees that anyone had experienced an occurrence similar to the Plaintiff's occurrence with regard to similar products of the Defendant. ANSWER: Defendant has no knowledge as to "Plaintiff's occur rence" or products to which Plaintiff might have been exposed, and accordingly is unable to responsibly respond to this Interrogatory at this time. 14. For each of the individuals referred to in the preceding interrogatory who experienced occurrences similar to the Plaintiff's occurrence, please give the following information: a. A complete identification, including name, address, tel ephone number and place of employment. b. The date of the occurrence. c. The location of the place where the occurrence happened. d. The reason given to any agent or employee of the defendant by the person who experienced the occurrence as to the cause of such occurrence. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 13. 15. If there has ever been any litigation initiated against the defendant concerning the product, similar products or comparable products, please: -7- a. Give the title and date of each such action. b. Outline the contents of the complaing filed in each such action. c. State the name and address of the court involved. d. Give the name and address of the attorney for the plaintiff in each such action. ANSWER: See Exhibit B attached hereto for a list of litigation regarding asbestos-containing thermal insulation products. Included in that list is the caption of each case identifying the court in which the case is pending and the case number. Defendant objects to the balance of this Interrogatory, as the same is a matter of public record contained in the court file of each respective case and available to Plaintiff. 16. Does the defendant contend that the defendant and all agents and employees of the defendant had no knowledge whatsoever of any hazard, danger, defect, or defective condition existing in the prod ucts or in the use of the products prior to the alleged occurrence of asbestosis in August, 1975? ANSWER: No. In late, 1964, when Dr. Irving J. Selikoff, et al, made public the contents of a paper entitled "The Occurrence of Asbestosis Among Insulation Workers in the United States" by I. J. Selikoff, et al, published in the Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, Vo. 132, Art. 1 (Dec. 1965), the asbestos industry or the scientific or medical world perceived that there was a possible danger in the United States to the health of those working with and/or installing and/or applying finished industrial insulation products such as those manufactured by Defendants. 17. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the negative, please identify all hazards, dangers, defects or defective conditions in the product of which the defendant, its agents, or its employees had knowledge prior to August, 1975, stating for each such hazard, danger, defect or defective condition: a. How the defendant or its agent or employee gained such knowledge. b. The identity, by name, address and job title of the agent or employee of the defendant who first acquired such knowledge. c. When such knowledge was acquired. d. A full description of the hazard, danger, defect or de fective condition. e. The probable cause of the hazard, danger, defect or de fective condition. f. The possible results of such hazard, danger, defect or defective condition which the defendant foresaw. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 16. 18. Does the defendant claim that the existence of the hazard, danger, defect or defective condition in the product which allegedly caused the Plaintiff's injury was not foreseeable to the defendant prior to August, 1975? Answer: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 16. The possible hazard or danger to insulation workers was not foreseeable prior to the Selikoff work in 1964. 19. Please state: ' 1. The date and name of the agent of Defendant who became aware of the following publications and, 2. The action, if any, taken by Defendant in response to the information in the following articles and pub lications: a. Cooke, Fibrosis of the Lungs Due to the Inhalation of Asbestos Dust, 2 Brit. Med. J. 147 (1924). b. Cooke, Pulmonary Asbestosis, 2 Brit, Pled. J 1 024 (1927) . c. Merewether and Price, Report on the Effect of Asbestos Dust on the Lungs and Dust Suppression in the Asbestos Industry (1930). d. Ellman, Pneumoconiosis, 14 Brit, J. Radiol. 361 (1934). '" e. Lanza, Asbestosis, 106 J.A. M.A. 368 (1936). f. Dreessen, et al, A Study of Asbestosis in the Asbestos Textile Industry, Public Health Bull. No. 241 (1938). g. Fleischer, et al, A Health Survey of Pipe Covering Operations in Constructing Naval Vessels, 28 J. Indust. Hyg. 9-16 (1945) . h. Documentation of the Threshhold Limit Values for Substances in Workroom Air, A. C.G.I.A., (3rd. Ed. 1971). -9- i. Selikoff, et al, The Occurrence of Asbestosis Among Insulation Workers, 132 Ann. New York AcadSc. 139 (1965). j. Selikoff, et al, Asbestosis and Neoplasia, 42 Am. J. Med. 487 (1967) . k. H.R. Rep. No. 14816, 90th. Cong. 2d. Sess. 349, 355 (1968). 1. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 USG 651. ANSWER: 1. Defendant is aware of all of the publications or documents (a) through (1), inclusive, as set forth in this Interrogatory. It is impossible to state the precise date of awareness or the in dividual who first had knowledge of the publication. For all the publications listed (a) through (1) inclusive. Defendant's knowledge would have generally been contemporaneous with the publication of the document or within a reasonable time thereafter. 2. It is impossible to state with any precision action taken in response to any particular paper or publication except as otherwise hereinafter set forth. Publications in the medical/scientific literature cumulatively served to expand Defendant's awareness of what was known in the medical and scientific and governmental communities as to the biological effects of asbestos. The Dreessen study, item (f) , recommended a threshold limit, which Defendant voluntarily accepted and adhered to. The Selikoff paper, item (i), was the first epi demiological study indicating a possible hazard to insulation workers exposed to asbestos-containing thermal insulation materials, and in response thereto, Defendant commenced labeling its asbestos-containing thermal insulation products in September, 1964. The Selikoff paper had the effect of contradicting and overruling the Fleischer paper, item (g), which had been the only prior epidemiological study of asbestos insulation workers and which had concluded that such oc cupation was relatively safe. In addition, and in response to the Selikoff paper. Defendants have participated in, and contributed to, the informational and educational program of the National Insulation Manufacturers Association. This program is designed to educate the insulation contractors' industry with respect to the health aspects of fibrous materials through regional meetings of insulation contractors' -10- associations. The purpose of these meetings is to aid the contractors in minimizing or eliminating the inhalation of, among other things, asbestos fibers by those working with and/or installing and/or ap plying the products of Defendant, Johns-Manville Products Corporation, and other manufacturers, i.e., industrial insulation applicators. In 1967, and again in 1968, programs have been presented at the regional meetings of industrial insulation contractors. Approximately 400 industrial insulation contractors have attended each year. These programs include a verbal review (of approximately three hours' duration) of the biological effects of fibrous materials, the thresh old limit value of fibrous materials, methods for evaluating con centrations of dust, and engineering and method change recommendations to assist the contractors in dust abatement and environmental control. In addition to the verbal presentations, booklets have been prepared by the National Insulation Manufacturers Association (NIMA), largely through Defendant's participation and efforts. The booklet entitled "Recommended Safe Practices for Handling and Applying Thermal In sulation Products Containing Asbestos", printed M.ay 1, 1968, described above was written by members of the NIMA Education and Information Committee. The Chairman of the Committee was Clifford L. Sheckler, who, at that time, was also Manager, Accident Prevention and Health Administration of Johns-Manville Corporation. Other members of the Committee included John Vyverberg, Owens-Corning Fiber Glass Cor poration, Harry Mesler, Ruberoid Company; Leon Horowitz, Certain-teen Corporation; and Jack Barnhart, Executive Secretary of the National Insulation Manufacturers Association. The aforesaid booklet was produced and circulated during the 1968 meetings. Also, subsequent to the meetings with the contractors, considerable work has been done in conjunction with environmental control, especially in the area of fixed machinery and equipment. In 1968, Johns-Manville joined in the establishment of the Insulation Industry Hygiene Research Program of Mt. Sinai Hospital. The purposes of this study are: (1) To develop improved methods for minimizing inhalation by insulation workers of dust and fumes encountered in their work; -11- (2) To disseminate knowledge of those improved methods of dust and fume control wherever they may be applied advantageously; and (3) To offer cooperation, advice and assistance toward universal adoption of these methods. The Program Director is Irving J. Selikoff, M.D., Director of the Environmental Sciences Laboratory, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, Mew York, Hew York. These studies have not been concluded. In response to the passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, item (1), as the same related to asbestos, the Company complied with the provisions of such law. 20. Does the defendant consider the product or similar products dangerous? ANSWER: Asbestos-containing thermal insulation products can be safely handled and used. 21. Please list and identify all items of printed or published materials including data sheets and test results by or for the defendant which refer to the uses, safety and side effects of the product or similar products, and with respect to each such item, please state: (a) The date is was distributed or printed. (b) The manner in which it was distributed. (c) The name, title and address of its author and the nature of his relationship to the defendant. ANSWER: Since approximately 1940, Defendants have, on a con tinuing basis, furnished customers information as to the proper use and application of its insulating products. Answering Defendant and affiliates have directly or indirectly advised industrial insulation contractors to utilize ventilation equipment, good housekeeping procedures, and personal protective equipment, such as respirators, at the sites where finished insulation products were being worked with and applied. Those respirators which have been recommended are approved by NIOSH (formerly the responsibility of the United States Bureau of Mines) for use as protection against pneumoconiosis-pro ducing dusts. Defendants have also affixed caution instructions to its industrial thermal insulation products which contain asbestos and -12- which might release dust upon application regarding the handling of these products described in answer to Interrogatory No. 22. Defendants also distributed to customers copies of the following booklet providing instructions designed to reduce health and safety risks in the fabrication, handling and application of asbestos products. "Recommended Health Safety Practices for Handling and Applying Thermal Insulation Products Containing Asbestos" (1968), a copy of which is available for copying in the office of Defendant's counsel. Defendants have participated in, and contributed to, the informational and educational program of the National Insulation Manufacturers Association. This program is designed to educate the insulation contractors' industry with respect to the health aspect of fibrous materials through regional meetings of insulation contractors' associations. The purpose of these meetings is to aid the contractors in minimizing or eliminating the inhalation of, among other things, asbestos fibers by those working with and/or installing and/or apply ing the products of Defendant, Johns-Manville Products Corporation, and other manufacturers, i.e., industrial insulation applicators. In 1967, and again in 1968, programs have been presented at the regional meetings of industrial insulation contractors. Approximately 400 industrial insulation contractors have attended each year. These programs include a verbal review (of approximately three hours' duration) of the biological effects of fibrous materials, the thres hold limit value of fibrous materials, methods of evaluating con centrations of dust, and engineering and method change recommendations to assist the contractors in dust abatement and environmental control. In addition to the verbal presentations, booklets have been prepared by the National Insulation Manufacturers Association (NIMA), largely through Defendant's participation and efforts. The booklet entitled "Recommended Safe Practices for Handling and Applying Thermal In sulation Products Containing Asbestos", printed May 1, 1968, described above, was written by members of the NIMA Education and Information Committee. The Chairman of the Committee was Clifford L. Sheckler, who, at that time, was also Manager, Accident Prevention and Health -13- Administration of Johns-Manville Corporation. Other members of the Committee included John Vyverberg, Owens-Coming Fiber Class Cor poration; Harry Mesler, Ruberoid Company; Leon Horowitz, Certain-teed Corporation; and Jack Barnhart, Executive Secretary of the National Insulation Manufacturers Association. The aforesaid booklet was produced and circulated during the 1968 meetings. Also, subsequent to the meetings with the contractors, considerable work has been done in conjunction with environmental control, especially in the area of fixed machinery and equipment. 22. On any occasion has the defendant given a warning to users of the product or similar products or taken other activities in regard to possible dangers in the use thereof: ANSWER: Defendant placed warning notices on the packaging of its thermal insulation products which contained asbestos which might release dust upon installation. The warning labels and the dates of use are as follows: CAUTION THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS ASBESTOS FIBER. INHALATION OF ASBESTOS IN EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OVER LONG PERIODS OF TIME MAY BE HARMFUL. IF DUST IS CREATED WHEN THIS PRODUCT IS HANDLED, AVOID BREATHING THE DUST. IF ADEQUATE VENTILATION CONTROL IS NOT POSSIBLE, WEAR RESPIRATORS APPROVED BY THE U.S. BUREAU OF MINES FOR PNEUMOCO NIOSIS-PRODUCING DUSTS. (1964-1970) CAUTION THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS ASBESTOS FIBER. AVOID BREATHING THE DUST. INHALATION OF ASBESTOS IN EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OVER LONG PERIODS OF TIME MAY BE HARMFUL. IF DUST IS CREATED WHEN THIS PRODUCT IS HANDLED, USE PROPER PROTECTION. IF PROPER DUST CONTROL CANNOT BE PROVIDED, RESPIRATORS APPROVED BY THE U. S. BUREAU OF MINES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST PNEUMOCONIOSISPRODUCING DUSTS SHOULD BE WORN. (1970-1972) -14- CAUTION CONTAINS ASBESTOS FIBER AVOID CREATING DUST BREATHING ASBESTOS DUST MAY CAUSE SERIOUS BODILY HARM (1972-Present) These warnings or some modification therof were used on the packaging of all industrial thermal insulation products of Defendant which contain asbestos which might release dust upon application. Use of warning labels was commenced during 1964. Defendant used such warning notices because in 1964, it was reported by a member of the medical profession that there might exist a risk to some persons who installed industrial insulation products containing asbestos, in that inhalation of excessive quantities of asbestos fibers over prolonged periods of time under certain conditions might create a risk of the contracting of asbestos is to some persons. The label presently in use is prescribed by the United States Department of Labor, Occu pational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.1001, such regulation being promulgated by OSHA in 1972. In addition, sales and service personnel, whose identity is presently unknown to Defendant, may have in the ordinary course of business communicated information to those using products manufactured by Johns-Manville Products Corporation or employees installing such products as the the then current threshold limit values. 23. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state as to each such occasion: (a) The date. (b) The manner in which the warning was given. (c) The wording of the warning or nature of the activity. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22. 24. Please list and identify all items of materials printed or published by or for the defendant which refer to the use, safety and side effects of the product and with respect to each such item, please state: -16- (a) The date it was distributed. (b) The manner in which it was distributed. (c) The name, title and address of its author and the nature of his relationship with the defendant. ANSWER: A booklet entitled, "What You Should Know About Asbestos and Health", published by Johns-Manville Corporation in January of 1975, a copy of which is available for inspection and/or copying at the office of Defendants' attorneys. This booklet was distributed to all employees at all locations using asbestos fiber or handling products containing asbestos fiber. A booklet entitled, "What Every Employee Should Know About Asbestos", published by Johns-Manville Corporation in 1973, a copy of which is available for inspection and/or copying at the office of Defendants' attorneys. This booklet was distributed to all employees at all locations using asbestos fiber or handling products containing asbestos fiber. A pamphlet entitled, "Recommended Safety Practices for Handling Asbestos Fiber", published by JohnsManville Corporation in November, 1973, a copy of which is available for inspection and/or copying at the office of Defendants' attorneys. This pamphlet was distributed to all employees at all locations using asbestos fiber or handling products containing asbestos fiber. An employee notification form entitled "Dear JohnsManville Employee", published by Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, a copy of which is available for inspection and/or copying at the office of Defendants 1 attorneys. This was inserted in paychecks of all employees at all Johns-Manville Sales Corporation contract units beginning in 1970. Since 1976, Defendant has made available a Catalog of Occupational/ Environmental Health and Safety Programs as listed below. All the publications, audio-visual programs and other material listed in this catalog are available to Johns-Manville customers and public interest groups as well as to all Johns-Manville personnel. A pamphlet entitled, "Occupational Health Guide Asbestos", published by Johns-Manville in 1976, a copy of which is available for inspection and/or copying at the office of Defendants' attorneys. This guide is designed as a reference for supervisory personnel. A 25-minute slide/tape presentation on industrial hygiene programs at Johns-Manville. A 20-minute slide/tape program on health aspects of working with asbestos. A 25-minute motion picture on occupational health risks associated with asbestos fiber. A newspaper entitled, "The Asbestos Report", published by Johns-Manville in 1976, a copy of which is available for inspection and/or copying at the office of Defendants' attorneys. -17- In addition, over the several years last past, there have been many oral presentations and meetings at the plant level concerning safety practices related to asbestos exposure. Also, Defendant has cooperated with the Asbestos Information Association in the production of the following booklets: "Recommended Work Practices - Molding and Fabrication of Asbestos-Containing Plastic Products". "Recommended Work Practices - Fabrication and Use of Asbestos Friction Materials". "Recommended Work Practices - Fabrication and Use of Asbestos Paper Products". "Recommended Work Practices - Shop and Field Fabrication of Asbestos Sheet Products". "Recommended Work Practices - Use and Handling of Asbestos Textile Products". Such booklets may be obtained from the AIA, 1600 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036. Additionally, Defendants participated in 1971 through the Oc cupational Health and Safety Committee of the National Insulation Contractors Association in the preparation of a booklet entitled, "Safety Reminders". Such booklet is available from NICA, 8630 Fenton Street, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, at a cost of 60 cents per copy. Also see Answer to Interrogatory No. 21. 25. Did the defendant or any agent or employee of the defendant affix or attach or caused to be affixed or attached to the product or to the package in which the product was sold prior to August, 1975, any label, tag, directions, instructions or other writings? ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22 26. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state and describe in complete detail for each such tag or label: (a) Its purpose. (b) Its contents. (c) Its position on the products or the packaging containing the product. (d) The colors and size of type used. (e) The name, address and job title of the person who composed or formulated the wording on the tag or label. -18- ANSWER: (a)To warn. (b) See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22. (c) On the exterior of the box or bag in which the product is contained. (d) The color and size of type varied. (e) See Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 32 and 44. 27. If the defendant will do so without a motion to produce, please attach a complete sample label for all similar products since 1952. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22. 28. Were there any pamphlets, instruction booklets, brochures, manuals or other printed matter distributed with or in conjunction with the sale of the product? ANSWER: See Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 21 and 24. 29. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state and describe in complete detail, for each such booklet, manual, pamphlet, brochure or piece of printed matter: (a) Its purpose. (b) Its contents. (c) Its size, in number of pages, number of lines per print per page, and the number of diagrams, charts, etc. (d) The colors used. (e) The sizes of print used. (f) The name, address and job title of the person at whose order or direction it was included or distributed with the product. (g) The name, address and job title of the person who composed or formulated the wording or copy in the piece of printed matter. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 28. 30. Did the defendant send or distribute or cause to be sent or distributed any warnings, directions, instructions or other printed matter concerning the product between 1952 and August, 1975? ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatories Nos. 21, 22 and 24. 31. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state and describe in complete detail, for each such warning or piece of printed matter: -19- (a) Its contents. (b) The purpose for which it was sent. (c) The name and address of the person to whom it was sent. (d) The date on which it was sent. (e) The name, address and job title of the person at whose order or direction it was sent. (f) The medium or means of communication or transportation by which it was sent. ' (g) Any means or devices employed to insure that the plaintiff or the owner of the product would receive the warning or printed matter. (h) Whether the plaintiff or the owner of the product ever received it, to the best knowledge of the defendant. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 30. 32. If there have been any changes in such label, insert, or other information, please state the reasons therefor and the name and address of the person who recommended or ordered the change. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22 for the dates each label was in effect. The change of labeling in 1972 was mandated by the Federal government under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and the standard promulgated thereunder for exposure to asbestos and under the direction of an informal labeling committee at JohnsManville W'orld Headquarters composed of members of the Environmental Control, Employee Relations and Product Marketing Departments. 33. Were there printed on the product any notations of danger or warning or instructions as to use or operation of the product? ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22. 34. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state: ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 22. 35. Please describe how and in what manner the defendant rec ommended the use of any and all safety equipment, or other implements, stating for each: (a) The nature of the safety equipment recommended. (b) How and in what manner said equipment was recommended, stating if in writing or orally. (c) To whom said safety procedure was recommended. -20- ANSWER: See Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 21 and 22. 36. Did the defendant provide any demonstrations of the product or similar products, any oral descriptions of the uses or operational characteristics of the product, any oral instructions concerning the care and maintenance of the product, or any oral warnings about the dangers or limitations of the product to the plaintiff or to the purchasers of the product? ANSWER: See Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 21 and 28. 37. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please give: (a) The exact content of any such demonstrations, descriptions, instructions, or warnings. (b) The names and addresses of the persons who gave any such demonstrations, descriptions, instructions or warnings. (c) The training, experience or qualifications of such persons, enabling them to give such demonstrations, descriptions, instructions or warnings. ANSWER: See Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 21 and 28. 38. Did any materials describing the recommended or proper use of the similar products also contain descriptions of the dangers possibly resulting from deviations from the recommended procedures? ANSWER: 24. Yes. See Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 21, 22 and 39. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please describe the content of the statements, the materials in which they appear, and the manner in which these ma terials were distributed. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 38 above. 40. Has the defendant ever conducted any recall campaigns, operations, programs, or activities which involved the product or similar products. ANSWER: No. 41. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state and describe in complete detail each such -21- recall campaign, operations, program or activity, including but not limited to such information as: (a) The exact date of the announcements or beginning of the campaign or operations. (b) The purpose of the campaign or operation, in terms of potential or real defects sought to be checked and/or corrected. (c) The types or model of products involved in the campaign or operation. (d) The number of products of each type referred to in sub section (c) sought to be examined and/or corrected. (e) The number of products of each type actually examined and/or corrected. (f) Whether the product was examined or corrected. (g) The date and location of the examination or correction. (h) The address of the person performing the examination or correction. ANSWER: Not applicable. 42. If on any occasion the product or similar products have ever been taken off the market, please state as to each such occasion: (a) The date. (b) The name, title, occupation and address of the person who ordered that action. (c) The reason such product was taken off the market. (d) The dates of the time interval during which such product remained off the market. (e) The circumstances which led to its being put back on the market. ANSWER: No. 43. Please state the names, titles and addresses of the defendant' advertising agents who are or were employed or used in connection with the promotion of the product or similar products, and give a summary of all the instructions given to such agents regarding the uses, safety and side effects of the product or similar products. ANSWER: During the last six years, advertising managers that have been concerned directly with Industrial Insulation advertising and promotion are Hal Hastings, no longer with Johns-Manville, and Larry Hall, currently Senior Advertising Manager, Industrial Divi sions, Johns-Manville Corporation, P. 0. Box 5723, Denver, Colorado 80217. From the mid-1950's until 1970, the advertising agency used was Cunningham & Walsh, Inc., 260 Madison Avenue, New York, NY. During 1970 and 1971 the agency was Warner, Bicking and Fenwick, 866 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY. During 1972 and 1973, the agency was Campbell-Mithun, 200 Fillmore, Denver, Colorado. Since the Fall of 1973, all industrial advertising has been handled by Broyles, Allebaugh & Davis, Inc., 31 Denver Technological Center, Englewood, Colorado. See Exhibit C attached hereto. Advertising records encompassing the period of time preceding that set forth in Exhibit C are no longer in existence, the same having been destroyed in the regular course of business and due to a change in corporate advertising agencies. 44. What is the name, title and address of the person who has or had charge of labeling of the product? ANSWER: Since the Fall of 1974, all corporate labeling ac tivities have been within the jurisdiction of the Corporate Labeling Committee. The present Chairman of the Corporate Labeling Committee is Paul Kotin, M.D., Senior Vice President. For activities prior to 1974, see Answer to Interrogatory No. 32. The labeling of products is now the direct responsibility of each Product Manager in conjunction with the Corporate Labeling Committee. 45. If the defendant uses or has used salesmen in connection with the marketing of the product, please give a full and complete account of all of the instructions given at any time to each such salesman with respect to the uses, safety and side effects or other effects of the product or similar products. ANSWER: Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that the same is unlimited in time, scope and location, and accordingly is unduly burdensome. 46. Is the product or similar products toxic or poisonous? ANSWER: No. 47. Has the defendant ever been cited, criticized or reprimanded or have any product or similar products ever been seized by any -23- public official because of an alleged violation of O.S.H.A., or of the Hazardous Substances Act or other government regulation concerning product safety? ANSWER; Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that the same is irrelevant and immaterial and not reasonably cal culated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 48. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please detail each and every such citation, reprimand, criticism, or seizure of similar or comparable products in which the defendant has been involved, including the date of each such seizure and the name and address of the person who has custody of the records relating to each such seizure. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 47. 49. Please state the names, titles and addresses and titles of all persons known to the defendant who have expressed their opinions or beliefs that: (a) The product or similar products was not adequately tested and evaluated prior to marketing by the defendant. (b) The labeling and advertising and promotional literature for the product was inadequate, inaccurate or incomplete. ANSWER: Defendant objects to this question on the grounds that the same is overly broad, burdensome and constitutes an improper discovery procedure. Questions calling for "all" people or sum totals of knowledge are improper. Further, such question requires this Defendant to identify each and every person who Plaintiff might utilize to testify against this Defendant, and accordingly is tantamount to this Defendant preparing Plaintiff's case, which it has no requirement to do. 50. With respect to the expressions referred to in the preceding interrogatory, please state as to each such expression of opinion or belief: (a) The date it was made. (b) The circumstances under which it was made. (c) The identity of the person who made it. (d) A full and complete account of its substance. -24- (e) Whether it was made in writing or has been reduced thereto, and the names, titles and addresses of the persons presently having custody thereof. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 49. 51. Please state the names, titles and addresses of all persons known to the defendant who have expressed their opinions or beliefs that the risks of harmful and serious injuries or side effects out weigh the potential benefits or uses of the product. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 49. 52. With respect to the expressions, opinion or belief referred to in the preceding interrogatory, please state as to each such expression, opinion or belief: (a) The date it was made. (b) The identity of the person who made it. (c) A full and complete account of its substance. (d) Whether it was made in writing or reduced thereto and if so, the names, titles and addresses of the persons presently having custody thereof. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 51. 53. On any occasion, has the Food & Drug Administration, O.S.H.A. or any other governmental body required the addition of a warning or contraindication to the labeling of the product or of similar products? ANSWER: Yes, O.S.H.A. See 29 CFR 1910.1001, et. seq. 54. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please state, as to each such occasion: (a) The date. (b) The nature of the addition required. (c) The reason the addition was required. ANSWER: (a) July 7, 1972. (b) 29 CFR 1910.1001 et. seq. speaks for itself. (c) 29 CFR 1910.1001 et. seq. speaks for itself. 55. Does the defendant or any agent or employee of the defendant have any knowledge of any sets of standards which apply to the design, manufacture, composition and/or distribution of the product or similar -25- products and which have been proposed by any industry, government, professional, trade, or private group or association? ANSWER: Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that the same is overly broad,' lacks specificity and as phrased is impossible to answer in its present form. 56. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please identify completely each such set of standards, with specific reference to: (a) The proposed or interim title of the standards. (b) The name and address of the group or association which has proposed such set. (c) The date of such proposal. (d) The place, book, letter, periodical or other publication in which the set has been proposed. ANSWER: Not applicable. 57. Please state the names of all industry, professional or trade or private groups or associations of which the defendant is a member. ANSWER: Johns-Manville belongs or has belonged to the following organizations: Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association, 441 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 (approximately 1969 to present) Inc. National Insulation Contractors 8630 Fenton Street Silver Springs, Maryland 20910 ( - present) Assn. National Insulation Manufacturers Association, 441 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 (approximately 1958 to 1968) Inc. Asbestos Information Association/North America Suite 402 1835 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (approximately 1971 to present) Asbestos Textile Institute P.O. Box 471 Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090 (approximately 1946 to 1973) -26- Quebec Asbestos Mining Association Suite 412, 5 Place Ville Marie Montreal, Canada K3B 2G2 (approximately 1930 to present) Asbestos Cement Pipe Producers Association Suite 1308 1600 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22209 (approximately 1972 to present) Asbestos Cement Product Assn, New York, New York (approximately 1955 to 1967) (defunct) 58. For each of the groups or associations referred to in the preceding interrogatory, please state each and every set of standards relating to the design, manufacture, composition or distribution of the product or similar products which have been proposed or prom ulgated by each such group or association. ANSWER: Defendant knows of no such standards. 59. Has the defendant ever participated in or contributed to or is the defendant now participating in or contributing to the estab lishment, proposal, drafting, or criticism or any sets of standards which relate to the design, manufacture, composition or distribution of the product, similar products, or comparable products and which are being established or proposed by any industry, professional, trade or private group or association, whether or not the defendant is a member thereof? ANSWER: Defendant knows of no such standards. 60. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please: (a) Identify completely each and every set of standards referred to in the preceding interrogatory. (b) Describe completely the extent of the defendant's participation in or contribution to the establishment, proposal, drafting or criticism of such sets of standards. (c) State the dates during which the defendant is or has been involved in the establishment, proposal, drafting or crit icism of each such set. (d) State the name and address of the group or association responsible for the establishment or proposal of each such set of standards. ANSWER: Not applicable. -27- 61. With regard to the design, manufacture, composition, or distribution of the product or similar products, has the defendant ever violated or not complied with any of the standards listed here tofore in these interrogatories? ANSWER: Not applicable. 62. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, please identify the exact standards violated or not complied with and describe in complete detail the act or omission which constituted the violation or act of non-compliance. ANSWER: Not applicable. 63. If defendant maintains that plaintiff, Robert Chandler, misused the product, please state with particularity your basis for that allegation. ANSWER: Defendant is unable to answer at the present time. Information necessary to respond to this Interrogatory will be de veloped upon discovery. 64. If defendant maintains that plaintiff, Robert Chandler, was guilty of contributory negligence, please state with particularity your basis for that assertion. ANSWER: See Answer to Interrogatory No. 63. 65. If defendant maintains that the instant action was not commenced within the time limit of the statute of limitations, please state with particularity your basis for that allegation. ANSWER: Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that the same represents improper discovery practices on the part of Plaintiff, to which Defendant need not respond. 66. If defendant maintains that the complaint of plaintiffs in the instant action fails to state a cause of action, please state with particularity your basis for asserting that defense. ANSWER: Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that the same represents improper discovery practices on the part of Plaintiff, to which Defendant need not respond. Dated this day of , 1977 . James S. Oliphant Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur Attorneys for Defendant, JohnsManville Sales Corporation 37 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) ) ) ss : . R. B. VON WALD being duly sworn according to law deposes and says that he is Assistant General Counsel of JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION and JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPO RATION, successor by merger to JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, defendants in this action, that he is author ized to take this Affidavit on their behalf and that the facts set forth in the foregoing pleading are true and cor rect to the best of his knowledge, information and belief. Sworn and subscribed to before me this day of ~TT976'.r> S>. ^ R. B. VON WALD NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires -Nov.---197--19ACT My Ccmmiss'ori expires Ime 10, 1951 I EXHIBIT B Adams, Pauline, Executrix of the Estate of Dewey Adams, Deceased v. Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, Greenville County, State of South Carolina Unnumbered Combustion Adams, Doris Maxine, Executrix of the pstate of Edward Lee Adams, v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia at Huntington Civil Action No. 77-3084 Adkins, Doreen, Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Adkins, v. Engineering, Inc., J-M Sales Corp., J-M Products Corp., J-M Fiber U.S. District Court, Southern District West Virginia, Huntington Civil Action No. 77-3032 Combustion Glass, Inc.et Afflerbach, Catherine M. v. Johns-Manville, et al Eighth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, County of Clark Case No. A 132424 Alessi, Joseph, et al v. Johns-Manville, et al United States District Court for the District of Civil Action No. 76-1817 New Jersey Allore v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al. U. S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Civil Action No. C-76-447 Eastern Division Allvord, Omar v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H 76-333 ' Anderson, Walter S. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District Virginia, Richmond Div. Civil Action No. 77-0089-R Andrews, William, et al v. Johns-Manville Corp., U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey Civil Action No. 77-0580 et al Antholz vs. Fibreboard Paper Products, et al United States District Court for District of Minnesota, Case No. 5-70 Civ. 105 5th Division Apostoli, Bridget, Executrix of the Estate of Vicenzo A. Apostoli, also known a; James Apostoli, deceased, v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al.____________________________________________________________________________________________________ United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Action File No. 76-604 Argeskie, John, et als v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Canadian Mining Co., Ltd., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Action File No. 76-735 Johns-Manville Atkinsen, Floyd M., et al v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Case No. 171 815 et al Austin ct al, vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Docket No. 75-754 Austin, Morton J. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Lake Asbestos Co.,Inc, United States District Court for the District of Mew Jersey Civil Action No. 76-1482 et al Bailey, Esther, Executrix of the Estate of Samuel Bailey, Jr., Deceased Manville Corporation, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News Div. Civil Action No. 76-155-NN v. Johns Ballinger, et al vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., In the Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Case No. 1-684-75 et al Baltz, Paul and Ida Baltz, v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Eastern Division, MO Case No. 77-0313-c(2) Barlow, Joyce J., Executrix of the Estate of Robert James Barlow, deceased Johns-Manville Corp. & Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District Virginia, Newport News Division Civil Action No. 77-11-NN v. Barnett, Bennie M., Administrator of the Estate of Gordon Luther Barnett, v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Greenville, State of South Carolina Unnumbered Deceas Barrett, John L. v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri Case No. 784,937 et al Bartholomew, William J.B. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Products Corp., et al Court of Common Please, Greenville County, South Carolina Unnumbered Johns-Manville Bassham vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al In the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico Civil Action File No. 8431 Baumann vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Superior Court, State of California, City and County of San Francisco Case No. 688-553 Baumgartner vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Civil Action File No. C-75 1057 Bawgus, Gordon James v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 1-128-77 et al Baycroft vs. Burlington Northern, Inc, et al U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington - Northern Division Case No. 3879 Bazemore, William L. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia Case No. L-76-883 et al Beauregard, Richard E., et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles Case No. Cl37466 Bednarczyk v. Armstrong Cork Co., Johns-Manville Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Case Number 76L 5285 Products Corp., et al Bell vs. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., et al United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas Case No. B-74-CA-50 Bellott, Lawless J. and Marie, his wife v. Fibreboard Corporation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division Civil Action No. B-74-253-CA et al Bender vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Southern District of Florida, Miami Division Civil Action No. 75-2578 Berardino, Vincent and Margaret Berardino, v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis Case No. 66939 F, Division 1 Berube, Armand Superior Court Case No. C 188 v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et of California, County of Los Angeles 547 al Biles v. Wise v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa Civil Action File No. 142.597 Birkner v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al In the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Docket No. 57711 F, Division 1 State of Missouri Bolton, Christopher and Gertrude v. Philip Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri Civil Action No. CV76-3764 Carey Manufacturing Corporation, Borel vs. Johns-Manville et al United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas Case No. 6449 Bouchelle, Betty v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp, Court of Common Pleas, County of Aiken, State of South Carolina Unnumbered Boudreaux, Geraldine Bauman v. J-M Products Corporation Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Jefferson Parish, Case No. 178-543 Louisiana Bovert, Elie and Jane Bovert v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Drs. David & Kent Wise, et al_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Superior Court, Contra Costa County, California Case No. 167521 Bradley, E. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Superior Court, Solano Court, Fairfield, CA Case No. 63510 et al. ( Bradley, John & Jewel v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District West Virginia, Huntington Civil Action No. 77-3046 Bradshaw vs. Johns-Manville Sales Corp et al 0; S. District Court for Eastern District of Michigan, Civil Action File No. 29433 Southern Dist. Bradshaw, William T. and Hattie H. v. Combustion Engineering, Corp., J-M Products Corp., J-M Fiber Glass, Inc., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District West Virginia Civil Action No. 77-3037 Inc., J-.M. Sales Breedlove vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Case No. C-75-105 Eastern Division Brooks, Franklin D. v. J-M Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Northern District Georgia, Atlanta Div. Civil Action No. C77-252A Brown, Clarry Donald v. Combustion Engineering, J-M Products Corp., U.S. District Court for District of South Carolina, Charleston Div. Civil Action File No. 76-1162 et al Brown, H. C. Admin, v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H76-60 Brown, Kim A. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H-76-325 Browner v. Johns-Manville, David Wise and Does Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa Civil Action File No. 162127 Broussard vs. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., et al United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas Case No. B-73-CA-300 Buff, William J. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp. U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina, Charleston Division Civil Action No. 77-685 Bugyis, Admin, v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. Circuit Court, Cook County, Illinois County Dept., Case No. 761 2164 Law Division Bull, Wilfred v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corporation, Court of Common Pleas, County of Charleston, South Carolina Unnumbered et al Bumgardner, William J. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., et Court of Common Pleas, Greenville County, South Carolina Unnumbered ' Burke, A. v. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District Texas, Houston Division Civil Action 75-H-870 Burke, J.F v. Combustion Engineering, Inc, et al U. S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 72-5843 Eastern Division Burows, Raymond v. Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et al. U..S. District Court, District of Montana, 3illings Division Civil Action File No. CV-76-60-BLG Buscaino, Joseph J. v. Johns-Manville Products, et al Superior Court, State of California,City & County of San Francisco Case No. 687-191 Byerly vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Civil Action 75-H-866 Houston Division Caines, Dorothy Wolf, Executrix of the Estate of Oliver K. Caines, Deceased v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Barnwel-l, State of South Carolina Unnumbered Call, Ruby C., Administratrix of the Estate of John David Call, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et Court of Common Pleas, Charleston County, South Carolina Unnumbered Deceased al v. Calvert, Mary, Bernice Brown, Artencia Christofferson and Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Drs. David & Kent Wise, et al Superior Court, Contra Costa County, California Case No. 167637 Barbara Coachman v. Campbell, Amy M. v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Case No. CA3-77-0333-F et al Dallas Division Campagna, Carlo S. v. Johns-Manville Corp,, et al U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H77-152 Carmichael vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation Third Judicial District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota Unnumbered Carollo vs. Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc., et al Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Case No. 2881 Carr, Adm. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District Michigan, Southern Division. Case No. 572332 Ceas, Francis v. Johns-Manville Industrial Sales Corporation, Johns-Manville Products Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Case No. 72 L 5843 Insulation, Johns-Manville Corporation, et al Chaddock vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al . United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Case No. C-75-102 Chandler, Robert & Connie v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Columbus, OH Case No. 76CV-11-4900 et al Cicero, Lillian, Admin, ad prosequendum & General Admin, of the Estate of Cicero, Dec'd., and Lillian Cicero, Indiv. v. J-M Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, New Jersey Civil Action No. 76-1488 Salvat Cloutier, Rita, Administratrix of the Estate of Archie Cloutier v. U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Case No. H77-177 J-M Corporati Clowers, Jim L. v. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action No. 76-H-1311 Coates, Joseph, Sr. v. Fibreboard Faper Products Corporation, JohnsManville Products Corporation, et al________________________________________________________ Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Case No. 76-17432 Cohen, Dorothy, Administratrix of the Estate of Emanuel Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corporation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Mew York Civil Action No. 77C 157 Cohen et al v. Combustion Condrav v, Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al U. S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division Civil Action File No. B-76-108-CA Conner, Howard R. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C161702 Consalvo vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County Docket No. L-1279-75 Corea, Nicholas & Rose v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania (County not indicated) Case No. 2111 Corkran v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al U. S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division Civil Action File No. B-76-128-CA Coulter vs. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al Supreme Court, County of Erie, State of New York Crawford vs. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, U. S. District Court Eastern District of Texas Case No. 6492 et al Crawford, E.E. v. Johns-Manville, et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Philadelphia Case No. 4016 Curtin vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit, Madison County, Case No. 75-L-146 Illinois Daniels vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee, Civil Action File No. 3-75 188 Northern Division Davis, Leon v. Combustion Engineering,Inc., J-M Products Corp.,et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Barnwell, State of South Carolina Unnumbered . / DeLoach vs. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Western Division Civil Action File Wo. 73-26 Demarest, Eugene & Marilyn Demarest v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., State of Michigan, Circuit Court for the County of Wayne Case No. 76-626429-NP et al Demers v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H76-56 De Rocco vs. Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Case No. 2880 et al Pennsylvania Dickey vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Civil Action 75-H-864 Houston Division Dishner, Ira H. and Helen Ann Dishner v. J-i! Sales Corporation, U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 77J et al Dittner, Henry v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court, District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H77-100 Dolce vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action 3-75-191-CA Beaumont Division Drake, Leroy v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H76-429 Driggs, Raymond v. Standard Asbestos Mfg. & Insulating Co., et al U. S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Case No. H-77-533 Drinkard, Harriett L., Executrix of the Estate of Ralph Drinkard v. Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Civil Action No. C76-1318 Johns-Manvil1 Dudley, Margaret A., As Executrix of the Estate of Paul E. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al State of New York Supreme Court, County of Erie Unnumbered Dudley, Deceased Dugger, Robert Ray & wife, Beulah D. Dugger v. Combustion Engineering Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al In the Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 3-442-76 Duncan, W. B. v. Combustion Engineering, J-!l Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina, Charleston Div. Civil Action File No. 76-1249 Dunn vs. Johns-Hanville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Case No. 73-H-1072 Duran, Demetrio D., et al v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Case Ho. 719-238 et al Durham, David C., et al v. J-M Corp., J-M Sales Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District Virginia, Norfolk Div. Civil Action No. 77-135-H Duzant v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H76-58 Eleazer v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H76-55 Enos, George v. Johns-Manville, et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H-76-427 Ericksen, Wendell S., Ross Jones, Russell Marshall, & George Baker v. Johns-Manv Sales Corp., Johns-Manville Products Corp., "Does" Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Case No. 171524 Estepp vs, Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et al In the Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Docket No. 2-474-75 Evans, Clyde J. v. Johns-Hanville Sales Corp., Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 1-126-77 et al Fabian, Annie Delloree, Executrix of the Estate of Idalee Knight Wiggins, deceased v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas, Charleston, County, South Carolina Unnumbered Farrar vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Civil Action 75-H-862 Houston Division Fearn, Clarence E. & Emily v. Johns-Hanville Corporation, Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Case No. CD76 23408 et al Featherstone, Jimmie W. v. J-M Sales Corp. & J-M Products Corp., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Div. Civil Action No. M-74-44-CA et al Ferris, Kathleen, Executrix of Estate of Walter J. Ferris, v. Johns-Hanville Structural Systems Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, PA Case No. 1536 Fleming, Frances C., Executrix under the Last Will and Testament of Judson G. Fleming, Deceased v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., et al Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco, California Case No. 720-331 Fleming, Judson G. v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Superior Court, State of California, County and City of San Francisco Case No. 710-899 Fletcher, John E., Jr. v. J-M Corp. & J-M Sales Corp. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Div. Civil Action No. 77-43-N Forest, Opal and Alma Forest v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation U.S. District Court, Eastern District Missouri, Eastern Division Civil Action No. 77-0145-C(3) Fortado, John, et al v. Johns-Ilanviij.e Sales Corp., Dr. Dr. Kent Wise, et al Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Case No. 167877 David Wise, Foster, Herbert v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division Civil Action No. B-74-204-CA Foxworthy Adm. v. Johns-Manville Corp., et al State of Michigan, In the Circuit Court, For the County of Wayne Case No. 75-076252-WP Freeman v. Johns-Manville Interntional Corp., et al U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Civil Action 75-H-869 Houston Div. Frith vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Western District of Louisiana - Shreveport Division Case No. Cl 750123 Froman, Clifford v. Armstrong Cork Co., U.S. District Court, Southern District, Civil Action No. 76-2257-Civ-JLF et al Miami Division Gaspard vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action 75-H-868 Gatlin, Helen, Executrix of the Estate of John B. Gatlin, deceased, Engineering, Inc, and Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas, Charleston County, State of South Carolina Unnumbered v. Combusti Gause, Furman D. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J--II Products Corp., Court of Common Fleas, County of Greenville, State of South Carolina Unnumbered et al Gencarelle v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H76-53 Gerace, Joseph & Norma Gerace v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Johns-Manville Products Corp. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Case No. 5439 Corp., Johns-Manville Gibson vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp. of Mass. District Court in and for the County of Boulder, State of Colorado Case No. 74-1206-2 Giorgianni, Peter and Ann Giorgianni v. U.S. District Court for the District of Docket No. 76-1610 Johns-Manville, New Jersey et al 10 Glazer vs. Johns-Hanville Products Corp. of Hass. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Middlesex, SS - Superior Court Case No. 33147 Glover, B. v. Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. U76-61 Glover, William 3. v. Johns-Manville Corp., et al Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia Case No. L-76-747 Goodman vs. Johns-Manville Corporation et al Circuit Court of Missouri, Sixteenth Judicial Court Case No. 333147 Graham v. Johns-Hanville Corporation, et al United States District Court for the District of Civil Action File No. CA 76 0090 Rhode Island Gray, et al vs. Johns-Hanville Corporation, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Johns-Manville Products, et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H-75-327 Greenday, Anne, General Administratrix and Administratrix ad Prose quendum of the Estate of William Greenday, deceased v. Armstrong Cork Company, Johns-Hanville Products Corporation, "Does" Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County Docket No. L-2458-76 Greer, Earl G. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp,, et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C161704 Grice, Earl Jackson v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Civil Action No. C-76-883 et al Grimes, Willie L. v. Keene Corp, J-H International Corporation, U.S. District Court for Southern Dist. Texas, Houston Div. Civil Action No. 76-H-1936 et al - Grugan, Anthony F. & Ellen Grugan, his wife v. Johns-Hanville Corp.,et al Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania Case No. 2052 Gunnells, Harrie B. Ray, Executrix of the Estate of Claude B. Gunnells, Deceased v. Johns-Hanville Products Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Charleston, State of South Carolina Unnumbered Gustafson, Floyd v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Fifth Division Civil Action No. 5-71 Civ. 40 et al Guy, Nathaniel & Betty Guy v. Canadian Johns-Manville Mining Company, Ltd., Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County Civil Action No. L-43060-75 Hallinan, E. J. v. Johns-Hanville Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana,' Evansville Div. Case No. EV-75-25-C Hamilton, Gloria et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri at Kansas City Case No. 784,988 Haney, Paul & Maxine Circuit Court, Wayne Case No. P-21146 v. Abex County, Corporation Michigan and Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et Harlow, Charles R. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court, Eastern District, Richmond Division Civil Action No. 77-0159-R Harper, Charles K., as administrator of the estate of Maxwell A. v. Johns-Hanville Sales Corporation, et al Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, State of Michigan Case No. 77-711309-UP Harper, deceas Harrod vs. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation et al United States District Court for the District of Kansas Case Mo. KC-3412 Harter, Glen F., et al v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Case No. 171 814 et al Harter R.J. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Civil Action File C-75 452 Hartman, George W. v, Superior Court, State Case No. C161705 Johns-Manville of California, Products Corp., et al County of Los Angeles Hartwell vs. Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for Eastern District of Case No. 7513 Texas Hatfield, Marion E. and wife, Arietta Price Hatfield v. Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Circuit Court of Knox County, Tennessee, Division II Civil Action No. 2-453-76 Combustion et al Haverty Admin, vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., District Court of Johnson County, Kansas Case No. 62897, Division No. Ill et al Hawkins, Howard P. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H76-428 Heath, Thomas A. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Court of Common Pleas, Greenville County, South Carolina Unnumbered Corp., - et al Hershman, Samuel E. v. Johns-Manville Corp., et al Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk, Virginia Law Docket No. L76-1706 Holton vs. Johns-Manville International Corp.( et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action No. 75-H-1635 Horan, James v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H76-449 Howard vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al District Court of U.S. for Eastern District of Texas, Case No. S-75-58 CA Sherman Division Huggins, Ocie v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., Court of Common Pleas, Charleston County, South Carolina Unnumbered et al Hunt, Wayne W. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C161707 Hunter, Leonard H. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court, District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H 77-99 Huskins, Howard C. & Mary M. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 3-126-77 et al Hutson vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Southern District of Florida, Miami Division Civil Action No. 75-2580 Isenhower, Max H. v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Circuit Court, City of Portsmouth, Virginia Law No. L-77-36 et al Jacomino vs. Johns-Manville Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Case No. 1507 Pennsylvania Janesko vs. Johns-Manville Corp., et al District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas Case No. 48110B Jeane vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Case No. B-74-337-CA Beaumont Div Johnson Hattie Bell v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., J-M Products U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Div. Civil Action No. B-74-124-CA Corp., et Johnson, Mildred F. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp,, et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C137467 Johnson V7. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Civil Action No. 670876 . Southern Division Joyner vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Southern District of Florida, Miami Division Civil Action No. 75-2581 Kadian, Vincent v. Johns-Hanville Corp., et al United States District Court, District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H77-151 Kaminski, Jerome v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina, Charleston Division Civil Action I.'o. 77-683 et al Karjala vs. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Fifth Division Case No. 5-71-18 Kearns vs. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio Case No. C73-70 Eastern ' Division Keeler v. Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Civil Action File Ho. H76-59 Connecticut Kelly, Nelson D. v. Johns-Hanville Corporation, et al State of Hew York Supreme Court, County of Erie Unnumbered Kendall v. Johns-Hanville Products Corp., et al. Superior Court, State of California, City & County of San Francisco Case No. 704-023 Kidd, Kenneth Lee v. Combustion Engineering, Inc, and J-M Products Corp., Court of Common Pleas, Greenville County,- South Carolina Unnumbered et al King, Edwin W. C. v. Johns-Hanville Sales Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H-76-337 King, Roy M. v. Court of Common Unnumbered Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Pleas, Charleston County, South Carolina Corp.,et al Kirchner vs. Johns-Hanville International Corp., U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 75-H-1634 et al Houston Division Knight, Ernest R. v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas, Charleston, County, South Carolina Unnumbered Koontz, Bertha Juanita, Administratrix v. and Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, Greenville County, Unnumbered Combustion Engineering South Carolina Kyburz vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action 75-H-863 LaGrappe vs. Fibreboard Paper Froducts Corp., et al United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Case Ho. B-74-CA-66 . Landre1 vs. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al Superior Court, Alameda County, Oakland, California Case No. 449876-8 Larson, Lloyd R. v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., et al Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco, California Case No. 717-596 Lauderback, Stephanie v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp,, et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division Civil Action No. M-76-69-CA Lawson, James v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al State of New York Supreme Court, County of Erie Unnumbered Leava et al vs. Johns-Hanville Products In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Civil Action No. CV75-4160 Corporation, Missouri, at et al Kansas City LeGrande vs. Johns-llanville Products Corporation United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Action File No. 741-57 Lemieux, Gerald Sr, v. Johns-Hanville Corporation U.S. District Court of the District of Connecticut Case No. H77-176 Lopez, Antonio v. Armstrong Cork Co., J-M U.S. District Court, Southern District of Civil Action No. 76-1411-CIV-JLK Products Florida Corp., et al Lopez, E. et al. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the Southern District of Civil Action 75-1365-Civ-JLK Florida Louisville Trust Company v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co., et al Jefferson Circuit Court, Common Pleas Branch, Seventh Division Case No. 164922 Lovna, Elizabeth et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C191-320 et al Luker vs. Johns-Hanville International Corp., U. S. District Court for Southern District of Case No. 75-H-342 et al Texas, Houston Division Lyons, Thomas F., et al v. G.&W.H. Corson, Inc., J-M Products Corp., Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County, Pennsylvania Docket No. 75-6065 et al Marcucci v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et. al United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Action File No. 76-414 Martin, Lula Ardean, et a1 v. Superior Court of California, Case No. 171 812 Johns-Manville Corp., et al County of Contra Costa Marzolf, Elizabeth & Robert Marzolf v. Johns-Manville Corp., State of New York, Supreme Court, County of Erie Unnumbered et al Massett, Errol and Mary Massett v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Case No. 76-15430 Marrs v. Johns-Manville, et al Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara Case No. SM18429 Matthews, Elizabeth, et al v. Fibreboard U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Civil Action No. B-73-CA-309 Paper Products Corp., et Texas, Beaumont Division al McAnespy vs. Johns-Manville Corporation Jefferson Parish State District Court, Gretna, Case No. 157-594 Louisiana McBride, Donald T. & Bernadine v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District, Huntington, West Virginia Civil Action No. 77-3040 McCarthy, John v. Johns-Manville, et al United States District Court, District of Civil Action No. H77-98 Connecticut McCoy v. Johns-Manville Products Circuit Court of Jackson County, Civil Action File No. CV76-1377 Corporation, et al Missouri at Kansas City McDaniel vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas Case No. 6967 McGinnis vs, Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio Case No. C-74-1077 . McGrath, Thomas & Dorothy, et al United States District Court for Civil Action No. 76-2417 v. J-M Products the District of Corp., J-M New Jersey Sales Corp., et al McKee J. v.. Johns-Manville Corp., et al State of New York, Supreme Court, County of Erie Case No. C-15572 McKee, Ralph & Martha K. v. Johns-Manville Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 1-127-77 Sales Corp., et al McKimmie v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al 0~- S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Civil Action File No. C-76-180 Ir McLaughlin H. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al U. S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Case No. C-7 5-3 7 7 McLaughlin J. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., U. S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Case No. C-74-i <23 et al Eastern Division McNeeley vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Case No. C-75-74 McNulty vs. Johns-Manville Corporation In the Circuit Court of Missouri, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Case No. 781,333 - Division No. 16 Measor vs. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U. S. District Court, Northern District Ohio, Eastern Division - Cleveland Case No. C73-238 Mellot vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U. S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Case No. C-75-1058 Eastern Division Mesaros C. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County Case No. 75-187 Mesaros, Catherine, Adm. John Superior Court of New Jersey, Civil Action No. L-34605-74 Mesaros, Deceased v. Law Division, Hudson J-M Products County Corp., et al Meyerhoffer v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. Superior Court, Somerset County, New Jersey Docket No. L 33168 75 Mitchell vs. Johns-Manville Corp., et al In the Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit Case No. 74-L-676 Mitchell, Robert P. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, State of Michigan Case No. 7 7-710648-NP Moore, James and Helen Moore v. Johns-Manville Corporation, Court of Common Pleas, Pennsylvania Case No. 942 et al Moran vs. Corson, Inc., et al Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County, Case No. 1699 ` Pennsylvania Morgan, Lucy A., et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C185140 et al Morris, Alvin L. & Fern District Court, Boulder Unnumbered B. Morris v. Johns-Manville County, Colorado Products Corp., et al Morris, Frederick W. v. U.S. District Court for Civil Action No. H77-36 Johns-Manville Connecticut Corporation, et al Morrison Adm. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al. Superior Court of the State of California In and For the City & County of San Francisco Case No. 701-446 Mosher v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Wayne County Circuit Court, Michigan Case No. 76-614243-NP et al, Muntean vs. Combustion Engineering Inc., et al U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Case No. C73-199 Eastern Div. Murphy K. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Civil Action C-75-453 Eastern Div. Murphy, Walter D. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Richmond Division Civil Action No. 77-0157-R Murray, Dolly, Executrix of the Estate of Donald C. Murray, Deceased v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp.,et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Charleston, State of South Carolina Unnumbered Murray, L. v. Johns-Manville, et United States District Court for Civil Action File No. 75-1475 al the District of New Jersey Nave, Bruce Alfred & Inc., Johns-Manville In the Circuit Court wife, Billie M. Nave v. Combustion Products Corp., et al for Knox County, Tennessee Engineering, Case No. 2-443-76 Nave, C. A. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Circuit Court of Knox County, Division III, State of Tennessee Docket No. 3-491-75 ' Neace, Chester and Margaret v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. J-M Sales Corp., J-M Products Corp., J-M Fiber Glass, Inc., et al U.S. District Court, Southern District West Virginia, Huntington Civil Action No. 77-3038 Neubauer, Charlotte E., Personally & personal representative of the Estate of Clifford S. Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp., and Transcontinental Insurance Co. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin Civil Action No. 77-C-52 Nicolai, Frank A., et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C 185 141 et al Nicholas, Norman v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, U.S. District Court, Billins Division, Montana Civil Action File No. CV-76-91 et al Noel vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation Jefferson Parish, State District Court, Louisiana Case No. 163-712 Nolan vs. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia, et al In the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Case No. 75 L 8672 Norris, Grover C. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina, Charleston Division Civil Action No. 76-1901 et al Ochoa, Onelio v. Armstrong Cork Company, et al U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Case No. 77-10460Civ-JLK Ohde, Clarence L. and Martha W. Ohde v. Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp. & Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Circuit Court, Jackson County, Missouri Civil Action No. CV76-5247 Oliver, Garnell v. Pacor, Inc., et al v. J-M Sales Corp., Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, PA Case No. 4207 J-M Products Corp., i Oman, James T. v. Johns-Manville Corporation Circuit Court of the City of Newport News, Virginia Case No. 2930-S Palermo vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action B-75-192-CA Beaumont Division Palm, Frederick W. , Sr. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et als United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H 76-426 Parker, Ophelia, Indiv. & as Sole Heir of Harold Manville Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Case No. CA3-77-0372-F T. Parker, Deceased v. Texas, Dallas Division Johns- Pastor vs. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil Action File No. 75-3282 Paul, Frederick v. Johns-Manville Corp., et al U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H-76-332 Pendley, Ethel Bowman, Executrix of the Estate of John Harold Pendley, Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Div. Civil Action No. C77-632 A Decease: Petillo Daniel, et al v. J-M Corp., J-M Sales Corp., J-M Products In The Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania Case No. 76-11065 - Corp. Petty, Gus & Dorothy Petty v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al. District Court of Harris County, Texas, D-80th Judicial District No. 1,080,269 Phelps v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al United States District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois Civil Action File No. 76-4-012 Pirozzi, Joseph & Alice v. Johns-Manville Corporation Superior Court of Somerset County Docket No. L 19594-73 Plitt vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Givil Action 75-H-906 Houston, Division Pollock vs. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Case No. 923,247 et al ' Poole, George W. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H-76-338 Pond, James T.v, Johns-tlanville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, Country of Los Angeles Case No. Cl 61703 Poree, Mrs. Willie B. v. W. R. Goodwin, 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Case No. 170-156 et al Jefferson, State of Louisiana Porter, Paul v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C 188 548 Potter vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 6329 Beaumont Division Prim, Madeline, Executrix of the Estate of James Prim, Deceased v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina Civil Action No. 77-301 Quattelbaum, R.W. v. Combustion Engineering, Johns-Manville Products Corp., U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Div. Civil Action File No. 76-1239 et Reinhardt, v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Wayne County Circuit Court, Michigan Case No. 76-614893-NP et al Ricci vs. Combustion Engineering, et al U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio -Eastern Division Case No. C72-507 Richards, James Court of Common Case No. 983 & Marie v. J-M Corp., J-M Products Corp., J-M Pleas (county not indicated), Pennsylvania Sales Coro., et Ridenour, Vivian L,, Executrix of Estate of James C. U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. H-76-326 . Ridenour v. J-M Sales Cor: :" Rigsby, Walter C., et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C151947 Roach, Maria A., et al v. Johns-Manville Corporation, Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, State of Missouri Case No. 65720 F Division 1 et al Roderman vs. Combustion Engineering, et al U. S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Case No. C72-390 Eastern Division Rogers, Casper Sharp & wife, Betty Jean Rogers v. Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Circuit Court of Knox County, Tennessee, Division Civil Action No. 1-456-76 Combustion I Engineering Rosenquest v. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern D-strict of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action File No. 76-H-115 Roswurm, Walter A., et al. v. Philip Carey Mfg. Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri Case No. CV76-2631 Corp., J-M Products Corp., et a Rubio, Jesse A. v, Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C161706 Rucker, Edna R., Indiv., and for the use and benefit of the next of Rucker, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al State of Tennessee, Circuit Court of Knox County, Division II Civil Action No. 2-220-77 kin of Noar Rudkin v. Johns-Manville, Kent Wise, Superior Court, Alameda County, CA Case No. 159 524 et al. Ruff, John S. v. Combustion Engineering, Court of Common Pleas, Charleston, South Unnumbered Inc., J-H Products Carolina Corp., et al Ryder v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. Circuit Court for the Twentieth Judicial Civil Action No. 76-L-2130 Circuit St. Clair County, IL Sabella, August and Ellie v. Johns-Manville, et al Superior Court, State of California, City and County of San Francisco Case No. 702-137 Safly vs. Johns-Manville Corporation Superior Court of the State of Washington for Kitsap County Salter v. Johns-Manville Corporation Superior Court of Washington for King County Case No. 802594 Sandoval vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court of the State of California, City and County of San Francisco Case No. 689-1 59 Santamaria, Ramon v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C168478 L* I Schneider, George L. & Kate v. J-M Products Corp., District Court, County of Boulder, Colorado Unnumbered et al Schnetke, Helen A., Executrix of the Estate of Ronald F. Deceased v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil Action No. 77-765 Schnetke, Schools, Gene v. Johns-Manville Corp., U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Civil Action No. 77-0156-R et al Richmond Div. Scott, Levy J. v. Combustion Engineering, Court of Common Pleas, Charleston County, Unnumbered Inc., J-M Products Corp., South Carolina et al Sedlock, B. vs. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Case No. C72-395 Sedlock, Joseph E. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Div. Civil Action Ho. C-76-1098 Shields, Charles J. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C137468 Shoup v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., J-M Sales Corporation,et al State of Michigan, Circuit Court for the County of Wayne Civil Action File No. 76-606-823 Simpson, Clarence v. Owens Corning Fiberglas, J-M International Corp., U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Div. Civil Action No. 76-H-1499 et al Sjostrom v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action File No. H76-57 Skindzier, Bernard v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al U.S. District Court for Connecticut Civil Action No. H77-35 Small, William v. Johns-Manville International Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action No. 76-H-1907 Smith, Gary L. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., Court of Common Pleas, Aiken County, South Carolina Unnumbered et al Smith, Harry & Catherine Smith v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation U.S. District Court, Eastern District Missouri, Eastern Division Civil Action Ho. 77-0144-C(A) Smith, Weeks and Martha P. Smith v. Johns-Manville Corp., In The Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia Case No. L-76-658 et al Smith, William v. Johns-Manville & Kent Wise, Superior Court Contra Costa County, CA Case No. 161288 et al Sokol, Edward P. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Case No. 77L 3299 J-M Sales Corp., et al Speake v. Johns-Manville & Kent Wise, et al Superior Court Contra Costa County, CA Case No. 160-993 Speer vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco, Docket No. 695-157 California Spell vs. Fibreboard Corp., et al United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas Case No. B-74-81-CA St. Jacque, Dorothy, et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C137465 et al Starnes, B.J. v. Combustion Ergineering, Inc., J-M U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Civil Action No. C-76-882 Products Corp., et Eastern Division al Starnes, Billy Joe and wife, Carolyn Carlton Starnes, v. J-M Sales Coro., State of Tennessee, Circuit Court of Knox County, Division I Civil Action No. 1-200-77 et al Starnes, J.E. Admin, U.S. District Court, Case No. C-76-46 vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Starnes, J.R. et al v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Case No. C-76-46 Starnes, J.S. & Barbara G. v. Johns-Manville Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 2-127-77 Sales Corp., et al Starnes, O.K. & Jerriann M, v. Circuit Court for Knox County, Civil Action No. 2-128-77 Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Tennessee et al Starnes, R,L, & Lula B. v. Johns-Manville Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 3-127-77 Sales Corp., et al Steele, E. H. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al U. S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Case No. C-75-359 Steele, Harvey v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation & "Does" Superior Court of the State of California, County of Contra Costa Case Number 167271 Sterken, Robert E. v. Johns-Manville International Corp., U.S. District Court, Galveston District Civil Action No. 76-G-lll et al Stevens, Waldo & Jo Emma v. Ccmbustion Engineering, U.S. District Court, Southern District, Huntington, .Civil Action No. 77-3041 Inc., et al West Virginia Stewart, Evelyn, Executor under the Last Will and Testament of Sherman 5. Stewart, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, City and County of San Francisco Case No. 713-284 Stewart, John, Indiv. and as Executor of Estate of Otho C. Stewart Deceased U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division Case No. CA3-77-0373F Stewart, S. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of San Francisco Docket No. 695-921 Stone, James L. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Richmond Division Civil Action No. 77-160-R Strickland F.E. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, City and County of San Francisco Docket No. 677-527 Strickland R.M. vs. Johns-Manville International, U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Case No. 75-H-492 et al Texas, Houston Div. Swisher, Norma L., Administratrix of the Estate of Ben E. Swisher, Deceased v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Sales Corp., et al U.S. District Court, Northern District Ohio, Eastern Div Civil Action No. C77-162 Talarico, Orlando T. and Caroline Talarico v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, Pennsylvania Docket No. 993 Talbot vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp,, et al U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Civil Action File No. B-75-391-CA Texas, Beaumont Div. Taylor, B.R. v. Combustion Engineering, U.S. District Court for the District of Civil Action File No. 76-1210 J-M Products Corp., et al South Carolina, Charleston Div. Taylor, H.L. v. Combustion Engineering, J-M Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Div. Civil Action File No. 76-1208 Taylor, M.F. v. Combustion Engineering, U.S. District Court for the District of Civil Action File No. 76-1247 J-M Products Corp., et al South Carolina, Charleston Div. Taylor, S.M. v. Combustion Engineering, J-M Products Corp.( et al U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Div. Civil Action File No. 76-1241 Thomas, Earl v. Johns-Manville .Circuit Court for Knox County, Civil Action No. 3-128-77 Sales Corp,, Tennessee et al Thomas, Janie v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al Court of Common Pleas, Charleston County, South Carolina Unnumbered Thompson, Henrietta Amelia, et al v. J-H Sales Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Case No. 171 816 et al Thompson H.J. vs. Johns-Manville Corp., et al Circuit Court of Missouri, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Case No. 775555 - Division 14 Thompson M.J. vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco, California Civil Action No. 698-870 Thornton, Hattie S., Administratrix of the Estate of Cedric William Thornton, Deceased, v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al Virginia: In the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth Unnumbered Thornton, John A. i, Charles W. Ay v. Superior Court, State of California, Case No. C161864 J-M Products Corp., et al County of Los Angeles Tomplait vs. Combustion Engineering, Inc., et al U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 5402 Beaumont Division Trahan vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action 75-H-905 Tretter v. Johns-Manville Corp. & Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Eastern Div., Eastern District of Missouri Civil Action No. 76-86 C(l) Treadway vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al In the Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Docket No. 1-528-75 Tuck, Earle D. v. Combustion Engineering, U.S. District Court, Charleston Division, Civil Action No. 77-0415 Inc., et al South Carolina Turley, Martis v. Combustion Engineering, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Civil Action No. C76-108 Inc., J-H Products Corp., Georgia, Gainesville Div. et al Turner, Charles David v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., Court of Common Pleas, County of Greenville, State of South Carolina Unnumbered et a Turner, R.L. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., J-M Products Corp., Court of Common Pleas, Charleston County, South Carolina Unnumbered et al Turner, William A. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado Civil Action No. C-70276 et al Tuttle, Harold D. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., District Court, Boulder County, CO Unnumbered et al. Tuttle, Jack v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al District Court, City and County of Denver, State of Colorado Docket No. not Shown Valiska, Admin, v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. Circuit Court, Cook County, Illinois County Department, Case No. 761 2913 Law Division Vaughn, James William v. Johns-Manville Corporation, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk, Virginia Case No. L-76-1725 et al Velasquez vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Case No. 681-172 Viator vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action 75-H-867 Vice v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action File Ho. B-76-115-CA Beaumont Division Vidou, Julian v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation U. S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Case No. H77-178 Wadley vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco, Civil Action No. 697-762 California Wagner, Larry & District Court, Unnumbered Maxine County Ellen v. Johns-Manville of Boulder, Colorado Products Corp., et al Walker, Fred R. v. Johns-Manville Corp., et al Circuit Court of the City of Newport News, Virginia Law No. 2959-G Ward, Presley v. Johns-Manville Products U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Civil Action No. M-76-73-CA Corp., Texas, J-M Sales Corp., Marshall Div. et al Ward, R. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al United States District Court for the District of Civil Action File No. H76-54 Connecticut Waters, Horace G., Jr. v. Johns-Hanville Products Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division Civil Action No. C77-633A \ Weirauch, Josephine as general fiduciary of the estate of Alfred Fredrick Weirauch, deceased, v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, State of Michigan Case No. 77-711317-NP .Wesberry vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action 75-H-865 Wesberry, J. R. vs. Johns-Manville International Corp., et al U.S. District Court for Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action File No. 76-H-116 West, Emma L., Administratrix of the Estate of Nebraska Sanders v. Bell's Asbestos, Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey Civil Action No. 76-2254 West, Oroville T., Peter DeLuca, and Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, Case No. C161701 Leatualii County of Fautanu v. JohnsLos Angeles White, Evelyn, Executrix of the Estate of Walter F. White, Deceased v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Court of Common Pleas, County of Greenville, State of South Carolina Unnumbered White, John E. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., Johns-Manville Court of Common Pleas, County of Greenville, South Carolina Unnumbered Products Corp., White, John W., et al vs. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al In the Circuit Court for Knox County, State of Tennessee Civil Action No. 3-672-75 White, John W. et al v. Johns-Manville Corporation et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News Div. Civil Action No. 76-178-NN Wilks v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., and Johns-Manville Fiber Glass, U.S. District Court, Southern District West Virginia, at Huntington Civil Action No. 75-0023-H Inc., et a Wilson, Ray B., et al v, Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C177502 Wimberly, Viola v. Johns-Manville Products Port Arthur, Jefferson County, Texas Civil Action No. B-74-224-CA Corp., et al Winborne, John R. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp., -'.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Div. Civil Action No. 77-273-N et al Womack, William B. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., et al Superior Court, State of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. C177501 Woodcock, Lucas v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Richmond Division Civil Action No. 77-0155-R Woodcock, Melvin v. Johns-Manville Corporation, et al U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Richmond Division Civil Action No. 77-0158-R Woody, Edwin James & Roberta v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee Civil Action No. 2-126-77 et al FIBER GLASS CASES Alexander, Mr. & Mrs. Warner Max vs. B&N Heating & Air Conditioning, Flick Supply Co., PPG Industries Inc. New Orleans, U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Louisiana Case Ho. 73-1969, Section G DIATOMACEOUS EARTH CASES Ingraham, Bette A., Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Ingraham, Jr., v. Johns-Manville Corp., Johns-Ilanville Sales Corp., Johns-Manville Products Corp. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Div. Civil Action No. H-77-24 EXHIBIT C i. UKOYLES. AUEBAUC.H & DAVIS, INC./PK1NT ADVERTISING SCHEDULE BROYLES. ALLEBAUG11 & DAVtffc 1 ./PRINT ADVERTISING SCHEDULE c c<o^ u m Q < Ctf O D t-- u UJQ UJ 2 j_ U on z on U) bo C > H W *2 o D < u o Z ny e a Cl. > o ID > < D CX Q *3 tc o U o l D <J < 22 < ^ L/n on W w cfl o>- T--I o 22 22 0) -D 2 C H W -3 M > < X I LO oX *") u. < r C C y uj ~s< 1 JOUKS-MANVILLE (INDUSTRIAL) F e b ru a ry , 1974 . 1/2/74 >ROYLl S. A! I L iiA U i,l! & i)AV!S. If I AUVLiULSIk'G SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A Asbestos Bearing Industrial Thermal Insulation Products PRODUCT Block 85% Magnesia SUPEREX-M SUPEREX 1900 SUPEREX 2000 THERMOBESTOS Silicated THERMOBESTOS Pipe ASBESTOCEL (aircell) ANTI-SWEAT 85% Magnesia SUPEREX-M SUPEREX 1900 THERMOBESTOS Silicated THERMOBESTOS METAL-ON Sheets ASBESTOCITE Finishes AERTITE INSULKOTE SG INSULKOTE ST INSULKOTE ET Paper, Felt, Blankets Asbestos Roll FIRE FELT D. C. FLEXSTONE Asbestos Firetard #50 Asbestos Weatherproofing Felt Commercial Grade Asbestos Paper 15A Asbestos Jacket 45A Asbestos Jacket 7700 Coated Asbestos Jacket Asbestos Turbine Blanket Asbestos FIRE FELT ASBESTOS-SPONGE FELT Asbestos Pipe Blanket Engineers Insulating Tape White Surface Asbestos Jacket THERMOWRAP THERMOTAPE Cements SUPEREX Cement THERMOBESTOS Cement LAPTITE Cement Fibrous Adhesive 302 Cement 352 Cement 301 Cement 450 Cement 500 Cement 85% Magnesia Cement 300 Cement 304 Cement 340 Cement 0352 Cement 364 Cement 400 Cement Date Commenced Date Discontinued 1902 1930 1922 1939 1966 1970 1970 1972 1972 1973 1973 1902 1903 1902 1930 1922 1939 1966 1959 1965 1965 1970 1970 1972 1973 1973 1973 1927 1975 1926 1929 1929 1929 1891 1929 1931 1931 1929 1931 1931 1931 1951 1891 1890 1898 1926 1931 1951 1951 1973 1962 1961 1960 1956 1968 1954 1964 1931 1959 1952 1930 1930 1930 1953 1930 1933 1931 1932 1931 1931 1931 1930 1931 1973 1969 1970 1973 1971 1972 1972 1970 1970 1969 1969 1969 1955 1969 D Q LU x u in oz tS) LU > Q < l- Z QZ a. <i <jn > < =3 X U D < C2 LU < t/i LU --J > o d: C2 /u n l k iis IN Ij b O iL U U L t fBROYLES. ALLLBAUGH & DAVIS, I I 'PRINT ADVERTISING SCHEDULE w f-- C> <0 u m cc CM 2 -- tx w < x 4-) 4-4 H H rH rH *H H XX CC TO P 0. cc TO CJ CJ X 4-1 H *H rO TO aTO CJ cC c u - u 0 *? 0a *H 4J 0 *H 4-1 D Cj CC TO rH rH TO (0 CO K CO iH TO TO TO TO a--^ C3 0 CO 3c 0 CM 0 3 H `r- H H CO H w u c 0 <y. H c X C rH H J= j: c X O O 0 0 H c J 4J M u M | 4-> u u t-* 0 4- 4-J U 4J X 4- 1- t CC 0 O TO u x J u C c 0 TO re o rH H TO iH f= rH TO TO TO TO TO TO TO 4J *-- cr. CC to TO u 3 TO TO TO TO U M Ucz 1 J CC 4J to TO (0 CO (0 4J CO Uh Mh 1 Ch UH *n u CH s 2 c O TO 0 x: c TO TO 0 TO TO a TO a = c : & c H H cc H H fH H CC Ctf cc cc 0 M H 0 c C n m rx rr, 0 j c\ * 2 h to X t: TO 4-1 ' p a) to c D 2 c _r* l 11 3 3 3 a> O IX c IX fx 0 rx 00 00 00 oc vX) a> r- r- r .--H CM rH CM rH r-H rH rH CM rH rH rH r* rH rH r-- m 11i 1 111 \ 11 1 1 > 1 1 1 22 33 3 rx r-- fx *3IX m -3 IX 3 <r *3 -3 fx rx fx |X *3 rx 3 *3 3 m pH U- U- r- rx |X IX n -- r* El \S. o0 a: C- c. TJ t) -- C, X X XX X X XXXXXX X X XX XX XX X 3 3 -> -3 C$ m3 3 -a rv 3 E2 3 rj m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 3 m3 m3 cc 0 M CC CC cc CC CQ CC CQ CC CC CC CC C=l[ X, --V 3 --^ \ \ \ ^4 u c CJ CJ CJ u m3 CJ CJ (J U CJ 0 u u (J 0 3 CJ u 0 CJ j U 3 3 3 *3 CQ 3 <r *3 <T MT <r *3 3 3 *3 3 3 3 3 TOD --TO TOD TOD TOD T3 T3 T3 TJ T3 'TO T3 o' TO3 TOD TO to: X TOO TO CC TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO to! TO TO U n TO TO TO TO to (V TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO C TO TO, TOI TO ^ Wi U U h u 00 S-* J U J W* W U U U OJ UJ 0J M M H C. a cx C- TO a a (X a cx cx a a 0 TO CC P. 0v C(- to to C/J CO Ph t/j w V) C/J c/: LTi CO UJ C/J (J OJ Ph t/J C/J p1 rH . TOD CO CO T3 c J 4-4 K oci c OC c H C iH iH rH TO TO eC u C c H oc U TO 0 O H TO U *H u c U 3 L 4-4 W 4-4 H H TO U O 4h Ofi rH CO H5 B u os u U 3 c d C *H c Cm to u3 CJ 0 *H 3 3 5> TO JX 0 0 TO TO 3 s TO TO 4-1 X3 TO H rH Ph C 0 0 OC u TO r* *'" c >-- /--n < TO s H *H U 3 a; Oh TO On n c C 0 w H TO e X TO rH TO C 2 t/ b0 U 3 H c 0 TO J c-< U 2 '"? a V--' --- w H-l J M 3 H CX iH w CO 00 uH CC O 0 X TO es JP r TOD CO u 4J TO TO c TO X c c H J U V- h OC C TO 3 0 CJ TO w 00 J a TO TO X m3 4--1 TO C TO 4-1 TO e O H TO 0 U -7 TO c1 b U 4-4 TO U TO P to CJ H u TO C m3 ^3 *H 4-J J b 3 iH U 3 H < c c TO c H a H TO rH 0 H rH *H H *H U 3 Vh tH TO3 U TO M 4J 00 CJ rH TO TO rs 0 TO 3 TO U *H (0 TOD a (J TOC 3 TO H U c w H J3 F--( 0 J a TO C7 b n H C > G ffiM 3 < < w 3 0 0 CJ c. fH w X w < CO CQ M sc < 2 -i TOI H M aij t3 _. sV . *s. ow 1 4-4 u U 4-1 CN 4J m 4-1 4J 4-1 4-4 4-4 4-J 00 H to L: ^ 04 cx Cu O. rH (N OJ 3 Cu TO to TO TO \ --x TO a & a P. P 3 r-- TO TO TO TO 0) p*1 a> to CO CO. CO O' Q\ ON CO ON C/J 00 to U1 CO CO O'' 0/ i *-> 1 / /-- " ,7 r|' 1J --1 0 -- r-M m O CO 061 in ft) On <N -- i-M m rH H I > T| T-. | )% T) n' O rH ^- f/) i 0 f--( *- 1 <' m r-- H rH ^- rH rH rx r-j u- j1 O > / >* (T . Ci )' .V fBROYLES. ALLEBAUGH & DAVIS, 1/PR IN T ADVERTISING SCHEDULE BROYLES. A LI.E B A U G I I & D A V IS , 'J /P R IN r A D V E R TIS IN G SCHEDULE^ W LO r> in ih o to Dt: H> O CJ PS Cu cJ u M H iTi CTn o V. Xa i--H 3 2 o O CN I -- -- -- 1- 1 1 11 -- --- ! T u f-S k in 10 0J( r^ CNI J- O Xi 4J c ou E CC CT Wi ` of, QJ Cm If) pC H 0Q>;! a OS PS 10 <U O' r c >- c c f" 4- 4c CC m a C? <D c H -- ---- -- --- -- ---- -- -- --- - "-- CO r- CC cr I in *H^1 <T or*> <r <3 7 5 -5 1 - -- ---- -- -- =--- -- -- ... --I* t-S CQ CJ DO C 00 i- Cl c *h| O G< -H Oil H CO c w CJ o H CJ j i to 2: Xo \ X -- 3X m5. PC ca CJ 3 >Tj -- 3 CO L> _>< 3 cO cc t: "O CO cc CJ, 0. V->! a0 cx ahi W0>!( S! <h CO | C! W 0J b Ph c 0 fa- to 10 3 3: X) QJ ez O O v^ c 01 QJ cE H a 4-1 HI CT3 3. <U u1. w -- TJ n a a co -- T3 u 0 L 0J PS X 0 a >- a .DO -- > Cl c fii-H c DC UX >- r-{ (C CO (. (0 0 <y CJ 1- a *H X 0' U >j 1 Xa -- A p p lia n c e M a n u fa c tu re r X --- -- -- -- -- -- - CJ ! Page 1 iI --- -- ' >1 > t-j rH 3, 3 X i- O \o| x> >> r-H r33 *-) X - ~ - ; m *"<1 \0 1 z 0 M H M 3 H 3 X -- X - ... - 1 1 -- I w _u D D 3 j 3 Z -n 2 Z z yT > Z D < r> D BIIOYLES. A l 1L IIA U G II & DAVIS, IN |^ PRINT ADVERTISING SCHEDULE 5S JJ rl r-i i-i a 3g j C H o r| U Q) a u 3 a W c 3u 3OJ U (fl o GJ H P4 a CM dj fS > jj *H .a Xi 03 cfl aa O' rj a I c ft e -H v d. tf; X -? o H aJ 03 rH =3 Vi c 3 4J W H 4--* >M <1/ a X w ,d u, V-r! 03' 0>. l QJ- l o0 CM CM l! I! li 1 il Siin <3 <3 <3 fM. X C2 m3 -a ca pa m3 m3 m3 ca oa CC u u m3 u u CJ <r c- <r <7 oa! -o !1 'TJ . 'V T3 T 03 o 03 a 03 03 o>, 0) 0) 0/ QJ QJ (3 )M i K PC M 3h a a t a ft a a 0 [to to _. to 1" _ a_ CO _ to hCJr. ~ _ t^ CS --a DO GO c c H or i 1 aj r> 1i r* r--1 V-4 OJ QJ C Oj uC GO si 03 I H c; Mh 3 0) I co! a o H [ H 'Hi (J c gji 2 a 4r-->C GJ a c I--11 G c w CO 1 pa . lr"' lu u: to 03 f-M ' U GO C QJ c LC 03 n: 0 i-i G c, u 03l *rH tj CO C! m3 H; 3- i to ] w -J rH i A-> ul OJ 3 ri [ <1 1 aj GO ui r--(' s G QJ I3 pD | 1 tJ i-H .J HH Dl <u H 2 CC < u C< W| 1 2 ri O I c! ^ c Oj a pa % __ 'S 1. . 1i ** I QJ OJ 1 G | | QJ ro ro QJ (V S O n Cc D n c c CM CM 3 \\ : | n, \D\ vD I C 3 n ipi r> i Z5 --4 m ^! i iJ ! O ^,, 1 rs. j CM; ; CM !1 . Li J ! I- i; % oo oo lO . o mo c o c o om m co _o o r w o<cU^ o<0T0 o o-->HMt CN CN 30 Ni o o--I o o CN o CcnN o m m in >3* m or-\|! #* CN mcn vD v5 *> m r"4 mcn r- LT r cc i _ o<- n XI <u U! UJ H UJ I Z 0 (ft (0 zD Q > <U c PS U -- UJ X iZl U i/i O c JuuS o 4J CO CO CD 3 C0f)t (ft c CiS M a) r-s1hj H ju= iOJ c UroH) j=u O u u CO L E u cO CD CO u rH3 cO a> CD r (0ft) IM0) (ft c (0f)t H PS PS M PS CD }H-i O 4U- CO X U-| CD ps xuu: Xou CO CO QJ CD (ft Cft t CD CD PS a aX Ul 13 H d o X ai U3J *H o <y> h Of UJ > O < a: CL W > < Q X o D < CO < LO UJ _J > o a; ca id m n* On r-H o Z Q >-> 2CO z . o tic o j4cC/-l. C- -c C.X cc Q o U uTi H1r---r*s1 G o s._- -J U C1O) c. J- --H On -H p--1 r- CO P-* r" 0r~04 n- >) -u rH <r m <r < -O' <r < n- r XX X X XX X XX X 2b0 2u3 PQ PQ U < -COJ' *2 03 PQ O w3 PQ 2*c3c 2 PC O <Or u '> u3 PQ U <r 2b Ju2S tf PQ o U ^3- <ur XX CO CO CD CJuD CD CL CO CO 60)0 TO CO CUD 03 CO UCD XI 0Xco) TJ X0COJ CO =H Ua3 tCo. tao & CO xC>0| XCD! tCoD X T3 CU0O) CQtJ X tco 3 CO (U6cCcD0 00 C 00 c oc (ft 5 2QJ lu 3. UJ a. X 00 nc u aCi 0 u7i CO c o CD H x 2a3 uC<d0 X H < i < hH 2 r--1 CcuO 3 *UQCH) 0 0J C H w CO oCa' u u: UJ H C CO 3oCD o CX CL X ncn 11 jcO a) a a0 n <3 u cc de Hox- VrP C0 *H 4J Cft Cft 333 3 CD fc 2 O! u j_) OC 0C) c E> H ClI u> *H CO CD X Ua3J 6 4cH-1 co 0) X rH CO H XXJ (ft 3 X Mc OH c rH E UJ UCOi CD rH <U rH, 3; c mj CO u *H jCD X H CD < toMo (ft h3;| MM **3 Nc, oH, U> 3' M<Cm vO sr r^ X No CD PC CO p< U(HfJt U3Ui H U rHl oc H u> CO rH CO 2C:i 2cOi1 (C3ft (ft CD Q u1. CO 2 cZ ao: X c/r. u o /U u 7 0--J) q xX CO cn ss O m On O' CN \0 CN Sn >' > S CO 2 CO s sCO sC( 1 KoN| r*i1 o> CN "ns. <T| <r s CN > CO 2 <..j r--i <3 >> CO CO 22 2CO1 . __ . o o>H n V*-* m - uQ r<r ll <T ^33 a..-v'Z* v JJ --I D D J Z r> / / n Z 3 j j BROYLES. AIIEBAUG H & D A V IS f C./PRINT ADVERTISING SCHEDULE w & ^c < 3 r*, Cn C c -J-r--J y -- o J -/";rN V uo. o n j-. z y. CO QJ *n Jz 0 K u 4-J QJ u 4-J TO; TO c <U| H *H CO y-t o3 o a> 05 05 y Q \D p- 00 / |1! a -J <T < r- r- w y y~ o -- -- -- -- < -- _X X X Ct -- w C" 3 *-> w3 <-0 CO U \ CJ CJ < -O' t: T3 TO TO <u 0) OJ ti H TO cJ a Cu in in CO j Hi D 34 U Vu H u 'ZL u a; aJl r- a; Cl) I c3 0 H X "| U u V-- U-3 p-' ! *" ! rf-OJi u U)[ 4-1; l/T J 1 o\ D: 3! ! "l `"O1 T)| c! C' C! H, --I1 M| /; . 1 r--11 I x i --m " _ ] H l `T1 ooi 2; - x V* cm - - 1 c. --! r' i <T -! i -/ \ i*-* r 4 m AD COST w _____ _ _________ SUBIECT OR HEADLINE <T CM *CN LLi D CU C3 j-] o z -O 2 --J > /-s -: < '-- V ^ -- r^ ^ " Z > 2 z lu I w " H W C *h O ^ cj -Q E <u oOj P a G " TCO5 X--1 tt POSITION AD NO. COLOR s_^ D < 1--3, < -o ai >D "* M 22 *~) w hJ Mp 1 PUBLICATION ^ 7i V) 1 < *") ' z K XG AD SIZE KEY NO. i 1 n il 74-3R TIMA 1 4-1 QJ (fl <D P c r af CO - 1 -- -- 1 <r r> M 2 -- ---- B&W 1 X PQ -- 0> oc CO p Next to ASHRAE a rtic le MARINE ENGINEERING/ | Page LOG . M arine C ataloe 1 Buyers Guide 1 ASHRAE JOURNAL I c joC u CO rfl --- -- -- m <N ... - i . -- - - -- - ' - -- -- - - -- _.. _ . D U LTi U (/ LO CSS UJ q h z Cf. V X- > < /-s c (-D UJ c W I s> u P. LO c o 3 U in Q uu U Z ' in > <3 U 3 < C2 UJ to UJ u o> CP w O r-* c o 1--4 > (U _pc _. _. AJ o _t U <T <U <--4 CL 60 1 03 ft iO tO|CO Oh o CM 1o Z to O -c u rr 1 X 60 rH 3 --S* < f" -1-- VD 01 r-H M1 rei m Cl 4- * < U r--4 00 t 3 ft to *"3 A- r- -- -- ._. ~ . sO o a) 1--H o in 60 tO 60 1 \n * 3 ft to so t-- <T^ CL *u Cn ct 1 o >s GJ >H . 2 CO rH iO U i c 3 \ CL iOl O *0 sO C/3, . vO o f--< X Po ft oX c 03 ft m 01 u1 p to LO - a. rH \D H OJ --4 u >-H WJ | P1-^ ft to <; m Pm to iH C ft O [ 03 PC *H *H ft f-* U 4-1 u 0) -H U ft u U1 0) i-H 2 "*. B. ~3- E3 (SI to E to 0C CJ M rs o o 1 to H CN T3 rH rH 0 4-4 o QJ CN o to U to 4l | to a ft: sC sO r-H < m O * o Qo *0 o u u to ft a) DJ i ft tO PC ro Z CN Pm r-> nj H Jh 4J to 3 TJ C M 1- 1 -13 a; re o> LO o c --^ H 1 ft rj B. *n 10 ; . _ ... _. - _ ___ .. ... - - * U CL tO a> to 00 SP CJ rH! 61 i ! ft to pH r- CN O C in (Nl SO -H 3 to ft CO dJ r-H O <- 60 to H l ! to 3 a to sD rH < r^- to r>- CN CN ^H 1 rH H CN * " CN o --4 <r 1 CO H CN - - ' ... -- * UJ 0) l-H G to 61 1 3 ft to "J to CL r*> __ .... _ CN . 1o 2 co o ro u rH . ,r. _ _ T3 ft CN CN CJ r--4 1o 2 to U 1 U CO ft Ns P LO M ro 2 <r CO h- H CN - -' --- * CN \o O CO M 00 H *<r CN 1 to z r^. o r>u r-H T3 PC * ft o Q> to U i CJ Ph **J Uh to O D CO w5 o PC ro *H 3o CO IO co hH ro - ---- - -- Q. CL, M- */ / - SL _ s-'' z -- - - w" " s' i r - - / n l-H t> 2 | to z rr! 'o z "0 M 02 ,. / H oj ,-J J / G> Z i-- *- O -l _. Z CO L D2 u W V r X CN / o z C3 M Mo Cm t--1 HH H CL HH p / c2 i' o hH i f< v*-' U) h-i :n < - ; / s z -_c J X r. 2 z --f / - - KJ V r? a. _v r . 1, / C' - / 1c 1 < .X " l) ro o 2 M PC /w UJ M2 - U M UJ o "j b 2 ' to UJ / r * X ; <y ij CN 1 w V W r: C- w c o p-( tz r-t D O UJ X u l/l < Q UJ 5 u z i O X o D < 3fl < i/T 0 as cs G rj o rs i! : O n CNJ rsi p> in O CSJ LO m <r *-- * -- <x> cs CSI 7031 4-)! 01: CO T5 3' u w H O fc -j 4C H O H <0 r~H o *ev3 DO P- to 0) H u o u rUj Uh 0) Crf D D LU X u LD LU u z ' to c3 X u D < lo LU >o Crf 0 o , pH Crf 00 u '"S u -er' 0) ^1 DN Q rH to c > 0o 2f --t CM T) erf PC co a pH u1 a <X to r- u CD 4o 4-. id a> erf . kju U 0); --i CD Q ru erf pH CN . u CD 00 PH Crf \ pHj ko CN CD CN i 4-1 <r >1^- oo l l 0J CJN o O cd> in frf 2 pH Ph r- v> m 2 CN m cn s V pH CN -- -tJ if) 5 vr: 1 4 J >- ( v lV * (V p-- CN -T pH 0. CN > > 00 1 o o CD IT 2 P" iX r-N TD 2 o DC pH 3 -x^ CD oc 0) pH u1 a -3 < r- to tj; k ra oo 0) O a pH c 3 *-x^ u1 a -3 n LO CO r-x vrO- o> __ _.. T3 erf --t CD 00 4 o CD p-H u; ph 4 | `o-1-- Oi<r < to r-* -- -- r~) pH pH u <o 0) CN Crf C4 00 t 0) CD in CO 00 erf r-- U CD uo tu 0) cr. b; tr\ pH rH J --H 3 n pH 0) r*4 00 I CD m pu 1--4 U CN "O cs CD U o 0) CD CO a) pH 4-t <r c n u 1 CD cr* 3 Crf erf sO co;r^ +: >aCN pH CD CN >> v> 00 1 CD CD m z m PH r- u CD uo 4-< >7 a; cr erf f-H - *3 crf pH <D 00 CN 0) r--< u rH 1 CD x. Crf'J- 2 CN j tO N On QJ ph 4J in U 1 u cd m o <J\ (X N m iD cn s *'<r | pH CN _ *H Mo CD O 2 00 so H J r- <r 0) c^ O- p-t 00 1 a '-H CD in to 00 A. r- ON CD pH 0( m 00 1 *3 CD m < r-- Crf m iO m > ON D pH rH m 00 t ' pH 3 -s CD m 2 CN n i> Crf r-. o u -cr cd u CO 0) ON 0) pH IM o c m 00 <u \D 3 CD m K cn n m 2 n. , C H a: o CD o z 00 i e H * Uo CD cn 2 00 JC -3" CN c H o cd: o z 00 <r a 1r a CN c CN 00 1 o^ a m m a, r- m vO cn g <r pH anU CN ON q; PHI >- m oc 11 CD CD m z -7 Crf r- ... *K r- c CN 1" u o > , CN CD -3- CT 2 oo hh <3^ -3* a CN 00 I CT m Crf r- rH ON H 0> pH U pH 00 | 0. CD m < cn Crf --- c H Uo CD o 2 oo --- V CD uO 4H oo 0) CO erf m "0 erf to CD oo <d H p o pH 0) --i ui u 0) \ Cu <T u0 4 to r-. u u CD Uo U-4 in 0 pH erf CN i cud lW 0) Crf 1 I r-H -- -- -- a c- ; . o ~l c 7 / I )c TD Crf m rH CD CO m 0) pH c rf 1 CD CN Crf< to r> u CD uo 4H CO <y erf 0cn0 ---- ---- - - -- - -- / _ c V C 7 /' X ^ ) ! r- *c . - c > -1 -1 s >r 7 _ - ./ 7' rf/ - L> r i; p" U y c Lr -~ u </. < . o C2 o ow 2 Crf M 4C-D1 iJ H W w Crf 14 a> TJ 2 W U b-4 2 -J i uM < i 00 2 o H wc W 2 / :S C5 H2 to M i - OO 31 < X 2W tH / C--MH C3 H *-c: O 3 ! 2T ' o c. r. o-Hs V. r-, i x . in pH / w <rCi 1M Crf o 't <Ss4 O pJ - i < W 'H k2 H H 1 Crf o oni1 S^i, o o; o ^-J on CM! T3 Crf cd oo 54 3C< aM> HI O-H *-> w H d m (0 oq *3 d M (X H a ^ c/) rf 2 OO CQ 2 P t-t it (/} Ui t/1 O UJ b: u QO a: 22 0)1 -H d--o1 DO | 0) CDi sO 1/3 Crf r- 0 *o 4-J 40 <D m erf m 0 <0 , w 4-1 sD Q> H erf H O 2 t-t Orf 3 2 O / r> crf o M 14 14 p-- sO O < r^* o u On Crf pH Crf 0) t-- OC u CD *< cc Crf / pH rn u Q. CO <U > *H OJ u CP o JZ uu Jo u 0) < c D Q UJ X u t-T) < Q 5 U z t-n Q c*(5 X O X < cc LO Ui CO O Qj H CO O U 0 (0 4-f 0), PC 1 < | GO'40 * iPn i I /-- Q pH M m i[ CO PQ, CN (N1 U3 4A r-> td 52 M > Pi PS so H U VC> ON 0) I ool (0 Ph j 5S O pi Oo z Su O >-) Hu U t-u wH PC CO OJ 60l CO A* m o r^ m \D <r r-. LO 0^ cx r>_. IO 10 loo 1^ sD i lu"1 'tTi m o <r loo iO iCTs :GO Iro 'm CO Q -3 H < H O W| H H > 4-J 1 < * yi, J CD H p *U M Suhicrl . j Com I, i" I [ . . . . . . . ]' j 1 "I I B7}PnTffT 12?.012.44) :' (Rudrcted: oi I -BROYLES, ALLEBAUGH & DAVIS, IN C ./M ED IA SCHEDULE vO r** -- *3* O > 0) Pi X o -to P < c --* -- 0J m 0 0 i 3 ra m < p- Cm X TO p- r - CLI 4-> ON A, 1 oV a ON LG Pv P H LG <41-1 m ON 0 sO H , ft 'O CO P^ m u i >o o A <T z --i LG 00 CM o 5* p- fot p~) m t j *3 . CO p^i 4-> Dm 0) V <nr, 0* ***^. LG 00 CX LG m tfot C0O0 c m XE cc CO o c*- TS a C0O) p- 0 Vi n tao X 2w o o^p3-- cm mCMt o> c 3 o CM m T3 Ps C0O) V 1 <p-r to LG SO O*--n1 *-) X o SO CO q; 1 p^ Q Pi CO "o"-No. MT M1 O0G- -3 O -- -- -- * - cH UaJ. to CG ft "G V Vi i-H QJ oc m i Uh1 m On <to-c"n- 0 in (Mr- 3 sO H TO CO >rH m a> p*- Vl 3 rG sO a CG <pr- 00 CM wX sPOm om ft n u- Xwo oc or>z 00 ft o CM sO Pm in -X co ft m 3" v QtoJ Ps VCU<T1 LG i P- - fftt ") m Xft CO oo om .. _ .. --_ __ . B ._ X T3 P^ <r SO Vi CO --pj^ CO QJ V MP1T- ! a ft CM LG Tft- z ft o 00 o ON m X a V CO ft m CM o CO QVJ p* 1 a LG Mp-r y* mr-H ft CM oM X H to CM LG r--i T> co n o X(D, a> 60' m1 CO ft pin*. | O m 0/ P- in 3 H o00 to Q> A- r--4 ACX' LG ^P3*1-. 00 Xo ft ON om wos 1 cEo h. cn 4) in U CM CO to m p* " I B toH LG 1o 4-4 o 3 00 H i-H - - X ft n -- - -- -- -- -- --- -- -- to Mex a/<. aL,/ I1 o 7. d __ L> i. w -- u Ui I < ft ft M >/, c u -1 > - // s V * A: ^/l LtS. <L 7 - u a- v*cf ___ c L \S. 1 L0 a: foMt ,z w LG soc ft w to ft ft '") H h-/ <s J -H <V to ' r to p; i O< A -- * UJ 7 h fU ti' 1 1> o u LG M - to M ft ft ft '* ft w fMt H is' cn <C H O H / ft r 33 <* ^ ) h :: .m ICO jco |cn 00 CM s> pcn m |m i co ,oo ,n I \ I I^ ON vO I CO CM sO CO CM 00 o to o cc i L--UI D G LU X u Ln < Q LU 0 z > X o D < :a < L/T- > o *y Cfi 'Vr--O-. o -o 003/ > U |vD t U gj U O.1 pc O :00 :co jz u o I'D. I cc 1 . TO : o> rs U|V g; o II VC-- ' <I P -< ico W0 it*o-1 o H1--1 ,CN I- T 00 Tk3 M<9. 4Jf <630!r^ w; 3 o 60 CN < ra'i u. 4-L to r BROYLES, ALLEBAUGH & V A V IS , IN C ./M E D IA SCHEDULE AHS, pg. W Bo 4wJ CO 00 PH i--i *V sPrcfl <II PP* ill-": 1 `V oM H I to 3WZ jg o u>zo < u I- > wii \ o2 uzPwC M 22 M <d < 2P 0 2 TcG3aJ PP^J wHO cpo Xw. a p* LO O 5? o< 'V 0Q3J Vh cao 'V utu0ao) o S3 Oh MM o*"> T3 QJ 0 aw QaJ 6<u to p to 'V u cuQ 4toJ 1 o2: M MO Oh h-i PM MH ^yMo PyoUi H< es wm sc < "O tH 03 O aw zu M o<c Pz0 o|l P*uwpY M u1 UJ pH to to of w! 21 vO r<r o 5 4= CO 4J ao m X< Z> Q UJ X U to a UJ u z vO rcr\ to Q <3 I U D < ea r*. -<! | *!vO to UJ > o CO pQl 00' CPIN| " CD \I nl-r M pi O <O Pu <O M a> Oii / 0 *1 M a> J.-4 - u. pi O col V U v> p.1 '< o P< m CN I .00 00 o t"I b o cr. w uae> to * >> 00 uo J < oo HC O -H H H 'O ^c t-l 03 oc s: r? .. `: S H V T / : aiA 3aiiy in :. ' * * IV I i