Document RarkK4ZabYpMm3Q0QEO2Ojgra

1 limits his exposure in certain respects. Page 693 2 For example, one of the designations talks 3 about his use of a respirator. 4 One of his designations talks about how the 5 air hose was replaced at a point in time with the use 6 of solvents, and it just so happens that when he is 7 talking about work practices and how he learned to use 8 friction products, he is talking about them in 9 reference to manufacturers, but nonetheless, I think 10 the information in those designations is directly 11 relevant to the types, intensity, and nature of his 12 exposure which this case is all about. 13 MR. SMITH: Your Honor, I have no problem 14 with nonproduct designations, and I don't object to 15 the respirator example, for example, that he just 16 mentioned. 17 It is when he says Borg-Warner was the 18 product or General Motors was the product. I think he 19 is trying to get in the back door what the Court has 20 already ruled out. 21 His position is, I think, that when our