Document Xz7rYGZRqV8qbbVGr54rEoZQw
FILE NAME Corning OC
DATE 1956 Nov 20
DOC OC149
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Letter to Corning from Consultant Group
RE Asbestos Workers Union
*
5.41
IRA
1. BROUGHT & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTANTS
138 EDISON B. ,, ny,
TOLEDO4 OHIO
November 20 1956
?
.
-
"
:
7 _4?
tile 3 . .
<2
; 1/15
Mr. M. D. Burch Director of Industrial
Corning Fiberglas Corporation
National Bank Building
Toledo Ohio
Relations
Dear Mr. Burch
;
On November 15 I advised
to Washington D. C. and
you by telephone of my visit
of the Asbestos Workers Um niyonconfWeeretnaclekewditohf the international officers
interest which led into a discussion of the healtmhatters of general
conducted by several of their locals in
investigation being
led to a discussion of
the New England area and that
connection therewith our problem in the South and their attitude in
While the international officers
as they always have been
were personally friendly
I detected an element of
animosity toward
Corning Fiberglas as a
against glass
company and specifically a feeling
Normally you would
their own investigation investigation with
expect the International to conduct
locals
if
respect to health bazards for their
they believe such hazards exist I
various
that either Mr. Sickles
personally don't believe
or Mr. Hoff feel that their
any lung condition resulting from the
people have developed
handling of Fiberglas On the
ship They did say
the past deleted
however
that they had
on several occasions
references to the subject fr in the
during
in the
quarterly Asbestos Workers
minutes as published
they said that they could
Journal In the same
connection
issues
Mr.
not keep the refere
Sickles advised that the matt
ce out of the last several had
last Executive
been brought up at the
Meeting held in Miami Flo da last
Executive Board as a whole indicated
spring and the
complaints from their
th they had had no particular
the harm that could
membership I cit to Mr. Sickles and Mr. Hoff
result from the public ton of
and that such references
unsupported rumors
and be
appearing in the
picked up by other locals
ournal might be contagious
Mr. M. D. Burch
November 20 1956
particularly in conference with these gentle-
While I received no proof resulted from the situation we
men that the revival of the health subjectmade it very clear that they
have permitted to exist in the Souotfhutn hei y on applicators over a period
Work-
didn't like our continued support
favor the United Mine
of years
when those applicatorsI was in no position to ask
am sure that
ers You will appreciate
In their opinion I had dirty hands
favors of the executive officers
we could always
Mr. Sickles made the statement
In years gone by
but of late
we have not hadd
get something accomplished by calling you
your cooperation
In the near future I plan to confer
the most powerful and influencial of the
the individual with whom I dealt ten years ago in that was placed against Fiberglas Fiberglas rescinded
with Mr. Hugh Mulligan
Executive Board and
having the premium
two occasions that I visited Washington
On the last
made reference to
Mr. Carl Sickles the International President
old friends about
he had had from our competitors and their
complaints
seemed to have on the market It is not beyond
the monopoly Fiberglas
of the health question has been
the realm of possibility that the revival
encouraged by competition
lived intimately with this situation for ten years
I have
is done and done promptly
and I feel very strongly that unless something
find them giving
with the International we may
to better our position
of their locals with respect to the
silent approval to the activities
could be costly to the
On the long haul this condition
health problem
volume of sales may preclude seeing there
Fiberglas industry The
storm clouds accumulating
over the years that our first line of
have suggestedand spread revival of the health
defense against the reopening
and their industri il
lies with the various branch managers
de
question
believe that anything that is likely to imp
salesmen I personally
is a sales hazard I also believe believe
the freeflow of the sale of Fiberglas
branch offices and eir
that if there was an intimate liaison between
could be nipj ed in
more of the complaints
respective business agents
the bud
truly
IB gmw
Ira I. Brought