Document YGBY3KQ770978OOyRy22a7O80
Interoffice Communication
TO:
FROM: DATE: SUBJ:
Distribution
.
-TG& Jtft: HR WB: AJO: RF
XF:
T. G. Grumbles February 15, 1990
VEIA
FUTURE TOXICOLOGY TESTING NEEDS FOR ALFOL 12 AND ALFOL 18
Attached is an article regarding an OECD program to obtain toxicity data on multiple "widely produced" chemicals. It is difficult at this time to predict the impact of having a product on the list, but ultimately we could be asked for any unpublished data we have and potentially, industry may be asked to share in additional testing costs. There is always the potential for adverse reaction to our products being on another "suspect list". I'll work with Dave Penny to stay updated on this effort.
{ C---
T. G. Grumbles
dlj
.1004
Attachment
Distribution: D. Penny, Carl Kerfoot, M. Sweet, R. Swantkowski, J. Friend, J. A. DeBernardi
VVV 000011111
INTERNATIONAL
VVV 000011112
OECD MOVES TO FILL RISK DATA GAP
o published data on heaith and existing chemicals assessment division
Nenvironment risks exists for in the Environmental Protection well over 100 ofthe most widely Agency's Office of Toxic Substances. produced chemicals. Concern that thTehe data will make it possible to
void could conceal some nasty sur betterprotect workers and evaluate risks
prises has spurred ever-greener gov from releases and wastes, Auer says.
ernments of the major Western indus How much further the products will be
trialized countries to launch an inter investigated beyond the screening will
national data-gathering program. The depend on the results of the screening
effort, announced last November (CW, and potential exposure levels, he says.
Nov. 22, 1989. p. 32), is being super
The launch of an internationally co
vised by the Organization for Economic ordinated, cooperative program is gen
Cooperation and Development (OECD; erally welcomed by industry. To date,
Paris).
there has been "a lot of overlap and not
At a mid-January meeting in Lon a lot of coordination" on the various
don. the finishing touches were put on testing programs under way in the U.S.
the testing protocols. The program is and various European countries, says
now in launch phase, and OECD hopes Ian Carney, safetv and environment
to complete the investigation by the manager/continental Europe for ICI
end of 1993.
(London). Faced with a plethora of
The testing program will consist of information requirements from various
two parts. An initial group of about 50 agencies, scarce testing resources, and
of the chemicals willbe divided among tests costing $300,Q00-$700,0OQ per
OECD's 27 member countries, with the chemical, "it's sensible to pull it all
U.S., West Germany, and Japan ex together," Carney believes. And OECD's
pected to take about 10 each. The proc work establishing an internationally
ess of dividing the labor should be accepted screening procedure should
completed by April, says Alan Smith, help set priorities in other testing pro
of OECD's chemicals program. The grams, such as some Superfund Title 1
authorities in each country will then requirements, says Joe Le Beau, direc
approach chemical companies--in tor/health and environmental sciences
principle, the biggest makers of each with Dow Chemical (Midland, MI).
product--to determine whether they
The West German chemical indus
hold relevant data.
try is counting on the international
If the data is not available from the program to help along the major screen
producers, screening tests paid for by ing of existing chemicals the German
the companies will be carried out cov- government has pushed it to undertake
eringtoxicity, mutagenicity, impact on since 1986. "We hope to use data from
reproduction, and ecotoxicity, The the OECD program in Germany too,"
programwillwiden to coverthe full list says Ian Meerkamp Van Embden, dep
of 147 chemicals--mostly organic in uty manager/environmental affairs and
termediates (see table)--forwhich pub technology department with Verband
lished data on health and environment der Chemischen Industrie (Frankfurt),
risks does not exist.
the German chemical industry associa
Regulatory agencies have no doubts tion. VCI has been working to ensure
about the usefulness of the program. the tests will be internationally com
The products in question are all made patible. The U.S. has a long-standing
in quantities of more than 1,000 m.t./ testing program coordinated by EPA's
year in at least two OECD member Office ofToxic Substances. The screen
countries. Inmanycases--for example, ing approach of the OECD program is
that of silicones-precuxsor chlorotri- seen as complementary to the in-depth
methylsilane, or hydrocarbons like investigations usually undertaken in
pentane and butene--output far ex the U.S., EPA's Auer says.
ceeds that amount. Although most
Industry sources are optimistic that
chemicals listed currently do not ap the gaps in the data are not as large as
pear to be a problem, "in view of the they seem and that they do not not
[production] volumes it is prudent to show neglect. "Many of these are high-
develop this level of information, " savs volume products, because they are
Charles Auer, acting director of the highly reactive intermediates, in the
pipes, going to another molecule, " say! Dow's Le Beau. "If you look at thal next-step molecule, it has been tested. ' Industry has voluntarily undertaker testing on some products, like isocy anates and chlorinated solvents, where
it saw lack of data, says ICI's Carney. And so far, OECD has only looked
for published data, says Gerrity Baker, director/international affairs with the
Chemical Manufacturers' Association [Washington). Experience in the U.S.
with testing programs has shown that where an investigation has been launched, producers usually have ex isting data to bring forward. Launch of the OECD programs makes it easier for companies to overcome their own confidentiality concerns with data, much of which shows negative results anyway, adds Michael Viney, an envi ronment affairs specialist with Shell International Chemical (London).
OECD officials note that manufacturers of named products hastily offered in
formation, apparently hoping the prod
ucts would be delisted. The main concern voiced by Euro
pean companies on OECD's program is
that it willbe duplicated by die manda tory existing chemicals testing program the European Commission plans. "We'd like to see the EC recognize [publicly) ihat the OECD program is there," says ICI's Carney.
DAVID HUNTER
rebnjary 7, 1990i'Chemica!week i
TO:
Interoffice Communication
FROM DATE
SUBJ
Distribution (Attendees)
TGGi be P. BBf: WO: RF
T. G. Grumbles February 15, 1990
XF:
OT MEETING AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 20
VIS
ATTENDEES:
AGENDA - OT MEETING DATE: 2/20/90 TIME: 3-4:30
JAD, THH, RDG, HWH,
TGG,
BRBM
1. Review Action Items 2 . Recognition 3. Communication 4. Review Wall Charts 5. Review OT Member Q-Scorecards 6. Select Employee Development
Process Element To Work On 7. Review Action Items
TGG 5 min ALL 10 min ALL 10 min
ALL 5 min ALL 30 min ALL 25 min
BRBM 5 min
T. G. Grumbles
dlj .1006
VVV 000011113