Document V3q7d81DReBmqy4pzp38bLXLw
,GcoskA
P%
p Ph /7
'
IF IIT F D f T A T F B rY Y m iO im iryY A V .. P R O 'i'f^CTSOn A P - r M C '
,Way 22 1984
' : ;;.' '
-
OFFICE O F G F M 11 A L C G IEMS E L
Michael Ax line, F,sq,, Pac 1f5.e No r i:awe ai: P or,our ees C1 in ic
Paw Center, University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon. 9 7 4 0 9
Dear M r ,, Ax 3.in e :
I am writing in order to confirm the agreement we came to in our telephone conversation on May 18, 1984, in reference to your Freednn of Information Act: request Rill-740-84 > elated February 99, 3984 ,,
In an effort to more clearly; define the scope of that request
we agreed that it won! d he sufficient for us to provide tables
summarising data and that it will, not be necessary to provide raw
laboratory data. You indicated your primary interest is in
obtaining chain of custody information indicating the site from
which, ill.e samples were taken, where and when the samples were
tested and the results of the tests, I indicated to yoit that the
Privacy Act or other legal const" mints may prevent us from
identifying the soivrce from whirli. samples were taken -and, in -
those instances, the sources will, be coded an they have been in
response to your previous requests, o
.. r
In regard to Item Pi in your request, it is my understending that you are seeking information an to all samnles taken, in the Sins law National Forest from 3.978 to the present, excluding raw data. In regard to Item #7, you. indicated that 3/ou.r interest is not in e v e r y .dioxin sample ever tested from Region 5, but, rather, those sampl.es referenced on Table 7 of Dr, A:op,s' draft report and Region. V samples referred to by Robert liar3ess in lxis testimony iTi. the 2,4,5"T cancel.!.ation proceeding, I hare identified this testimony as Frhibit 4912, If chain of custody records or other relevant records are unavail.e.bl.e, we will, identify that
In our discussion of "inconrpl.ete documents" i indicated that the documents sent in response, to an earlior pa IA roues i: were, in the form in wh ieh we ma.Art nine d them in our records and that any further '.response as to there documents 'would, result in duplication of i:he same documents whir.h. yon have already received. If you
can :<dent ifv to us specific documents wb.icb. appear to be
25649