Document XRBZr0a2pD59q6pOVMOvwn5EG

. ............. mmmmmmmmmmmmmMmmMmmmmmm AR226-2415 PENNY, HERE ARE THE RESULTS FOR THE C-8 IN WATER SAMPLES THAT YOU AND TERRY 'COLLECTED. I SHOW A COMPARISON OF EXP STATION VS CH2MHILL. TWO OF EXP STATIONS' SAMPLES WERE NOT REPORTED, I'LL CHECK ON THIS. RESULTS ARE VERY INTERESTING. I'LL LEAVE IT TO YOU TO FORWARD TO TERRY, DAVE, ROGER, WALT, AND BILL ANDERSON SINCE YOU DID THE WORKS I'LL SEND TO CRUM AND COIN IN POLYMERS. . MIKE v a******************************************************************** EXPERIMENTAL STATION TEST WELL #27 WELL #331 WILL MW-4 7.1 Va/1 OHIO RIVER "1 OHIO RIVER -1 DUPLICATE <i <i OHIO RIVER -2 OHIO RIVER -2 DUPLICATE <i 3.9 OHIO RIVER -3 (NEAR OUTFALL) OHIO RIVER -3 DUPLICATE 19.6 16.8 OHIO RIVER -4 OHIO RIVER -4 DUPLICATE 5.2 3.1 OHIO RIVER -5 OHIO RIVER -5 DUPLICATE 4.2 2.8 OHIO RIVER -6 OHIO RIVER --6 DUPLICATE ? <\ 2.0 NEW LUBECK WELL -F NEW LUBECK WELL -F DUPL <1 <1 NEW LUBECK WELL -B NEW LUBECK WELL -B DUPL <1 <1 OLD LUBECK WELL -1 OLD LUBECK WELL -1 DUPL 8.8 4.1 OLD LUBECK WELL -4 OLD LUBECK WELL -4 DUPL 4.2 2.9 (PPB C-8) CH2MHILL 1.2 0.1 0.2 NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED 11.0 12,0 0.8 1.1 1,1 1.1 0.5 0.6 NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED 0.3 NOT DETECTED DESTROYED 1.1 /!</*r m / 0.9 1.7 T t~ * fX o /w EID103027 ASH010172