Document VVx0r4vnxRJDMn4nzVjKEbd4
,, . . JMft HTTT,, T --- 9 2 T u i i 3 e
CALL. B E F O R E S E N D I MG
R _0 1
(0 \
(TvfcT^
$ Lt H l^ . ~ t< * T ^ . A i * 7 C^<w *
\p T ? z- 4 p A C e j
r (_. 1
i .. . J'-
MAY-- 7--92 THU 10=39
* -,f
CALL BEFORE SENDING
P . 02
STATE OF WISCONSIN
CIRCUIT COURT BRANCH 6
MILWAUKEE COUNTY
STItOH OIK CASTINO COMPANY,
MONSANTO COMPANY,
Defendanc. SPKC1AL VERDICT
Ca s k No ft:w-HH7
FILED
1 -M -lJ-G S L. 8
GART J. BARCAK CURKOfCOURtt
FIRST QUESTION;- 'Wa% th<T Py-dtauT^Hydraulic fluids, containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls, when it left the possession of
"Mourtnnto Co., in such defective condition AS to be unreasonably dangerous to a prospective user?
/) ] . *
"
: i . : : v r - i'j w . 1
Yes
No_____
SECOND QUESTION: If you answer Question No* I *'Yes, " then
,Lonswer thls;:que|Stloui
'! \
Was such defective;; condition si cause of damages to Stroh Hie Casting Co.?
' 'lO ' I \
Y e s tX
N o ______
THIRD QUESTION; Whs Monsanto Co, negligent with respect la
ICS testing, wAfnj ugs, Antl/or marketing ot ifrs Pyilrnul
hydraulic fluids containing Polychiorinoted Biphenyls?
Yofi No__
:i y .J .. I*,,
. "*
f o u r t h q u e s t i o n s if you answer Question No. 3 "Yes," rhen onawor this question: - ...... -
Was.such; negligence a cause of!damages to .Stroh Die
C#M n g C o ,7
' . 'll;-.
YC3 \/^ No
F I F T H . QU R S y IO N ; W as S e r o n D i e C a s t i n g C o . n e g l i g e n t w i t h
respeetto Its handling of the Pydraul hydrHulic fluidsconLttLning Polchlorinoted Biphenyls?
Yesi_No__
I0 *d *
0ES S D E S ie= G I
U32SOON Q N tf V H 3 3 3 U E E ! S I I G - C I - 0
Mfit V-- T--92 XHU 1 0 5 3 9
CA
SO 'd
e ^ BEE s te -a i
BEFORE SENDING
u s u a ii .&-3NV waaoort i ? c :z i
R_e3
tB -El-60
SIXTH QUESTION If you answer Question No. 5 "Yen,*1 thon answer this questions
Was such negligence a couse of damagea to Itself?
Yes_____ no_____
SEVENTH QUESTIOH: If you hayo answered at least one of Questions 2 or 4 "Yes," and also have answered Question Mo, 6 "Yes" and have thus luund both parties causally negligent then answer this question;
What percentage of the total negligence that caused any damages to $troh Die Casting Co. do you attri bute- to :
A, Monsanto Co.?
%
*.: ;$tro:h .......... .. ^
Casting Co,? ........... - Total
________ % 100%
EIGHTH QUESTIONi Whe.t sum of money will fairly and reuaontihly compensate Stroh Die Casting Co. for any damages sustained by it as a natural and probable consequence of its use and handling of the Pydraul hydraulic fluids containing
1 Pdiychr l.o;r.inatodt'Biphenyls wl t:h Vespect toi
A. Contaminated culvert and soil?
$
B. Testing, cleaning and refilling of die cast machines and trim presses? $ (c *>*{
NINTH QUESTION: Wos^Monaanto'n-conduct. in itn dealings with Stroh Die Casting Co, oufcrOgci'OuK?
Yes No
TENTH QUESTION ; If you answer Question No. 9 ^Ycs**' thnn answer
this question.
!
What sum'of money f`if any, do you assess .against Monsanto Co n g .punitive damages?
i;, i
MAY- 7-92 THU 10=40
C A L L B E E OR E, S E N D I N G
L .\
R. 04
SO *d
STATE o r WISCONSIN
MILWAUKEE COUNTY S * *
i, the undcitaeu, cteih of me circuit Court of MilwauHeti County. Wisconsin do hereby certify that I have compared this document with the original on file and that the same Is afull, true end correctcopy of Id original and of the whole therM, m the same remain* or record in my office. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have hereunto ^ myAW d
and affixedite seal of saidcourt, this W 3jfl_Iflgi
1I N / V g GARVY J*. fBlUA.t.M'Tiu/ / / Clerk p| Circ w it and director of Court Services
0G9 9CC 6 ie -a i
V3B33H QNtf V9B33W bC:Cl XB-CI-E0