Document QkkkZqpbYyjbbdz88QXkLVMav

EPA Region 10 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division Clean Water Act (CWA) Inspection Report Inspection Entry Date/Time Inspection Exit Date/Time Weather Media Statute(s)/Program(s) Type of Inspection 01/22/2024 10:30 AM (PT) Announced: No 01/22/2024 12:45 PM (PT) Access: Granted Rain, 46 F Water Clean Water Act, NPDES, Stormwater - Construction CEI - Compliance Evaluation Inspection Permittee Name General Contractor Project or Site Name Project/Site Physical Address City, State, Zip Code County/Borough/Parish Facility GPS Coordinates Permittee Mailing Address HD Fowler Corp. Tapani, Inc. HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Intersection of SR-3 and SW Birt Drive Port Orchard, Washington 98642 Kitsap County 47. 513566 N -122.736932 W 3633 136th Place SE, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98006 FRS ID Permit Number NAICS 110070555495 WAR312451 238910 (Site Preparation Contractors) Inspection Contacts: Organization Name EPA Region 10 Jon Klemesrud EPA Region 10 Emily Siangkam Washington State Maria Zeman Department of Ecology Tapani, Inc. Reuben Halme Tapani, Inc. Kyle Webb HD Fowler Corp. Cyle Boeck Title Lead Inspector Inspector Inspector Present in Opening Conf. Yes Yes Yes Present in Closing Conf. Yes Yes Yes Civil Superintendent Yes Yes Superintendent No Yes Project Manager No No EPA Inspector Signature/Date Supervisor Signature/Date JON KLEMESRUD Jon Klemesrud PETER CONTRERAS Peter Contreras, Chief FDDWES Digitally signed by JON KLEMESRUD Date: 2024.03.25 14:49:28 -07'00' Digitally signed by PETER CONTRERAS Date: 2024.03.25 14:56:42 -07'00' 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report This inspection report is based on information supplied by conversations with Mr. Reuben Halme, Mr. Kyle Webb, Mr. Cyle Boeck, or direct observations made at the time of the inspection, and records and reports maintained by the permittee and/or general contractor. This inspection report may also include information gathered from a review of EPA, State, and/or public records. SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Entry and Inspection Chronology This was an unannounced inspection; I was joined on the inspection by fellow EPA Region 10 Inspector Emily Siangkam and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) inspector Maria Zeman. At approximately 8:00AM on the day of the inspection, I called and spoke with Mr. Cyle Boeck, Project Manager with HD Fowler Corp. Mr. Boeck is listed on the project's Notice of Intent (NOI) as the current operator/permittee. I introduced myself discussed that I had been asked to conduct an on-site inspection at the HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard construction project to assess compliance with the project's coverage under Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit (CGP). I explained that the inspection was in coordination with Ecology and would include a walk-through of the construction site and a review of permit related documents. Mr. Boeck welcomed the inspection and discussed that the site is currently active with the general contractor on-site (Tapani, Inc), likely pouring footings and completing some utility work. Mr. Boeck explained that he would be unable to join on-site, but discussed that general contractor representative, Mr. Kyle Webb of Tapani, Inc. would be on-site and available for the inspection. Ms. Siangkam (EPA), Ms. Zeman (Ecology) and I arrived on-site at approximately 10:30AM, we entered the jobsite trailer and were greeted by Mr. Reuben Halme, Civil Superintendent with Tapani, Inc. Mr. Webb was also present within the job-site trailer but was initially on the phone at the time of our arrival. Mr. Halme discussed that he had just finished a walk-through that morning with representatives of the local stormwater authority, who had had just departed the site. Following our initial introductions, I presented my EPA credentials and discussed the purpose and expectations of the inspection and provided my business card. We had a brief discussion regarding the project's general timeline and recent activities, Mr. Halme explained that the project was wrapping up utility work and vertical construction was still in the initial phases. It was discussed that Mr. Halme has been involved on the project since it broke ground in September 2023 (approx.) and Mr. Webb had only been on-site approximately 1 weeks. It was discussed that Mr. Webb is a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL); however, the project also utilizes Lissa Rhoades, with Tapani, Inc. for CESCL related work. Ms. Rhoades was not currently on-site. The project's former Assistant Project Manager and CESCL, Mr. David Wessles had left employment approximately 1-week prior to the inspection. The inspection consisted of an opening conference, a walk-through of the construction site, a records review and concluded with a closing conference. Portions of the record review also occurred post-inspection, as discussed in Section III of this inspection report. During the closing conference we discussed our observations during the walkthrough, potential compliance concerns and next steps. We were accompanied throughout the inspection by Mr. Halme, Mr. Webb was present for portions of the opening and closing conference. Post-inspection, I followed up with an email to Mr. Halme, Mr. Webb and Mr. Boeck recapping the general inspection activities that had occurred, as Mr. Boeck was unable to join on the inspection. I also provided a copy of EPA's Small Business Resources Information Sheet. Project History The HD Fowler HR-3 Industrial Stock Yard construction project (hereinafter referred to as the "Project") is permitted to discharge to the Highway-3 Ditch under the CGP, the permit tracking number assigned to the project is (WAR312451). Based upon my review within Ecology's Permitting and Reporting Information System (PARIS), the initial permit application (notice of intent) for the construction project was submitted by Mr. Boeck on April 6, 2024. Permit coverage was effective on May 18, 2023. See Attachment A, Permit Coverage Letter. No prior EPA/Ecology inspection/enforcement activity had been previously documented. Page 2 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report SECTION II - OBSERVATIONS Site Review The Project consists of developing an 8.26 acres site, encompassing five separated parcels with a total area of approximately 12.44 acres. The Project includes the construction of a 16,000 square-foot warehouse and a 4,500 square-foot, 3-sided storage building. The site will serve as a warehouse and distribution center for HD Fowler Corp. (permittee), storing waterworks, irrigation and landscape, pumps, and wastewater equipment. The outdoor storage yard will store plastic and iron pipe, pressure tanks, large pipe fittings, plastic septic tanks, stormwater chambers and fire hydrants. For the construction of the warehouse and distribution center, activities also include adding site access and road improvements along SW Birt Drive, land clearing/grading, utility installation, the construction of permanent stormwater infrastructure, including a collection system (pipes and catch basins) that convey runoff to an engineered stormwater vault and large infiltration/detention pond. See Attachment B, Site Plans. North of the Project is the permitted discharge location, the SR-3 Roadside ditch. Gorst Creek is located downslope of the SR-3 roadside ditch, west of the Project. Gorst Creek discharges to the Sinclair Inlet of the Puget Sound. At the time of inspection, perimeter silt fencing had been installed, construction/site access had been completed and the area had been cleared and graded and base material (rock) had been applied. The primary/permanent stormwater/sediment pond and associated vault(s) had been constructed. A second, temporary stormwater/sediment pond had also been installed. As discussed earlier in this report, Mr. Halme explained that the project was currently wrapping up the remaining utility work and vertical construction was still in the initial phases. Construction was on-track to be completed in June 2024. At the time of inspection, approximately 8-9 Tapani, Inc. staff were on-site, the majority appeared to be working on trenching and installing water main piping along SW Birt Drive. Approximately 10 steel/masonry subcontractors were working on initial construction of the warehouse. Mr. Halme discussed that he was currently working on repairing PVC piping used to pump stormwater from the two stormwater ponds to a wooded/vegetated area south of the construction area. The pumping of stormwater allowed the project to route stormwater to the wooded/vegetative area for infiltration, rather than discharge the SR-3 roadside ditch. Mr. Halme discussed that pipe repairs were required after several sections of piping became cracked/damaged after a recent cold weather event which caused the freezing within the above-ground piping. As a result of the broken lines, the stormwater pond was approaching maximum capacity. Mr. Halme was not aware of any discharges from the Project to the SR-3 Roadside ditch from the infiltration/detention pond. Photographs taken during the inspection walk-through are attached to this inspection report as Attachment C, Photograph Log. Initially for the walk-through we reviewed the Project's Site Map, which was posted on one of the walls inside the job-site trailer (Photo 1 & Photo 2). We departed the job-site trailer and began the walkthrough along SW Birt Drive. We first observed the northern perimeter including the trenching work that was occuring at the time of inspection. Walk-Through Observations: Location: SW Birt Drive Observation #: OB-001 We first observed areas north of the job-site trailer, including north and south of SW Birt Drive. Perimeter chainlink fencing was installed around the property, as well as silt fencing along the construction boundary. As a best management practice (BMP), unstabilized areas were generally covered with straw (Photo 3). Along SW Birt Drive, we observed active trenching and water pipe installation occuring on the north end of SW Birt Drive. The new trench was being dewatered just north of the trench, between SW Birt Drive and SR-3. The trench dewatering water appeared turbid, discharging to a vegetated area off-site near the intersection of SW Birt Page 3 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Drive and Sunnyslope Road SW, south of SR-3 (Photo 4 & Photo 5). The discharge was not observed downslope of the vegetative area, east of Sunnyslope Road SW (Photo 6 & Photo 7). We returned to SW Birt Drive and continued to observe the flow path of the dewatering discharge and trenching activity (Photo 8 - Photo 12). Location: Northern Construction Areas Observation #: OB-002 We continued west along SW Birt Drive, until we returned to the northeast corner of the Project. We observed a single catch basin located north of the planned warehouse structure (Photo 13 & Photo 14). Mr. Halme discussed that the single catch basin is the sole catch basin not currently routed/connected to the Project's stormwater vaults/ponds. The single catch basin discharges separately to the SR-3 roadside ditch, northwest of the catch basin. The areas around the catch basin were unstabilized, no inlet protection or stormwater BMPs were observed. Stormwater was observed entering the catch basin as sheet flow from the area(s) west/southwest of the catch basin. We then walked southwest and observed discharge location for the single catch basin we had just visited. The discharge location was on the north side of the perimeter fencing (Photo 15). A below ground PVC pipe was discharging stormwater to a rip-rapped area into the SR-3 roadside ditch. Accumulated sediment was observed within the rip-rapped area (Photo 16). It was discussed that the outfall/discharge was not being monitored/sampled. We continued southwest and continued to observe the remaining sections of the northern perimeter. In addition to the applied base rock, silt fencing and straw was being used as BMPs along the northern perimeter (Photo 17). We also observed two catch basins installed (Photo 18); Mr. Halme discussed that both catch basins were routed to the primary/permanent stormwater pond. Near the northwest perimeter, we came to an area of silt-fencing that had previously failed according to Mr. Halme (Photo 19). Mr. Halme discussed that the area appeared to be a low spot of the northern perimeter, after the silt-fencing failed and was repaired, a temporary drainage pipe was installed to divert stormwater under the newly constructed access road and into a stormwater catch basin that discharges to the primary/permanent stormwater pond (Photo 20 & Photo 21). We continued southwest and observed the northernmost stormwater vault that receives stormwater from the northern catch basins (Photo 22 & Photo 23). The stormwater vault(s) discharge to the primary/permanent stormwater pond via piping. Mr. Halme discussed that the media for the stormwater vaults had been received and currently staged on-site. We then observed the primary/permanent stormwater pond located in the northwest corner of the site; the pond was observed to be at or near full capacity (Photo 24). Mr. Halme discussed that the Project was currently unable to pump/dewater the pond to their upper temporary pond and designated dewatering area. This was due to several sections of PVC pipe currently damaged after a recent cold/freeze event. Mr. Halme discussed that prior to the cold/freeze event, the Project had been routinely pumping from the primary/permanent pond to an upper/temporary pond, most recently one week prior (approx). From the upper/temporary pond, the Project would then dewater via a sediment bag to a wooded area south of the construction area. Dewatering was utilized as an alternative to discharging to the SR-3 road ditch. It was discussed that a gated valve controls the pond's discharge to the SR-3 road ditch and the Project had yet to open the valve to discharge to the SR-3 road ditch. Location: Western and Southern Construction Areas Observation #: OB-003 Page 4 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report From the northwest boundary we then traveled south along the western perimeter. We observed the southern areas of the stormwater pond and several sections of broken PVC piping currently in repair (Photo 25). We also observed the southern stormwater vault (Photo 26) and staged media for future use within vault(s) (Photo 27). Along the western perimeter, we observed a section of silt fence in need of maintenance (Photo 28). The adjacent property to the west was an auto wrecking business that was temporarily closed. Construction areas had generally been covered with base rock. As we continued south, we observed the secondary/temporary stormwater pond and dewatering area located within the vegetated/wooded area (Photo 29 - Photo 32). Location: Eastern Construction Areas Observation #: OB-004 As we returned north from the vegetated wooded area, we walked along the eastern boundary and observed additional catch basins that were connected to the primary/permanent stormwater pond. Catch basins were equipped with fabric filters (Photo 33 & Photo 34), construction areas were generally covered with base rock. Along the eastern perimeter, we also observed a foundation trench that had been excavated and currently full of water. Mr. Halme discussed that the Project had just received the required permitting items for that area, which had been delayed following the trenching activity. The trench had yet to be dewatered and/or connected to the stormwater collection system (Photo 35 - Photo 37). Location: Central & Northeastern Construction Areas Observation #: OB-005 Within the construction area we observed numerous materials staging areas. Within one staging area, we observed an open 5-gallon bucket labeled "Spraylock SCP 327," as well as a 5-gallon bucket of lubrication oil (Photo 38 - Photo 39). We continued to the active vertical construction areas (Photo 40 & 41), within the area we observed another stormwater catch basin and additional areas where base rock was applied (Photo 42). We also observed the Project's fuel storage area within enclosed shipping containers that were staged on-site (Photo 43). We then entered the job-site trailer to conduct the records review and closing conference. Location: SR-3 Roadside Ditch & Stormwater Pond Discharge Location Observation #: OB-006 The SR-3 roadside ditch and primary/permanent stormwater pond's discharge location isn't easily accessible from the construction area due to perimeter fencing. At the time of inspection, it was discussed with Mr. Halme that the inspection team would be visiting the area after departing the Project site, following the closing conference. Mr. Halme elected not to join us for this final portion of the inspection. Upon arriving at the SR-3 roadside ditch and pond outfall along SR-3, we observed water within the stormwater pond's discharge pipe and within the SR-3 roadside ditch. Rip-rap was observed at the pipe's discharge location. Straw wattles within the SR-3 roadside ditch appeared to need maintenance. Stormwater within the SR-3 ditch was observed to be either infiltrating or ponding. No discharge to Gorst Creek was observed (Photo 44 - 48). SECTION III - RECORDS REVIEW Records may not be in sequential order. Record: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Reference #: RR-001 Page 5 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report The Project's SWPPP was located within the job-site trailer. The SWPPP was prepared by N.L. Olson and Associates, Inc., with a prepared date of August 2022. The SWPPP narrative include the 13 required elements contained with the permit. I suggested updating the SWPPP to include the current CESCL contact information, as Mr. David Wessels had left employment the week prior to the inspection. Record: SWPPP Site Map Reference #: RR-002 The Project's Site Map was located within the job-site trailer and posted on the wall. The Site Map contained handwritten notes of BMP install dates, locations, and general comments (Photo 1 & Photo 2). Record: Routine Site Inspection Reports Reference #: RR-003 Routine Site Inspection Reports were not available at the time of inspection. Mr. Halme discussed that site inspection reports are generated electronically following the inspection and sent to Lissa Rhoades of Tapani, Inc., who helps manage CESCL activities. It was believed that the reports were only available to view internally/electronically by Tapani, Inc. I requested the Project email completed Site Inspection Reports for my review. On January 30, 2024, I received weekly Site Inspection Reports via email from Ms. Rhoades, they were reviewed upon receipt. Reports received were completed on the following dates: 08/31/23, 09/06/23, 09/14/23, 09/21/23, 09/29/23, 10/05/23, 10/18/23, 10/25/23, 11/03/23, 11/07/23, 11/15/23, 11/30/23, 12/07/23, 12/11/23, 12/20/23, 01/03/24, 01/10/24, 01/18/24, 01/25/24. It was noted that the first report, dated August 31, 2023, was blank and likely generated in error. Site inspections were initially conducted by Mark Abernathy, who was listed as the Foreman/CESCL for the time. Reports generated by Mr. Abernathy were documented on a 21-page checklist. On October 25, 2023, site inspections transitioned to being conducted by Ms. Rhoades, who utilized a 6-page checklist. On occasion, Ms. Rhoades would also include photographs of site conditions/BMPs. On January 18, 2024, site inspections transitioned to Mr. Webb, utilizing the 21-page checklist. The November 8, 2023, Site Inspection Report indicated: "water flow to low point across site and blew out silt fence, stopped work repaired silt fence and diverted water to pond stabilized silt on outer edge of silt fence with straw." It was noted within the report that the site had received 4.09 inches of rainfall since the last inspection and 1.35 inches in the past 24-hrs. The December 7, 2023, the Site Inspection Report was generated by Arthur Lipe, CESCL. The report indicated that a turbidity sample was collected and reported at 60 NTUs. Record: Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) Reference #: RR-004 At the time of inspection, no DMR's had been submitted for the Project. Post-inspection, DMR's were submitted by Lissa Rhoades on February 6, 2024. DMR's were reviewed on March 18, 2024, using Ecology's Permitting and Reporting Information System (PARIS). Post-Inspection, I reviewed DMR's applicable at the time of inspection (August 2023 - December 2023). The review indicated the DMR's were submitted for each month and indicated "No Discharge." The November 2023 DMR included the following comment: "11/8: ERTS#728372. Fence blew out by the time went to test water team had repaired area and stopped all discharge." Page 6 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report SECTION IV - SAMPLING ACTIVITIES AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS No sampling was conducted for this inspection. SECTION V - AREAS OF CONCERN Area(s) of Concern may not be in sequential order. The presentation of Area(s) of Concern (AOC) does not constitute a formal compliance determination or violation. AOC Reference #: AOC-001 Location Reference #: OB-001, SW Birt Drive Regulation and/or Permit Requirement: Permit Condition S9.D.10. Control Dewatering AOC: Along SW Birt Drive, we observed active trenching and water pipe installation occuring on the north end of SW Birt Drive. The new trench was being dewatered just north of the trench, between SW Birt Drive and SR-3. The trench dewatering water appeared highly turbid, discharging to a vegetated area off-site near the intersection of SW Birt Drive and Sunnyslope Road SW, south of SR-3 (Photo 4 & Photo 5). The discharge was not observed downslope of the vegetative area, east of Sunnyslope Road SW (Photo 6 & Photo 7). We returned to SW Birt Drive and continued to observe the flow path of the dewatering discharge and trenching activity (Photo 8 - Photo 12). According to Section F.3. "Utilities" of the Project's SWPPP: "Dewatering devices shall discharge to an appropriate sediment trap or pond, preceded by adequate energy dissipation, prior to runoff leaving the site. If a sediment trip is not used on the site, discharge shall be upstream of a properly installed silt fence." The concern was the highly turbid dewatering water observed to be discharging off-site without controls. AOC Reference #: AOC-002 Location Reference #: OB-002, Northern Construction Area, Catch Basin & Discharge Regulation and/or Permit Requirement: Permit Condition S4.C.2.a. states: "The permittee must sample all discharge points at least once every calendar week when stormwater (or authorized non-stormwater) discharges from the site or enters any onsite surface waters of the state (for example, a creek running through a site); sampling is not required on sites that disturb less than an acre." Permit Condition S4.C.3.a. states: "Sampling is required at all points where stormwater associated with construction activity (or authorized non-stormwater) is discharged off-site, including where it enters any onsite surface waters of the state (for example, a creek running through a site." Permit Condition S9.D.7. states: "Protect all storm drain inlets made operable during construction so that stormwater runoff does not enter the conveyance system without first bing filtered or treated to remove sediment." AOC: We observed a single catch basin located north of the planned warehouse structure (Photo 13 & Photo 14). Mr. Halme discussed that the single catch basin is the sole catch basin not currently routed/connected to the Project's stormwater vaults/ponds. The single catch basin discharges separately to the SR-3 roadside ditch, northwest of Page 7 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report the catch basin. The areas around the catch basin were unstabilized, no inlet protection or stormwater BMPs were observed. Stormwater was observed entering the catch basin as sheet flow from the area(s) west/southwest of the catch basin. We then walked southwest and observed discharge location for the single catch basin we had just visited. The discharge location was on the north side of the perimeter fencing (Photo 15). A below ground PVC pipe was discharging stormwater to a rip-rapped area into the SR-3 roadside ditch. Accumulated sediment was observed within the rip-rapped area (Photo 16). It was discussed that the outfall/discharge was not being monitored/sampled. The concerns are that no inlet protection was observed to be installed for the identified catch basin and the discharge from the catch basin to the SR-3 roadside ditch was not being sampled/monitored. Accumulated sediment was observed at the discharge location within the SR-3 roadside ditch. AOC Reference #: AOC-003 Location Reference #: OB-003, Western Perimeter Silt Fence Regulation and/or Permit Requirement: Permit Condition S9.D.11.a states: "Permitees must maintain and repair all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function in accordance with BMP specifications." The Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (July 2019) lists maintenance standards for BMP C233 (Silt Fence) which includes: "Remove sediment deposits when the deposit reaches approximately one-third the height of the silt-fence or install a second silt-fence. AOC: Along the western perimeter, we observed a section of silt fence in need of maintenance (Photo 28). The adjacent property to the west was an auto wrecking business that was temporarily closed. The concern is the BMP in need of maintenance based upon the written standard. AOC Reference #: AOC-004 Record Reference #: RR-003 & RR-004 Regulation and/or Permit Requirement: Permit Condition S5.B. states: "Permittees required to conduct water quality sampling in accordance with Special Conditions (S4.C (Turbidity/Transparency), S4.D (pH), S8 (303[d]/TMDL sampling), and/or G12 (Additional Sampling) must submit the results to Ecology. Permitees must submit monitoring data using Ecology's WQWebDMR web application accessed through Ecology's Water Quality Permitting Portal." "Permittees must submit DMR forms to be received by Ecology within 15-days following the end of each month." AOC: At the time of inspection, no DMR's had been submitted for the Project. Post-inspection, DMR's were submitted by Lissa Rhoades on February 6, 2024. DMR's were reviewed on March 18, 2024, using Ecology's Permitting and Reporting Information System (PARIS). Post-Inspection, I reviewed DMR's applicable at the time of inspection (August 2023 - December 2023). The review indicated the DMR's were submitted for each month and indicated "No Discharge." The December 7, 2023, the Site Inspection Report was generated by Arthur Lipe, CESCL. The report indicated Page 8 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report that a turbidity sample was collected and reported at 60 NTUs (Attachment D). The concern is that August 2023 - December 2023 DMR's were submitted on February 6, 2024, past the 15days following the end of each month requirement. In addition, the December 7, 2023, sampling event documented in the corresponding Site Inspection Report, was not reported in the December 2023 DMR (Attachment E). AOC Reference #: AOC-005 AOC: Location Reference #: OB-006, Stormwater Pond Discharge Location Upon arriving at the SR-3 roadside ditch and pond outfall along SR-3, we observed ponded water within the stormwater pond's discharge pipe and within the SR-3 roadside ditch. Stormwater within the SR-3 ditch was observed to be either infiltrating or ponding (Photo 45 & Photo 46). Earlier during the inspection, it was discussed with Mr. Halme that a gated valve controls the pond's discharge to the SR-3 road ditch and the Project had yet to open the valve to discharge into the SR-3 road ditch. Although water was not observed to be flowing at the discharge location, the concern is the presence of the ponded water observed within the stormwater pond's discharge pipe and within the SR-3 roadside ditch with the gate valve not having been opened. AOC Reference #: AOC-006 Location Reference #: OB-005, Central Construction Area: Regulation and/or Permit Requirement: Permit Condition S9.D.9.a. states: "Handle and dispose of all pollutants, including waste materials and demolition debris that occur on-site in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater." Permit Condition S9.D.9.b. states: "Provide cover containment, and protection from vandalism for all chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products, and other materials that have a the potential to pose a threat or human health and or the environment." AOC: Within the construction area we observed numerous materials staging areas. Within one staging area, we observed an open 5-gallon bucket labeled "Spraylock SCP 327," as well as a 5-gallon bucket of lubrication oil (Photo 38 - Photo 39). The concern is the potential stormwater contamination from the open bucket of "Spraylock SCP 327" and storage location of the bucket of lubrication oil. SECTION VI - CLOSING CONFERENCE AND POST INSPECTION CORRESPONDENCE Closing Conference Following the walk-through of the construction areas, a closing conference was held with Mr. Halme and Mr. Webb. We discussed our general observations and AOC #001-003, & AOC #006. We also discussed the followup records request for the completed Site Inspection Reports. Page 9 of 52 Post Inspection Correspondence 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report As discussed earlier in this report, post-inspection on January 23, 2024, I followed up with an email to Mr. Halme, Mr. Webb and Mr. Boeck recapping the general inspection activities that had occurred, as Mr. Boeck was unable to join on the inspection. I also provided a copy of EPA's Small Business Resources Information Sheet. On January 30, 2024, I received an email from Ms. Rhoades that contained the requested Site Inspection Reports. SECTION VII - LIST OF APPENDICES Attachment A - Permit Coverage Letter Attachment B - Site Plans Attachment C - Photograph Log Attachment D - December 7, 2023, Site Inspection Report Attachment E - December 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report Page 10 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment A Permit Coverage Letter Page 11 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report May 18, 2023 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600 360-407-6000 Cyle Boeck HD Fowler Corp 3633 136th Pl SE Ste 100 Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit Permit number: Site Name: Location: Disturbed Acres: WAR312451 HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Intersection of SR-3 and SW Birt Drive Port Orchard, WA County: Kitsap 9.34 Dear Cyle Boeck: The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) received your Notice of Intent for coverage under Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSWGP). This is your permit coverage letter. Your permit coverage is effective May 18, 2023. Retain this letter as an official record of permit coverage for your site. You may keep your records in electronic format if you can easily access them from your construction site. You can get the CSWGP, permit forms, and other information at Ecology's CSWGP eCoverage Packet webpage1. Contact your Permit Administrator, listed below, if you want a copy of the CSWGP mailed to you. Please read the permit and contact Ecology if you have any questions. Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reports (WQWebDMR) This permit requires you to submit monthly discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) for the full duration of permit coverage (from the first full month of coverage to termination). Your first sampling and reporting period will be for the month of June and your first DMR must be submitted by July 15, 2023. You must submit your DMRs electronically using Ecology's secure online system, WQWebDMR. To sign up for WQWebDMR go to Ecology's WQWebPortal guidance webpage2. If you have 1 http://www.ecology.wa.gov/eCoverage-packet 2 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/Guidance-technical-assistance/Water-quality-permitsguidance/WQWebPortal-guidance Page 12 of 52 Attachment B Site Plans 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Page 13 of 52 Scale: 1"= 60' DATUM 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 60 0 60 120 Scale in Feet ' 33"E N52 00 \\server-host\AutoCAD Projects\11540 HD FOWLER SR3\11540 C3.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN.dwg, 8/16/2022 6:49:02 AM, RHL 115.0' 150.00 24' 31' 965.78' 302.03' "E 41' 38 N52 ' 21"W S52 16 9 S52 00' 33"W 51.35' N43 57' 38"W 20.00' 7 19 3 20 S1 12' 21"W 505.31' N86 44' 22"W 332.89' 2 11 17 10 13 ROAD A 10 30' 75' 19' N43 57' 38"W 30.00' 30' 18 8 N1 12' 21"E 286.76' ROAD B 4 B ROAD ' 4523.28 "E 1' 21 N46 0 ' 21"W S46 01 422.70' ASPHALT PAVEMENT STATE HIGHWAY 3 14 10+00 11+00 15 1 85.00 9+35 REVISIONS NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION 1 08.22 RHL REVISED PER KCDCD COMMENTS DATED JULY 11, 2022 BY DATE DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED ACCEPTED NLOII 10/21 30' ROAD A 16 12+00 13+00 B AD RO 0.00' 60 8' 39"E 5 S43 15+00 30' 14+00 5 DETENTION/RETENTION POND MAXIMUM WATER ELEVATION 97.00' EX ACCESS (AIRPORT AUTO WRECKING) 08.16.2022 N0 33' 08"E 1343.93' 8 (;,67,1*9(*(7$7,21,16(7%$&.725(0$,1 81',6785%('$5($ S85 48' 58"E 198.58' 16+00 5 17+00 18+00 14 19+00 (;,67,1*9(*(7$7,21 727$/$5($ 6)$& 20+00 S0 10' 51"E 909.73' 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 25+24 SITE SCHEDULE SURFACE MATERIALS LEGEND 2" COMPACTED DEPTH, HMA 1/2" (PG 58-22) 1 BEGIN SITE STATIONING STA 10+00 AT SW PROPERTY CORNER 2 WASTE/RECYCLE INCLOSURE (20'X20") (SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.34) LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT, SEE SECTION SHEET C3.0 HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT, SEE SECTION SHEET C3.0 2" C.S.T.C. COMPACTED DEPTH 3 BEGIN ROAD A ALIGNMENT STA 10+00 4 65 LF RETAINING WALL 5' MAX HEIGHT, CBOUNILCDRINEGTEPECRUMRBITGRUETQTUEIRRED, BY OTHERS 5 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (TYP) SEE SHEET C3.36 6 NOT USED CRUSHED SURFACE TOP COURSE, SEE SECTION SHEET C3.2 6" BASE COURSE COMPACTED DEPTH %27 81'$5.55<FT /W,ID1E(M7O$N%O/LI(THIC CURB GUTTER & SIDEWALK FLUSH WITH ASPHALT STANDARD ASPHALT 8 APPROXIMATELY 2,150 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 3 BARBED WIRE SYSTEM AT TOP , SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.6 6e : 9 SANITARY SEWER DRAIN FIELD, DESIGN BY OTHERS 1e : NOTE: IT IS SUGGESTED HEAVY DUTY ROAD SECTION TO BE USED IN MARKED DRIVE ISLE. STANDARD ASPHALT SECTION MAY BE USED IN PARKING AREAS & STOCK YARDS 10 CMU WALL, SEE SHEET C3.6, SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRE1DSeEEARCHITEC(TS PLANS 11 ADA PAR1KINeGSP ACE(2): 3" COMPACTED DEPTH, HMA 1/2" (PG 58-22) SECTION 12 ADA PAT1HSeIDEW ALKFLU(SH WITH ASPHALT 13 6e : SLIDING CANTILEVER GATE, SEE DETAILS SHEET C 3.8 6e ( 14 30' DOUBLE SWING GATE, SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS 6e ( 15 12' WIDE POND CONTROL STRUCTURE ACCESS ROAD 6e ( 16 12' WIDE POND FOREBAY ACCESS ROAD 1e ( 17 WHEEL STOP (TYP) SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.5) 1e : 18 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER (INVERTED CROWN) SEEDETA1ILeSHEETC3.4( 3" C.S.T.C. COMPACTED DEPTH 6" BASE COURSE COMPACTED DEPTH 1 3 2 OVER ALL 19 BEGIN ROAD B ALIGNMENT STA 10+00 20 ~440 LF SOLID SCREENING FENCE (CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH SLATES OR CEDAR FENCE, TBD) HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT SECTION KEY MAP SCALE: 1"= 400' Page 14 of 52 OVERALL SITE PLAN HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Site Development Activity Permit Portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 23 North, Range 1 West, W.M. in Kitsap County, Washington FOR: HD FOWLER CYLE BOECK / CONST. HD FOWLER CORP. OFFICE 3633 136th PLACE SE, SUITE 100 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 Phone: (425) 654-8800 SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: 2021.10.21 DRAWING NUMBER: 11540 SHEET C3.0 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment C Photograph Log All photographs taken by Jon Klemesrud on January 22, 2024 Nikon Coolpix AW100 Page 15 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:01 (DSCN3510) Description: Photo within the jobsite trailer, "SWPPP Site Map" posted on the wall. Photo #:02 (DSCN3511) Description: Photo within the jobsite trailer, "SWPPP Site Map" posted on the wall. Photo #:03 (DSCN3512) Description: Facing northeast, photo of SW Bird Drive from just north of the jobsite trailer. Photo #:04 (DSCN3513) Description: Facing south/southeast, photo of the observed trench dewatering discharge location. A vegetative area on the north side of SW Birt Drive, south of SR-3 along Sunnyslope Road SW. Page 16 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:05 (DSCN3514) Description: Facing south, photo of the observed trench dewatering discharge location. Area is north of SW Birt Drive, south of SR-3 along Sunnyslope Road SW. Photo #:06 (DSCN3515) Description: Facing northeast, photo of drainage area south of SR-3, north of Sunnyslope Road SW. Downslope of dewatering discharge location. Photo #:07 (DSCN3516) Description: Facing northeast, photo of drainage area south of SR-3, north of Sunnyslope Road SW. North of dewatering discharge location. Photo #:08 (DSCN3517) Description: Facing southwest, photo of trench dewatering water flowing northeast along SW Birt Drive and entering vegetative area. Page 17 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:09 (DSCN3518) Description: Facing southwest, photo of dewatering water from trench operations along SW Birt Drive. Photo #:10 (DSCN3519) Description: Facing northeast, photo of dewatering water from trench operations along SW Birt Drive. Photo #:11 (DSCN3520) Description: Facing northwest, photo of trench dewatering along SW Birt Drive. Photo #:12 (DSCN3521) Description: Facing northeast, photo of trenching operations along SW Birt Drive. Page 18 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:13 (DSCN3522) Description: Facing south, photo of stormwater catch basin. No inlet protection observed at the time of inspection. Catch basin discharges directly to SR-3 roadside ditch. Photo #:14 (DSCN3523) Description: Facing west, photo of stormwater catch basin. No inlet protection observed at the time of inspection. Catch basin discharges directly to SR-3 roadside ditch. Photo #:15 (DSCN3524) Description: Facing west, photo of stormwater outfall from the single catch basin to the SR-3 roadside ditch. Outfall discharging at the time of inspection. Photo #:16 (DSCN3525) Description: Facing west, photo of stormwater outfall from the single catch basin to the SR-3 roadside ditch. Outfall discharging at the time of inspection. Page 19 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:17 (DSCN3526) Description: Facing southwest, photo of north perimeter silt fencing and straw application as BMPs. Photo #:18 (DSCN3527) Description: Facing southwest, photo of constructed stormwater catch basin, connecting to stormwater vault and stormwater pond. Photo #:19 (DSCN3528) Description: Facing southwest, photo of stormwater being piped to stormwater catch basin connected to stormwater vault and stormwater pond. According to Mr. Halme, temporary pipe was installed after the area experienced significant stormwater and the silt-fence failed. Photo #:20 (DSCN3529) Description: Facing southwest, photo of inlet to stormwater pipe, area being drained to stormwater catch basin connected to stormwater vault and stormwater pond. According to Mr. Halme, temporary pipe was installed after the area experienced significant stormwater and the silt-fence failed. Page 20 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:21 (DSCN3530) Description: Facing northeast, photo of area being drained to stormwater catch basin connected to stormwater vault and stormwater pond. According to Mr. Halme, temporary pipe was installed after the area experienced significant stormwater and the silt-fence failed. Photo #:22 (DSCN3531) Description: Photo of northernmost stormwater vault connected to stormwater pond. Media for the stormwater vault currently not installed and stockpiled in staging area. Photo #:23 (DSCN3532) Description: Facing southwest, photo of northernmost stormwater vault connected to stormwater pond. Media for the stormwater vault currently not installed and stockpiled in staging area. Photo #:24 (DSCN3533) Description: Facing south, photo of stormwater pond. Stormwater pond routinely pumped to upper (secondary) pond and pumped to vegetative area for infiltrated. Above ground PCV pipes used for pumping froze and burst the week prior from below freezing temperatures. Page 21 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:25 (DSCN3534) Description: Facing south, photo of above ground PVC pipes being repaired for the pumping of stormwater from primary pond to secondary pond. Photo #:26 (DSCN3535) Description: Facing north, photo of southern stormwater vault and primary storm pond. Photo #:27 (DSCN3536) Description: Facing north, photo of media staged for the installation to stormwater vaults. Photo #:28 (DSCN337) Description: Facing northwest, photo of western perimeter silt fencing in need of maintenance per standard (BMP C233 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington). Page 22 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:29 (DSCN3538) Description: Facing north, photo of secondary stormwater pond that receives stormwater from primary stormwater pond (when pumped). Stormwater from the secondary pond is pumped upslope to vegetated/wooded area to the south. Photo #:30 (DSCN3539) Description: Facing north, photo of secondary stormwater pond and pumping hose. Stormwater from the secondary pond is pumped upslope to a vegetated/wooded area to the south. Photo #:31 (DSCN3540) Description: Facing south, photo of pumping hose used to pump stormwater from the secondary pond to the vegetated/wooded area to the south. Photo #:32 (DSCN3541) Description: Facing south, photo of sediment bag used at discharge location in vegetated/wooded area for secondary pond. Page 23 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:33 (DSCN3542) Description: Facing west, photo of stormwater catch basin within the stockpile area. Catch basin designed to route stormwater to primary stormwater pond. Catch basin equipped with fabric/filter. Photo #:34 (DSCN3543) Description: Facing northwest, photo of stormwater catch basin within the stockpile area. Catch basin designed to route stormwater to primary stormwater pond. Catch basin equipped within fabric filter. Photo #:35 (DSCN3544) Description: Facing southeast, photo of foundation trench full of water along the northeast perimeter. Photo #:36 (DSCN3545) Description: Facing northwest, photo of catch basin at foundation trench full of water along the northeast perimeter. Page 24 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:37 (DSCN3546) Description: Facing northwest, photo of foundation trench full of water along the northeast perimeter. Photo #:38 (DSCN3547) Description: Facing north, photo of opened bucket of "spraylock SCP 327" and lubrication oil near temporary stockpile area. Photo #:39 (DSCN3548) Description: Facing north, photo of labeling of open bucket "Spraylock SCP 327." Photo #:40 (DSCN3549) Description: Facing northeast, photo of vertical construction of future warehouse/office building. Page 25 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:41 (DSCN3550) Description: Facing southeast, photo of vertical construction of future warehouse/office building. Photo #:42 (DSCN3551) Description: Facing south, photo of area northeast of the jobsite trailer, stormwater catch basin routing to stormwater vault/primary pond. Photo #:43 (DSCN3552) Description: Facing south, photo of conex/shipping containers used to fuel/material storage. Photo #:44 (DSCN3568) Description: Facing northeast, photo of stormwater pond discharge location to the SR-3 roadside ditch. No flow observed at the time of inspection. Page 26 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Photograph Log - HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Photo #:45 (DSCN3569) Description: Facing southwest, photo of primary stormwater pond discharge location to the SR-3 roadside ditch. No flow observed at the time of inspection. Photo #:46 (DSCN3570) Description: Facing south/southeast, photo of primary stormwater pond outfall location to the SR-3 roadside ditch. No flow observed at the time of inspection. Photo #:47 (DSCN3571) Description: Facing northeast, photo SR-3 roadside ditch downslope of stormwater pond outfall. No flow observed at the time of inspection. Photo #:48 (DSCN3572) Description: Facing southwest, photo of SR-3 roadside ditch downslope of stormwater pond outfall. No flow observed at the time of inspection. Page 27 of 52 Other Photographs Not Included: DSCN3556 - SWPPP Title Page DSCN3557 - SWPPP Table of Contents DSCN3558 - SWPPP Page 1 DSCN3559 - SWPPP Page 2 DSCN3560 - SWPPP Page 3 DSCN3561 - SWPPP Page 4 DSCN3562 - SWPPP Page 5 DSCN3563 - SWPPP Page 6 DSCN3564 - SWPPP Page 7 DSCN3565 - SWPPP Page 8 DSCN3567 - SWPPP Page 9 DSCN3568 - SWPPP Map 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Page 28 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment D December 7, 2023, Site Inspection Report Page 29 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SITE INSPECTION FORM DETAILS Date: 12/6/2023 Job: 233005. 01: HD Fowler Bremerton CIVIL Recorded By: Arthur Lipe Category: Inspections INSPECTION INFO Permit Number 22-05609 Date Inspected 12/7/2023 7:44 AM Name of CESCL or Qualified Inspector (if less than one acre) 1992 - Arthur Lipe WEATHER INFO Approximate Rainfall Since Last Inspection (Inches) 5 Approximate Rainfall in Last 24 Hours (Inches) 2 Current Weather Rain Attachment(s) TYPE OF INSPECTION Weekly Yes Page 30 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Post Storm Event Yes Other No Comments Rain keeps falling Attachment(s) PHASE OF ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION Preconstruction/Installation of Erosion/Sediment Controls Yes Concrete Pours No Offsite Improvements No Clearing/Demo/Grading Yes Vertical Construction/Building No Site Temporary Stabilized Yes Infrastructure/Storm/Roads Yes Utilities Yes Final Stabilization No Comments Page 31 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment(s) QUESTIONS 1. Were all areas of construction and discharge points inspected? Yes 2. Did you observe the presence of suspended sediment, turbidity, discoloration, or oil sheen? Yes 3. Was a water quality sample taken during inspection (refer to permit conditions S4& S5)? Yes 4. Was there a turbid discharge 250 NTU or greater, or Transparency 6 cm or less? No 4b. If yes to #4 was it reported to Ecology? N/A If answering yes to #4 record NTU/ Transparency with continual sampling daily until turbidity is 25 NTU or less/ transparency is 33 cm or greater. 5. Is pH sampling required (required if pH 6.5 to 8.5)? No 6. If answering yes to a discharge, describe the event. Include when, where, and why it happened; what action was taken, and when. Comments Attachment(s) SAMPLING RESULTS Date 12/7/2023 Turbidity Sample Yes Page 32 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Write in which method was used: tube, meter or laboratory. Meter Results: NTU 60 Results: CM Notes pH Sample No Write in which method was used: Paper, kit, or meter Results: pH pH Notes Attachment(s) ELEMENT 1: CLEARING LIMITS Before beginning land disturbing activities, are all clearing limits and/or natural resource areas (stream, wetlands, buffer, trees) protected with barriers or similar BMPs (high visibility recommended)? Yes BMP needs maintenance No BMP failed No Action Required No Comments Page 33 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment(s) ELEMENT 2: CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 2a. Construction access is stabilized with quarry spalls or equivalent BMP to prevent sediment from being tracked onto roads? Yes 2a. BMP needs maintenance No 2a. BMP failed No 2a. Action Required No 2a. Comments 2b. Sediment tracked onto the road way was cleaned thoroughly at the end of the day or more frequent as necessary Yes 2b. BMP needs maintenance No 2b. BMP failed No 2b. Action Required No 2b. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 3: CONTROL FLOW RATES 3a. Are flow control measures installed to control stormwater volumes and velocity during construction and do they protect downstream properties and waterways from erosion? Yes Page 34 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 3a. BMP needs maintenance No 3a. BMP failed No 3a. Action required No 3a. Comments 3b. If permanent infiltration ponds are used for flow control during construction, are they protected from siltation? 3b. BMP needs maintenance 3b. BMP failed 3b. Action required 3b. Comments ELEMENT 4: SEDIMENT CONTROLS 4a. All perimeter sediment controls (e.g. silt fence, wattles, compost socks, berms, etc.) installed and maintained in accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Yes 4a. BMP needs maintenance No 4a. BMP failed No 4a. Action required No 4a. Comments 4b. Sediment control BMPs (sediment ponds, traps, filters etc.) have been constructed and functional as the first step of grading Yes Page 35 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 4b. BMP needs maintenance No 4b. BMP failed No 4b. Action required No 4b. Comments 4c. Stormwater runoff from disturbed areas is directed to sediment removal BMP Yes 4c. BMP needs maintenance No 4c. BMP failed No 4c. Action required No 4c. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 5: STABILIZE SOILS 5a. Have exposed un-worked soils been stabilized with effective BMP to prevent erosion and sediment deposition? Yes 5a. BMP needs maintenance No 5a. BMP failed No 5a. Action required No 5a. Comments Page 36 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 5b. Have soils been stabilized at the end of the shift and/or before a holiday/weekend if needed based on the weather forecast? Yes 5b. BMP needs maintenance No 5b. BMP failed No 5b. Action required No 5b. Comments 5c. Are stockpiles from erosion protected with sediment trapping measures and located away from drain inlet, waterways, and/or drainage channels? Yes 5c. BMP needs maintenance No 5c. BMP failed No 5c. Action required No 5c. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 6: PROTECT SLOPES 6a. Has stormwater and ground water been diverted away from slopes and disturbed areas with interceptor dikes, pipes and/or swales? Yes 6a. BMP needs maintenance No 6a. BMP failed No Page 37 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 6a. Action required No 6a. Comments 6b. Is off-site stormwater managed separately from stormwater generated on the site? N/A 6b. BMP failed 6b. BMP needs maintenance 6b. Action required 6b. Comments 6c. Is excavated material placed on uphill side of trenches consistent with safety and space considerations? Yes 6c. BMP needs maintenance No 6c. BMP failed No 6c. Action required No 6c. Comments 6d. Have check dams been placed at regular intervals within constructed channels that are cut down a slope? Yes 6d. BMP needs maintenance No 6d. BMP failed No 6d. Action required No Page 38 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 6d. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 7: DRAIN INLETS 7a. Storm drain inlets made operable during construction are protected Yes 7a. BMP need maintenance No 7a. BMP failed No 7a. Action Required No 7a. Comments 7b. Are existing storm drains within the influence of the project protected? Yes 7b. BMP need maintenance No 7b. BMP failed No 7b. Action Required No 7b. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 8: STABILIZE CHANNEL AND OUTLETS 8a. Have all on-site conveyance channels been designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion from expected peak flows? Yes Page 39 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 8a. BMP needs maintenance No 8a. BMP failed No 8a. Action required No 8a. Comments 8b. Is stabilization, including armoring material, adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream conveyance systems? Yes 8b. BMP needs maintenance No 8b. BMP failed No 8b. Action required No 8b. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 9: CONTROL POLLUTANTS 9a. Are waste materials and demolition debris handled and disposed of to prevent contamination of stormwater? N/A 9a. BMP needs maintenance 9a. BMP failed 9a. Action required 9a. Comments Page 40 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 9b. Has cover been provided for all chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products and other material? Yes 9b. BMP needs maintenance No 9b. BMP failed No 9b. Action required No 9b. Comments 9c. Has secondary containment been provided capable of containing 110% of the volume? Yes 9c. BMP needs maintenance No 9c. BMP failed No 9c. Action required No 9c. Comments 9d. Were contaminated surfaces cleaned immediately after a spill incident? N/A 9d. BMP needs maintenance 9d. BMP failed 9d. Action required 9d. Comments 9e. Were BMPs used to prevent contamination of stormwater by a pH modifying sources? N/A Page 41 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 9e. BMP needs maintenance 9e. BMP failed 9e. Action required 9e. Comments 9f. Wheel wash wastewater is handled and disposed of properly N/A 9f. BMP needs maintenance 9f. BMP failed 9f. Action required 9f. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 10: CONTROL DEWATERING 10a. Concrete washout in designated areas. No washout or excess concrete on the ground. Yes 10a. BMP needs maintenance No 10a. BMP failed No 10a. Action required No 10a. Comments 10b. Dewatering has been done to an approved source and in compliance with the SWPPP Yes Page 42 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 10b. BMP needs maintenance No 10b. BMP failed No 10b. Action required No 10b. Comments 10c. Were there any clean non-turbid dewatering discharges? No 10c. BMP needs maintenance No 10c. BMP failed No 10c. Action required No 10c. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 11: MAINTAIN BMP 11a. Are all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs maintained to perform as intended? Yes 11a. BMPs needs maintenance No 11a. BMP failed No 11a. Action required No 11a. Comments Page 43 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment(s) ELEMENT 12: MANAGE THE PROJECT 12a. Has the project been phased to the maximum degree practicable? Yes 12a. BMPs needs maintenance No 12a. BMP failed No 12a. Action required No 12a. Comments 12b. Has regular inspection, monitoring and maintenance been performed as required by the permit? Yes 12b. BMPs needs maintenance No 12b. BMP failed No 12b. Action required No 12b. Comments 12c. Has the SWPPP been updated, implemented and records maintained? Yes 12c. BMPs needs maintenance No 12c. BMP failed No 12c. Action required No Page 44 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 12c. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 13: PROTECT LID 13a. Are all Bioretention and Rain Garden Facilities protected from sedimentation with appropriate BMPs? N/A 13a. BMPs needs maintenance 13a. BMP failed 13a. Action required 13a. Comments 13b. Are the Bioretention and Rain Garden protected against over compaction of construction equipment and foot traffic to retain its infiltration capabilities? N/A 13b. BMPs needs maintenance 13b. BMP failed 13b. Action required 13b. Comments 13c. Permeable pavements are clean and free of sediment and sediment laden water runoff. Muddy construction equipment has not been on the base material or pavement. N/A 13c. BMPs needs maintenance 13c. BMP failed 13c. Action required 13c. Comments Page 45 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 13d. Have soiled permeable pavements been cleaned of sediments and pass infiltration test as required by stormwater manual methodology? N/A 13d. BMPs needs maintenance 13d. BMP failed 13d. Action required 13d. Comments 13e. Heavy equipment has been kept off existing soils under LID facilities to retain infiltration rate. Yes 13e. BMPs needs maintenance No 13e. BMP failed No 13e. Action required No 13e. Comments Attachment(s) ELEMENT 14: DUST CONTROL 14a. Is there Dust Control? N/A 14a. BMPs needs maintenance No 14a. BMP failed No 14a. Action Required No 14a. Comments Page 46 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment(s) AREAS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED All in place BMPs Yes All disturbed soils Yes All concrete wash out areas Yes All material storage areas Yes All discharge locations Yes All equipment storage areas Yes All construction entrances/exits Yes REQUIRED ACTION Action required? No Elements checked "Action Required": describe corrective action to be taken. List the element number; be specific on location and work needed. Document, initial and date when corrective action has been completed and inspected. 1a. Element # 1b. Description and Location 1c. Corrective Action Required 1d. Action Completed Date Page 47 of 52 1e. Initials for completion 2a. Element # 2b. Description and Location 2c. Corrective Action Required 2d. Action Completed Date 2e. Initials for completion 3a. Element # 3b. Description and Location 3c. Corrective Action Required 3d. Action Completed Date 3e. Initials for completion 4a. Element # 4b. Description and Location 4c. Corrective Action Required 4d. Action Completed Date 4e. Initials for completion 5a. Element # 5b. Description and Location 5c. Corrective Action Required 5d. Action Completed Date 5e. Initials for completion 6a. Element # 6b. Description and Location Page 48 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report 6c. Corrective Action Required 6d. Action Completed Date 6e. Initials for completion 7a. Element # 7b. Description and Location 7c. Corrective Action Required 7d. Action Completed Date 7e. Initials for completion CERTIFICATION "I certify that this report is true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge and belief" Title/ Qualification of Inspector Cecel Inspected By: (name) Arthur lipe Signature Page 49 of 52 Date 12/7/2023 Notes Attachment(s) 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Page 50 of 52 2024 WAR312451 Inspection Report Attachment E December 2023, Discharge Monitoring Report Page 51 of 52 Washington State Department of Ecology Discharge Monitoring Re20p24oWrtAR(D31M245R1 I)nspection Page: Report 1 of 1 Permit Number: WAR312451 Permittee: HD Fowler SR-3 Industrial Stock Yard Facility County: Kitsap Receiving Waterbody: Sinclair Inlet Puget Sound Monitoring Period: 12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023 Outfall: 1 - Gorst Creek Version: 1 Monitoring Week Point 001 001 Minimum BM: >= 6.5 (RO) Maximum BM: <= 25 (RO) BM: <= 8.5 (RO) Reporting Codes Used: C - No Discharge Overall DMR Notes/Comment Reporting Code: C - No Discharge Outfall: 1 - Gorst Creek Monitoring Parameter Point 001 All Parameters Sample Date/ Statistical Base Value C Notes/Comment BMPs Monitoring Point Week BMP 001 Silt Fence 001 Straw Wattles 001 Temporary Sediment Pond I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Lissa Rhoades Signature 2/6/2024 7:48:15 AM Date Page 52 of 52