Document Xz6LnyB8J9dxw5bN3e1KGRDXw

FILE NAME: Oil Industry and American Petroleum Institute (API) DATE: 1950 May DOC#: API069 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Unpublished Internal Report - Progress Report The Project on Carcinogenicity Proposed Epidemiological Studies \ UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI ocmuthcnt or n cvem vt mcmcink and industbjal health THE KETTIKIN8 LABONAfONV COLLE4E o r MEDIC lH I-- O E M A V E N U CINCINMAT! I t , OHIO May IS, 1950 r m AADSMi ( R U I . CtNCIIINAfl TELETHON*, C A m o t m i TO: Members of the Subcommittee on Carcinogenicity Medical Advisory Committee American Petroleum Institute PROM: Joh n J . P h a ir , M .D. I am submitting herewith a revised Progress Report for the Proposed Epidemiological Studies of the Project on Carcinogenicity at the- Kettering Laboratory. It contains the modifications and revisions suggested for the report presented at the meeting of the. Subcommittee on Carcinogenicity of the Medical Advisory Committee held April 3# 1950 in Chicago. The Standard clinical record and occupational history forms to be employed in gathering the information required for the Retrospective Study and the Current Registry ' are in preparation, and it is hoped that these can be *1 distributed for immediate* use early in June.. It is planned that the code to be used in the tabulation of these data will be ready for circulation at the same time. As many personal visits as feasible will be made before the November meeting of the Subcommittee, so that & uniform handling of these record can.be insured, insofar as possible, under existing conditions, ` As an additional activity of the epidemiological survey, a simple questionnaire requesting certain fundamental descriptive facts about each refinery or. installation of the participating companies will be sent to each Medical Director in the near future.. This will be the first step in the routine assembling of necessary basic information for this study regarding the employee population involved and the control measures presently in force or as adopted. JJP :h p For Information Only - Not for Publication ` Kettering Laboratory University of Cincinnati THE PROJECT ON CARCINOGENICITY PROPOSED EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES Progress Report for The Subcommittee on Carcinogenicity c! of the API Medical Advisory Committee April 23, 1950 Revision - May 1$, 19^0 911230 BinEutM 01828 FRESKNT STATUS At the Subcommittee meeting held March i?5i 1950 the following: objectives were presented: I. The determination of incidence and prevalence rates of retrograde, hypertrophic or neoplastic reactions in employees of the Petroleum Industry* ' II. The comparison of these rates with those of the general population and other industries* III. The evaluation of control procedures that have been accepted, employed or recommended. IV* The recommendation, if the studies justify the action, of standardized safety and control measures* The possible approaches to these objectives are: I. A Retrospective or Historical Study of all available records of such cases among the employees of the Petroleum Industry. II. A Current Registry receiving reports of such cases as they are discovered by and/or reported to the various Medical Departments. Ill* A study of the Employee Health Benefit Plan records with the hope that liko data can be secured from other industries. IV. Fio-ld Surveys of retrograde or hyperkoratotic lesions on exposod skin surfaces* V. A repetition of the studies which have pointed out an unusual hazard in the Slack Wax Process. VI. The establishment of a Consultation Service to assist in the planning of comparable company studies. This last approach was not discussed at the Cincinnati meeting. ' ' 911230 BtnEulM 01829 - 2- FUTURE PLANS A. It Is proposed to implement immediately, insofar as possible and/or.feasible, with due consideration and understanding of . the wide variation in company policies, medical care programs, management interest and labor relations, the first two approaches, namely, (I) the Retrospective Study and (II) the Current Registry. I. Retrospective or Historical Study 1. Description v This approach requires the assembling of the clinical records and employment histories of proved cases of Neoplastic disease known to have occurred among employees of - the cooperating Petroleum Companies, regardless of site, type * of tumor, degree of exposure to various carcinogenic hazards and employment status. The Medical Departments, under this plan, within the limits of their legal responsibilities (See Appendix, Page 1), would be expected to forward to the Survey Group of the University of Cincinnati the records of all known cases of proved or suspected Neoplastic disease which have occurred among their employees during the period covered by their immediately available files. It would bo expected that the details of the clinical records would be augmented, supplemented and/or verified, insofar as possible, by the various Medical Departments 911230 BinEulM 01830 - 3- through their relationships with their subordinate offices, private physicians, hospitals, clinics and laboratories* To determine the degree of possible exposure to various potential carcinogens, the various Medical Departments would be expected to request that their Personnel Departments furnish, insofar as their records permit, a detailed employment history, including not only information regarding the employment of the patient in the company or industry, but also any other employment in other industries as covered by their records. (See Appendix, Pages 2, 3* b 5 and 6 for the details of the information to be requested on (1 ) the initial report, (2) the clinical record and (3) the employment history.) The Survey Group of the University of Cincinnati would be expected to set up the necessary clerical mechanism to receive the initial reports, to process the clinical records and employment histories and to provide interim and final summations to the Medical Advisory Committee. The tabulations and analyses would be arranged to protect the identity of the companies and/or the individual patients involved in the study through the use of a code system. 2. Objectives The serious defect in this plan arises from the great variation in the amount and type of information available in files of the various Medical and Personnel Departments. For some companies, the need to collect this data is an entirely now concept. In others, even the provision of medical care programs for the employees is a relatively recent activity. ' 911230 BinEulM 01831 -k- This approach even with optimum^ conditions, information and cooperation, can only furnish a crude estimate of the prevalence of Neoplastic disease among employees of the cooperating companies who have had exposures to the older conditions and processes. The tabulations cannot be used to ascertain the potential hazards of the newer processes. However, if a consistent pattern in the -occupational histories of this group of cases was found, the presence of N 1 ' overlooked hazards in the older methods might be indicated. 'Furthermore, if an unusual distribution Is reported with regard to type and site of tumor, further epidemiological studies of Neoplastic disease in employees of the Petroleum Industry might be limited to only certain types and sites! 3. Approximate Period of Study It is readily apparent that, due to the many diverse situations found in the industry, the variation in the degree of cooperation offered by the different companies, the time needed to secure general acceptance of a standardized report and the necessary lag that will be encountered in setting up the clerical mechanism at the University of Cincinnati, this approach will require approximately two years to complete. It would be expected that the final report including cases as they have occurred up to and including January 1, 1951 could not be submitted before 1952, 911230 BinEulM 01832 description of the job of the individual in the company and/or industry, but also all other employment covered by their records. It is hoped that this record can be augmented or supplemented, if n e c e s s a r y b y the Medical Departments, since, in many instances, the patient will be in direct contact with the Medical Director or his immediate subordinates. (See Appendix, Pages 2, 3, Ij., % and 6 for the details of the information to be requested on (1 ) the initial report, (2) the clinical record and (3) the employment history.) It would be expected that the various Medical Departments, either directly or by securing the assistance of their Personnel Department, would furnish, periodically, similar employment histories for certain groups of employees in their company. The groups or samples required for this phase of the study would be selected with a direct request from the Survey Group, but only after personal consultation with tho various Medical Directors and subject to the general approval of the Medical Advisory Committee, (See Appendix, Pages $ and 6 for the employment history as used for cases which would be sought not for all, but only a sample of the total number of employees in the company or industry.) The Survey Group of the university of Cincinnati would be expected to set up the necessary clerical mechanism to receive the initial reports, to process the clinical records and employment histories and to' provide periodic interim summations to the Medical Advisory Committee. The tabulations 911230 BinEylM 01834 -7 - and analyses would be so arranged that the Identity of the companies and/or the individual patients involved would again be protected through the use of a code system. In the attempt to calculate incidence rates for at least a fraction of the industry, it would be expected that the Survey Group would prepare the plan, subject to the approval of the Medical Advieory Committee, for selecting the needed employee groups for the population studies as previously described. As an adjunct to the Central Registry, it would seem desirable to create a Central Pathology Service at the University of Cincinnati to whom the various cooperating Medical Departments could forward slides and/or tissues for diagnosis and a uniform classification. This particular activity would stimulate the cooperation of the physicians in the search and reporting of cases to the Central Registry. It would also establish a uniform level for acceptance of a case as one of proved Neoplastic disease. How this service can be established and financed still remains an open question. 2. Objectives This approach would furnish, in contrast to the prevalence rates of the Retrospective Study, an approximate estimate of the incidence of Neoplastic disease among employees of the cooperating companies, since it is hoped that, for at least a portion of the industry, adequate estimates of the number of employees involved and possible exposures to various potentially carcinogenic hazards will be obtained. 911230 BlnEulM 01835 f 8 - It would be expected that this plan would augment, t supplement and finally supplant the Historical Approach in defining far more accurately the hazard of the older processes* If successful, and since this will be a current registry providing for reports in the years to come, the analyses could be used to ascertain the hazards of the newer processes, provided that the study is maintained and supported for a sufficient period of time to take into account the long latent period commonly found with Neoplastic disease. It is also possible that this plan, in the future, will provide comparisons of incidence rates not only between various processes, but also geographic areas, racial groups, companies, other industries and the general population* 3. Approximate Period of study It would be well to call attention at this point to the fact that the greatest obstacle to this approach is the dynamic almost fluid state of the technology of the Petroleum Industry. This situation will seriously interfere with any fi logical attempt to define accurately the degree and period of 0 exposure, except in the very broadest of terms. It will be, 8 likewise, the most dangerous factor in the estimation of exposed populations, since process changes bring about the 0 frequent shifting of the employees in the refinery operations. Also, since it is generally accepted that Neoplastic 0 reactions require usually a relatively long and heavy exposure to even proved carcinogenic agents, and that there is, 1 likewise, usually a very long period between exposure and ; 0 911230 BinEulM 01836 reaction, it is readily apparent that the registry must be continued and adequately maintained for a considerable period of time before it will even begin to measure the hazard of the newer processes. It is to be hoped, however, that satisfactory rates measuring the hazards of the older processes would be available much earlier. 911230 BinEutM 01837 - 10 B* It is proposed to continue the exploration and the possible implement ation, as soon and insofar as possible and/or feasible with due consideration and understanding of the wide variation in coopany policies medical care programs management Interest and labor relations, of the third and fourth approaches, namely, (III) Employee Health Benefit Plan Study and (IV) the Field Survey for Retrograde or Hyperkeratotic Lesions. The description, objectives and approximate period of study for both of these attractive and possibly feasible approaches must await further consultation, discussion and pilot trials before they can be brought to the Subcommittee and/or Medical Advisory Committee for their consideration. It is hoped that these two avenues can be explored sufficiently during the summer of 1950 to permit firm planning at the November meeting. 911230 BinEulM 01838  r r c o 0 0 o 0 - 11 - C* It is proposed to implement* as soon and insofar as possible and/or feasible, with due consideration and undehstending of the wide variation in company policies, medical care programs, management interest and labor relations, the last two approaches, namely, (V) Repetition of the Slack Wax Studies and (VI) the Consultation Service, It is not proposed that the Survey Group take an active part in the Slack Wax Studies-, but that the observations will be repeated by individual companies. It is hoped that the Survey Group of the University of Cincinnati, through personal contact, can make certain that adequate observations are secured so this question can be thoroughly explored and evaluated* In serving as an agency to insure that the individual company protocols are valid, acceptable and comparable, it is expected that they can act as a medium of dissemination so that the various other cooperating Medical Departments will have access to this information. It is planned, likewise, that the Survey Group of the University of Cincinnati will stand ready to assist, upon the specific request of any Medical Department, in the planning of other studies to determine particular and/or unusual hazards. It is not expected that the information so gathered would be disseminated generally unless the interested company permitted this action. The sole objective for this approach would be to insure comparability of studies and observations in case general dissemination or comparisons became desirable. 911230 BinEulM 01839 e appendix E 0 3 0 * 911230 BlnEulM 01840 COPY December 20, 19^9 Appendix Page 1 Dr. Mclver Woody ESSO Standard Oil Co. BUILDING Dear Doctor Woody: You haye told me the plan is being developed to accumulate in the bande of investigators of the University of Cincinnati, who have been designated for the purpose, data with respect to operatives engaged in petroleum refining and petroleum handling who may have been determined to be suffering from or who may be suspected of suffering from cancer which may be attributed to their occupation or to contact with petroleum products. You have asked me if I see any . objection from a legal standpoint to transmitting to the designated authorities at the University of Cincinnati the records of such patients. There has grown up a feeling, and perhaps a right, on fhs part of patients to have their consultations with their physicians and the physicians' records with respect to the patients treated as confidential between the physician and the patient. Even if the patient's right to have such communications and records treated as confidential is not fully established, I think our anxiety to develop cordial relations between our employees and company doctors ought to compel us to regard those communications and records as confidential. Starting from this premise, I think it is entirely proper from- a legal Standpoint, and feasible from the standpoint of the relations we want to preserve with our employees, for you to report cases of the kind fierein mentioned, provided you keep the identity of the patient strictly confidential. I suggest that these reports may be made under a series of code numbers or under fictitious names, you preserving in your confidential files the identity of the code number or fictitious name of the patient involved. I think if this anonymous scheme is observed in making the reports you have described to me, it cannot offend the patient's legal rights. I feel equally strong it is not likely to cause any disturbance in the relationship between our employees and our company doctors. I would think that if the designated authorities at the Univer sity of Cincinnati desire to compile and use generally in the industry or with the public any statistics with respect to data of the kind herein described, which they receive from our company and from other companies, they ought to'again use codo numbers so that the identity of the company whose employees are embraced in the statistics will be carefully concealod. If the foregoing restrictions arc observed, I think the confiden tial nature of the physician-patient relationship will bo preserved, and, similarly, the confidential nature of the company records will be preserved and I do not anticipate any trouble would be involved. ESH A Very truly yours, Orlelnir230 BinEulM Signed Hail 0184! Preliminary Notification Appendix Page 2 T. Identification Data A. Code Number - All identifying data (Name-Address) to be retained by the Medical Director, correlated with the code number. B. Age (Year born) C. Sex D. Pace II. Clinical Data A. Type of Tumor B. Site of Tumor C. Date of Diagnosis* 911230 BlnEulM 01842 Appendix Page 3 Detailed Clinical Record (To "be completed in duplicate) (One copy to be retained by the Medical Director) I* Identification Data A. Code Number - All identifying data (Name-Address) to be retained in the office of the Medical Director. B. Age (Year born) C. Sex D. Race E. Marital Status F. Employment Status II. Clinical Data A, Dates 1 . First Symptom 2. First Visit to Physician 3. First Diagnosis k- First Treatment or Hospitalization 5. Death B. ''Clinical and Pathologic Diagnosis - List of tumors to be reported which will be placed on the reverse of record. This list is not exhaustive but comprises the great majority of terms usually used. When there is doubt concerning the malignant nature of a tumor, it should be reported. 911230 BinEulM 01843 Carcinoma Sarcoma Epithelioma Endothelioma Al 1 and any term of which one of these words is a part. Acanthoma Astrocytoma Brain Tumors Chorioma Chloroma Cholesteatoma Embryoma Ependymoma Ganglioneuroma Glioma Granulosa Cell Tumor (Ovary) Hypernephroma Hodgkin's Disease Leukemia Lymphoma Lympho sarcoma Linitis Plastica (Stomach) Melanoma Meningioma Myeloma Medulloblastoma Mixed Tumor Neurocytoma 0ligodendroglioma Pinealoma Syncytioma Seminoma Sympathoblastoma Spongioblas toma Teratoma Thymoma Paget's Disease (Breast) Wilms t Tumor (Kidney) Ewing's Tumor (Bone) Grawitz Tumor (Kidney) C. Primary Site and Stage D. Treatment Advised and Received . E. Complications - Metastatic Sites III. Unusual Exposure to "Possible Carcinogens - Including estimates of Degree, Type and Length of Time (As elicited by the Physician) List which will be placed on the reverse of the record. A. Physical Agents 1* Trauma 2. Radiant Heat 3* Solar Rays zu Ultraviolet Rays 5. Radioactive Substances or Roentgen Rays B. Inorganic Substances 1. Arsenic 2. Chromates C. Organic Substances 1. Aromatic Amines 2. Tar or Pitch 3. Soot 4.. Creosote and Anthracene Oils - _______ _ _____________ _ 911230 BinEulM 01844 Detailed Occupational Record (To be coupleted in triplicate) (One copy to be retained by the Medical Director and Personnel Department)* Appendix Page 5 I. Identification Data A. Code Number B. Age at Commencing Work C. Employment Status II. Occupations and Detailed Employment Record - Listed in Chronological Order A. Name )f Companies and/or Plants B. Products Handled by Worker * C. Job Descriptions - The Broad Classifications which will be placed on reverse of card. 1. Production a. Riggers and Drillers b. Others 2. Refining a. Cracking ' (1) Catalytic (2) Thermal (3) Others b. Lubricant and Paraffin (1) Crude Wax (2) Others c. Straight Run Distillation and Light Ends d. Special Products 911230 BinEutM 01845 06- 24/92 14:10 409 636 6064 jH L HOBSON l 020 020 Appendix Page 6 e. Maintenance (1) Pipe fitters and Boilermakers (2 ) others f. Control Laboratory g. Others 3. Transport ati on a. Pipe Line b. Fuel Oil Carriers c. Others Ij.. Marketing and Executive a. Service station b. Others 5. Others - Specify in detail D. Periods Employed III. Unusual Exposure to Possible Irritants - Including estimates ~ of Degree, Type and Length of Time (As elicited by the Employment Record) (See list - Detailed Clinical Record) 911230 BintulM 01846