Document VJLvo2pr7ya3wgLnd396mV1rw

Message From: Sent: To: Subject: F Bouder] Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) i 12/11/2017 2:34:57 AM Beck, Nancy [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=168ecb5184ac44de95a913297f353745-Beck, Nancy] Re: Frederic's slides, Clear background rather than blue Dear Nancy, O f co u rse I knew about yo u r jo b a t EPA, but d id not read t h i s h o r r ib le c h a r a c t e r i s a t io n . . . I f I remember JG a l so re c e iv e d hi s f a i r sh are o f nonsense. Sad. See you on Tuesday ! Frederic On Mon , Dec 11, 2017 a t 12:22 AM, Beck, Nancy <B e c k . Nancy@epa. gov> w r o t e : > Yes much t o di s c u s s . > I 1ook forward t o s e e in g you Tuesday. > l u s t wanted t o be sure you were aware o f my new p o s i t i o n a t EPA. Here i s how > one group has c h a r a c t e r i z e d . So you can see why I'm a b i t s e n si t i v e ! > https://www.ewg.org/planet-trump/2017/05/scari est-trump-appointee-you-ve-never-heard#.Wi3BRYVOmEc > > Nancy > > > Nancy B . B e c k , P h. D . , DABT > Deputy A s s i s t a n t Admi ni s t r a t o r , OCSPP > P: .ZQ2-.5Mr.1273.., > M: Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) : > Be ck'7Nan'cy@epaTg ov > > On Dec 10, 2017, a t 10:39 AM, F Bouder Ex. 6 wrote : > > Dear Nancy, > Hope you a re w e ll 1o okin g fo rward to meeting and to the panel . I t o t a l 1y > agree wi th the poi nt r a i sed a c t u a l 1y and t h i s i s a myth SRA i s here to > debunk. We a re hel pi ng b r i ng more s c i ence and not the o t h e r way round . But > I see the debate i n some c i r c l e s , v e r y v i v i d i n Europe > Somethi ng i n t e r e s t i ng to di scu s s on the panel . > > We can have a c h a t about the s r u d y i t s e l f around a b eer - key peo ple we know > were in v o lv e d in the s e l e c t i o n o f the " e l i t e s " ( j u s t a conve ntional > t e r m i n o l o g y ) . A l 1 t h i s w i l l be c l a r i f i e d i n the fo rth c o m i ng a r t i c l e . > Kind regards > Frederic > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 a t 0 9:45 , Beck, Nancy <B e c k . Nancy@epa. gov> w r o t e : Thank you f o r s h a rin g th e s e . F r e d e r i c - w h i1e i t s hard t o know what you w i l l sa y , I have a few questi ons: S i i de 5- no tesyou co nducted 20+ e l i t e i n t e r v i e w s . I ' mnot sure what " e l i t e " means. I t may h e l p to c l a r i f y t h i s , c l a r i f y i f you i n t e r v i ewed anyone from the US, c l a r i f y i s t h i s sub set i n e l uded the r e g u la te d community, and a l s o note t h a t t h i s was a co nve nience sa m p le . S i i des 6 /7 - the headi ng says what has " c l e a r l y changed" , and agai n i t s hard t o know what you may sa y , but the s u b - b u l 1e t s b e l ow seems t o r a i se q u e s t i ons where the answer i s no t c l ea r so perhaps the headi ng sh o uld not r e f e r to i terns as " c l e a r l y changed" . For i n s t a n c e , one can al so come from what the p re s s and envi ronmental groups have a c a l 1ed a " c o r p o r a t e back ground" but a l s o be a s c i e n t i s t wi th a p p ro p ri a te c r e d e n t i a l s (aka perhaps someone we both know 3). F i n a l 1y , on s i i de 9, i t i s i n t e r e s t i ng t h a t you say t h a t r i sk a n a l y s i s can b r i ng more s c i enee i n t o the poi i cy determi n a t i o n s . The sad r e a l i t y , i s t h a t , Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00039941-00001  a t l e a s t i n the case o f the c h e m i c a l s / p e s t i c i de w o r ld , i t i s because we are b r i ngi ng a r i sk based approach (hazard and ex po sure) t h a t we a re bei ng seen as a n t i - s c i e n e e , and l e s s i n t e r e s t e d i n p u b i i c h e a lt h p r o t e c t i o n s . So a c t u a l l y the r i sk based approach i s havin g a compe te o p p o s i t e e f f e c t on the p e r c e p t i o n (whi ch yo ur s i i de 6 a lm o st e nco ura ges) o f t h i ngs bei ng a n t i - s c i e n e e . I t h i n k t h a t i s an im p o r t a n t p o i nt t h a t we a l 1 need t o be aware o f . Ri sk based approaches are seen by th e envi ronmental gro ups (UCS, EDF, EWG, NRDC, e t c ) as a n t i - s c i enee and 1ess p r o t e c t i v e . Nancy ___________________ Nancy B . Beck, Ph. D . , DABT Deputy A s s i s t a n t Admi ni s t r a t o r , OCSPP P: 202 -_56_!:.!2_7_3, > > M i i Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) i Be ct'."fi'ancy@e pa'fgov From: Sal l y Kane 0______Ei _.f,?r_s_0_n_ai f rJ.Ya_c_y_!_p_p!_____ i Sent : Sunday, December 10, 2017 12:47 AM To : B e c k , Nancy <B e c k . Nancy@epa. gov>; Li sa A. Robi nson <robi nson@hsph. h a r v a r d . edu> ; 3op-A.ru^i..^il.ajrAia.i/amjii ch . edu> Cc: T e r j e <t e r j e . a v e n @ u is. no>; j Ex. 6 \ S u b j e c t : F r e d e r i c ' s s i i des , Cl ear"'lb"ackgf o'u'nd' T a t Fier than b lu e H i . F r e d e r i c c r e a t e d t h i s v e r s i on f o r me maki ng i t e a s i e r to p r i n t . I b e l i eve i t i s e s s e n t i al 1y the same as hi s o r i gi nal . Sally Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00039941-00002