Document RpEkBMJDQLbzrqGkzxgYbbw6z

DEP ARTM ENT O F PH ARM ACO LO GY C O R N E LL U N IV ERSITY M ED ICA L C O LLE G E 1 3 0 0 Yo r k Av e n u e Ne w Yo r k 21, N. Y. Ju ly 8 1946 Dr. Robert A. Xehoe le t t e r in g Laboratory of Applied Physi ol ogy Un iversity' of Cin cin n ati College of medicineMen Avenue Cin cin n at i 19 Ohio ' Dear Dr. Kehoa% I have non had the opportun ity of goin g over the correspondence and opin ion s of the E d it o r ia l Board on Dr. Deichmann's paper, which was submitted t o The Jou r n al of Pharmacology and Experim en tal Th erapeu tics. h h ils I have not had the opportun ity of readin g the r e v ise d copy of the manuscript I did read the f i r s t ver sion and at th at time st at e d th at the paper contained in t e r e st in g eviden ce which I would lik e to^pu blish 4,bu t at the same time calle d at t en t ion t o var iou s shortcomings, in the p r esen t at ion , some of which were in corporated in Dr. W allace's l e t t e r of February 2nd t o Dr. Deichmann. The d i ffi c u l t i e s have or igin at ed lar ge ly be cause of the sim ultan eous work car r ied on with DDT in var iou s lab o r at o r ie s, and the absence of any plan fo r t h eir orderly p u b licat ion . This d iffic u lt y i s in creased by the delays to which t h is paper h as been su b ject ed and, because of the amount of m at er ial which the p r in t e r s now have on hand, p u b licat ion could not take place u n t il the end of the year* After u t iliz in g any su ggest ion s con tain ed in Dr. W allace's l e t t e r of A p r il 3rd which you th in k d e sir ab le , I sh a ll be very glad t o resubm it the paper to the E d it o r ia l Board, i f you so wish. Sin cer ely y e ar s, L'ct-iicCi McXeen C a t t e ll REr 0020137