Document Ra3nqpeGgZgr8Zpg7YYr4eMk7

IGNUrSt Asbestos Textile institute Technical Cormittae Beport October 5, 1967 Tbo seating was bold at Villiaa Hilton J-m, Hilton Hoad Island, South Corolino IH ATTENDANCE! J. W. Hawkins RaybestoeWtanhatten, Inc. Villlaa Maaakant ** Aasriean Asboatos Company D. T. Austin UnlBoyal, Ine. J. D. KcCluor H. X. Porter Co^any, Ine. H. 2* Sunbuiy Asboatos Textile Institute The Kinutos of the mating in Atlanta on August 17th. It 18th. at Harriott Kotor Hotel are combined with the current meting* ATTENDANCE AT AT1AKTA MEETIHOi J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan, Ine. D. T. Austin W. Maaakant UnlRoyal, Inc. - American Asbestos Company O. E. Houghton - Oarlock, Inc* J. D. KcCluor H. X. Porter Coapany, Ine. P. J. Smith - A3TK H. E. Sunbury - A. T. I. SUBJECTS DISCUSSESt Rerlslon of ASTM Specifications D 299. 0 37g aI D 1061 At the Atlanta meting D 299 was revised as the 6th. Draft dated August 17, 1967 and D 375 was rerlsed as the 3rd. Draft dated August 17, 1967. These two were consequently sent to Paul Nicodetsu* (2$ copies of each draft) for letter ballot and to Dr. Seroggle (7 copies of each draft) for editorial constants. During the interin a reply from Dr. Scrog^ie accepted these two drafts as written with eery tdmor changes snd he ssid the two drafts would be acceptable for printing with the changes he suggested. To gsin tine, s lottor ballot waa circulated to all mabers of the coamlttee with the responae that Dr. Seroggle suggestions would be acceptable* Without redrafting, these ehsnges were retyped in the margins of the sheets snd resent to Paul tfieodomus snd Dr. Seroggle. For all practical purposes this finalises these two spe^isatleas. Also at the Atlanta mating, D 1061 wss revised as the 1st. Draft dated August 18, 1967* This draft was circulated to mabers only for possible discrepancies. At the current meting, the eemdttee confined acceptance of all the oba&gea suggested by Dr. Seroggle in D 299 snd D 375* D 1061 wss reviewed snd no sufficient changes aide* Decision was mde to send Paul Nleodeaus a copy of this draft for his views prior to Mndlng to Dr. Seroggle. -1 * At the Atlanta nesting federal specifications Mil-l-l53Wc and SS-C-b66f were revised In the light of current industry praetlee, both editorially and in the dlaenaicDS and weights tables. Copies of these revisions were circulated to Mahers only for possible discrepancies. At the current Meting, these two specifications were Aieeussed again with further changes end decision was eede to send revised copies to the appropriate govenneat agencies* with e list of suggested changes in addi tion to the corrected draft. Copies of all ASTM specifleatlms referred to la the drafts are to be enclosed for the benefit of the agencies. The revised drafts with suggested changes on the two above specifications will be sent to H. S. Simbury for hla to submit to the -appropriate goverunent agencies with the atetenant that thssa drafts supersede all prior rscciTwsndationa sent in by Individual companies. In conclusion* the coo&ittee, during the peat two years* has completed revisions on specifications 0 1571 - Cloth* 0 31$ Tape, 0 2100 - Electrical Insulation* D 1718 - Asbestos Content* 0 279 - lam, D 375 - Roving, and partially ccnpleted revision of 0 1061 - lap. The specifications yet to be revised aret D 62% - Braided Tubing, 0 1118 - Magnetic Rating, end D 1573 - Heat Ageing. J. D. HcCluer Chainaan of the Technical Ccnittee