Document X7YD1pYoowE6KLN09ZeXBkrrJ

FILE NAME: National Safety Council (NSC) DATE: 1966 Feb 10 DOC#: NSC141 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Meeting Minutes with Attendee List - NSC Technical Publications Committee; Industrial Conference FILECOPY t'y C' 64 ( ) LU O Presiding: KraUTHS innisngtt nmmcs TKTfmncAL prmr.TCOTTnws r t M fr r r m ire m u r. rm tm v r 10, 19 vramoOTH bocm, lake sbdre club CHICAGO, ILXJBOIS E. 0. Mattocks ATTENDIBQs ABSBfT: E. 0 Mattocks W.T. McLean Ton WUkensen W. , Broun J V.'Grimaldi B. B* Moore 0. H. Orth C . C Ruddlck QUBSTB: Stuart Hopkinn, Rational Safety Hewo Prank McElroy, Publications Department UoRAftY N<\HviAL SAFETY COUNC3L <42$ N MiCHIOkN AVK. CHtCAOO f t . tjUi I The meeting was called to order at 9:15 e.m, by Chatm a r Mattocks. II. Minutes of Previous Meeting. Mr* Mattocks called for corrections concerning the minutes of the October 2k meeting. It vas mentioned that the name of John Skinner had been left*off of the list of those attending the October 2k meeting. Otherwise, the minutes vere satis factory and were approved unanimously. III. Progress Report - IrJuatrlal Conference Survey of t-.fr ^yrrowAT. fltwmrr wgww Stu Hopkins reported that since we had exhausted the Industrial Conference members, so far as finding new reviewers Is concerned, be had been selectlng reviewers from the Executive Committeeman o f t h e 26 Sections. Mr. Bopklns reported that the quality of the reviews were good, but.the number replying was poor. The first two months that thia facility vas used t only 50 per cent o f the reviewers compiled as requested. John Skinner auggested that Stu Ifopklna use only the subcoaslttee Chair* men of the Executive fcsmlttees of the 26 Sections. Mr. McLean asked Mr. Bopklns lf it vere possible, that data eheeta, when published In the B'iilOBAL SAFETY H E W , might be bound In aujebra way that the ntlre Data Sheet Section could b ^ i o r n out as a unit, rather than as tear sheets. Mr. Hopkins replied that this could be done, and he thought it would not add greatly to the coat. Be pointed out that there might be an advertisement o r two in this section. IV. Progress Report on Mew Technical Publications. It was reported that the Porting Rafftt.y Mnmial had be reprinted in August following the original printing of 1,000 copien in Frbruuxy. Prank McElroy reported the completion of the Third Edition of the ii-asb... book for Accident Prevention. PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT N sc -jy o - 2- McELroy hIbo reported on the Data Sheet Series on Visual.Aida,... The dnta eheeto included ares Motion Pictures for Sttfetymen 57* Projected Still Pictures 561*32 Hon-Projected Visual Aids V. ftev Data Sheet Appraisal and Ballot Pons. In general, the Committee approved of the nev format. However, It was mentioned that when the present supply Is exhausted, It should be revised to Include some in* dication that the draft also should be returned and not kept In file, since It vas not intended for permanent reference. The Technical Publications Committee requested that two copies of the Appraisal and Ballot Draft be Bent to each masher of this Cemnittee, Instead of one.: Arrangement)] have been made to comply with this request. It also was mentioned that the Committee h*-* requested, and the Council had agreed, to send two copies of each nt <r data sheet to members of the Technical Publications Committee. In the past, this has been done at the end of the year. By now, the members have received copies of the new data sheets published in 1965 and two copies each of those published so far In 1966. Routinely, two copies will be sent as soon as they are published rather than postponing this until after the year Is ended. VI. Accident Prevention Manual Bevlew Credit To Reviewers. There was considerable discussion concerning how much credit should be given to reviewers and how credit would be in dicated In the Accident Prevention Manual. Kelly pointed out that thank you letters were written to reviewers routinely as their ccmments were received. There was no definite conclusion made exoept that the subject will be discussed again at the May 1966 meeting and acme method of credit will be determined based on that discussion. The Ccmmittee reviewed the Suggested Organizations Review Chapters of the AIM, Fifth Edition, which had been developed by the Committee in June 1965. Each chapter H a t i n g vas reviewed and a number of organiza tions were deleted, and in acme cases the names of one or two organizations were added. It also vas determined in the discussion that there were basically five types of reviewers as follows: 1. Industrial Conference Members 2. `Trade Associations 3. Professional Societies (weak respondents) U . Professional People Government Services t - 3 - It was pointed odt that the Armed Services end the United States Depart ment of Labor had been omitted. Where pertinent, these have been added to the lists. Further discussion brought out that the Technical Publications Oonalttea recoownded that this H o t of reviewers be used and that ve not go through the Industrial Conference to select a Captain for each chapter as has been done In the p u t two editions. It was agreed that the Secretary of the Technical Publications Ceesnlttee, by July 1, would write to each organisation asking if they were willing to review specific chapters as shown on the llat. If no replies were received by January 1 1967 another selection would he made. It was Indicated that by January 1 1967 vs should have an active H a t of organisations willing to review one or more chapters. Frank McZlroy suggested that we might run a pilot test review, sending the ten chapters out to ten organizations. YU. Data Sheet Review. The Technical Publications Committee was pleased with the work done by the Industrial Department staff in evaluating the existing data sheets. They reccunend that the procedure be followed through Ismedlately. The Staff Representatives are to work from the list of those which they felt Should be revised requesting lmsediate review and revision by thu Executive Comnlttee concerned. V I H . Design Handbook There was boom discussion on the proposal that we consider development of the design handbook. However, it was decided to postpone further discussion on It until the meeting In May. i MEMBERSHIP ROSTER INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE 1948 - 1974