Document R26M50DGDaJXNmzyyxLoZwO2B

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Sally M, Kanej Ex- 6 Personal Privacy (PP) | 12/9/2017 4:56':30 PM robinson@hsph.harvard.edu Terje Aven [terje.aven@uis.no]; Beck, Nancy [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=ExchangeAdministrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=168ecb5184ac44de95a913297f353745-Beck, Nancy]; F Bouder j ~E~x~6 PersonaI Priva'cy"(PP] j JoeArvai [jlarvai@umich.edu]j. :.6..P?[H aJ.P rN a.c.y .(.PP)J Oops /Tuesday Plenary / Re: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday Hi Lisa, In the message below, I mistyped your name as Linda. Safe travels. Sally Hi Everyone. I have read all of the correspondence. You can expect another note from me about your introductions. Please send around reactions to this note and make any suggestions that you have. I'm always open to new ideas. Background This is a challenging and interesting Plenary topic. I am very happy to be working with each of you on this endeavor. It seems to me that Terje is being visionary and experimental with this Plenary. I think our job is to continue to ask questions to get to the heart of the matter and see what thoughts and expertise we can offer. The Plenary is the first stage in the discussion. My hope is that we can: illuminate some areas of the broad question; identify and explain challenges; and articulate additional questions that could be the starting point for a second phase of discussion. My input I will be adding another dimension -- asking Terje's question but in the context of a well functioning, transparent decision-making environment. In my experience in the White House and Senate, rules are circumvented, access to principal decision makers is key, and effective communication is critical. Decision-making is an inherently human endeavor. So, given that good, knowledge-based decision -making is needed, how best can we proceed? The line-up is as follows: Frederic- takes a broad international view, Europe mostly Nancy - reminding us about current requirements under EPA using the example of TSCA Linda - adding economics into the regulatory decision-making process and highlighting the phenomenon of 'judgement' in the conduct of reg analysis and benefit-cost analysis Joe - returning to Terje's questions adding specific insight from RA profession and to look at the actual deviance in today's governance 'systems' compared to the past 20 years. Talk lengths Everyone (Nancy see below) has 7-10 minutes, with a sharp cut-off at 10. Nancy, I'm asking 5-7 minutes, because she has less latitude as a current EPA employee. Plenary Schedule Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038713-00001 Terje -10 minutes Sally -10 minutes including introductions and Plenary format Individual Panelists -- 40 minutes in total Discussion among Panelists (facilitated by Sally -- 10-15 minutes Questions from the Audience 15 minutes ( facilitated by Sally) Few Reactions from Terje - 3 minutes Closing from Sally-- 30 seconds Many thanks! Sally Hi. I am delighted to be working with Terje on the Tuesday AM Plenary. The topic is timely and broad. Later today I will be sending out the order of speakers are off ofer some comments. Thank you Sally Sally M. Kane, Ph.D. Email. C_el,l,: ij Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP)] ! | On Dec 7, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancy@epa.gov> wrote: Attached are some draft slides I am considering. I will essentially focus on how the new TSCA statute requires a transparent accounting of uncertainties in our risk evaluations. Please let me know if this is not what you were looking for. Safe travels to those of you that are heading our way! Nancy Nancy B. Beck, Ph.D., DABT Deputy Assistant Administrator, OCSPP P: 202-564-1273 M :j 6 i Ex. Personal Privacy (PP) beck.nancy@epa.gov From: Terje Aven [mailto:terie.aven@uis.no1 Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 11:38 AM To: F Bouden Ex. 6 i> i__________________________________________________ ) Cc: Joe Arvai <ilarvai@umich.edu>; Kane, Sallyi Ex. 6 Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancv@epa.gov> Subject: SV: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday robinson@hsph.harvard.edu; Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038713-00002 Thanks, sorry here is the correct email address for Nancy Beck.Nancy@epa.gov; Best Terje Sendt fra E-post for Windows 10 Fra: F Bouder { Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) ! Sendt: Sunday, November 26, 2017 5:24:06 PM Til: Terje Aven Kopi: Joe Arvai; Kane, Sally; Nancy Beck; robinson@hsph.harvard.edu Emne: Re: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday Dear T erje, I think this is very straight forward ! Best regards Frederic On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 10:17, Terje Aven < terie.aven@uis.no> wrote: Hi I have simplified my slides and message a little - see e.g. slide 7 leading to two key questions. Best Terje Sendt fra E-post for Windows 10 <TSCA Implementation. SRA. 12.12.17v2.pptx> Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038713-00003