Document VjQV0z8qMr6zgLNYwNz4DMEJj
M kt
ATICO, HC
^VaM` TM*` CBinaTM MQMM
z. J,
t r. oaiiat
rnmj siu
ftt* 20, 1942
Ca / i, 1942, I* J. ItXm asd t
fUltU
XUkilm, fbatfar l inlliUU| af tti Till
at AlnliUt Ta* K* KlklMlMi UA Vm pvtfltiaXf anplayad
tta fwiVlt Oaapaay, aM had praaantad a i--fl aal papar*
tta *aa tf gaa ahynatafrapty ^ ttc iilmlutlai af Irat
.tin U Tla/1 thlsrlds* nr. HUkiUa'i papsr la tta aaly
dlaalaaad in a aaarth af tta Utaraturs, and alaaa ta
ia m aaylayad at Till ahara va ten frlaadly aaataat, tta Tiait
ms mmialljr
Mr, ftltkalaaa first ahawad a atraaatacraphls traaa ia teite tte fsllsvlaf layaritlas ia rtayl ahlarlda war* dataatadi
tetntiai
8atrttia
Jiattyl ahlarlda Tlayl ahlarlda
Tiayl aaatylaaa attyl ahlarlda Tiayi traalda iaorlldwa ahlarlda
"
4
it i/a 14 1/2 21 1/2 91 97
tltmaat
1 ns waad aa aa latacaal ataadasd aad t ia tha rlayl ahlarlda.
aat
datarnlaad ia a typlaal
la af lljaid rlsyl
ahlari
ir tta 2thyl Oarparmtiaa* SUsv tta
af tta asiatnatlaa tad taan ta dataat asataldtkyda, ii aaaa via
dataatadV aa attaayt n mad# ta aimr* additlaaal UpwittM
jdite ara laaar teliist than rimyl ahlarlda, (Rathyl ahlarlda su
dataatad tat aa luantltatirt suvsr tta attaiaad taacaaa It vai
lawar telUa)* It la Utemtisc ta aata that tta Idaatltlas af
tta ladlTldnal UpiriUas aftar aaparatlan vara dataanlaad hy MM
apaatroaatyy. asd astflnsd ty rataatlaa Ham,
* hraaariad at flttaWrgt Onfsmss an Amalytlaal ^Aayllad tyaatvaaaayy. Tat* 29 War. 4, 194a
Card U 9/7/40 Larry Praatan itatraata Cada 44*94-41
AP00044134
-i-
M* 0,
.)*ar^4 m latrataaa* lata tfr* tLmAU|Ti^
"jy gaMlla^ % rsi2i$a la 217 laa, paarlac
afclwrlA# from
a baxr Ulo i&t i7rli|t ftplitiai tk pXvactr aai itei
laJaatlBf lata tfca
ftifckalaaa ballavad
Ttpmtloa laaaaa vara as*ll*ibla.
lit tpptraUfl 1U afelafc th#a taalpMi wr* vaa a 'Arabia tluwMinyk* lOAUmtid bp H*. Rlkfcalaaa.
Thl* aatoaAlta aaaaatlallp U aaaa prlaalpla aad Aaaitn *a U
Arabia abr--atacrapb AaaaribaA la lira* tapn Caa2-0*a Aaallac *itb Ua ialaniaaUai X atrbaayl aalfld* la tirti iltii&i. Satb ilu war* 10 tMt last, paaka* with Albatpl aalaat# b abraaaaorb mad war* oparata* at ?0#C, ?b* first # praparatiw* !& vas 1/3* G*tf* *blla tM amalytlaal aalaaa
1/4* 0.0.
fcibatpl aalaat* a*llam pMlrlig aad aaall aajsplaa af
to* liAtaA impurltloa hit* a* baaa
WUaa ur im
raaairad, v* will attaap* to dapnlilaat*a* tba ratamtlaa tla* tai
a*pfti*tl*** Aawavar, oar raaact saaaaaaaa 1U ta* aaa f
h* X1m italMtica da tootora aak ui feepafml Ibit m mk
ashlar* a aaaaitiwitp a^aal to tUt af Alkkalaaa wlt^oat Ou
*# af a pwparatlra ata** la thm ahraaatagrapb.
W, re 1
aat
a. Kalla*
a. Alaaahar* P. V. *. l. ii<
I. J. Vaiscm ?. Oollab
ai.
AP00044135
, il t * l
* A. H, Taylor
! MF- C. A* Cook
M Murray Hill
M
--
SUBJECT: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC AMALT3I3 OF VC1
Calvert City
1-- `
n.i.
' -i --=--
Jana 13. 1962
(*.** t. fm MUftttW
At tha present tlna at Calvert City we ara analysing tha inlat and axit of our vinyl chlorida monomer reactors via gas chroma tography. For thia analysis we usa a Perkin-Elmer I54-C gas chromatograph containing a 6 foot i inch stainlass ataal column packed with Floropak 80 eeatad with 20% Silicone DC 200. With a temperature of 35C., inlat prassura of 5 psi, and 8.2 volta bridge currant, air has a retention tine of 0,85 ainutas, C9H2 1.30. HC1 2.50, and VC1 5*4* Chlorine any also ba separated on this column, haying a retention time of 4 ainutas.
While coating 20% liquid substrata on teflon supposedly im-
gossibla, wa hare found that this weight par cant gires us attar raaults than tha racosnandad 10% level. Wa haya also__ _ uaad Sllicona DC 220 and found it to ba suitable. While wo hare not triad it, several people hare claimed that freezing the teflon prior to preparing columns makes it easier to handle. Wa have not triad any columns longer or shorter than tha present 6 foot column, hut have investigated temperature and flow rata and find that tha present values give us the heat results*
Greenbrier Instruments Company in one of their process gas chromatographs separates *2, vCl, HC1, and C2H2* Using a 12 foot silicone on teflon column at 57C., current of 13 ata., and 60 cc/min. carrier flow, N2 has a retention time of 1 minute* C2H2 1.8, HC1 2.0, and VC1 4.0.
At tha recant ISA symposium in Charleston, W. Va., I was talking to some people from Monsanto* s Texas City plant and they claimed that DuPont T-6 grads ttflon was the best to use for VCl work. They alsq^mmntiened that sometime in the near future their will be publishing a paper on the analysis of VCl by gas chroma* togrsphy.?
*."**C^i* '-vim1' For work in gas analyais fro* the stripping section of our polymer plant we use a Perkin-Elmer E* column (Carbowax 1500)' to analyse gas samples containing 90% VCl. At 706., 10 pai inlet pressure, and 8.2 volts, VCl has a retention time of 1.3 minutes, acetaldehyde 4*0, acetone 6.0, rlnyl acetate 9*0, and trlchlorm* ethylene 13*0.
AP00044I36
June 13, 1962
B, ?, loodrieh has recommended the use of a 20 foot inch column ooatalnin* 30i Armeen 3D on ehrcmesorb, it a temperature of 3SC,. they claim the following retention timeax propane 2,4 minutes, methyl chloride 3*25, VC1 3*40, ethyl chloride 6,40, 2-ehlorooropene 7.7, *7 Br .3, VCl^ 12*5, 3-chloropropene 14*2, 1,1 dichloroethan* <0,2, and ehloroprene 22,0,
We hare obtained a column of the above type for evaluation on our Micro-Tek instrument but hare not found time to do so yet. We also have * 20 foot i inch column containing 10ft Armeen 3D on teflon which vre want to try out.
OACxaja cc: R, L. Siegaann
CA Jtr
COOK
AP00044137
ABCAC
i H, Taylor Xorrtr Bill
AHALTS331 TUtn CIOOHZD5 MQRGHEB
R. 1. jtigMim
Calvert City
ta* lf9 1963
1 md tdth interact tht trip report by I. J. Iblaon nod P. 0oU6b
About 4 year ago, 2 diaaoeaed KukU, paper with Bill Kmrrla, Chief Chariot at Goodrich. Bo stated that Goodrich lavoetigatsd
the procedure and did not Ilka It. Consequently, tholr reeeereh group proceeded la other directlone* reeu&lns u tho chroma' tograpnie method using Amson 3P oa ebronosorb, doaorlbad la crcook's lottor to yma, 6/16/62.
Thi* nothod la nor la uao by Goodrich at Calvert City. They performing thla analyeie on a Bookman 0C*2A using thermal om
duotivity dotootioa. Vacant2yp tboy have equipped thla unit with a hydrogen flame dotooter and a temperature progrew--r. 1 tear , thoy planed to evaluate thoir mothod using the hydrogen flam* \ dotooter, bat harm act hoard thalr rooulta.
from tho ooana X harm aoon, tboy harm problem with TCI
bob arm reporting rooulta aa iov aa 2
Ad didJUkke
identified^ fnsuntlos bv mama that tholr teaiivllli lab has detected
My Information AO lapvitiw
ldontlflod about 2D. *e plan to try
SB on Teflon* with
tho bopo of reducing tho tailing of VOX. Goodrich hoo not triad
this yarn.
Goodrich uooa MleroTob snap coupler* mbioh arm oxeollent vinyl ohlorldm. Ethyl Corporation alom mama Xlm>Tk
enap samplers and tho Micro-Tab liquid oo^lm valve* X
Micro-Teh worked oloomly with Ethyl and is working with at Oof soai% In. by have had no suaooom in imruting information from UoM-tsk, for they claim they harm had no clearance ft release emeh Inforaetloo, but ere trying to got a reloooo from
Ethyl.
Attached for your information la a ramaot analysis of Ethyl
Corporation's vinyl chloride and monomer from Goodrich, moth mads vis tho ethylene dlchloride routs.
Udtsh Attssnmont ms X. f. Volson
F. Gollah A. MOlor
I* Me Blanchard
b. u szEonon
AP00044138
vxsn. amorce*
ieidlty. as MSI, ppM
UilrlWi Pf iitiU>hydA> ppm.
HfM, PPM v
kur, PPM
m
ta MUtllM, ppM
NraUtt, u I^Bsa ppM
Atte, ppM
Paxil liUMriitt H*
HS|Mr CanviraiMy %
ImIB TUOOalt? v
rurx ktm*rimt n* ,%
'
t
.
Stfcylahlarld., n.
IfttaL
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
U.0 .o 0.01
1
0.0 0.1 99.1
. o.or - 4 .e...
0.05
to ^
0.00
0.00
0.00
v*/:
1
0.5t
04
JUO
/.'r , ;
,.vV -a
.
.
> -,,.
AP00044139
fileAftCftC
Q. '% Colm Mow York
J P. *!UKK - 7ISTL CHtTlIC* CU2K
fu l* leseana Calvert city
2/U/62
2/12/62
'lav# stated oany tires before that the enapllng rmd analysis of vinyl chloride aonomsr is sot as staple as It locks* Even with carefully controlled nd standardised procedures* it It ?2aeet impossible to duplicate results within aoraal anelytleel Unite* Our friends at Goodrich ala agree with thle preaiee* However, analysis for water in vinyl chloride - under almost any mioaibly diverse eeaditione will not lead to a difference of 0*3!* in the results of tee tests*
The standard method in the industry for water in vinyl chloride la the Karl fischer oethod* Variation la techniques aaployed to avoid atnoephsrle oolatwe oontsalnation are widespread* hut even here, the spread free the beet eethod to the worst netted is only la the order of 0*02S*
The eeapllao technique is an additional source of error - but if one uses s book which is standard - and takes reasonable precautions to avoid oontaninstlca* results obtained by the different sampling tochaiquae should not differ by acre thaa s few hundredths of a per east*
la open oontainere such os a Sewer flask - doss lead to vary high results la the analysis for water* and* of course* failure to puree sample lines will do the seas*
Attached is cur currant procedure for soapltng and analysts for water* Pertinent ocooents have been added to indicate critical points*
X al#*ftddd that the tank ears in questtea were sampled after fllllnfL$tt eonpleted and the taapia obtained via the stapling davios ed the car. This devise reaovee a eeapls Area a well in the oar bottom*
cc 1 B. ft, Craahln - ST F* Rears - ST
S* U Jaffee - ST B* ?* Qeles - ST s* r. Qaeawsy - cc
AP00044140
H 6000 - c 4 (Coat'd)
nalytlcal rrocedure (Cont'd)
i
1. "ry electrodes *ind stirrer vith Kleenex, titration vessel In oven at 2j05C* *i*d cool la Jasoieator*
2. dd 50 ol of "ethanol to dry titration vessel nd ran a blank* (Upper dial at 70g lower dial
at 35*) an to a 30 second endpoint*
3* Add 50 al of aethtnol to a second dry titration vessel* taro on balance and add 30 sroas of vinyl chloride after insuring that the aoaple cylinder nipple la clean and dry.
4* Xasediately connect vessel to aoo tltrator and stopoer. Titrate using sans settings as la the
blank detaralnatlon and to a 20 second endpoint*
atomamma* HjO, ppm - fnl KT far Simla
J flfeo y`taCa,`> ,, io,CXX
tt*-C factor*
rotoralRo by proceeding a for blank determination* kben endpoi_n_t is* __ reac-h ed* * ^_ oMl.gb la one drop of------------_________________ ^ fater froa a weighing bottle or froo a vial fitted ulth a aodicins dropper (counted in a cork stopper* Titrate to and point aa above. Uoe this titration
for calculating factor*
Hoteat 1* hila nany labcratorlee neutralise the water la the oethaaol solvent before adding vinyl chloride Instead of naming a blank * it bee been found that high results are obtained, particularly on high hueldlty days. At the and point * a sUrbt nom of KF reagent is present which rapidly reacts with ataospherle noistore daring the aubeequeet handling.
AP00044142
3 AM 6000 * 0 4 (Coat1*) Analytical ?rccadura (Coat'd) Hflttti (Coat'd) 3 If a Mattlar "800* balanea is neb available for rapid walbi&g9 eylindar oaa ba valghad befora ?md oftar addin* tha oonoaor to tha titration nsMl* ai*h to 0*1 gran* 3, Tha vinyl ohlorlda trill boil off fron tha vassal during tha proeadura, affaotlvaly blanketin* tha systan and nvoiding ataoapbarlo contadoatioc* Tba watar fron tha vinyl ohlorlda remains in tha aathaaoJU Tha vaaaal containing tha oathoaol la net art*sooiad to pravant loea of aonoaar baoauaa tha EF reaction rata ia ajctreoaly alow at low tswparstures# 4* Titration to a visual and point eta ba uasd vitk raaultaafc loas In accuracy*
aptTM cra>
AP00044143
CUMBERLAND
R# L. Giegjnaam (2) Calvert City
Coat of VC1 Monomer Analysis
C* A* Cook Calvert City
February 23, 1961
In determining the coat of a laboratory analysis of vinyl chloride monomer shipment samples, the following times for analysis ware used:
Aldehydes
45 minutes
Acid and CgHj
60 minutes
Turbidity
10 minutes
Conversion
95 minutes
Non-volatiles
35 minutes
Water
35 minutes
Dorell Weathering Iron
20 minutes 45 minutes
Resin Viscosity
35 minutes
Bomb Cleanup
T& minutes minutes Total
In addition, 15 minutes is allowed for laboratory observation of sample pulling, giving a total time of 400 minutes* This Is actual working time and does not take into account the many waiting periods that occur during a monomer analysis such as allowing the VC1 to vaporize off, polymerisation time or freeze*
thaw time in polymer conversion test* Tims has been allowed for the preparation of reagents and apparatus cleanup in all cases
where required*
At a cost of analysis of 44*59 per hour (the figure supplied by Accounting Department) a total analysis time of 400 minutes would put the cost of a TCI shipment analysis at $32*63*
It is felt that in general all time figures are on the con servative side and would only be attainable by a technician under optimum conditions*
AP00044I44
Mr. R. L. Siegmann (2)
February 23, 1961
This fisure or ^32*63 per shipment analysis would apply to on sample being carried all the way through. Obviously if several samples were run at the same time, some savings would
be noted. Also this data assumes that the monomer is uninhibited* If the monomer was Inhibited the cost of analysis would be slg~ nlficantly higher.
CACsmja
CHARLES A. COOK Project Chemist
AP00044145
CUMBERLAND
F* Wood Calvert City
VINYL CHLORIDE CATALYST
C* A, Cook Calvert City
May 10, 1962
The following ia for your Information*
A, Catalyeta for VC1* I Calculation of the Complicated Reaction Equilibrium In the Syatheele of VG1* The specific action of sublimate catalyst* Janda, Ghent* svestl 11 15-23 (1957)
Xp values experimentally found in the synthesis of VC1 from C2H2 and HC1 with HgCl2 and active C as catalyst, were compared with the theoretical thermodynamic values* The A
equilibrium composition In the reaction mixture at 350-550' X was calculated* Sven at the initial mole ratio VC1 1:1, the conversion of C2H2 to VC1 decreases permanently with the
increasing temperature, and the conversion to 1,1-dichloroethane (ZZ) first slightly Increases and at temperatures about 230 decreases rapidly* This was found to be true by
experiment* By comparing the theoretical calculations wltk practical rasuxta In tha formation of ZZ In tha excess of HC1 the selective effect of the catalyst (HgCl2 on active C)
was determined In the reaction forming VC1.
B* ZZ Increasing the Activity of the HgClj Catalyst by the Addition of Inorganic Acids* Effect of the carrier of the catalyst salt on the activity and selectivity of the catalyst* Janda * Vanko, Ibid 2*4-5*
Is the synthesis of VC1 from C9R2 ^ HC1, the activity of the HgCl2 catalyst is increased by the addition of equi molar amounts of H3FO4, and BOIO4 to the HgCl2 on active C* The increase In activity of tha catalyst is dependent upon polarity of the said end increases in the order H3PO4 <16104* The chemical nature of the mercuric salt does not affect the selectivity of the catalyst* The type of aetive C used to prepare the catalyst does affect the activity am well as selectivity* The higher the amounts of Iron and sine in the aetive C, toe higher the formation of higher boiling by products*
t* **x,.
AP00044146
Mr. F. Wood
-2-
May 10, 1962
C. Ill Conditions for Development of Slda Reaction Products. Ibid 660
VC1| synthesised abovo 150 on a catalyst prepared by impregnating active C with HgCl2. contains from the products boiling above 200, MeCHCl2 (II) trans (OlOH-te (III). AoH (IV) and in sstaller amounts els (C1CR>2 (IV). CICR2CRCI2 (VI) and CR2"|CCl2 (VII). In the system for tne foroatlon of IV and VII water is necessary. Formation of HI, V, and VII is dependent on the demount of free chlorine in the HC1 entering the reaction. In reaction of HC1 with VC1, the formation of II, III., and VI and part of IV and VC1 is catalysed by the active C~p while the other part of VC1 and IV, VII | and V is catalysed by KgCl2*
D. IV Reaction Intermediates Formed During Synthesis in the
Presence of Water. Ibid
37-47 (1956)
The preparation and properties of some unknown compounds formed during the synthesis of VC1 on KgCl2 catalyst in the presence of water are described. The formula for the final compound was found to be OHCC (Xg-Cl)2 RgO HgQ(Rg01)2 -- 6X012* Kg0l2 catalyses the formation of VC1 even if not spread on matter having a large speoifle surface.
E. V Form of Inactivation of Bg Contact. Ibid 155-62
In the sythesle of VC1, the HgCl2 catalyst is mostly deactivated by the exoeee and unreacted C2H2 and by the humidity of the reaction system. The dsorease of catalyst activity caused by the pressure of HgQl2 vapor la negligible in the praxis. The only significant reaction leading partly to the reduction of HgC I2 to Xg2Cl2 and metallic Hg and partly to the formation of elementary C is the reaotion between C2H21 HgCl2# and water. This does not agree with finding of others.
CAC :mja
C. A. COOK \
AP00044I47
L. r*araet Jr* Murray Hill
DKTI31ICI1ATICM OF ACETALCEHYOB II VIBTJL CHLORXEE HCBCHCR
o J* Parker Calvert City
June U, 1*1
Thanks for the letter of Hay 31* Lou*
letter from you Is
always welcome --even one that requires on answer*
Out before answering your -;uaationst I uould like to inject some eomeests* Firet of all* Z have no quarrol with the
^wethyUndoXi method -- It has been la use for a lens tine and envoys a good reputation* *hy then develops a "gadget* method that smacks of hlerooaoeyT dimply because it has the following advantages over the turbldimetrio procedure*
1* The polarocraphlc method io five times faster*
2* The reagents are stable*
3* It is a simpler procedure with fewer steps*
Um It appears to he sore reproducible*
5* Xt can quantitatively separata mixed aldehydes* (see sttsahsd chart)
6* It can determine from 0*5 to over 1000 ppm aldehyde without the necessity of diluting or otherwise Juggling the sample else*
Out lets get down to esses* The 2-sethyllndole procedure re*
quiros about 3 hours for completion as oompored with 30 slisitse for the polsrograph* And If the aldehyde content goes much above 10 pas the 2*methyllndolo procedure has to be repeated *** soother 3 hours lost*
An an essmpXs* I'.ecsnfcly the lab received a monomer sample com* Coining gross amounts of aldehyde* The shifts made two attempts
to obtain results using the turbldlmatrlc method -- only to end up titrating the sample* Therefore it took some 6 hours to find
an approximate agtvsranfaj|TP8t--I il dikgiP^ofOiiflbineinmoi fple fjBfdffikisegraph c-
while it le true that in any method speed should be ancillary to
accuracy, wouldn't It be alee to have an aldehyde method that is both fact and accurate*
AP00044148
Sarnes, Jr*
2
<Tuna 1U$ 1961
nut before I c*t coopietely carried away let's answering your -luesticos,
>ttvw to gutitian 3o. 1
on with
from the data we have gathered so for tbs polaroeraphic method
appears to b# reproducible within 0*3 ppn as compared with 1,0 ppci for ths turhidlnetrlo method,
-bww -*o-/sttgeton-3a._2
The polarogrcphic reoults ars not always higher, -e ths attached results,
\ntKWC to quaatlon So. 3
Calibration curves fcr both methods were orepared using acetaldehyde-sranonla complex, These curves are attached,
^e a chede, ooee acetaldehyde (reatman) was added to vinyl
chloride aonooar and determined using both methods. The results on repetitive samples run independently verei
polarograph
2-methylindole
fl.2 ppm 3.5 3.5
Anaww to auoatlao ilo.
6,3 ppi 7.2
4 talstdk* was mads in th* 2*Mthyiindole procedure seat to you. e no Ioniser add the 20 ml of water to the 1 ml of concentrated aaacnifi hydroxide,
And now fcr sons results,
hen if# first developed the method we took a aaaple of monomer and ran. several independent analyses. The results weret
polarograph
2-eetbyllndole
3.1 ppm 3,0
5.2 ppm
2,6
2.7
On another sample of monomer that had been reported "less then 1 ppm aldehyde" we found 0.7 and 0.7 ppm on duplicate samples.
AP00044149
Jf*. 'imu, Jr
3 June 14* 1961
Inee the pelaroeraphle method has been used only v/hen there Has been semi confusion About the result* obtained by our Itb
:\nd thmo reported by onu of our suppliersv wo aro at preseat
sooouhat fltoaoicod as to just what tho accuracy of tho nsthod la* I'er aa ajcaaple, Hero Is on interesting case*
Dur supplier reported 11*3 ppa aldehyde or a teak oar mmm only to reealnd that figure for 5*6 ppeu Tho shifts found 6 to 30 ppcs on this car* The polsrograpti fouai 11*2 aad 11*2 pps*
in the second oar taken fro tho sane storage teak tho supplier ntuck to hie 5*6 ppo figure* Tho ahifto found 6*9 and 6*y ppeu
The polarograph round 11*2 aad 11*0 ppa *hot to believe?
one more results* polarograph
2-aethylindole
.ample 1
3.2 3*5 3*5
7.2 6.3
3aspl* 2
'aeple 3
'tapU 4
. ample 5
-aapls 6 eapls 7
5*7 5.5
6*5 3.1
19.3
o.a
1*3
11*6
11*6
6*9
10*6 over 10
14*0
leas then 1 lose than 1
6.0
That* a about It* Lou* e*ll set tho shifts to rtsa both methods
so we can gather nore detailed Infornatlca*
also sight obtain
sons nttill, weldable aaaple boobs and bubble the ooncaer directly
into tho polarographic cell*
Before closing it probably should be Motioned that we did investigate the effect of the nitrogen purge <** end wo did investigate to see ho well tho aldehydes were entrapped ift the buffer solution*
Thanks for your interest f Lou* v would appreciate any otmute or suggestions you sight oare to ike*
JPtnja
Att&ehsenta
cct
n* A*
aU*
siti Toy;
* J* PAflKEB
c. A* leaser
II* A* HUod
:4i
AP00044I50
Cumberland
R. A. v.ilaon (2) Calvert City
R. L Siegaaan Calvert City
VINYL CHLORIDE RON DOWN TANK ANALYSES
10/25/60
Attached are typical run down analyses for the various periods of operation as requested by you. There are, of course, many more such analyses available, but they do not differ signifi
cantly from those listed.
RISsaja
Attachment
cc: 1. C* R. Wagner
2. J.
Frevert
3, R. F. Gasaway
R. L. SIEGMANN
AP00044151
TYPICAL VINYL CHLORIDE RUN DOWN TANK ANALYSES
/
Date
Aldehvde
2-20-60
3.4
2-26-60 3-1-60
4.7 nil
3-5-60
nil
3-15-60 4-5-60
1.3 6.6
5-14.-60
nil
5-17-60
nil
6-13-60
nil
6-15-60
6-20-60 7-1-60
1.0
7-6-60
<5
7-17-60 3-27-60
(5
1.8
g-31-60
0.6
9-5-60 9-20-60
0.9
<i
9-24.-60
nil
9-24-60
nil
9-28-60
nil
10-2-60
nil
10-6-60
nil
10-7-60
nil
10-9-60
nil
10-12-60
1.25
part3 par million
2*12 Iron H,0 HC1
V
Nonvol
0.6
nil 220
6
59
nil
0.4 460
4.0
97
nil
nil 140
1.9
7
nil
nil 269
0.7
8
nil
0,1 264
4.9
28
nil
nil 314
4.5
22
nil
nil 613
nil
67
nil
0.2 975
3.6 141
0.5 nil 664 1.0 58
2
nil 677
6.0 201
nil 0.8
nil 434 0.01 1035
nil nil
83 68
0.3
nil 792
0.8 100
nil nil 789 2.9 20
2.8
1.7 929
nil
45
nil
nil 872
4.9
18
nil
nil 583
1.7
34
nil nil
nil nil
646
448
nil nil
34 40
nil
nil 573
nil 302
nil nil 977 3.2 60
nil nil
nil nil
933 637
3.2 nil
476 9
nil 1.6
0,6 nil
770
324
nil nil
24
22
nil nil 528 nil 19
c.
Dorell
0.4 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.2 0.15 0.1
0.1
0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
*&onv. 75.7 85.0 90.0 90.0 91.5 92.4 94.0 98.0 93.0 94.0 87.0 93.0 93.5 91.5 94.0 96.5 97.0 96.0 96.0
96.0
95.3 97.0 96.6 97.7
97.5 97.9
Resin Viscosit
2.53 2.86 2.99 2.97 2.93 2.92
2.84
2.67 2.88 2,82 3.05 2.89 2.92 3.15 2.78 2.71 2.90 2.80 2.68 3.22 2.74 2.67 2.73 2.75
2.73 2.55
AP00044152
00-17-60 10-16-60 10-20-60 10-23-60
nil nil nil
nil nil nil nil
nil nil nil nil
260 375 303
66
nil nil nil nil
112 12 53
294
0.3 0*2 0.2 0.2
96.0 62.3 69.3 95.5
2.62 2.91 3.05 3.17
AP00044153