Document Yjg38bkYz1Q5Ray1vL4VmzxKn

\'atu. e Vol. 261 May 20 1976 195 review article Short term screening tests for carcinogens Bryn A. Bridges * .fhere are now short term tests with a high predictive valuefor mammalian carcinogens Many of them are based on the ability to detect damage to DNA in bacteria or mammalian cells after metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes. Their introduction will enable provisional safety assessments to be made for the many thousands of industrial and environmental chemicals for which long-term animal testing cannot at present be considered. It has been estimated' that if one could totally abolish exposed to chemicals capable of giving rise to specific and human cancer it would add a mere two years to the average rather rare neoplasms. The classic case is soot which has lifespan. Most cancer sufferers are past retiring age so that been known for 200 years to produce scrotal cancer in industrial production would be little affected by the abolition young chimney sweeps*. More recent examples are of cancer. The fight against cancer must instead be justified 2-naphthylamine, vinyl chloride and asbestos which produce, in terms of the cost of hospital services and of basic respectively, rare cancers of the bladder, angiosarcomas of humanity; treatment of cancer, even when it is successful, the liver, and mesotheliomas of the lung cavity. The is a miserable process. When it fails, as it so often does, one problems involved in identifying two populations differing guilty of a double offence, not only the loss of the only in their exposure to one chemical are formidable and nt, but the imposition of heroic measures that them- are further compounded if the chemical gives rise not to s may cause considerable physical and mental suffering. specific and otherwise rare tumours, but to a variety of The International Agency for Research on Cancer holds common cancers. Population studies are thus likely to be it as a rule of thumb that around 80% of cancer has anof limited value in identifying environmental (as distinct environmental cause1 others would give a higher figure*. from occupational) carcinogens but they will be indispens The evidence is indirect, being based on differences in able in providing the basis for risk evaluation, particularly tumour incidence between genetically similar populations where dose-response data can be obtained. in different environments11 '. Even if this estimate is only The alternative is to screen chemicals to which man is approximately correct it leads ineluctably to the conclusion exposed. The generally accepted method of doing this is to that a substantial proportion of cancers, possibly a majority, carry out long term carcinogenicity tests with laboratory are in principle preventable. In past decades those mammals. Not only are those tests very demanding of responsible for the disbursement of cancer research funds resources but any extension of animal testing on such a have tended either to look for a breakthrough in the area of wide scale would be vigorously opposed by a number of curative treatments or to make a long term investment in animal welfare lobbies. In practice, it is inconceivable that basic biology in an attempt to understand the disease (or resources could be made available (either men, money or more properly diseases since "cancer" is but a general term mice) on the necessary scale to screen all the tens of for hundreds of different malignant conditions). Recently, thousands of substances to which humans are exposed. Of however, these two essentia! approaches have been comple necessity, therefore, testing with whole mammals will be mented by a third, the search for the specific environmental restricted to certain groups of suspect substances, for factors involved in carcinogenesis. example those suspect but already in use on a large scale, The nature of these environmental factors is not known or those substances which it is proposed to administer on a in detail, but it seems likely that many of them are man large scale, as food additives or cosmetics, for instance. made or natural chemicals. Even factors such as diet or If one is to screen for carcinogenic chemicals, therefore, stress may act indirectly by altering the metabolism of one must use short term tests with a high predictive value, chemicals in the gut or in the body itself. Of course, 1 propose to review a number of possible systems which identification of environmental carcinogens does not have been suggested in recent years. As will become necessarily lead to their removal but it does open the way to apparent, many of them are in fact systems for the detection control so that the risk that they present is no more than is of agents causing damage to DNA. Damage to DNA necessary when weighed against any benefits that they leading to heritable changes may be important to man not may give. only because of carcinogenicity but because it may cause most direct method of identifying environmental ci^Hbgens for man is based on population studies, but hereditary disease'-*. Moreover, DNA damage may con ceivably be involved in ageing and diseases associated with unrortunately it is expensive and seems to have rather low ageing'. I take it as self-evident that any agent likely to resolving power. Only a handful of chemicals are known damage the DNA of man, whether in somatic or germ cells, to be carcinogenic to man and most of these have been is potentially hazardous. detected following the study of workers occupationally Screening systems Address: MRC Cell Mutation Unit, University of Sussex, Falmer tnghton BN1 9QG, Sussex, UK The induction of cancer is but one aspect of long term toxicin and for the evaluation of such BOR 0 1 2 0 4 9 1% approach has been proposed" ". The first tier would consist of simple short term sub-mammalian tests with a high predictive value for the human effect ultimately of interest. As many substances as possible should be screened with these tests. Second-tier tests would be both short and long term, on mammals. Only selected, high priority substances would be screened by these tests in addition to the first-tier tests. Tests in the third tier are designed not to detect toxic agents but to evaluate as quantitatively as possible the hazards to man from agents shown to be potentially toxic. Only substances whose use or presence seems inescapable would be subject to the third tier of evaluation, the object of which would be to make a risk-benefit assessment and institute appropriate regulatory action. Tests in successive tiers show in principle increasing relevance to man but this is often accompanied by decreasing sensitivity and practicability. Not all of the sub-mammalian tests depend upon the postulated electrophilic nature of the active forms of carcinogens and in particular on their ability to react with DNA. Williams and Rabin1', for example, have proposed that substances might be screened using a test based on membrane-polysome association. They found that a number of carcinogens caused degranulation of rough endoplasmic reticulum (microsomal membranes) from male rat liver. This test has been further developed by Purchase and Lefevre" who have measured the loss of radioactive RNA from rough endoplasmic reticulum. Preliminary results (D. Anderson et al.. unpublished) with a large number of carcinogens and non-carcinogens indicate that the method predicts the activity of arylamines rather well (85% correct) although it is less successful with polycyclic hydrocarbons and direct acting alkylating agents. The necessity for metabolic activation of many carcino gens by microsomal enzymes prompted the suggestion of McPherson et al." that the specific in vitro enhancement of biphenyl 2-hydroxylation activity in rat liver microsome preparation might be used as a screening test. They found that of eight known carcinogens, all caused an increase of around 100% in such activity, four compounds whose carcinogenicity is in doubt gave lower but significant increases, and eleven non-carcinogenic compounds gave no significant increase. This test system, like that of degranu lation of ribosomes, is obviously promising and in need of a much more exhaustive validation on a scale similar to that used with some other systems. Metabolic activation There is a widespread belief among cancer workers that DNA damage is involved in the induction of cancer. That is the basis for the supposition that carcinogens might be detected by the consequences of DNA damage in simple systems. Two recent developments have enabled this possibility to be realised. First, it has become clear that many carcinogens are the products of metabolism of inactive chemicals by mixed function oxidases in the animal'1, and that preparations of liver microsomes can be used in vitro to carry out this metabolic activation"'". Second, ultra sensitive bacterial systems, usually involving strains deficient in DNA repair, have been developed for the detection and characterisation of agents causing damage to DNA,,",I. The first published work in which the mutagenic activity of metabolites was detected after metabolic activation of carcinogens was by Mailing". The methodology of his quantitative liquid assay system has been recently described". Later, Ames et a!." showed that microsomes could be added to the semi-solid agar overlay in a plate test, a procedure that is in some ways rather better for routine screening although it fails with a few compounds, for example, dimethylnitrosamine, possibly because the agar interferes with the diffusion of short-lived active metabolites. Bacteria deficient in repair of DNA are killed more Nature Vol. 26/ May 20 1916 easily by DNA-damaging agents than are wild type bacteria, and this is the basis for several simple tests. Bacteria deficient in excision repair have been used" but these are sensitive only to certain types of DNA damage. Much more useful have been bacteria lacking DNA polymerase I (Pol')", or deficient in genetic recombination (Rec")". These tests are usually conducted on the surface of agar plates but are also amenable to rather more quantitative procedures with liquid-phase treatment"'". Another way of revealing the existence of DNA damage is to look for the repair that it usually initiates and this is the basis of a very useful test developed by Stich and his colleagues. It depends on estimating the amount of DNA synthesis involved in repair by measuring autoradiographically the uptake of initiated thymine during the period immediately following exposure to the test chemical. The method has the advantage that it can be used with cultured human skin fibroblasts. To prevent normal DNA synthesis the cells are kept in an arginine deficient medium for 3 d before exposure. In a report on 64 substances tested, Han and Stich" found that all directly acting carcinogens elicited unsche duled DNA synthesis whereas no repair synthesis was observed after treatment with 16 non-carcinogens. Most carcinogens known to need metabolic activation gave nega tive results although a few were active after prolonged exposure to high concentrations. More recent results" indicate that metabolic activation systems can be incorpor ated in this assay and make possible the detection of proca"inogens. Mutation induction Perhaps the most sensitive assay for DNA damage is the induction of mutations in bacteria, particularly if the bacterial strain carries a mutation rendering it unable to excise damage from DNA (Uvr'). Excision-proficient strains should always be included in any assay, however, because certain agents able to cross-link DNA are only mutagenic in such strains"; presumably the mutational event occurs as an error during excision-initiated repair. Reversion to prototrophy is generally regarded as the most sensitive type of assay and the methodology has recently been reviewed" ". Escherichia coti WP2 is a tryptophanrequiring strain that responds to mutagens causing base-pair substitution mutations at both adenine: thymine and guanine : cytosine sites. A more complete set of tester strains has been developed in Salmonella typhimurium by Ames and collaborators". Individual strains respond to base-pair substitution mutagens or to compounds causing various types of frameshift. The permeability of these Salmonella strains to some chemicals has been increased by the incorporation of a cell wall mutation ("deep rough")". From recent data one can calculate that these strains are capable cf detecting muta genic activity of between 61%" and 90% (D. Anderson, unpublished) of known carcinogens. In an attempt to detect the "false negatives" obtained with the deep rough strains, Ames's group developed a fourth generation set of strains containing the drug resistance plasmid pKMlOl". As suggested by MacPhee certain plasmids confer a mutator activity on their host cell which becomes more sensitive to many mutagens and carcinogens". The ability of these plasmid-containing strains to detect carcinogens as mutagens is impressive (see below). A word of caution is in order, however, since although the mechanism by which the plasmids act is still unknown, it is clear that they convert into mutations damage which would not be mutagenic in a normal cell. They may even act as amplifying systems and produce mutations at sites where no damage exists. The value of such strains lies in the correlation they show with carcinogenicity but there is at least a theoretical possibility of real "false positives". BOR 012050 196 Nature Vol. 261 May 20 1976 ao, prr pr,c*^Uc prd A nimal carctnog...e. mcitv' and bacterial mutagenicity with and without metabolic actuation (from McCann era/.") Carcinogens Non-carcinogens Compounds cf detected as not mutagenic uncertain carcinogenicity .up of compounds bacterial mutagens to bacteria detected as mutagens .amines etc. .ialides,etc. ./cyclic aromatics asters, epoxides, carbamates, etc. Nitro aromatics and heterocvcles F Miscellaneous organics G Nitrosamines H Fungal toxins and antibiotics I Mixtures (cigaretie smoke condensate) J Miscellaneous heterocvcles K Miscellaneous nitrogen compounds L Azo dyes and diazo compounds M Common laboraioiy biochcmieals Total 23/25 17/20 26/27 13/18 25/28 1/6 20/21 8/9 I/I 1/4 7/9 ll/ll - 157/178 10/12 1/3 7/9 5/9 I/d 13/13 2(2 5/5 7/7 2/4 2/3 46/46 101/117 5/7 1/1 1/1 O'l 0/2 0/1 1/1 - - - - 3/3 - 11/17 tion is only as good as the confidence one has in the reliability of both parameters. Whereas positive and negative mutagenicity results can be both unambiguous and repro ducible, the same is not true of carcinogenicity results where, as will be discussed below, there are several factors which could result in a failure to detect relatively weak carcinogens. A' discussed by McCann and Ames", there is good reason to believe that many of the "false" positive chemicals will eventually be shown to be carcinogenic. This has already happened with the food additive furyl furamlde which had been used for many years in Japan and had given negative results in two carcinogenicity trials". After positive results had been obtained in Bacillus subtilis and E. coli systems for detecting DNA damage, it was re examined and shown to produce a low hut significant yield for tumours when given to foetal and young mice*'. There is also the real possibility that some of the "false" negatives are genuine, that metabolism in vivo is different from that with isolated microsome preparations. Only further studies in depth can resolve this. It is worth analysing the data of McCann et al., further to see whether there is any particular type of mutational event (as detected hv the Salmonella) that is correlated with carcinogenicity. It has been postulated*1 that carcinogenicity is associated with the ability to produce specific types of frameshift mutation. This hypothesis does not hold up in any general application. As can be seen from Table 2, whereas most members of some groups of carcinogens (for example, amoratic amines, polycyclic aromatics and nitroaromatics) gave rise to both frameshifts and base-pair sub stitutions, others (for example, esters, epoxides and carbamates, nitrosamines, miscellaneous nitrogen com pounds) gave rise exclusively to base-pair substitutions. There was no group that gave rise exclusively to frameshifts. Taken together, 45.2% of mutagenic carcinogens gave rise solely to base-pair substitutions, 14.8% solely to frameshifts, and 40% gave rise to both. Rosenkranz (cited in ref. 62) using a Pol" strain of E. coli together with the Salmonella .set without plasmids, has obtained results as encouraging as those of McCann et al. with the plasmid-containing salmoncllas. Of about 100 com pounds tested, 85% of the known carcinogens were detected (91% of direct acting carcinogens, 72% of procarcinogens). The proportion of non-carcinogens detected as positive was rather high. 30%, but the figure is not comparable with the lower value derived from the data of McCann et al." since it did not include the 46 common laboratory bio chemicals tested by the latter workers, none of which was positive. A comparison of the efficiency of various microbial systems for detecting DNA damaging agents has been carried out by Shirasu et al". They found that the hyper sensitivity of repair-deficient bacteria (Rec" B. subtilis) was the most sensitive. Of 166 pesticides studied. 23 were posi tive in the Rec-assay (carried out without microsomal activation). Of the 143 negatives, none proved to be positive when tested with E. coli or Salmonella reverse mutation systems. Of the 23 positives 9 were positive in reverse muta tion systems, and of these 9, 1 was not detected by the E. coli strains and 1 by the Salmonella strains. As far as base-pair substitution mutations are concerned, the non plasmid E. coli strains were found to be preferable to the non-plasmid Salmonella strains at least with some groups such as nitrofurans. With other groups such as the organic phosphates a similar small proportion of mutagens was missed by both S. typhimurium and E. coli strains". The only study in which a single laboratory has compared a number of different tests for predicting carcinogenicity appears to have been carried out by the Central Toxicology Laboratory of 1CI (D. Anderson et al., unpublished). The preliminary results with I2C chemicals point to the value of the bacterial mutation tests when metabolic activation is incorporated. The carcinogenicity, or noncarcinogenicity was accurately predicted for 90% of the chemicals by this test. Cell transformation in vitro came close with 83% accuracy. Rather less accurate was degranulation of endoplasmic reticulum, 72%, and morphological changes following subcutaneous implanta tion, 70% correctly predicted. Sebaceous gland suppression*' was good for polycyclic hydrocarbons (90%) but little better than random for other substances (52-62%). Tetrazolium reduction in mouse skin was also poor (62% overall). The authors conclude that some of these rapid tests are capable of distinguishing between carcinogens and non-carcinogens with sufficient accuracy to enable them to be used for selecting potential carcinogens. They also make the point that figures for successful prediction must be treated with Table 2 Number of carcinogens detected as bacterial mutagens (with or without metabolic activation) classified as to type of mutation induced. Base-pair Frameshifts Both base-pair substitutions only only substitution and frameshift mutations A B C* D E F G* H 1 J K t Ke M Total 1 14 7 13 5 1 19 0 0 0 7 3 0 70 9 2 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 2 0 23 13 1 14 0 23 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 62 * Data not available for one member. Key for chemical groups as for Table 1. (From McCann et al") BOR 0 1 2 0 5 1 Nature Vol. 261 May 20 J976 It is possible to improve sensitivity by altering the methodology, and a modified fluctuation test has been proposed which achieves between ten and one hundredfold grejter sensitivity than the conventional assay without the need for plasmid-containing strains" There is also the possibility of developing a single tester strain that can be used to detect many different types of mutational events". Although hacterial screening systems have proved very useful, there is still scope for further improvement. As well as the bacterial tests that have now been extensively studied, a large number of other techniques can he used to detect DNA damaging activity and may perform a useful supplementary role, probing ambiguous or suspect results and characterising more fully the nature of the genetic damage. One may, for example, study the induction of mutations in cultured mammalian cells"'". Mammalian cells may also be used for cytogenetic study of visible chromosome aberrations". Recently developed staining techniques for demonstrating sister-chromatid exchanges show a greatly enhanced sensitivity" and their role in screening has been recently discussed". Sister-chromatid exchanges may now be detected in spermatogonia" and bone marrow cells" following exposure of the whole animal to carcinogens, ft is already clear, however, that although the induction of sister-chromatid exchanges is a very sensitive response to some carcinogens it occurs hardly at all with others". Other eukaryotic mutation systems include fungi, yeasts and insects. All of these have their own advantages and disadvantages. Malignant transformation in cultured cells Rather than develop a model system depending on mutation or DNA repair, others have worked towards a screening method by which transformation to the malignant condition could be brought about and detected in cell culture. The only really valid criterion for malignant transformation is the ability of a cell to produce a tumour when inoculated into an appropriate host. There are, nevertheless, several secondary criteria (discussed by Freeman and Huebner", of which the most commonly used is the ability of cells to grow into clones in soft agar or, in the case of fibroblast cultures, to produce clones of piled-up cells when growing on a solid surface. Most human cancers are carcinomas which are derived from epithelial cells. Relatively little work has, however, been done on the transformation in vitro of epithelial ceils. Such cells are usually obtained from rat liver and are not easy to retain in culture in the differentiated state. Never theless they have been successfully transformed by 4-nitroquinoline-l-oxide". aflatoxin Bi, (V-hydroxy-2acetylaminofluorene, and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a] anthracene", dimethylnitrosamine and N-methyl-N'-nitro-/V-nitrosoguanidine', and N-acetoxy-2-acetyIaminofluorene". Epithelial cells transformed in vitro usually show no altered morph ology although they may grow in soft agar. Work on fibroblasts is considerably more advanced. Fibro blasts, when transformed, give rise to sarcomas, responsible for a minority of human malignant disease. They show, nevertheless, great promise as the basis of a potential screening system for chemical carcinogens. As with bacterial mutation systems, it has often been found necessary to supplement the fibroblast's relatively poor ability to metabolise carcinogens into their active form. This has been achieved, either by cocultivation with other cells capable of carrying out metabolic activation", or by isolating the cells from hamster embryos after treatment of the pregnant mother". Much of the work on transformation has been carried out with treatment of mass cultures often for long periods of time and has been subject to some criticism. Trans formation has, however, been reported with short treat ments followed by cloning" and this would seem to be a 197 better approach to adopt in future A noteworthy feature of much work with both fibroblast and epithelial systems has been the high spontaneous rates of transformation, sometimes considerably higher than one would expect for a gene mutation. Many workers regard this as the result of the artificial environment in which the cells are cultured, and have looked (often successfully) for conditions in which the spontaneous rate is lower. Nevertheless it is likely that the rate of transformation in vivo is higher than has been thought and that the body is normally able to deal effectively with the aberrant cells. If this were true the role of DNA-damaging carcinogens might be seen as increasing the already high spontaneous rate and thus overloading the ability of the natural defences of the body to cope with malignant cells. Most of the work on transformation in vitro has con centrated on the development of systems that can be used as models for the study of carcinogenesis (for reviews see refs 55 and 56). To the uninvolved observer, a certain amount of contradiction and inconsistency is apparent. There is, notwithstanding, an impression that this tech nique`may soon be a valued constituent of the battery of techniques for detecting carcinogenic and DNA-damaging substances. Two recent studies have shown successful pre diction of carcinogenicity almost as good as that of the bacterial mutagenicity tests" ". Validation Some of the test procedures described above are very sensitive, but how good are they as predictors of carcino genicity? Recent reports have presented" and discussed" carcinogenicity and mutagenicity data obtained for more than 300 chemicals. All the results come from the use of Salmonella strains developed by Ames. Where negative mutation results had been obtained with now-obsolete strains, the test was repeated with the latest plasmidcontaining strains. Testing was done both without metabolic activation and (generally) with microsomes embedded together with the bacteria in soft agar. With some nitrosamines incubation was carried out with microsomes before plating. A summary oi the results is given in Table 1, Since publication, one of the non-carcinogens, 5-hydroxy 2-acctylamino-fluorene, has been shown to be mutagenic because of the presence of an impurity and has now been reclassified as non-mutagenic. It can be seen that of 179 compounds whose carcinogenic effect on animals is well documented, 157 (or 87.7%) were detected as positive in the bacterial test. This level of confirmation was obtained with essentially all types of compound and was also evident for the small group of compounds for which evidence exists for carcinogenicity in man. The proportion of compounds believed to be noncarcinogenic which gave negative results in the muta genicity tests was also high: 101 out of 117 (or 86.3%). These included 46 common biochemicals all of which were negative. Seventeen compounds were tested for which carcinogenicity data are uncertain; of these 11 were positive in the mutagenicity test. The apparent "false" positives and negatives have been discussed elsewhere". It is apparent that many of the latter damage DNA or cause mutations in other systems, or have mutagenic metabolites. Furthermore there is a very obvious limitation to the use of liver microsomes for activation : some chemicals may need reductive activation, or may be metabolised by the gut flora, by organs other than the liver, or by cell components other than microsomes. Indeed it is surprising that liver microsomes are as effective as they seem to be; certainly the method is capable of further improvement. When one considers the "false" positives, that is the sup posed non-carcinogens that register as mutagenic with bacteria, certain difficulties become apparent. Any correla- BOR 0 1 2 0 Nature VqI. 261 May 20 1976 some caution since they can be manipulated within wide limits by the choice of substances tested. As their substances lude a large number of non-carcinogenic chemicals sely related to known carcinogens they feel that their results give a reasonably good indication of the likely value of the tests in practice. DNA damage and human cancer The correlation between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity is satisfying to those who believe in the somatic mutation theory of cancer** and distressing to those who do not'7. 1 think the correlation can be more correctly described as being between DNA damaging ability and carcinogenicity. Gene mutation is but one consequence of DNA damage; others such as chromosomal structural rearrangements, viru' integration and excision, and changes in TMene expresion, may well he important in the carcinogenic process. Non-genetic effects are also probably involved. One could argue that detecting DNA damage is merely a very sensitive way of detecting electrophilic reagents, and that the actual target(s) may well be in other molecules as well as or instead of DNA. This is quite possible; but there is other evidence strongly implicating DNA damage as the rate-limiting step in many carcinogenic processes. In man, for example, mutations in five complementation groups are known to reduce or abolish the ability of cells to remove ultraviolet photoproducts from their DNA". In all cases they enormously increase sensitivity to the car cinogenic effect of sunlight (resulting in the hereditary disease xeroderma pigmentosum). A further mutation causing the same symptoms has been shown to be associ ated with a deficiency in another DNA repair pathway ^tive on newly synthesised DNA". Another human muta^vi responsible for the disease ataxia telangiectasia has Wen shown to hlock repair of ionising radiation damage" and also results in proneness to develop malignant disease11. Thus, the human data strengthen our confidence in the reality of the observed correlation between DNA damaging ability and carcinogenicity. It must be emphasised, however, that even an empirical "litmus paper test", with no known theoretical basis, which gave an 80 to 90''i predictiveness for carcinogenicity would be a powerful tool in the screen ing of chemicals for human toxicity. The place of tests with mammals No single test is adequate for a first-tier (sub-mammalian) screen; most authorities agree that a battery of tests must be used as false negatives may occur with any one test. The results of these tests would be used to assign priorities for further testing using mammalian systems. At one extreme, a substance with no apparent effect on sub mammalian systems might be given a priority so low that no further tests would be considered unless a large human population exposure were to occur or he contemplated. At the other extreme a strongly active substance might well be regarded as hazardous without further testing if the population exposed were small. If it were, say, an industrial chemical, then production workers and users ought to treat it as if it were a known toxic agent or carcinogen, at least until such time as it became possible to carry out full scale animal tests. The greatest problem in testing for carcinogenicity or mutagenicity with mammals is the insensitivity of most of tests. This has led, for example, to difficulties in valiig microbial carcinogenicity screening systems since many of the "false" positives obtained with these are based on animal experiments that may be inadequate". There have been, and still are, too many carcinogenicity tests with 20 or 30 animals per group. Provided that the number of animals in each group is kept small, even a large increase in the frequency of neo 199 plasms can tail to be statistically significant and enable a conclusion of "non-carcinogenic" to be drawn (see for example a recent study on the carcinogenicity of hair dyes'"). As long ago as 1954, Barnes and Denz" pointed out that to detect with a probability of 0.01 an effect occurring in 1% of the animals, one would need a group of at least 455 animals. If the effect also occurred spontaneously then the number of animals per group would have to be increased manyfold. Today, notwithstanding, carcinogenicity experi ments with 100 animals per group are often regarded as "good" and those with 200 animals per group are extremely rare. But although "kilomouse" experiments are theoreti cally attractive there may be little to be gained from them in practice. Logistical problems dictate that such experi ments be phased over many weeks and involve slightly varying conditions. "Spontaneous" rates of tumour occur rence unfortunately often vary in time and place, perhaps reflecting slight differences in diet, and it is often difficult to run an adequate control group. Errors in handling are also more likely in very large experiments. Whereas a significant reproducible positive result in a mammalian test may be taken as indicating the existence of a potential hazard for man, a negative result taken should not necessarily be taken to indicate the absence of hazard, particularly if the human population to be exposed is very large, and the number of animals in the test small. We may take some comfort where the disparity in dose between the animal and human exposure is great. This is not always so. Anaesthetic gases, for example, are given to an appreciable fraction of the population in Western society at concen trations which are not far from the lethal level. One might well feel that a negative result in a screening test with a few dozen mice would be of little value. It can he seen that mammalian tests are not wholly appro priate for the validation of sub-mammalian tests, and it is perhaps remarkable that they should show such good agree ment. Validation of one type of test against another must not blind one to the real objective, which is to predict long term toxic effects in man. There are few proven human carcinogens and most of these can be detected by both mammalian and sub-mammalian tests. In man, carcinogens tend to be recognised only when the tumour is of a rare type and there is a sufficient cluster of cases to enable association with a particular occupation to be seen by an alert clinician. Genetic effects in man are even harder to detect retrospectively. There are several examples of somatic chromosome damage in lymphocytes of persons exposed to known mutagenic and carcinogenic substances (for example, vinyl chloride", ozone", benzene", toluene", cadmium"1" and methyl mercury". Recent evidence for the possibility of dominant lethal damage in man by vinyl chloride (P. Infante, unpublished) and anaesthetic gases" is ominous but needs closer examination. Ultimately quantitative risk assessments must be attempted, for we must face the unpalatable fact that man will almost certainly have to be exposed to some carcino gens and mutagens whose benefits cannot be dispensed with and others which it is impracticable to eliminate from the environment. Risk evaluations at the present time almost always require information which is not available, such as the nature of the dose-effect response at low doses. Never theless, approaches must be found that will lead eventually to risk-benefit evaluations based less on guesswork and more upon knowledge. In the meantime the use of short term tests would enable potentially carcinogenic substances to be identified among the many thousands for which long term animal testing cannot at present be contemplated. This in turn would open the door to provisional regulatory action to minimise human exposure. Taken seriously and on a large enough scale, there is good reason to believe that this approach would ultimately result in a reduction in the incidence of chemically induced cancer. BOR 0 1 2 0 5 3 200 I thank Drs D. Anderson, E. J, Ashby. P. A. Lefevre, E. Longstaff, I. F. H. Purchase, J. A. Styles and F. R. Westwood of ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory, and Dr Bruce Ames for allowing me to see their data before publication. 1 Burnet. F, M.. intrinsic Mutagenesis: a Genetic Approach to Ageing (Medical and Technical. Lancaster. 1974V 2 Higgtnson, J.. Cun. Cancer Conf., 40-75 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1968), 3 Higgmson, J., and Muir, C. S,, in Cancer Prevention and Detection, t (in the pres*). * Cairns, J., Set. Amer., 233, 64-78 (1975). 3 Doll, R... prevention of Cancer--Pointers for Epidemiology (Whitefnars Press, London, 1967). * Pott. P . cn Conference of Biologv of Cutaneous Cancer. NCI, Monograph No. 10 (1963). ^ 7 Legator. M. S.. A. Rev. Med., 23. 4(3-428 (1972). Environ, fifth Pvr*ptct.. 6 (whole issue) 0973), Drake. J. W., et of. Science, 187. 503-514 (19751. 10 Bridges. B. A.. Environ. Hhh Penpect , 6, 221-228 (1973). 11 Bridges, B. A., m Screening Tests in Chemical Carcinogenesis (%di\. by Montesano, R... Bartsch. H,, and Tomutis, L ) (IARC. Lyon, 1976). >2 Williams, D. and Rabin. B, R.. Nature, J32, 102-105 (1971). >> Purchase. I. F. H . and Lefevre, p. A.. Chemv Indy, 10. 4(5-416 (1975'' 34 McPherson. F . Bridges. J. W., and Park. D. V., Nature, 252, 488-489 (1974). Cramer. J. W.. Miller, J. A., and Miller. E- C..J,biol Chem., 235. 885-888 (I960). Slater, E. E,. Anderson, M. D,, and Roscnkruu, H. $,, Cancer Res., 31, 970-973 (1971), 11 Mailing. H. V.. Mutat. Res., 13,425-429(1971). 14 Garner, R. C.. Miller, E. C.. and Miller. J. A.. Cancer Res., 32. 2058-2066 (1972). 19 Igali, S., Bridges. B A., Ashwood-Sroith, M. J.. and Scott, B. R,, Mutat. Res., 9, 21-30 (1970). 20 Bridges, B. A., Mottershead, R. P.. Roth well, M. A., and Green. M. H. L., Chem.-Blof Interactions, 5, 77-84 (1972), 21 Ames, B. N.. in Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for their Detection, 1 (edit, by Hollaender, A.V 267-282 (Plenum, New York. 1971). 12 Ames. B, N., Lee, F. D,, and Durston, W. E.. Proc. natn. Acad, Set U.S.A., 70, 782-786 (1973). 23 McCann. J.. Spingarn. N. E., Kobori, J., and Ames. B. N., Proc. natn, Acad, Scl. U.S.A., 72, 979-983 (1975). 24 Frantz. C. N., and Mailing. H. V.. Mutat. Res., 31, 363-380 (1975). 23 Ames, B N.. Durston. W, E., Yamasaki, E., and Lee. F. D., Proc. natn. Acad. Set. U.S.A., 70. 2281-2285 (1973) 29 Slater. E. E.. Anderson. M. D.t and Rosenkranz, H. S., Cancer Res,, 31, 97(^*973 (1971), 27 Kada. T.. Sadaie. Y.,andTutikawa. K.. Mutat, Res., 16.165-174 0972). 21 Bridges, B. A., Mottershead, R. P., Grean, M. H. L.. and Gray. W. J, H., Mutat. Res., 19, 295-303 (1973). 29 34 GHraene,nR, .MH. .Hc...La..nadnSdtiMchu,rHie.l, W. F., /nt. Mutat. Res., 28, 331-336 (1975). J. Cancer. 16, 284-291 (1975). 31 Stich, H. F., Lam, P.. Lo, L. W., Koropatnick, D. J., and San. R. H. C,, Can./. genet, Cytol.. 17. 471-492 (1975), 32 Murayama, l., and Otsuit, N., Mutat, Res., 38, 117-119 (1973). 33 Ames. B. N.. McCann, J.. and Yamasaki, E., Mutat. Res., 31, 347-364 (1973). 54 Green, M. H. L.. and Munel, W. Mutat. Res., 38. 3-32 (1976). 33 McCann, 3.. Choi, E.. Yamasaki. E., and Ames, B. N., Proc. natn, Acad. Scl. US.A., 72. 5135-5139 (1973). 34 MacPhec. D. C., Appl. Microbiol., 26, 1004-1005 (1973). 37 Green, M. H L.. Muriel, W. J.. and Bridges. B. A.. Mutat. Ret., 59, 33-42(1976). 31 Mohn. G., EHenbcrger. J,, and McGregor. D., Mutat. Res., 25, 187-196 (1974) Nature Vol. 261 May 20 1971> I* Chu. E. H. Y.. in Chemical Mutagen* Principle* ami Methmi* for their Detection. 2 (edit by Hollaender, A,). 4f1-444 /Plenum, New York, |97l) 40 Arlett, C. F., Turnbull, D.. Harcourt, S. A.. Lehnunn. A R., and Co'ella, C. M,, SlLtat Res., 33. 261-278 (1975). 41 Clive. D.. Flamm. W, G., and Patterson, 3,8 , in Chemuul Mutavrtn, Prim iplri and Methods for their Defection, 3 (edit by Hollaender, A ). 79-103 (Plenum, New York, 1975), 42 Lilly, L. J,, Bahner. B.. and Magee, P, N., Nature, 258, 611-612 (1975) 43 Perry, P,, and Evans. H. J . Nature. 258. 121-125 (1975) 44 Savage. J. R. K-, Nature, 258, 103-104 (|97J) 43 Allen, J, W., and Latt, S, A., Nature (m the press) 44 Vogel, W, and Bauknecht. T., Nature (m the press) 47 Freeman, A. E., and Huepner, R. J-. J. mini. Comer fust.. 50. 303-306 (1973) 44 Yamada, T., Takaoka. T,. Katsutj. H . Nainba. M,, and Sato. J , Jap J r*p. Med., 42. 377-388 (1972). 49 Williams, E. M., Weisburger, E. K., and Weisburger. J. H , Fxpl cell. Ret., 69, 106-112 (W7\>, 34 Montesano, R., Samt-Vinccnt, L., and Tomati*. L , Rr. J Cancer, 28, 215-220 (1973), 31 YamaguChi, N., and Weinstein, I B.. Proc. Am As\>>c Cancer Res., 15.94 (1974), 32 Huberman, E-. and Sachs. L., Proc man. Anal, S< t V.N. 4 , 56, 1 123-1129 (1966) 33 Evans. C. H., and DtPaolo, J A . Cancer Re*. 35. 10)5-1044 (1975) 3* DiMavorca, G.. Greenblatt. M,. Traothen. T.. Seller, A . and Giordano, R., Proc. natn. Acad. Set U.S.A . 70, 4iwt9 (197') 33 Heidelberger, C.. A. Rev Btochem . 44, 79-|2 (1975). 34 Casto. B. C.. and DiPaulo. J. A,. Prnv metl Virol . 16. 1-47 (1973). 57 Pienta, R. J,, quoted by Such et al n 34 McC-nn, J.. and Ames, B. N., Proc. natn. Anal Set tfS 4 <m the press) 34 Miyaji, T., TohokuJ. exn. Med.. 103, 331-369. 381-388 (197)) 44 Nomura, T., Nature, 258. 610-61! (1975). 43 Ames, B* N., Gurney. E. G,, Miller, J, A., and Bartsch, H,. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci, V.S.A., 69, 3128-1132 (1972) 42 Brookes. P.. and de Serres. F. J., Mutat. Re*, (in the press) 43 Shirasu, Y,, Moriya, M,, Kato, K., Furuhashi. A., and Kadi, T., Mutat. Res , 40, 19-30 (1976). 44 Hanna, P. J,, and Dyer. K. F.. Mutat Res., 28. 405-420 (1975). 43 Bock, F. G,, and Mund. R,, Cancer Re*. |8, 887-893 (1958). 44 Ames. B. N-, Science, 191, 241-245 (1976), 47 Rubin, H.. Science. 191, 24! (1976) 44 Kramer, K, H., de Wecrd-Kastelem. E, A,, Robbins. J. H.. Keijzer, S F.. Barret, R.A., Petinea. R. A,, and Bootsma. D., Mutat. Pc*.. 33. 327-140 0975) 44 Lehmann. A, R., Kirk-Bell, Arlett, C. F., Paterson, M. C., Lohman, P H. M., de Weerd-Kastelein. E, A., and Bootsma. D., Proc. natn Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 219-223 (1975), 70 Taylor. A. M. R,, Hamden, D. G., Arlett,C. F., Harcourt. S. A.. Lehmann, A. R., Stevens. S., and Bridges. B A., Nature. 258. 427-429 (1975) 73 Hamden, D, G., in Chromosomes and Cancer (edit, by German, J.), 619-636 (Wiley, New York, 1974). 72 Giles. A. L., Chung, C. W,, and Kommmeni, C., /. Toxicol, env. Hlth,, 1,433-440 (1976V 73 Barnes, J. M., and Denz, F. A., Pharm. Rev , 6, 191 0954), 74 Ducatman, A., Hirschhorn, K.. and SelikofT, 1. Mutat. Re*,, 31, 163-168 (1975). 73 Mert2, Tv, Bender, M. A,, Kerr, H. D,. and Kulle. T. J., Mutat. Res., 31,299-302 0975). 7* Form, A. M., CoDpellini, A., Pacified, E., and Vigham. E. C., Arch environ. Hhh, 23. 385-391 (1971), 77 Tough, 1. M,, and Court-Brown, W. M,, Lancet, 1. 684 0963) 74 Shtraisu. Y., and Yosida, T. H., Proc, Jap. Acad . 48, 248-251 0972). 74 Bui, T. H., Lindsten, ]., and Nordberg. G. F.. Environ Res.. 9, 187-193 (1975). 40 Skerfvinff, S., Hanson, K,. Mangs. C.. Lindsten, J.. and Ryman. N , Environ. Res, 7. 83-98 0974). 11 Cohen. E. N,. Brown, B. W.. Bruce, D. L. Cascorbi. H, F., Corbett, T H., Jones. T, W., and Whuchcr. C. EAm. dent. Ass,, 90, 1291-1296 (1975), articles Isolation and N-terminal amino acid sequence of membrane-bound human HLA-A and HLA-B antigens John Bridgen Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK David Snary & Michael J. Crumpton* National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK Colin Barnstable, Peter Goodfellow & Walter F. Bodmer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK Membrane-bound HLA-A and HLA-B antigens have been extensively purified in good yield. The sequences of the Nterminal 16 amino acids have been determined using about I nmol of protein eluted from polyacrylamide gel after electrophoresis in sodium dodecy/ sulphate. Ths major histocompatibility region of man (HLA) occupies at least 1 to 2 recombination units on chromosome 6 and pro bably contains a large number of genes involved in diverse immune and possibly other functions1, The gene products that have so far been identified with this region comprise various Reprint requests to M. J. Crumpton at the above address. BOR 012054