Document V3LdYYD6qe7NnLGr9E7zow8Xg

/.M-oiisanto LAW DEPART JT T . M. Bistline - E2 0*11 April 5, 1983 = f >wct: Annual Meeting Briefing Book - 4-2989 TO D. R. Bishop - F3EB Attached please find a revised version of the response concerning Agent Orange for inclusion in the briefing book. I have underlined the single change that I suggest. T. M. Bistline TMB/vf Attachment r- \--10C (REV. 2/78) RDER C14418 M Q: DID MONSANTO MANUFACTURE AND SUPPLY AGENT ORANGE TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT FOR USE IN VIETNAM? A: Yes. Monsanto was one of several companies asked to supply this compound during the Vietnam War. Background: Monsanto manufactured the principal ingredients of Agent Orange -- 2,4,5-T at the Nitro Plant from 1948-1969 and 2,4-D at the Krummrich Plant from 1946-1970. At various times from 1963 to 1969 Monsanto provided quantities of a mixture of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D to the U.S. government. In 1969 and 1970, respectively, Monsanto decided for economic reasons to stop production of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D. The dioxin 2,3,7,8-TCDD can be formed in ultra-trace quantities during the manufacture of tri-chlorophenol, which is used to make 2,4,5-T. The Agent Orange controversy involves this dioxin, which is extremely toxic to some laboratory animals and less toxic to others.7 The only proven long-term effectof dioxin exposure in humans is the skin disease cmoracne'. -it}': WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE AGENT ORANGE LAW SUITS AND MONSANTO'S POTENTIAL LIABILITY? A: These lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial purposes in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Discovery and other pretrial matters are continuing. Since this is a matter in litigation, it would be inappropriate to speculate on the potential liability to Monsanto, but I will say that, in our judgment, the available scientific and medical evidence does not support the claims of adverse health effects alleged in these lawsuits. T0 PKOlHCt"* SUBJECT C14419 " "