Document Qj8Lzmq99aENRGX6j4gvgkG7
Albany, Mew York April 15, 1969
/
K. H. Fenner - Reaaarch cc: N. tf. Hendry - Asbeetoe
- ilp.noven--- Reaaarch ^ Chrono
BUFFALO VI3IX3 TO DISCUSS
HEALTH HAZARDS 07 ASBESTOS Lee me thank you for your tine and effort in calling on Hooker Chemical and Harrlaon Radiator with me to dlacuea health aapecta of aabcatoe fiber. Attached la the Hat of peraonnel attending the two maetingai I neglected ta aak you for a copy of the paper "Aabeatoa and the General EUbLlc" and would appreciate it if you aend me a copy.
J. 7. Bala
JFR/pm
PRODUCED JM - 83
HARRISOH RADIATOR. DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Dr. John Stuns - Medical Director
Bob Slate - Group Process Leader
Gary Berntsen - Process Engineer
Jim Harrer * Chief of Plant Protection
Joe Maiakcfwskl - Safety Engineer
Jerry Lindsay * Chief Chemist
Jim MuIvey - Chemist
Carl Hays Buyer
-
HOOKER CUmiCAL
H. Kirchgeeener - Manager of Production - Cures Plastics Dlv. C. Heyers - Plant Manager - Dures Plaatics L. Kohrdens C. Sclonolfl H. Bryslnaky John Curry - ICD Cell Development C. Wolosln - Mgr. of Purchasing Raw Materials
George Bralrly - Niagara Plant Safety Engineer
produced
June 17, 1970
MEMO TO FILE
cc: H. W. Hendry - Asbestos 1500 J. F. Reis - Boston
Harrison Radiator Environmental Control Meeting June 5, 1970
......
On the above date the following people, representing Johns-Ilanville, called at the subject company:
Dr. George Wright, St. Luke's Hospital, Cleveland
E, M. Fenner, Manager, Environmental Control, Research.
N. W. Hendry, General Sales Manager, Asbestos 1500
D. Smyth, Technical Consultant to General Sales Manager, Asbestos
H. G. Donovan, Product Marketing Manager, Research
,
J. F. Rei3, Special Representative, Boston
The fallowing people from the Harrison Radiator Division of General Motors at Lockport, Hew Fork, were also at this meeting:
Gilbert D. Hooh, Master Mechanic:
Robert Slate, Superintendent, Production Engineering
Tom O'Donnell, Safety Director
Albert N. Benoit, Manager, Plant Engineering
John Potrubacz, Production Engineering
Dr. John Stunz, Medical Director
Howard Bolton, Manufacturing Manager
'
D. I, Rayoor, Works Manager
Carl J. Hays, Buyer
Edward A. Gailor, General Purchasing Agent - '
.
The meeting was opened by N. W. Hendry with general remarks and then turned over to Dr. Wright. Following are my notes on Dr. Wright's presentation:
I. Bound (locked in)--resin bound, latex bonded, etc. Unbonded--insulation, textiles
2. Size >10 microns do not reach breathing area; drop out.
,
To reach breathing zone, must have low settling velocity; 1 micron
size behave like a gas and follow the air mass.
Most dust does not enter breathing zone; those that do drop
out in the tubes and few get to the end.
PRODUCED JM-83
2
Notes on Dr. Weight's Presentation (Continued)
3. Mucus membrane in breathing apparatus? phillia (projections on surface). These pick up dust and carry blanket (mucus blanket)-particles deposited on blanket gradually work out the particles from the surface. (Self-cleaning mechanism.) Second cleaning mechanism "macrophase '. Doesn't handle all du3t some does remain.
.4. In 1900, men who worked-in textile mills in England had short life and died from heart failure. By 1930, in was known that the physical problems were much higher here than in other trades. In 1940, the "Threshold Limit" was established. This is about the same as for chrystalline silica (all items dose related). Below 5 million particles/ft3, no problem with chrystalline silica proven. However, this is not true of asbestos. When asbestos ~ was originally tested on this basis, it was mixed dust; hanse, must have much less in asbestos particles.
At fiist, fiber counts were not made just a count of particles.
In 1960-61, fiber counts were made and fiber diameter/length (1/3)
to be classed as such in counting. Membrane filters were used .
to collect the fiber for counting. Hence, there are safe level3
of inhalation in the working life on an individual.
..
British set the "Threshold Limit" at 2 fibers/cc (have<'l% chance of developing fibrosis).
Between 4-6 fibers/cc is considered acceptable Between 6-10 fibers/cc is considered unacceptable
s^lQ fibors/cc man should not work.
U. S. industrial hygienist TLV's abandoned 5 million particles/ft^
and went to fiber counts direct. Set limit of 5/cc peak level.
Time weighted average is 5. There are levels which are safe but
the levels wore set to protect the most vunerable as some people
are more susceptible to fibrosis.
'
In about 1948, investigations of death causes of people having asbestosis showed that such people had a higher rate of death from lung cancer.
Mining & Milling Vxpoaiira
Thera is no evidence that the people in this industry have a greats incidence of lung cancer; however, data on exposure is not too gooc
Inspection Workers
Inspection workers showed a higher frequency of lung cancar, especially some working with anthophyl11to in Finland.
PRODUCED
JM-83
3
Notea on Dr. Wright's Presentation {Continued)
Bronchial cancer Anthrophyilite workers Textile workers
ratio 3:1 ratio 3:1 ratio ..3 11
) ) is variable )
Mining and milling workers were ayain looked at by McGill (Dr. MacDonald). No excess of lung cancer was found over the average population; however, when comparing with other workers, the heaviest concentration of cancer is among this group. Least exposed workers showed less incidence to lung cancer. Study showed that present disease is a result of what happened 20-30 years ago (takes disease a long time to develop), There is very ` " little evidence of disease in people during last 10-15 years.
In 1959 cases of Mesothelioma {disease affecting the plural lining of the chest covering the lung) were discovered in South Africa, where crocidolite is mined. Usually a very rare disease, 50 or so cases were discovered. The strange thing was that most of the mining was done 400 miles away in the Transvaal area where no cases were reported. Few cases of the disease have been discovered in amositc mining:areas. Upon investigations in other areas, 3ome cases of Mesothelioma were found in London where Blue Asbestos has been used. There has been no definite evidence that asbestos was truly the cause, however.
Bronchial cancer, related to anthrophyilite, showed no Mesothelioma. In Canada, a relation was discovered with men working in insulation industry to the disease, but none at mill or mining area. In Italy, Mesothelioma wa3 discovered in shipyard workers but not at mines. All these are dose related and must be related to something else.
Dr. Newhouse investigated all records of workers at "Cape". He
discovered that the highest exposure gave greatest chance of cancer (bronchial or Mesothelioma) . Light axpoauro shov/od little evidence of cancer. Cigarette smokers are more prone to develop disease.
5. Cumulative aspects -- hard to resuspend bound fiber; fiber bound does not subdivide; higher density.
Talc does everything that asbestos does and more talc is used in the U.S. than asbestos fiber.
The meeting wa3 then turned over to
M. Fenner. Pol lowing are ray notes
on Mr. Fenner's presentation with a question from Dr. Stunz.1
1. In our environmental health control efforts, good equipment is necessary but more important is monitoring the system.
PRODUCED JM - 83
4
Motes on E. M Fenner's Presentation (Continued)
2. Dust can be controlled:
a. Change process to one that does not produced dust or one that will have adequate dust control.
,
b. Monitor the system.
3. Dr. stunz of Harrison questioned, `"-'hat is count on deflashing?" Our answer would be:
a. Take membrane sample for fiber b. Take station sample for particulate
'
c. Calculate T.L.V,
Following Mr. Fenner's presentation, De3 Smyth presented our story on bulk handling. This could be done in either of two approaches: (1) basic bulk handling; or (2) the possibility of producing and shipping in a bag that could be used right in their mix so that no free fiber would be available to contaminate the air.
A visit to their plant was then scheduled and we observed the loading station where asbestos was loaded. The suggestion wa3 made that since there is a positive pressure on the sieves, there would be a certain amount of asbestos blow-back, which there was. It wa3 suggested that possibly they could use a combination vacuum and positive pressure system which Ed Fenner discussed with John Fotrubacz. Also, during this visit, v/e observed the dcflashing station where the excess flash from the molding was removed by men using a hand grinder with an air blower on it. It was indicated to me that one of the biggest objections of the men working on this job was that the glass fiber irritated their eyes. They would like to do this deflashing automatically and are considering it since they could save a considerable amount of expense and manpower if this could be effected.
The conclusions from the meeting as indicated to us by Harrison personnel were that:
1. They would reconsider their proposal to eliminate asbestos fiber.
2. They would call on us for engineering help and wa would bo very
happy to give it, in the event they wanted to make any further
revisions in their process.
1
.
Jim Reis will keep close to this customer and report periodically on the outcome:of their investigation.
K. G. Donovan Research a Engineering
prJMod-u8c3ed
"V ! t*
A.F.n. ASBESTOS June 19, ]970
!emo to file
PLAN"!' VISIT HARRISON RADIATOR - June 5/70
Personno1:
HARRISON
Gilbert D, Koch - Maslti Mechanic Robert Slate - Sup't., Prod. Engineering Tom O'Donnell - Safety Director Albert M. Reno it - 'Inn., Plant Eng, John I'roirubaet - i'rod. Engineering Dr. John Stuns - Medical Director Howard Dolton - Manufacturing Manager B.T. Rnyunr - Worlc Manager Carl J. Hays - Buyer Edward A. Gailor - Cen. Purchasing Agent
JOHNS-MAMVILI E
N.W. Hendry H.G. Donovan Dr. Wright E. Fenner D.P.R, Smyth J.F. Reis
""
PRESENTATION* 1 2 3
Dr. Wright talked extensively and interestingly about research work concerned with lung diseases caused by dust. He pointed out that:
(1) Asbestos dust can cause asbestosls which in turn may cause cancer.
(2) If dust control is sufficiently well applied to result in an atmosphere meeting the revi.qpri standards sat in both Britain and the U.S., then a man could work with asbestos all his working life and suffer no ill effects from the asbestos.
(3) All forms of dust constitute a threat to human health. Some substances like silica or talc are as harmful or more harmful than asbestos.
Ed F cniii' r then spnlo briefly about tlint rnnt'*o1 and oTffr^d to assist Harrison cither with advice on redesigning present duct control installations, or with help in determining dust counts.
PRODUCED JM - 83
P.nr ?.
I), Smyth invent! bnllc kindling in .1 short LJ1' \'i Lh si / ties. T hr r.ir, th'"' silo, and the pump were shown in brief de arl and the point wade that 7T15 shipment to Ford were completely tiauble-free over the past six months.
A cost estimate was given for the insto11at:on nf silos and pump. Alternative
leasing and car-rental rates were offered as per my letter to Carl. J. Harp of June 12, 1970.
After some discussion of the alternatives Mr. Rnysor summed up by saying that the new facts presented by J.M. compelled Harrison to take a new look at bulk handling and that they would re-study the whole project.
After lunch J.M. personnel were taken on a short tour of the Harrison plant to observe dust conditions at the hand-feeding station and the flash-grinding station.
Bagged fibre is fed through a rotary air-lock into a blower system which blows the fibre through a 4" pipe to a receiving silo. Fibre is blown from this silo through a metering arrangement to the mixer. The air-lock at the hand-feeding station was leaking. Blow-back was causing excessive dust:- If a properly designed air-lock were used the dust control provided should be adequate.
Dust control at the flash-grinding looked reasonably adequate.
Dr. Stunz accompanied us on the tour. As a result of discussion between Dr. Wright and Dr. Stunz a request was made that J.M. give specific help in determining dust counts at Harrison and Ed Fenner agreed to set this up.
Dl'RS :st
D.P.R. SMYTH
PRODUCED JM - 83
HM: i 'i
p ASDESTOS FibSE DIVISION
u r.O. hOX 1500 - ASSESTOS, QUCDEC - TEUPliOME. 379-5431
0
I October 1st, 1965. <E . ' ,
1
I
c Gentlemens
You will notice that beginning shoxJly each bag of thiysolila asbestos fibre shipped by ihis
1 Company will carry a label reading as follows;*
..
CAUTION
"This bog contain; f.h:y;oli!o asbestos fibre. Persons
exposed to lliis material should use adequate proleclivo
devices os inhalation of this material over long periods
may bo harmful."
. ..
The label is intended to remind all industrial users ot asbestos that proper handling wtQ
contribute to improved conditions in work areas.
`
f
Physic':! protection for employees' is provided through the use of safely hats, shoes, g'.2Uts,
and olhor devices when- rireurr.slsnccs warrant. Health protection is (ust as important end
should include appropriate practices and equipment such ns collectors, ventilators, masks, etc*
lo prevent inhala ,tion o'tf -'Vfum -e-s and par^ticVulIa*':te-* m-a`*tter*. 1A!lC4^CVy'&ir*'-
As you knew, in the pa;1 several years there has been increasing publicity and madiral attention given to health effects of inhaling industrial dust and fumes of all kinds. Soma studies have raised the question whether adequate control measures arc being taken in certain indusliial operations to piovcnl the inhalation of asbestos particles. Other studies have s*cwn (tat whcio proper proleclivo measures ore token, occupational health risks are minimis ed.
- PRODUCED
, . . JM - 83 j cont.'.uoa
t
J*A
|' /"
/' rj
4
-2-
Medical'research on hcahh question; ro'uiino !o a;bes.`os is being sponsored by JeKni-Manvilla, . /the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association, end several other orgoni;:,-ilons. Such research will
y/ lead (o a belter understanding and conlrd of health hazards associated with inhalation of
I asbestos particles.
'
'
Until more concrete information is available from the abovcmcniioned research, we have
I - .concluded that it U in ihs besf interest of ell concerned llial wo place the above label on \J ba^s containing asbestos to encourage careful handling of the fibro.
B . if you haVO any questions, wo would bo ploaiod to hoar from you. '
.'`
I
1 I
NWH / oh
I
I I I
I t
f.. 4
`f VI
I **
Yours very truly,
N. W. HENDRY, *
General Sales Managor.
.
* *\*i
* p* * n > t s- *# v r - r
pROOUCf.0
JW r*V
y - J[ii
'K'
Research & Engineering Center September 8, 1970
MEMO FOR FILE:
OiViN.
VISIT TO INLAND DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS - AUGUST 31, 1970 Brake Lining Decomposition Products
Dr, Merle Gibson, Medical Director of the Inland Division of General Motors, commented during the J-M Research Center session of the Asbestosis Course held June 15 through 18, 1970, at Mt. Sinai Hospital, that results of work at Inland did not agree with the data presented by Jerry Lynch on the decomposition of brake lining materials. He agreed to set up a meeting with Dr. George Rappaport, head of the Chemical Laboratory at Inland's Dayton laboratory, to review both Inland and J-M research on this project.
After several brush-offs, I was able to arrange a meeting with Dr. Gibson and Dr. Rappaport on August 31. Also present during part of the meeting were Mr. G. W. Beck, Chief Engineer for Inland, and Mr. J, (Joe) H. Overwein, Assistant Chief Engineer*
Summary
Dr. Rappaport doubted the validity of the general data presented by Jerry Lynch on the breakdown of brake linings. After reviewing J-M's data and discussing peripheral information, he is convinced of the validity of our data showing less than 1 per cent chrysotile content. He suggested, as a final test, that the biological effect of the brake lining decomposition products be determined by animal tests. These may be sponsored by General Motors with Dr. Selikoff. Dr. Gibson still believes asbestos to be the main cause of lung cancer, and objects to any additional input to the atmosphere no matter how slight. I doubt if he can be convinced otherwise.
Discussion
'
Dr. Rappaport was quite frank in his discussion, especially when Dr. Gibson was not present. Inland has done no significant work
on capturing and analyzing reaction products from brake wear. They were planning to begin a project in the near future.
PRODUCED JM - 33
MEMO FOR FILE:
VISIT TO INLAND LABORATORIES
September 8, 1970 Page 2
Dr. Rappaport had been asked to comment on the validity of Jerry Lynch's results. He reacted unfavorably to the paper and did not accept any conclusions because the paper:
1. presented only approximate fiber concentrations;
2. gave no detailed experimental techniques;
3. did not define the technique for "quantification" of fiber content; and.
4. did not define the effectiveness of collecting all decom position products.
He was also concerned about whether the decomposition products, whatever they might be, were in themselves carcinogenic.
The following J-M reference material was used as a basis for discussing our work and answering Dr. Rappaport's questions.
1. Research Report 4 56-2506 (December 19, 1966) * STUDY OF
WEAR DUST FROM BRAKE LINING, written by D. Sinclair.
"
2. Research Report 456-T-94 (June 13, 1968) - WEAR PRODUCTS FROM BRAKE LINING, written by S, W, Wegrzyn,
3. Research Memo M456-386 (November 8, 1967) - COLLECTION OF WEAR DUST FROM AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE ASSEMBLY DURING INERTIA DYNAMOMETER TEST, written by W. R. Randolph.
4. Research Report 404-67 (August 3, 1970) - METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF CHRYSOTILE FIBER IN SAMPLES FROM VARIOUS SOURCES, written by A. F. Burns, K. L. Jaunarajs, and G. P. Reimschussel.
The discussion included:
1. A review of test apparatus and techniques, with special reference to the millipore system of collecting samples, and its known efficiency in collecting all particulate decomposition products.
2. The techniques for quantifying fiber, including the previous point count method and the more recent radioactive tracer method.
3. The quantitative test data showing that 50 to 80 per cent of the wear products were collected as either airborne or "in the box" samples.
produced
JU-83
MISMO FOR FILE:
VISIT TO INLAND LABORATORIES
ieplembor !), i'j'/O Pago 1
4. Analytical data on both the airborne material and the com posite material illustrating the collection of all residual products from decomposition of asbestos (equal MgO and S1O2 contents).
5. Pictures of airborne and total composite samples.
6. Discussion of amorphous material vs fosterite in the decom position products, with different severity of wear as evi denced by average drum temperatures of 175, 330 and 550F, respectively.
7. Actual detailed "chrysotile11 contents in the various samples and their relationship to the chrysotile content in the ori ginal product.
We also discussed certain subjects which Dr. Rappaport indicated he was particularly interested in. These included:
1 1. "Asbestos" bodies vs ferruginous bodies.
2. Factors influencing respirabi1ity of fibers, including Timbrell's work and recent Uattelle work on retention of extremely fine particulate matter.
3. Tiie proposed programs on the effect of filler diameter, filler length, and aspect ratio, including J-M programs, Webster's work, and others. Dr. Rappaport was particularly concerned with the effect of particle size and fiber diameter of the decomposition products, and its relation to respirability.
4. Extraction of minerals from lung tissue, including low tem perature ashing, and hydroxide of Hyamine treatment.
After a full morning's discussion. Dr. Rappaport indicated to Messrs. Beck, Overwein, and Dr. Gibson that he was satisfied the decomposition products, in fact, contained only very small quan tities of chrysotile. He suggested the desirability of conducting tests to show that these decomposition products were not biologi cally harmful and calculating the actual "net input" of chrysotile to the ambient air from the decomposition of brake linings based on our data and known brake lining statistics.
(We have already recognized the complexity of such an undertaking in our calculations on the fiber contributed by decomposition of asphalt asbestos paving. For example, how much fiber is removed per day from the atmosphere by fall-out, rain, wind, migration, etc., as compared to the input from any source of contamination.)
PRODUCED JM - 83
MEMO FOR FILE:
VISIT TO INLAND LABORATORIES
September 8, 1970 Page 4
General Motors, through Dr. Gibson, is seriously considering funding work at Mt. Sinai, but no specific program has apparently been defined. Inland personnel were invited to visit us at the Research Center at any time to discuss the problem and any of their suggested programs. I will send Dr. Rappaport those portions of the above-mentioned Research reports which can be released without digclosing proprietary information.
Dr. Gibson is still a firm believer that asbestos is the major, positive cause for lung cancer. I think he is overpowered by the Selikoff mystic and that it is worthless to try to convince him otherwise then by direct statements from Dr. Selikoff. However, the others present at the meeting could probably be convinced that no problem exists-by a few animal experiments with calcined asbestos, calcined serpentine, and brake lining wear material.
S. Spell
.ss/rs-
cc: J. R. M. Hutcheson, Asbestos Plant H. M. Jackson, DH F. L. Pundsack L. R. Blair
T "ec
J. P. Leineweber W. C. Streib
PRODUCED JM - 83
' 11 Johns-Manviile
environment.*! Control
Doit ISO Manvlllo, N. J QB835
(1*01} 1?? 100(1
Division
June 30, 1971
I : II. W. lliitdfy - Asbestos 1'jQO II. G. Iirjnovrm A. Hois''Lair
Mr. Carl L. Welshman Senior Buyer Rogers Corporation Rogers, Connecticut 06263
Dear Mr. Welshman:
Your letter of May 18, 1971 to our Mr. Anthony Boisclair has been referred to me for reply.
Presently, there are no standards applying specifically to airborne emissions of asbestos fiber other than those that apply to discharge of particulate matter in general. The office of Air Pollution Control in the Environmental Protection Agency of the Federal Government presently is working on emission standards for asbestos-using manufacturing plants. It is expected that these standards will be published late September 1971. It is highly probable that in order to conform to these standards, process emissions of asbestos fiber to atmosphere will require high efficiency fabric bag filter-type dust collectors for control.
Relative to in-plant working conditions, the new Occupational Safety and Health Bill will require that the airborne levels of asbestos fiber bo below tho established Threshold Limit Value. Threshold Limit Values refer to airborne concentrations of substances and represent conditions under which it is believed that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed, day after day, without adverse effect.
The present Threshold Limit Value for asbestos fiber has been established under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act at 12 fibers per milliliter greater than 5 microns in length, or 2 million particles per cubic foot, dependLny upon Liu: measurement technique used. It is expected that shortly the federal Government will reduce the Threshold Limit Value to 5 fibers per milliliter and will delete any reference to particulate count.
Wgbuced JU-S3
Mr. Carl L. Welshman Page 2 Juno ^0, 1971
An industrial hygiene survey using proper measurement techniques is necessary to determine if the various workplaces in your concern comply with standards. If you do not have the capabilities of performing the survey yourself, our Industrial Hygiene Engineering Services Department would be very glad to perform this survey for you. I enclose a brochure describing the activities of this group. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours,
Edmund M. Fenner, Director Environmental Control EMF/oms Enc
PRODUCED JM-83
DIIQ - Asbestos Fiber Sales August 15, 1972
M. W. Hendry
cc: W, L. Vanderbeek J. R. ilutchenson F, J. Solon, Jr. H, B. Moreno C. L. Stake E. M. Fenner H. Jackson
BENDIX CORPORATION SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN ASBESTOS HEALTH SEMINAR 8/8/72
A seminar on Asbestos Health was held at the Executive Offices of the subject company on the above data. The format is attached, as is tha list of Bendix attendee::. This presentation can form the basis for future J-M presentations on A/H as well as for the A,I.A. regional seminars now being planned.
Our presentation was very well received, and from the Chief Operating Officer on down, all Bendix personnel expressed their appreciation and acknowledged that the information presented is of considerable help to them.
.
During our visit we had an opportunity to hold meetings with B.B. Burton, J. Armstrong, H. Stolar and C. Menz. These occurred at dinner, breakfast, and lunch as well as immediately before and after the seminar.
Questions were as follows:
1. Cost per employee to meet OSHA TVL Requirements
a) of 5 fiber/cc (Arthur D. Little Study estimate $1,600/employee
b) of 2 fibers/cc (estimate $2,800/employee)
2. Accuracy of Tests for fiber content in air
(our answer t- 20-25?. uL TT.V of 5)
J. How is brake lining dust disposed of (Resulted in general discussion covering pelletizing, land fill, etc.).
4. Questions by Heitman to Dr. Wright during presentation were answered by Wright's total presentation. An example was risk on grinding linings in garages.
PRODUCED JM - 33
2.
Answer: Do not flow dust off brakes. Use ",icuum.
5. Any time limit an employee can be on a job that is hazardous and do we rotate people on such jobs.
Answer: No, we correct the problem so that the hazard is controlled.
6. Can technological approach work in controlling
problems ?
Answer: We do the following
a. reduce forming and finishing by technical changes.
b. educate personnel to reduce costs and work better
c. work towards least expensive solution. Ex use of wet or damp resin mix.
7. Have we been cited by OSHA.
-
Answer: Yes
8. How do we handle OSHA Requirement to notify individual employees of stations that are hazardous?
Answer: (1) Post on bulletin board results of
station surveys that are over limit, (2) advise what is being done to correct.
9. Any value in taking your own dust counts side by side with OSHA Inspector?
Answer: We try to take simultaneous samples.
10. Does #9 help in getting more cooperation from osha?
Answer: We really can't tell any difference. Bendix
has tried thin and wlicrn i t wan done no ci tations no fur from osha.
PRODUCED JM - 83
3.
11. General questions on. air samplers and pumps.
a. How many do we have
Answer: b. Cost
100
Answer:' $150/pump {note we do have some Bendix
pumps J
$ 50/charger
12. How do you secure Industrial hygenists, what type of man and how much training.
-
Answer: (1) Secure man with 2 yr. college or college grad. (4 yrs.). Train in house. Takes 6 months for man to become fully operative.
13. How many do you have.
Answer: 20 full time
14. If glass fiber lodges in lung, what damage.
Answer:
a. glass has almost no effect vs. asbestos
b. However, there is some evidence that very thin glass (micro-fibers) can cause a problem. Still
under investigation..
c. some coatings have been found to render glass inert in the lung.
d. if we could determine the method of coating
particles or fiber similar to the natural method in the lung (by iron & protein] problem would be solved. Work going on in an attempt to do this. PVNP (Polyvinyl N Pyridene) works on some silicates and quartz). On quartz PVNP destroys free bond present on quartz surface.
15. With advent of OSHA have we found any marked increase in compensation claims.
Answer: No great increase
produced
JK - ">3
16. How do you comply with, requirements on including employees in Environmental Control Committees. Answer: We've done this for years in our employee safety committees - just changed the group's name. This is an excellent employee communication media.
I discussed the possibility of our securing business at the Cleveland Plant with Harry Stolar and Charlie Hens. They were encouraging and I will pursue it through our contacts. i talked with Bob Burton on August 13 and discussed it with him. He said there was some discussion at the top level on this. I expect our visit will pay dividends. Will keep you informed.
H. G. Donovan Attachments: I. /attendees From the
Bendix Corporation 2. Agenda 3. Health Aspects of Exposure
by Inhalation of Asbestos Fiber
PRODUCED JM - S3
ATTENDEES FROM THE BENDIX CORPORATION
Charles E, Heitman (Charlie) W. L. Miron (Bill) Hank BoJjel II. 0, Stclar A. C. Joines (Al) Neil Saunders R. B. Hungate (Bob) C. Hertz (Charlie) R. B. Bur Lon (Bob)
J. W. Armstrong (Jim) H. Kaplan Joe Tierney Aubry Raymond
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
President, Automotive Group
staff Assistant
Director of Management Advisory Staff
Senior Staff Executive to Chief Operating Officer
Director of Cost Reduction and Ilfg. Engineering (Corp. )
Vice President and Group Executive
General Manager, Friction Materials Division
Staff Assistant for the Vice President, Manufacturing, On Environmental Control
Corporate Manager for Safety and Health
Vice President, Public Relations
Director Public Relations
Legal Staff
produced
AGENDA
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PRESENTATION TO BENDIX CORPORATION EXECUTIVES SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN - AUGUST B, 1972
I. INTRODUCTIONS
H. G. DONOVAN Product Marketing Manager Asbestos Fibre Division
A. Introduction of Johns-Manville personnel
II. MEDTCAT, ASPECTS OP ASBESTOS/HEALTH
GEORGE W. WRIGHT, M.D. Director of Medical Research St. Luke's Hospital Cleveland, Ohio
Medical Consultant to J-M.
Ill. OSHA REGULATIONS
H. M. JACKSON Director of Employee Relations
E. M. FENNER Director of Environmental Control
XV. CUSTOMER RELATIONS
W. L. VAN DERBEEK Vice President, Mining and
Canadian Products Divisions
V. IMPACT OF OSHA REGULATIONS ON ASBESTOS MANUFACTURING USE H. B. MORENO Vice President, Industrial Products
C. L. STAKE
Production Manager, Industrial Divisions
VI PUBLIC RELATIONS ASPECTS
OF ASBESTOS/HEALTH
F. J. SOLON, JR.
Vice President Corporate Relations
VII
Q &A
PftODwcifl S3
Health Aspects of? exposure by Inhalation of Achontov, Fiber
G. W. Wright, M.D. 1. Biological effect in humans and experimental animals.
.2 Is the biological experience the same in all types of commercial operations: Mining and Milling Canada - Italy - Russia - South Africa
Textiles - Asbestos Cement - Building Materials Friction Materials Insulation trades
3. Reasons for variations observed'in "2" (above)
- Kinds of fiber: -
short * thick
Chemistry - geometry and size^--=---------Nlong .x thin
Dose:
Generated - Inhaled - Destroyed - Retained
Location of fibers:
Bronchi - Alveola - Pleura
Co-Factors: Cigarettes - Trace Metal - Other
4. Risk to employees in BL manufacturing
McDonald
chrysotile - size of fiber - dose/
data
\Enterline
OSIIA
5. Risk to Public from BL use
General Public Garages Fate of Fiber Animal Experiments
produced
JM -
Jo hn s-;Vi a nvi!! a Ccrp oration
22 Enst dOlli Street
New York, N.Y. 10016 Executive Offices
June 28, 1971
Mr. Samuel G. Warr, Buyer U. S. Steel Corp. 600 Grant Street Pittsburgh, Penna. 15230
Dear Mr. Warr:
Recently you requested toxicological information concerning JohnsManville Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre.
It is a pleasure to provide you with this information.
Asbestos is the name given a family of mineral fibers comprised of three major types -- chrysotile, crocidolite and amosite - each of which differs from the other; physically and chemically. Studies of the relationship between asbestos and health arc complicated by this diversity.
Chrysotile is a white magnesium silicate, which can be attacked by acids, has a positive electrical charge and is flexible and not easily pulverized. Crocidolite is a blue ferrous sodium silicate, is acid-resistant, has a negative electrical charge, and is less flexible than chrysotile. Amosite is a brown ferrous magnesium silicate, has a negative electrical charge and is brittle and easily pulverized.
In the United States, chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite asbestos are all
used. Chrysotile is by far the most common, is primarily mined in Canada
and the U.S., and accounts for about 90% of the asbestos consumed in this
country.
'
For workers who handle asbestos fibres in mines, mills, factories, and some
building and insulation trades, the industry shares with doctors, Public
Health officials, and others Involved in industrial medicine, a concern about
possible health effects from excessive on-the-job exposure to asbestos dust.
We have Inn}' roccij'iii
the risk of a p.itli cul :ir lunp, difsenfio called
" A'.liei. I o.'. j
.inioog umi* worker:;. Tin:; ooii-m.i 1 i j-11 .in i di:.e,i:,c is brought. on
liter i nli.i I .i L I on ol < :ro::\ l ve eoilcen L i < L i on *. of i-.to *. lo1: du;,L ovi r .i pin*,*1
of many years. Asbestosis is one of the lung diseases called "Pneumoconiosis".
PRODUCED
JM - S3
Mr. Samuel G. Warr
-2-
June 28, 1971
Recent medical studies have indicated, that the disease "Asbestosis" and ocher pulmonary diseases claimed Co be associated with Asbestosis, are dose and time related. The occupational use of asbestos fibre, therefore, can achieve the same degree of safety as the use of any other potentially toxic material providing adequate control measures are taken.
The current threshold limit value (TLV) for asbestos dust as stated in the Federal Occupational HcaLth and Safety Act, Federal Register, Saturday, Nay 29, 1971, Volume 36, No. 105, Part II, Pago -0506, is 12 fibres per milliliter of air greater than 5 microns in length -a uetcrminud by the membrane filter method at 430X Phase Contrast Magnification, or 2 million particles per cubic root of air as determined by the impmgpr method of sampling.
To control asbestos dust to within the prescribed threshold limit value, we recommend that operations which present a source or dust should be equipped with mechanical ventilation exhausting into a collector; utilize wet processes where possible; maintain good housekeeping throughout the work area, including removing scrap material from floor and other hori zontal surfaces. Scrap should be disposed of in closed containers. -
A program of industrial hygiene environmental monitoring is highly desirable to determine that threshold limit values are not being exceeded.
If dust concentrations cannot be controlled to within the threshold limit value, U, 3. Bureau of Mines approved types of respirators for pneumoconiosis
producing dusts should be worn.
I am attaching the following medical references that substantiate dose and time relationship of exposure, as related to the development of disease:
1. "Mortality in the Chrysotile Asbestos Mines and Mills of Quebec"
J. Corbett McDonald, M.D.
'
Archives of Environmental Health, Volume 22, June 1971
2. "A Study of Mortality of Workers in an Asbestos Factory" M. L. Newhouse, M.D. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1969, 26, 294-301
3. "Identification and Control of Asbestos Exposures" [,, J. Cr.il ley, I'li.l)., IJ. S. Public Ileal Lit Service American Industrial Hygiene Journal, February 1971
PRODUCED JM 33
Mr. Samuel G. Warr
- Je
june 22, L971
4. "Asbestos ana Health m 1969" , G. W. Wright, >1. D. American R^viuv< of Acapirntory Diseases
volume 100 - Mo. 4 - October 1969.
5. "Epidemiology of Asbestos Cancers" - Drs . Uagnor, Ciltjon, Merry & Timbrel! British Medical Journal - January, 1971
Also tor your further -information I am enclosing the following papers and booklets:
1. Asbestos atid Human Health, 2. Asbestos - A Family of Minerals. 3. Asbestos .uul tlu- General Public. 4. Recommended Safety Practices for llandlim; Asbestos Fibre. 5. Recommended Health Safety Practices for Handling and Applying
Thermal Insulation Products Containing Asbestos. 6. Recommended Practices tor Fabricating, Handling and Applying
Ashesloh Cement Products in tile Building G Construction Industries. 7. Recommended Health Safety Practices for Handling and Fabricating
Asbestos Textile Products. S. Why Asbestos?
j f you require any additional information, or I can be of further assistance,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
C. L Sheckler Manager, Accident Prevention and Health Administration
CL9:mw
cc: J.K.ri. Hutcheson - AFD Asbestos
N. W. Hendry - Ai-'D Asbestos
11. G. Donovan - Research
PRODUCED JM-83