Document RYZgmpaRdbKRz20oaknG0dOz

Serbia Ear The State fining saea*er, olnes Pepartaent* PSRW. 11th* June 1955 n Aoirnllsp Bias Asbestos* - wiTTSgQOtt* On Jobs 1st* X isspocted the operations of tbs above Coa$any at fltteaoca* and ted occasion to draw the attention of the ttaoogpent to the very eaii factory working condltiono In the oillinc section* X pointed cat tfit no effective modifications, aiaod at the er eradication of duel* tad been achieved during the eleven soothe einco oy initial in^eettou Ae X ted sot be informed of the Company's future intent* ions as to a renprij of this situation X xe^uestod that X bo supplied with a written statoMnt of how and when sons improvement could bo expected* X stated that X coated thin laloa&atlca by the end of J.no otherwise X asy be esapelled to order the do care of the Billing section X alo Isfoxned the oenegecent that should X adopt thio line of action , the Ccspeny was entitled to appeal to the Senior Inspector of Vines * Salgoerlie* ogsinot ay dooioion* X ss advising yon of this natter now es the repercussions could te quite eerioos* however the working conditions are dlcgrocefal end X consider that< would be falling in cy duty to have taken a more lenient attltu&l* The underground conditions were ae cod es I have seen in any nine in the state and I contended the aanagenent cn thio point* However* X consider that the econonie aspect of any alnlng venture oust into consideration the cost of cafe and healthy working conditions, sad X was well aware of the Company'o operating looses when X called for a sppedy decision on the natter* c 1543 ~rt X liotrict Inspector oi iilnse********Cue*