Document XORRJ74Lx3yD6Ypzabe48Gpxx

Message From: Sent: To: Subject: Beck, Nancy [/0=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=168ECB5184AC44DE95A913297F353745-BECK, NANCY] 5/26/2017 2:01:27 PM Dunlap, David [David.Dunlap@kochps.com] RE: TSCA rules Thanks for the input David! I totally agree with you that we wont be able to pull this off working alone! Regards, Nancy Nancy B. Beck, Ph.D., DABT Deputy Assistant Administrator, OCSPP MCJ*DEZ! P: 202-564-1273 beck.nancy@epa.gov From: Dunlap, David [mailto:David.Dunlap@kochps.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 10:25 AM To: Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancy@epa.gov> Subject: TSCA rules One general note for you as the Agency finalizes the risk assessment rule. Simply put, the goal of TSCA is to manage risk from chemicals used in commerce. Everyone should agree on this. But this won't truly happen in any broad way at the minimum pace laid out in the legislation. For the LCSA to truly meet its potential and serve the public's needs (minimize risk without stifling innovation), TSCA must work with pace and efficiency. Not everyone may agree with this premise, but I certainly do. For this to happen the Agency must treat industry as an equal and trusted stakeholder and find cooperative (not coercive) ways to leverage industry's financial and knowledge base in a way that meets our common goal of low risk (for the intended use) and effective products/chemicals for the businesses and the public. A good start will be through an industry nomination process that encourages rather than penalizes or disadvantages industry generated risk assessments. New TSCA will only be successful if the Agency can incentivize industry to do much of the work in assessing both high and low risk chemicals. Regards, DDD David D. Dunlap j: Director, Environmental Regulatory Affairs Koch Companies Public Sector Culture eats strategy for breakfast - Peter Drucker From: Beck, Nancy [mailto:Beck.Nancy@epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 10:25 AM To: Dunlap, David <David.Dunlap@kochps.com> Subject: RE: CDR Sent by an external sender Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 1 ED 002061 00050749-00001 Thank you. This is not the first time I'm hearing concerns about CDR. Nancy Nancy B. Beck, Ph.D., DABT Deputy Assistant Administrator, OCSPP P: 202-564-1273 M: Ex. 6 becR7nnVPlp.gv From: Dunlap, David [maiito:David.Dunlap@kochps.coml Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 10:22 AM To: Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancy@epa.gov> Subject: CDR I remember now. All stakeholders should be focused on making sure EPA gets accurate data. Without accurate data, EPA cannot make proper Section 5 and 6 decisions. Data quantity does not equate to data QAULITY or even data useability! DDD Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 1 ED 002061 00050749-00002