Document R2pobLpepkgKoOLYggqDGMv5k

Pursuant to the Court's April 13,2000 Order, Abex's answer to this interrogatory is limited to the years between 1930 and 19E0. Abex also objects to this interrogatory to the extent it purports to seek information or materials regarding time periods and products that are not at issue in these cases, on the grounds that such information or materials lack relevance and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Abex further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the information or materials it purports to seek lack relevance to the issues arising in these cases and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissibte evidence. Abex objects to this interrogatory to the extent to which it purports to seek information or materials that have been gathered, received, or prepared in the course of litigation, or which are otherwise subject to the attorney-client privilege, protected by the attorney work-product doctrine, the rule protecting materials prepared in anticipation of and/or in connection with litigation, or any other applicable privilege. Subject to and without waiving these objections, and insofar as Abex understands this interrogatory: SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO INTERROGAOTRY NO. 7 fate Abex manufactured and sold automotive and railroad friction products, some of which contained chrysotile asbestos only. SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO INTERROGAOTRY NO. 7 (b): See Objections and Answer to Interrogatory No. 6, which are incorporated by reference as though set forth herein in full. 13