Document Yrn2Xmy3dvZwrNrO9XwRMOMLk
FILE NAME Kaiser Gypsum KG
DA 197T 3 NoE v 19
DOC KG101
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Report - Evaluation of Exposure to Asbestos During
Mixing and Sanding of JointCompounds
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SPECIALISTS
SOUTHFIELD MICHIGAN 48075
EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS DURING MIXING AND SANDING OF JOINT COMPOUNDS GYPSUM ASSOCIATION Denver Colorado
November 19 1973
GP032
1 96
EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS DURING MIXING AND SANDING OF JOINT COMPOUNDS
GYPSUM ASSOCIATION
Denver Colorado
INTRODUCTION
The Gypsum
conduct an
Association Stained George D. industrial hygiene survey at a
Clayton and Associates to
test site located in Den-
ver Colorado centrations of
The purpose of the survey airborne asbestos to which
was to determine the
workers were exposed
con-
dur-
ing mixing
results in
and sanding of joint cement compounds and to interpret the terms of potential health hazards with particular refer
ence to regulations promulgated Safety and Health Act of 1970. 19 1973 by Mr. Robert D. Soule
under authority of the Occupational
This study was conducted -- --November
of Clayton and Associates
Results
of that study are reported herein
BACKGROUND
The Gypsum Association located Illinois is & trade association
at 1603 Orrington Avenue in Evansto which represents ten to fifteen in
dustrial companies which are engaged in the manufacture of products
incorporating gypsum or gypsum materials
As with most indus-
trial concerns the activities of the Gypsum Association have become
more broad with the passage and implementation of federal regulations
such as the Metal and Metallic Mine Safety Act and the Occupa
tional Safety and Health Act
Technical committees composed of ber-
sonnel from companie comprising the Gypsum Association have been es
tablished with particular interest in the occupational safety and
health field
Of particular concern in this respect was the poten-
tial hazard associated with exposu of workers to airborne asbestos
during mixing and sanding of compounds used to seal cracks and joints
formed during installation of wallboard material
Although the Spe
cific formulations used by the various comp manufacturing and
supplying the joint compound vary is all of them incorporate asbestos in the
understood that
product whether
essentially as a dry.com dry.com
pound or a ready product
In order to evaluate the exposure of workers to asbestos during han-
dling and use of the
decided to undertake
joint compound
a test program
products the Gypsum
during which several
Association
products
would be mixed and sanded
George D.
tained to collect and analyze samples
Clayton and
which would
Associates was rerepresent the ex-
posure of workers
November 19 1973 Townhouses which
engaged in the study
The tests were performed on
in a development of townhouses known as King's Mill
were under construction in a suburban area north of
Denver Colorado
POTENTIAL WITH
HEALTH HAZARD ASSOCIATED EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS
Asbestos is a generic term referring to various mineral silicates The types used most widely in industrial applications include chrysotile OF white asbestos a hydrated magnesium silicate site
or grey asbestos an iron magnesium silicate crocidolite or
blue asbestos a sodium iron silicate tremolite a calcium mag-
nesium silicate and anthophyllite another iron magnesium sili-
cate
Of these chrysotile accounts for over 90 percent of the
total usage of asbestos in this Country with amosite and Crocido
lite being the only other types used to any significant extent
Asbestos exists naturally in bundles of extremely fine fibers which
can be subdivided easily into many smaller fibers
The potential
health hazard associated with exposure to estos is that of inhala-
tion of airbor fibers resulting in a type of pneumoconiosis Referred
to as asbestosis
Small asbestos fibers can pass readily through
the upper respiratory tract and be deposited in the terminal bronchi-
oles of the lung
There they produce a local irritation which the
body attempts to overcome by initiating a tissue response resulting
in the encapsulation of the fibers and consequent formation of as
bestos bodies
If sufficient quantities of fibers are inhal over
an extended period of time a generalized diffuse peribronchiolar
fibrosis can develop
This pulmonary fibrosis can impair the trans
fer of oxygen across the aveolar membranes and result in ratory
insufficiencies or even cardiac failure
It has been determined
through toxicological and epidemiological studies that long fibers
20 to 50 micrometers in length are most active in the production of
the fibrosis
Fibers shorter than about two micrometers in length
are practically without an irritating effect
There is some evidence
that other minerals having fibrous teristics can produce simi
lar reactions
Many recent studies have indicated an tion between exp
to asbestos in both industrial and urban atmospheres and an increase
in a relatively rare type of lung cancer known as mesothelioma
Al-
though it has not been possible to establish a ction with asbes
tos in all cases of this disease there is a strong correlation e
tween exposure to crocidolite and Occurrence of mesotheliomas
Other
types ever
of asbestos have been this new hazard has
implicated to
received much
a much
public
lesser extent
How-
attention because
it has been suggested that very minimal occupational expos
can be sufficient to produce the disease in some individuals
For many years the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists has recommended a threshold limit value TLV of five miilion particles per cubic foot of air mppcf for all types of asbesbearing dusts containing less than one percent alline silica
The threshold limit value is efined as the concentration of an air
borne contaminant to which it is believed that nearly all workers can
be exposed for continuous and epeated work days without experienc
adverse effects
The TLV of five appof was based on the impinger sam-
pling technique which Was selected as the standard method in the ly
epidemiological studies of occupational exposure to asbestos *
this method air is drawn through an impinger containing water and
the total particles
both grains and fibers in an aliquot of the
sample counted using field microscopic techniques
Within recent years because of the increasing concern about asbes
in the environment and the resulting need for a more relevant sam-
pling method the American Conference of Governmental IndustriIandustlrial
Hygienists has proposed a TLV of five fibers greater than five mic
meters in length per cubic centimeter of air
This standard is based based
on the membrane filter technique with actual microscopic fiber count-
ing at 400-450x magnification using phase contrast illumination
The Occupational
lished the above
Safety and Health Administration OSHA has estab concentration five fibers greater than five micro-
meters in length per cubic centimeter of air as an emergency stand
ard and have announced that effective July 1 1976 the acceptable
limit for an eight weighted average exposure will be re-
duced to two fibers
In addition OSHA has established the con
centration of ten fibers greater than five micrometers in length
per cubic centimeter Workers shall not be
of air a an accept ceiling concentration exposed to rations of asbestos in excess
of this value regardless of duration of exposure
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
The air sampling conducted to evaluate exposures of Workers to asbes-
tos was all of the breathing zone type
These samples were col-
lected by drawing air through mm diameter membrane filters Milli
pore Type AA at operated
a rate of about two liters per minute using small pumps Mine Safety Appliances Company Model G The
sampling units were worn by the workers engaged in either mixing Or
sanding the joint compound the pump was attached to the belt and
the sampler head fastened on the outside of the worker's shirt at
approximate breathing zone height
Thus these samples were repre
sentative of the weighted average conditions to which the ---- --
were exposed during the sampling period The sampling head consisted of a three piece cassette Millipore during sampling the face cap was removed and the filter was used in an open face mode with the
filter positioned slightly downward so as to minimize dust fall
directly onto the filter
Sampling was conducted for the entire duration of the mixing oper tions but because of the higher anticipated concentrations associ
ated with sanding of the joint compounds it was decided to change
filters approximately every ten minutes
Sampling during the sand-
ing on the various joint compounds was conducted over a total perio
of sixty minutes
Therefore six consecutive minute samples were
obtained for each sanding test
In addition to the minute test
les were collected over minute periods as well e two
consecutive minute samples for each sanding test
After collec
tion of each sample the filter cap was replaced and the casset ----
sampler head was sealed immediately and prepared for transfer to the
analytical laboratory
The method of counting asbestos fibers was essentially the same as
that used by the U.S. Public Health Service for the enumeration of
asbestos dust on membrane filters
The description of this method
6P032 first appeared in an article written by G.H. Edwards and J.R.
and appeared in the Annals of Occupational Hygiene Volume 2 1-6 1968
Lynch
pages
19
In summary the method consisted of the following ste
A shaped section of each sample was mounted on a standard
microscope slide using a high viscosity solution of membrane
filter in a 1 mixture of diethyl oxalate and dimethyl phtha-
late to render the filter transparent
The asbestos Fibers
which were on the surface of the filter were then counted usin
a 10X eyepiece and a 40X objective with phase contrast illumina-
tion
A number of fields
ficient to reveal a
selected at random across the sample suf-
minimum of 100 fibers were examined and
fibers greater than five micrometers in length were counted
Any particle having an aspect ratio of three or greater was con
sidered to be a fiber
Although it was conceivable that there
would be fibers of paper or other materials present -- --the fil
ters which would have been dislodged from the wallboard during
the sanding operation it did not appear that these were of any
adverse consequence during the analysis of the samples Although
it is realized that the counting technique is not specific in
terms of being able to identify the chemical ----
--,of --the fibers
present in the sample all of the fibers observed in these sam-
ples appeared
tos fibers
to have
physical
features
characteristic
of asbes-
For those samples collected over a minute period and which were too heavily loaded to evaluate directly under the microscope the collected material on the filters was dislodged in a highly purified distilled water bath using an ultrasonic unit Dynasonic Corporation Model G6 generator and Model 16 tank and diluted to one liter An aliquot of the resulting suspension was drawn passed through a membrane filter Millipore Type HA and was then analyzed according to the cecure
described above
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A total of four joint compound products were used during this study
These products two dry
two manufacturers whose
mix and two ready mix were supplied by identities were not known to the investiga-
tor The products were number referring to the
identified by code 2D supplier and the letter
2R 4D and indicating
4R a
whether
the product was a dry or ready compound
The results of the sampling program conducted the two dry mix products and sanding tests on pounds are presented in Tables I through IV data reveals following
during the mixing of all four joint Com
Examination of these
1 During mixing of Joint Compound 2D the worker was exposed to a concentration of 31.4 fibers greater than five cicremeters in length per cubic centimeter of air
sand-
2
The amount of total particulate generated during the sand-
ing operation on Joint Compound 2D was so great that e
analysis of the minute samples was not possible
Anal-
ysis of the minute samples which were redeposited
indicated an average concentration of 39.4 fibers greater
than five micrometers in lengtph er cubic timeter f air
The results of analyzing four of the six minute samples
collected during sanding on Joint Compound 2R indicated an
average concentration of 4.2 fibers per cubic centimeter
two of the samples were too heavily loaded to analyze di-
rectly
Results of analysis of the two minute sam-
ples collected during the sanding on Joint Compound 2R indi-
cated an average concentration of 11.1 fibers per cubic cen-
timeter a factor of over 2.5 times as high as the average
obtained from analysis of the minute samples
The sample obtained during the mixing of Joint Compound 4D indicated a concentration of 7.6 fibers greater than five micrometers in length per cubic centimeter of air
Results of analyzing four of the six minute sample collected during the sanding on Joint Compound 4D indicated an
average concentration of 4.4 fibers per cubic centimeter
Analysis of the two minute samples which were subjected to the redepositing procedure indicated an average
concentration of 14 fibers Per cubic centimeter a factor of 3 times as high as results obtained from the minute samples
The results of analysis of five of the six samples obtained
during the sanding on Joint Compound 4R indicated an aver-
age concentration of 10.8 fibers per cubic centimeter
Re-
sults of analysis of the two minute samples indicated
an average concentration of 9.7 fibers per cubic centimeter
a value essentially the same as that obtained from analysis
of the minute samples
Six of the thirteen minute samples obtained during sand-
ing on
excess
the four joint of five fibers
compounds
per cubic
indicated concentrations in
centimeter
Both mixing
operations generated asbestos concentrations in excess of
five fibers per cubic centimeter
Two of the thirteen minute samples collected during the
sanding tests indicated concentrations in excess of ten fibers per cubic centimeter the acceptable ceiling concen
tration
One
bestos
of the two mixing operations generated an
concentration in excess of ten fibers per
as
cubic
centimeter
Of the four products tested sanding on 2R and 4D resulted
in concentrations less than but approaching the current acceptable limit for continuous exposure of workers five
fibers per cubic centimeter
Product 4R consistently pro-
GPO32 duced very high ntrations of total
the asbestos fibers on the samples
dust
which
obscured
1701
CONCLUSIONS
The and
following conclusions are presented on the basis of
measurements made during the study reported herein
observations
1
Based on the results of the minute samples it is appar
ent that the exposures of workers engaged in mixing and sand-
ing of the various joint compounds used during this test would
be to concentrations approaching or exceeding five fibers
greater than five micrometers in length per cubic centimeter
of air
:
2
It is clear that persons engaged in the mixing and anding of
joint compounds similar to those used during this test would
be exposed to concentrations of airborne asbestos in excess
of two fibers per cubic centimeter during the entire Course
of their work
This value is the proposed acceptable limit
for an eight weighted average exposure to asbestos
which is scheduled to become effective July 1 1976
3
With the exception of the tests conducted during sanding on
joint compound 4R the results of analysis of the thirty
ute samples using the redeposition technique were consist-
ently higher than those obtained by direct analysis of the
minute samples by a factor of 2-1 to 3-1 Therefore
it appears that use of the redeposition technique would re-
sult in the apparent concentrations of asbestos in air being
higher than actually present and would therefore err on the
conservative side
4
Discounting the results obtained by analysis of the thirty-
minute samples for which the redeposition technique was
used three of the samples collected mixing of 2D and sand-
ing on 4R indicated concentrations in excess of ten fibers
per cubic centimeter and are thereforea concern as
exposures
With those exceptions the problem is --
peak
----of
con-
trolling the weighted average exposures of workers to
asbestos
In that respect it must be pointed out that the
sampling results reported herein are indicative of the exposures of Workers during the mixing or sanding operations and not their weighted average exposure for a full workday
RECOMMENDATIONS
1 The results of sampling reported herein should be analyzed i
conjunction with a study of the work practices and routine of
persons engaged in mixing sanding or otherwise being exposed
to joint compounds similar to those used in this study
In
way a true evaluation of the weighted average exposure
this of
such workers to asbestos can be made
If it is true that as
reported by workers used
for an individual to mix
during this test it or sand on the joint
would be unlikely compounds for
greater than two hours per workday then the weighted ave
age exposure of such Workers to asbestos likely would be wi
acceptable limits
Of course the problem of controlling any
exposures to below ten fibers have to be contended with
per
cubic
centimeter would
still
2 From the standpoint of being able to eliminate or minimize the problem of excessive concentrations of asbestos being generated by handling and use of the joint compounds consideration should be given to the following aspects
a.
The most effective means of eliminating the asbestos prob-
lem obviously would be to eliminate asbestos from the joint
compound formulations if this is feasible Although the specific role that asbestos plays in the joint compound formu
lations is not clear it is unders that manufacturers of
joint compounds consider it ary that asbestos be in the
formulations
b
From an engineering standpoint it may be necessary to imple
ment the following measures in conjunction with mixing and
sanding of the joint compounds containing asbestos
1
Mixing of the joint compounds could be done in such a
way that the material is more effectively wetted as it
is removed from the containers 10 could be done within
an 0
enclosure with or
as to minimize the
without mechanical amount of asbestos
ventilation
fibers released
into the breathing zone of the workers
~
11.
Although
indicate
the results of concentrations
the air sampling reported herein
of asbestos fibers in excess of
acceptable limits either those currently enforced or those proposed to be made effective in July 1976 it was obvious during the study that the sanding process in general has associated with it exposure of the worker to
tremendously high concentrations of total dust
There
fore if means were implemented to maintain the exposure
of the workers to total particulate to within accepta
limits there would be an inherent control of the asbestos
problem as well
Although more extensive in nature en-
gineering control of the total dust generated by the sand-
ing operations is feasible Such control techniques would
'. include but not technique and
be limited to the use ofa wet
use of a portable local exhaust
sanding
ventila-
tion system incorporating as the air moving device a
unit similar to common industrial vacuum cleaners and bag
collectors
3
The next phase of the testing program to control workers expo
sures to asbestos during use of the joint cement compounds logi
cally would be evaluations of the various potential engineering
control concepts indicated or inferred above
This report prepared by
rae) /
aon
!
.
ads.
GP032
Robert D. Soule P.E.
President Industrial Hygiene Services
1203
Client Gypaum Association
TABLE I
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SAMPLING SUMMARY
Material
GP03 1204
AsbestoB
1973
Date Sample
JOINT COMPOUND 2D
a
Description
19 | 2D
Mixing of compounbd
11/19 2D Sanding on compouncd
19 2D | Sanding on compouncd
11/19 2D | Sanding on compouncd
11/19 2D | Sanding on compouncd
19 J 2D Sanding on compound c
11/19 2D | Sanding on compouncd
19 2D Sanding on compound c
19
2D
|
Sanding on compouncd
Sampling
Period
Sample Weight
Start | Stop
Sample
Concentration
Volume / Fibers
Liters ...m
09:28 11:57 12:07
12:17 | +
12:27 12:57 12:37
13
31.4
60
35.2
-
*
-
*
-
*
60
43.6 **
-
*
12:37 12:47
12:57
-
*
-
*
a All samples were obtained in the breathing zone of the workers
b Mixing of Compound 2D was done by Mr. Harold McDowell in King's Mill
Townhouse Unit 81
.
.
c Sanding of Compound 2D was done by Mr. James Pasquariello in King's Mill
Townhouse Unit 77 Psychrometric conditions in 77 at 11:45 were 56 dry bulb 41 wet bulb 22 relative humidity
too heavily loaded for direct analysiu
material on filter was taken into suspension and an aliquot
redeposited for analysistaken
TABLE II
Client
_
1973 Date
Gypaum Association
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SAMPLING SUMMARY
Material
GP032 1205 Asbesto8
Sample
JOINT COMPOUND R
a
Description
Sampling
Period
Sample
Weight
Start | Stop
Sample
Volume
Concentration Fibers
Liters 5 m
19 | 2R | Sanding compounbd
19 2R | Sanding compounbd
1/19 | 2R
Sanding
b compound
11/19 2R | Sanding compounbd
11/19 2R | Sanding compounbd
11/19 2R | Sanding compounbd
11/19 | 2R Sanding compound b
11/19 | 2R | Sanding compounbd
16:18 15:58 15:58 16:18 16:48 16:28 16:38 16:48
60
20 20 .
20
60 20 20 20
12.3 ** 4.5 4.2 4.1 9.9
*
3.8
*
a All samples were obtained in the breathing zone of the workers
in b Sanding of Compound 2R was done by Mr. David Potter in King's Mill
Townhouse Unit 79 Psychrometric conditions 79 at 15:45 were 39 dry bulb 35 wet bulb 66 relative humidity
* too heavily loaded for direct analysis ** material on filter W88 taken into auspension and an aliquot
redeposited for analysis
Client
_
1973
Date
Gypsum Association
TABLE III GEORGE D.'CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
INDUSTRIAl hygiene SAMPLING SUMMARY
Material
GP03 1206 Asbesto8
8ample
JOINT COMPOUND 4D
a
Discription
Sampling Sample Period = Weight
Start | Stop
Sample
Volume
Concentration Fibers
Liters ...m
11/19 | 4D
Mixing compound b
11/19 | 4D | Sanding compouncd 19 | 4D | Sanding compouncd
11/19 | 4D Sanding compound c
11/19 | 4D | Sanding compouncd 11/19 | 4D | Sanding compouncd
1/19 | 4D Sanding compound c
11/19 | 4D Sanding compound c 11/19 | 4D | Sanding compouncd
09:09 09:17 10:20 10:50 10:20 10:29 10:29 10:40 10:40 10:50
_ | 10:50 11:00
10:50 11:20
11:00 11:00 11:10 11:10 11:20
14 4
7.6
60.0
15.5
18.0
5.2
22.0
*
20.0
3.7
20.0 60.0 20.0
4.1
14.
*
20.0
4.7
m All samples were obtained in the breathing zone of the workers
b Mixing of Compound 4D was done by Mr. Harold McDowell in King's Mill
Townhouse Unit 80
;
c Sanding of Compound 4D was done by Mr. James Pasquariello in King's Mill
Townhouse Unit 76 Psychrometric conditions dry and wet bulb tempera
tures were not recorded
* too heavily loaded for direct analysis ** material on filter Waa taken into suspension and an aliquot
redeposited for analysis
Client
[
1973 Date
Gypsum Association
TABLE IV GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SAMPLING SUMMARY
Material
GP032 1207
Asbestos
Sample
JOINT COMPOUND 4R
Description
Sampling Sample Sample
Period Weight | Volume
Concentration Fibers
Start | Stop
Liters 5...m
11/19 | 4R Sanding compounbd
11/19 | 4R | Sanding compounbd 11/19 | 4R | Sanding compounbd 11/19 | 4R | Sanding compounbd
19 | 4R | Sanding compounbd 1/19 | 4R | Sanding compounbd
11/19 | 4R | Sanding compounbd
11/19 4R Sanding compounbd
14:31 15:01 14:31 14:41 14:41 14:51 14:51 15:01 15:01 15:31 15:01 15:11 15:11 VOID 15:18 15:31
60.0 20.0
11.3 ** 6.3
20.0
7.5
20.0
19.9
60.0
8.1 **
20.0
5.3
-
-
26.0
15.0
a All samples were obtained in the breathing zone of the workers
b Sanding of Compound 4R was done by Mr. David Potter in
Townhouse Unit 78
King's Mill
44
Psychrometric conditions'in 78 at 14:45 were
dry bulb 38 wet bulb 68 relative humidity
material ae
on filter was taken into suspension and an aliquot redeposited for analysis