Document RJ7awYZXB46zr1wrpJBxN5dek
. V ft rtiZisr: . LOwATiON)
N. T. Johnson Si. Louis February 16, 1970
REFERENCE.
TO
POLLUTI
ry - St. Louis J. H. Davidson - Los Angeles R.A. Damiani - Chicago G.F. Fague - Detroit R.A. Garcia - Akron R. C-arnsworthy - Melbourne J. A. .Heilala - Akron R. Irwin - Houston J. S. Pullman - New York J. J. Roder - Chicago R. Giles - Melbourne
Pj J. A. Marsh - Brussels R. Enrhardt - New York T.W. One son - Montreal J. N. Haggart - Brussels V. Morse - St. Louis
Brydon - Montreal R. Graham - New York P. G. Benignus J. G. Bryant D. E. Roush J. R. Falien D. A. Hall D. R. Pogue D. F. Smith D. A. Olson
A.ttached is a list of questions and answers which may be asked of
you by customers receiving our Aroclor-PCB letter. You. can give
verbal answers; no answers should be given in writing. If the
customer asks a question you can't answer or if he wants an
answer in writing, then send his-questions to me and we will
cin swer from here.
./
.
We want to avoid any situation where a customer wants to return , . .
fluid. The new reformulated products will be available within a
month. We would prefer fhat the customer use up his current inventory and purchase Pydraul 625A, Pydraul ACA, Pydraul ACA Winter Grads and.Pydraul 540A when available. He will then top off with the new Fltiid and eventually all Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1260 . will be out of his^system. We don't want to take fluid back. Sell
him the replacement.
'
We must be very positive in our approach with each customer relative o our decision to eliminate the use of Aroclor 1254 and . Aroclqr 1260 in our Pydraul products. We (your customer and Monsanto) are not interested in using a product which may present a problem to our environment. We certainly have no reason to be defensive or apologetic about making this change. The decision to change makes good sense and our customers should commend us, not criticize our actions. No oi e has forced us to make this
IN- TO nC V t ! Ci-
SW 201631
STLCOPCB4052710
z
change. We have- done it to keep our customers out of possible trouble. . Tliey should appreciate our effort, and stay with us as a customer on the reformulated Pydrauls. To make this change has cost us re search monies and time. Fortunately, we possess the technical skills to make a change in our formulations without affecting the performance of products. Be positive. Take the offense. Don't let a customer or competitor intimidate you. I doubt if our competitors know whether their product could present a problem to our environment. You might ask your customer; if he has ever asked Houghton or Stauffer, Carbine, etc. about the effects of their products.
We should also recognize (point this out to your customer) we must clean-up. The Chemical Week article gives him an idea of laws in effect in his state. Read this yourself. Be familiar with the data on each state in which your customers are located. Use this in your discussions.
We have no replacement products for Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1260. We will continue to make these products; however, customers will have to use their own judgement on continued use.
We can't afford to lose one dollar of business. Our attitude in discussing this subject with our customer will be the deciding factor in our success or failure in retaining all our present business. Good luck.
(We have also attached a copy of the letter sent to transformer customers. )
N. T. Johnson
lb
f ! i <___
'~ DSW 201632
_
// STLCOPCB4052711