Document RjoLMj4ENNX9e8OMJQVLoxZ8k

FILE NAME: National Safety Council (NSC) DATE: 1944 Jun 24 DOC#: NSC268 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Petition to Review and Set Aside Order of Federal Trade Commission URITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PETITIOH TO REVIEW AHD SET ASIDE AS ORDER OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COVMI"SIOW To th e H onorable Judge* o f th e U nited S ta te * C ir c u it C ourt o f Appeal* fo r th e S ix th C irc u itt Come* now P la n t R ubber St A sbeatoa Work*, a c o r poration, p e titio n e r herein, and file s th is , it* p e ti tio n to review and t t s e t aalde an Order to Cease and D e sist o f th e F ed eral Trade Commission, h e r e in a f te r c a lle d "Commisaion," and r e s p e c tf u lly re p re se n ts and shows to th e C o u rtt I. HATURB OF PROCEEDINGS AS TO WHICH REVIEW IS SOUGHT 1* On O ctober 1 0 , 1941, th e Commission is s u e d and su b se q u e n tly se rv e d upon th e re sp o n d e n ts named th e r e in , including your p e titio n e r, i t s com plaint in a proceeding i V- i1* 1 befoxe# i t e n t i t l e d " I n th e M a tte r o f Acme A ebestoe 8 C overing and F lo o rin g Company, e t a l . , Docket So. S 4 613," and th e r e a f te r , on December 27, 1941, ieeued 4 and subsequently serv ed i t s amended com plaint in sa id 5 p ro ceed in g upon th e re sp o n d e n ts named th e r e in , in c lu d 6 in g y o u r p e t i t i o n e r , i n v h ic h i t v as a lle g e d , among 7 other things, th a t said respondents, including your 8 p e titio n e r , were engaged in an unlaw ful oom bination 9 and conspiracy in connection w ith the sale and d is 10 t r i b u t i o n o f a s b e s to s p ip e c o v e rin g , and t h a t th e s ams 11 and the acts and p ra c tic e s th e re in alleged to have b^en 18 committed and engaged in in fu rth eran ce th e re o f were 13 u n f a i r methods o f c o m p e titio n in commerce w ith !n the 14 I n te n t and meaning o f S eo tlo n 5 o f the F ed eral Trade 15 Commiaaion Act* A copy o f s a id com plaint and a copy 16 o f a a ld amended com plaint w i l l appear In the tr a n s c r ip t 17 e f th e reco rd o f sa id proceeding to be f i l e d h e re in by 18 th e Commission. 19 2 . T h ereafter your p e tltio n - r duly and tim ely 20 f i l e d w ith th e Commiaaion i t s answ ers to sa id com plaint 81 and s a id amended c o m p lain t, w h erein your p e titio n e r 22 ad m itte d th a t i t was a w in d er o f low p re s s u re a s b e s to s 23 covering which i t so ld and caused to be tra n sp o rte d to 24 purehasers lo c ate d in v ario u s s te te s , end th a t I t had 25 been and wae in c o m p e titio n w ith o th e rs ) b u t denied 26 th a t i t had hindered, lessen ed , re s tric te d or fo re sta lle d 2. . . . .. - ... - - * rt f ' ; . ; ' . I- * r , - V i i ' ^ ' ' com petition o r th a t i t had v io la te d , or th a t the com plaint o r amended com plaint a ta te d any v io la tio n by i t o f S e c tio n 5 o f th e F ed eral Trade Commietion Act A copy o f each o f aa id answ ers w i l l appear in the tra n s c rip t o f the record of aaid proceeding to be f ile d h e re in by th e Commission. 8 T h e r e a f te r , and a t v a rio u s tim es and p la c e s from May 4 , 1942, to and in c lu d in g F eb ru ary 15, 1945, h e a r in g s on s a id amended com plaint and the answ ers f i l e d by the se v e ra l respondents th e re to were held b efo re Bandolph P re sto n , a duly ap p o in ted t r i a l exam iner o f the Commission, and s n id t r i a l e x a m in e r1* B ep o rt upon th e e v id e n c e was subm itted to and f i l e d w ith th e Commission on o r about March 1 5 , 1945, and a copy th e re o f was se rv e d upon your p e titio n e r) th e re a fte r your p e titio n e r file d w ith the Commission i t s e x c e p tio n s to s a id t r i a l e x a m in e r*a r e p o rt upon th e evidence and b r i e f s were t h e r e a f t e r f i l e d w ith the Commission in s a id proceedings by your p e titio n e r and by th e a tto rn e y fo r the Commiesion| th e r e a f te r the cau se came on f o r o r a l argum ent b e fo re th e Commission and ib llo v in g such argum ent was tak en under subm ission* 4* T h e re a fte r, and on the 27th day o f A p ril, 1944, th e Commission Issu ed and su b seq u en tly served on the respondents in said proceeding, including your p e t i t i o n e r , th e Commission* F in d in g s as to the F aets and Conclusion and i t s Order to Cease and D esist* A 5 1 copy o f s a id F in d in g s as to th e F a c ts &nd C onclusion 2 and O rder to Cease and D e s is t w i l l a p p e a r i n th t r a n s 3 c r ip t of the reco rd of said proceeding to be f ile d h ere 4 i n by th e Commission, and a tru e and com plete copy o f 6 sa id Order to Cease and D esist i s a tta c h e d h e re to , 6 marked E x h ib it A, and made a p a r t h e re o f* 7 5 S a id "R eport and f in d in g s a s to the f a c t s " 8 o f s a id Commission are w ith o u t su p p o rt in the evidence 9 re c e iv e d by th e Commission in s a id p ro cee d in g ; s a id 10 "C onclusion" o f sa id Commission in sa id proceeding is 11 not supported by the fin d in g s or by the evidence receiv ed 12 by th e s a id Coranission; the o rd er e n title d "Order to cease 13 and d e s i s t , " so made by th e s a id Commission a g a in s t your 14 p e t i t i o n e r , is n o t su p p o rted by the re c o rd b e fo re the 15 s a id Commission in sa id proceeding and is beyond the 16 a u th o rity and J u ris d ic tio n o f s a id Commission. 17 II. 18 FACTS AMD STATUTES UPON iTHICH VCNUE IS fctfSED. 19 1. P e titio n e r i s , and a t a l l tim es h erein mentioned 20 was, a c o rp o ra tio n organized and e x is tin g under the laws 21 of the S tate o f C a lifo rn ia, w ith i t s o ffic e and p rin c ip a l 22 p lace o f b u sin e ss lo c a te d a t 537 Brannan S tr e e t, San 23 Francisco, C alifo rn ia, w ithin the Ju risd ictio n o f th is 24 C ourt. P e titio n e r does not m anufacture any o f th e p ro 25 d ucts a lle g e d in th e amended oom plaint hereinabove r e 26 f e r r e d t o , b u t i e , and has b een f o r many y e a rs l a s t S 3 A I H J H V l V N U l i V N JIU IV 0 J JM O U M d 1(J USP A T I. OA. 4. 1 p a s t, a w inder o f m a te ria ls which I t purchases from 2 m an u factu rers and c o n v e rts in to low p re s s u re a s b e s to s 3 p ip e c o v e rin g s, which i t s e l l s and causes to b e tr a n s - 4 p o rted to purchasers lo c ate d In v ario u s sta te s * 5 2 The s t a t u t e s u n d er whloh t h is C o u rt has 6 j u r i s d i c t i o n and venue a r e See* 225, T i t l e 2 8 , tf. S* 7 Code (S e c tio n 128 o f th e J u d ic ia l Code, es mended), 8 and See* 4 5 , T i t l e 1 5 , U* 3 . Code (Sec* 5 o f th e F e d e ra l e 9 Trade Coauaiesion Aet)* 10 Sec* 225, T i t l e 2 8 , U* 5 . Code, a f o r e s a id , p ro v id e s 11 in paragraph ( e ) i 12 "The C irc u it Courts o f Appeal a re f u r th e r empowered to e n fo rc e , s e t a s id e o r 15 modify o rd ers o f the F ederal Trade Conmisslon as p ro v id ed in S e c tio n 45 o f T itle 15 ; n 14 S ectio n 45 o f T itle 15, provides in paragraph (c) 15 in part: 16 " ( c ) Any p e rs o n , p a r tn e r s h ip , o r co rp o r* 17 a tio n re q u ire d by an o rd er o f the Commission to cease and d e s is t from usin g any method o f 18 c o m p e titio n to a o t o r p r a c t ic e may o b ta in a review o f suoh o rd e r in the c i r c u it co u rt of 19 appeals o f the United S ta te s, w ithin any c ir c u it where the method o f co m petition o r the 20 a c t o r p ra c tic e in q u estio n w aa used o r where such person, p artn ersh ip o r corporation resid es 21 o r c a rr ie s on b u sin e ss, by f i l i n g in th s c o u rt, w ith in s la ty days from the date o f th e se rv ic e 22 of sueh o rd er, e w ritte n p e titio n praying th a t th s o rd e r o f th e Commission be s e t asid e* A 25 eopy o f sueh p e titio n s h e ll be fo rth w ith served upon th e Com mission, und th ereu p o n th e Commis 24 sio n fo rth w ith s h a ll o t r t i f y and f i l e In the court a tra n s c rip t o f the e n tire record in the 25 proceeding, In clu d in g a l l the evidence taken and the re p o rt and o rd er o f the C o m m is s io n * U p o n suoh 26 f ilin g o f th e p e titio n end the tr a n s c rip t the oourt RFf' R o mi r F n at t h f n a t i o n a l a r c h i v e s USP ATL. OA. 5* 1 h a ll have Ju risd ic tio n of tho proceed ing and o f the question determ ined th e re in , 2 * 3 3 Tour p e t i t i o n e r doe* n o t r e s id e nor c a rry on 4 business w ith in the ju risd ic tio n o f th is C ourt, nor has 5 i t used th e re in the osthod o f com petition o r any ac ts 6 or p ra c tic e s In question in said proceeding before the 7 Commission) b u t the J u r is d ic tio n o f t h i s Court ia a s s e rte d 8 because a m ajority o f the respondents in said proceeding 9 b efo re th e Commission re s id e o r c a r r y on b u sin e ss w ith in 10 th e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f t h i s C o u rt and a r e f i l i n g i n t h i s 11 C ourt t h e i r p e t i t i o n s to rev iew and s e t a s id e s a id O rder 12 to Ce&ae and D e s i s t, and b ecau se th e method o f c o m p e titio n 13 and the a c ts and p r a c tic e s i n q u e stio n In sa id proceeding 14 b e fo re th e Commission were u sed by c e r t a i n o f s a id r e s 15 p o n d en ts, i f a t a l l , w ith in the J u r is d ic tio n o f t h is Court* 18 III. 17 FOISTS ON HITCH PSTITI jNER INTENDS TO RKLY. 18 S aid Order to Cease and D e s is t i s erro n eo u s, im 19 pro p er and unw arranted aa to your p e t itio n e r on the grounds 20 and f o r th o re a s o n s fo llo w in g , b e in g th e p o in ts on which 21 your p e t i t i o n e r in te n d s to r e l y , t o - w i t t 22 (1) The O rder to Cease and D e s is t a s to your 23 p e titio n e r is not supported o r J u e tlfle d by evidence 24 o r any fin d in g o r fin d in g s o f f a c t , and is erroneous, 25 c o n tra ry to low and w holly v o id . RF PRon un F n at t h e n a t i o n a l a r c h i v e s 26 (2) The amended co m p lain t in s a i d p ro ceed in g 1 1 b efo re th e Commission f a l l s to s ta te any ft v io la tio n o f law by your p e titio n e r o r th e 8 commission by I t o f any a o ts upon which the Order 4 to Cease and D esist could be predicated* ft (3) So p ro o f was adduced i n s a id p ro c e e d in g b efo re th e Commission showing o r te n d in g to 7 she th a t your p e titio n e r has committed any s e t ft o r a c ts , o r engaged in any p ra c tic e or p ra c tic e e ft pro h ib ited under the provisions o f Section & of 10 the F ed eral Trade Commission A ct, o r w arran tin g 11 iss u a n c e by th e Commies io n as to your p e t i t i o n e r 12 o f sa id Order to Cease and D esist* 13 (4) The f in d in g s o f th e Commission a s to 14 the fa c ts and i t s co n c lu sio n s, to th e ex ten t th a t 18 t$ey purport to fin d end conclude th a t your p e t i t 16 io n e r had com mitted o r was engaged in any a c ts , 17 p ra c tic e s , com bination o r conspiracy c o n stitu tin g X **1 X 18 u n f a ir methods o f c o m p e titio n i n coctmaroe w ith in X -**> X 19 the in te n t and meaning o f S ectio n 5 o f the F ederal n x 20 Trade Commission A ct, a re n o t su p p o rted by > -H 21 evidence* X "X :Z 22 (6) The f in d in g s o f the Commission as to 1 ^ l: z 23 the fa c ts and i t s conclusions, to the ex ten t th a t 24 they purport to r e la te to your p e titio n e r o r to > I ' D ! X 2& act o r p reo tlcee o f your p e titio n e r a t any tim e < m 26 or times a f te r August, 1938, are n o t supported by 2 proceeding b efo re the Corollas ion as to y o u r p e titio n e r 3 I s th a t your p e titio n e r became a su b lic e n se e under 4 th e p a t e n t t h e r e i n in v o lv ed on o r ab o u t November 3 20, 1936, th a t i t c a n c e lle d sa id sublicensee and d is I con tin u ed use o f sa id p a te n t in A ugust, 1938, and 7 a statem en t o f i t s counsel showing i t s s a le s on a 8 d eliv ered p ric e sons b a sis p rio r to i t s e n try into 9 said sublicense agreem ent, a s lig h t m odification 10 o f s a id zones w hile i t was a s u b lic e n s e e and a r e - 11 a u n p tlo n o f I t s own zones when I t ceased to be a 12 su b lic e n s e e . 13 (6 ) No ev id en ce was adduced i n th e p ro ceed in g 14 b e fo re th e Commission as to your p e t i t i o n e r , o r as S 1 A I H3 H V 1V N 0 I 1 V N JHl IV OJJMUOtid.lU 13 to any a c t o r p ra c tic e o f your p e titio n e r , of any 16 kind o r ch a ra cte r w hatsoever, from and a f te r i t s 17 c a n c e lla tio n o f, and w ithdraw al from, said sublicense 18 agreem ent i n A ugust, 1938j and the~e i s no evidence 19 o r baaia w hatsoever to support o r ju s tify any fin d in g 20 o r co n clu sio n by the Commission, i f made, th a t th ere 21 ia any lik e lih o o d ,p o s s ib ility o r reason to apprehend 22 th a t your p e titio n e r w ill, in the fu tu re , engage 23 in any o f th e eo ta o r p ra c tic e # which th e Commission 24 found and eoncludad are u n f a ir Methods o f com petition rfS in com ro e , w ith in th e in te n t and meaning o f Seotion 26 3 o f th e F e d e ra l Trade Commission A ot. * ? evidence, In th a t the only evidence adduced in the proceeding b efo re th e Commission as to your p e t i t i o n ^ ,' * i s th a t your p e titio n e r became a su b licen see under th e p a te n t th e r e in Involved on o r about flbvesfcer 20, 1936, th a t i t c a n o elled sa id su b licen se and die* continued use of sa id p a te n t in August, 1938, and a statem ent of i t s counsel shoving i t s sa le s on a d eliv ered p rice sons b a sis p rio r to i t s e n try Into said sublicense agreem ent, a s lig h t m odification o f said cones w hile i t vas a sublicensee and a sum ption o f i t s ovn zones when I t ceased to be a sublicensee* (6 ) No ev id en ce was adduced in th e p ro cee d in g b e fo re the Commission as to your p e titio n e r , o r as to any aot or p ra c tic e o f your p e titio n e r, o f any kind o r o h araeter w hatsoever, from and a f te r i t s c a n c e lla tio n o f, and w ithdraw al from, said sublicense agreem ent i n A ugust, 1938; and th e re i s no ev id en ce o r baaia w hatsoever to support or ju s tify any fin d in g o r conclusion by the Commission, i f made, th a t th e re i s any lik e lih o o d ,p o s s lb ility o r reason to apprehend th a t your p e titio n e r w ill, in the fu tu re , engage in any o f th e a c ta o r p ra c tic e s which the Commission found and concluded a re u n fa ir methods o f co m p etitio n i n on* r o e , w ith in th e i n t e n t and meaning o f S e c tio n 5 o f th e F e d e ra l Trade Commission Act* T * M -4' c.iS.on# " c . , 1 (7 ) On th a re c o r d b e fo re th e Cow ale Ion 2 In aid proceeding and the proof adduoed before S i t the Commission wee w ith o u t a u th o rity o r 4 ju risd ic tio n to en ter any order respecting 5 your p e titio n e r o th er than an o rd er dism issing 6 the proceeding as to your p e titio n e r* 7 IV. 8 PRATER FOR RELIEF 9 WHEREFORE, y o u r p e t i t i o n e r pray t h a t t h i s C ourt 10 review and s e t a s id e s a id O rder to Cease and D e s is t. 11 12 aPLAcNoTr pRoUrBaBtEioRn&, APSeBtEi tSiToOnSe Wr ORKS, 13 14 Herman P h le g e r, 13 S11a1n FS ruatntecris cSot r, e Ce ta, lif o r n ia . 16 3 n Theodors' R. Meyer, 3 3 111 S u tte r S tr e e t, 3 3 San F ra n cisc o , C a lifo rn ia . 5 n 3 20 C n 21 R. D .D aniels, 913 Southern B uilding, W ashington, D. C. 22 DATEDi June 2 0 , 1944. A ttorneys fo r P s titlo n s r 3 23 33 24 25 f 26 i U1TIT8D TSTATB BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIOH 3 A* At * r e g u la r s e s s io n o f th e F e d e r a l T rade Contai s a lo n , h e ld a t i t s o f f ic e in th e c i t y o f W ashington, D. '** *M. on th e 2 7 th day o f A p r il, A D. 1944, > abeat* COMMISSIONERS 2 ....iiAation Robert E, F re e r, Chairman, Garland S. Ferguson, C h a rle s H, March., Ewln L, D a v is, W illia n A, A yres, In the M atter of ACME ASBESTOS COVERING AKD FLOORINO COMPANY, ASBESTOS, ASPHALT AKD INSULATION MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ATLANTIC ASBESTOS CORPORATION, A. H. BENNETT COMPANY, THE PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, THE CLARK ASBESTOS COMPANY, EMPIRE ASBESTOS PRODUCTS, IN C ., OILLEN-COLE COMPANY, JOHNS-ilANVILLS CORPORATION, KEASBEY ft MATTISON COMPANY, L. A. RUBBER it ASBESTOS WORKS, IN C ., G. A. MaoARTHUR COMPANY, NORRISTOWN MAGNESIA AND ASBESTOS COMPANY, W, S , NOTT COMPANY, PACIFIC ASBESTOS ft SUPPLY COMPANY, PLANT RUB3ER ft ASBESTOS WORKS, THS RBEROID COMPANY, SALL MOUNTAIN COMPANY, STANDARD ASBESTOS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, co rp o ratio n s; and DONALD TULLOCH, J R ., an individual DOCKET NO, 4615 ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Thie proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon th e amended com plaint of th e Commission, the answers f i l e d th e re to by reep ondenta, testim ony and o th er e v i dence in support of and in opposition to the alleg atio n s of s a id amended o o n p la in t ta k e n b e f o r e an exam iner o f th e Com m ission th ereto fo re duly designated by I t , rep o rt of the t r i a l examiner and exceptions th e re to , b rie fs in support of the amended com plaint and in o p p o sitio n th e re to , and o ra l arguments EXHIBIT A o f c o u n s e l, and th e Commission h av in g made i t s f in d in g s a s t o ^ the fa c ts and i t s oonolusion th a t said respondents have viola the p ro v isio n s of S ection 5 of the F ederal Trade C om ission M ty XT IS OKDERKD t h a t th e c o rp o ra te re sp o n d e n ts Acne A sbestos C overing and F lo o rin g Company; A sb esto s, A sphalt and In s u la tio n M anu factu rin g Company; A t l a n t i c A sb esto s C o rp o ra tio n ; A. H. B e n n ett Company; The P h i l i p Carey M an u factu rin g Company; The C lark A sbestos Company; Umpire A sbestos P ro d u c ts , I n c . ; G ille n Cole Company; Johna-M anvllle C o rp o ra tio n ; Keasbey H M attiso n Company; L A* Rubber & A sb esto s W orks, Xno; 0 , A, McArthur Company; M orristow n M agnesia and A sb esto s Company; V S . Mott Companyj P a c ifio A sbestos & Supply Company; P la n t Rubber h A sb esto s Works; The R u b ero id Company; B a ll M ountain Company; and S tandard A sbestos M anufacturing Company, t h e i r re sp e c tiv e o f f ic e r s , a g e n ts, and em ployees; and respondent Donald T ulloch, J r , h is ag e n ts, re p r e s e n ta tiv e s , and em ployees, in o r in con n ection w ith the o ffe rin g fo r s a le , sale,an d d is trib u tio n of in s u la tin g m a te ria ls (asb e sto s paper o r rollbo& rd, wool f e lt or sponge f e l t p ap er, co rru g ated asb esto s paper, h ig h - o r lowpressure lam inated asb esto s pipe covering, sheets o r blocks, low -pressure a ir - c e ll asbestos pipe covering, sheets or blocks, wool f e l t , an tisw ea t, o r fro stp ro o f pipe coverings, b o ile r ja c k e ts, w aterproof ja c k e ts, and accesso ries u su ally sold w ith th e above m a te ria ls} in commerce, as "commerce" i s d efin e d in th e F ed eral Trade Commission A ct, do fo rth w ith cease and d e s is t from e n te rin g in to , co n tin u in g , cooperating in , or carry in g out any p la n n ed common c o u rse o f a c t i o n , u n d e rs ta n d in g , ag reem en t, co m b in atio n , o r c o n s p ira c y between and among any two o r more o f e a ld re sp o n d e n ts, o r betw een any one o r more o f e a ld resp o n d en ts and o there not p a rtie s h e re to , to do o r perform any o f the follow ing th in g s; 1. E stab lish in g or m aintaining uniform p ric e s, d is counts, term s, o r conditions in the sale of said m aterials, o r in any manner agreeing upon, fix in g , o r m aintaining any p ric e s , d isc o u n ts, term s, o r co n d itio n s of sa le a t which such m a terials are to be sold 2 . E stab lish in g or m aintaining uniform d iffe re n tia ls in price applicable to designated differen ces in sp ecifica tio n s o f said m a terials o r to d iffe re n c e s in the type or q u an tity of accesso ries sold w ith said m aterials. 3 E s ta b lis h in g o r m a in ta in in g any c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f custom ers o r any method o r form ula f o r c la s s ify in g cus tomers used or to be used in determ ining p ric e s, disco u n ts, to rs , or conditions of sale to purchasers A. C o n tin u in g th e u n ifo rm d e l iv e r e d - p r i c e zones h e re to fo re fix ed fo r making q u o ta tio n s and s a le s of m a te ria ls , or estab lish in g or m aintaining any d eliv ered -p rice nes which are s im ila r to those h e re to fo re used in th a t th e ir -2 use would p e w i t in making re s p o n d e n ts ' d e liv e re d p r ic e # i d e n t i c a l d s s p i te t h e i r d i f f e r e n t c o st* oT delivery* 5* S e le c tin g o r d e s ig n a tin g p a r t i c u l a r lo c a tio n * to be used as fre ig h t e q u a lisa tio n p o in ts fo r pricing purposes* 6* E s ta b lis h in g o r m a in ta in in g an e x c lu s iv e method (such as f* o .b . facto ry , or f*o*b. fa c to ry w ith fre ig h t eq u a lise d , o r d eliv ered to d e s tin a tio n ) fo r quoting and p ricin g a p a rtic u la r m aterial or group o f m aterials* 7. E stablishing or m aintaining any form ula fo r calculating u n it prices, or fo r calculating to ta l pricss from u n it p ric e s , o r using any form ula so e sta b lish e d or m aintained. B, M aintaining o r c o n tin u in g o r a id in g or a s s is ti n g in the maintenance o r continuance o f the lic en sin g system and m erchandising plan h ereto fo re e sta b lish e d under and p u rsu an t to th e Toohey patent* IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t h a t n o th !rig i n t h i s o rd e r s h a l l be co n stru ed to p ro h ib it the owner o r owners o f the Toohey p a te n t from g ran tin g law ful lic e n se s to o th e rs to use said p a te n t, or to p rev en t any respondent h e re in , o r o th e r s , from ta k in g law fu l licenses to use said patent. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th a t re s p o n d e n ts s h a l l , w ith in s ix ty (60) days a f t e r th e se rv ic e upon them o f t h i s o rd e r, f i l e w ith tb s Commission a r e p o rt in w ritin g s e t t i n g f o r th in d e t a i l th e manner and fo ra in which they have com plied w ith th is order* By th e Commission. SEAL O tis B* Johnson (Signed) O tis B. Jo h n so n , S e c re ta ry , - : TCQUZJCKJ . " i' im rt'Wni'isgi'mm ms Oi ICsfe Iniirii States (Etrrmi curt of Appeals FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT T J . H. iie n z ie s I , ........................................................, Clerk of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Review and Set Aside an Order of th e F ed eral TVrade .Commi-s s i on-............................................................ in the case of ,.? l ^ .t ..Rubber A sb esto s ..Works,....... vs. Federal. Trade Commission No. ...... , as the same remains upon the files and records of said United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and of the whole thereof. In T estimony Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of said Court at the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, this fay o f ............f**?..................., A. D. 19.44.* Clerk of the United States Cip [urt of Appeals So1 the Sixth Circuit. yP ATL, OA.