Document Qg7Odgn68jaDx2Y4qz6XvRwk8

FILE NAME: Asbestos in Plastics (AIP) DATE: 2010 Sept DOC#: Al P001 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Unpublished Consultant Report on Airborne Exposures from Sawing Asbestos Containing Resin Pipe <nJL. / n /^/0C 7^ 2 -'Y 9 r* ,, .. - ^ ' I l *! I III ATLANTA Corporate Headquarters 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 (770) 866-3200 FAX (770) 866-3259 Cutting of an Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe: A Work Practice Study Materials Analytical Services, LLC September 2010 LOS ANGELES 3020 OLD RANCH PARKWAY SUITE 300 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 WWW.MASTEST.COM (562) 799-5530 FAX (562) 799-5531 Cutting of an Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe: A Work Practice Study Protocol Summary of Air Sampling Data and PCM Images Bulk Analysis M-42122 Study 1 NlOSH 7400 & 7402 Data M51855 Study 2 NIOSH 7400 & 7402 Data M51857 Study 3 NIOSH 7400 & 7402 Data M51863 Photographs SECTION 1 Cutting of an Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe: A W ork Practice Study Protocol September 27, 2010 Overview: On February 19, 2007 Materials Analytical Services (MAS) received a molded resin based flange with a small piece of pipe from Motley Rice Law Firm. According to the documentation the flange/pipe sample had been sent to them by the law firm of Riggs Abney & Turpen. MAS was requested to conduct a work practice study with this pipe by the Lanier Law Firm. . The study was designed to measure any airborne asbestos fiber levels during the cutting of the pipe section using various cutting tools. This work practice was divided into three studies. Study 1 will consist of cutting a small section of the pipe with a fine tooth hand saw. Study 2 will cut another small section of the pipe with an electric powered hand saw with a fine tooth blade. Study 3 will consist of cutting a small section of the pipe using an electric powered hand saw equipped with a masonry blade. Cutting of the Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe I. ECL Set-Up A. Study is to be performed in the MAS exposure characterization lab (ECL) constructed using negative airflow asbestos abatement technology. The size of the ECL is approximately 15' x 20' x 8'. The ECL will be decontaminated before the study. B. Air exchange inside the ECL during the work phases will be approximately 200 cubic feet per minute as measured at 10' (in middle of 12" ID duct) from the air exhaust of the HEPA filter negative air machine (Force Air 2000 EC). C. High intensity lighting setup will be in general accordance with the methods described in D.T. Chambers, "Asbestos", John Wiley & Sons, 6, 193, 1983 and the Environmental Protection Agency SOP, EPA-Libby-02, Revision #1, March 2001 (Tyndall lighting section only), and the MDHS # 82, "The Dust -1 - amp March 1997. The high intensity lighting source will consist of three high intensity light (1000 watts ellipsoidal pyrex lens, 219K candle power 8 degree beam angle) located on each side of the worktable at a heiqht of approximately 5.5 feet from the floor and approximately 7 feet from the work activity. Study 1: Hand Sawing " Background. Area & Personal Air Samples A. Before the hand sawing work practice study takes place, background air samples will be run in the ECL. B. Adjust and calibrate high volume area pumps to approximately 10 0 liters per minute. ' C. Set up four area air samples inside the ECL. Use 25 mm air cassettes containing 0.8 micron pore size mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters with a 5.0 micron backing pad. D. Locate the background air samples in each quadrant of the ECL at a height of 5.5 feet from the floor and a distance of approximately six feet from the work activity. E. During this study the four area samples located in each quadrant will be calibrated and run at a rate of approximately 10.0 liters/minute. These area air samples will be set up as described in section II of this protocol. F. The investigator will be fitted with four personal air pumps and air cassettes (two on each shoulder) located in his breathing zone and calibrated at a flow rate of approximately 2.0 to 3.5 liters/minute. Hand Sawing Work Practice G. For this work practice the investigator will use a 13" PVC/ABS plastic pipe saw (Buck Bros.) to cut a %" to 1/ 2" section off the pipe taken at the end of the pipe. The air sampling information will be recorded on the IH air sampling chain of custody sheets for the study. H. The investigator will wear appropriate protective clothing, work apparel and air supplied respiratory protection equipment. -2- S itin g ^ PraCt'Ce WiH be Performed under both ambient and high intensity J. The entire procedure will be videotaped with two separate cameras (Sony Handycam, model numbers HDR-HC3 and DCR-HC). During filminq the high intensity lighting will be turned off and overhead lights turned on several times during the study. K, Fabric work clothes samples will be collected off of the investigator after each phase of the study has been completed. L. The field blanks will be opened inside the ECL for 30 seconds after each phase of the study has been completed. Study 2: Electric Sawing TU Inch Plywood Blari m- Background, Area & Personal Air Samples A. Before the hand sawing work practice study takes place, background air samples will be run in the ECL. Since this study will be run after the hand sawing study, the ECL's ventilation will be elevated prior to the collection of the background samples for Study 2. The ventilation rate will be increased to 2000 cubic feet per minute for approximately 30 minutes. B. For the background samples adjust and calibrate high volume area pumps to approximately 10.0 liters per minute and the background air samples will be run for approximately one hour. C. Set up four area air samples inside the ECL. Use 25 mm air cassettes containing 0.8 micron pore size mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters with a 5.0 micron backing pad. D. Locate the background air samples in each quadrant of the ECL at a height of 5.5 feet from the floor and a distance of approximately six feet from the work activity. E. During this study the four area samples located in each quadrant will be calibrated and run at a rate of approximately 2.0 liters/minute. These area air samples will be set up as described above. -3- F. The investigator will be fitted with four personal air pumps and air cassettes (two on each shoulder) located in his breathing zone and calibrated at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 liters/minute. Study 2: Electric Saw Work Practice G. For Study 2 the investigator will use a Skil 2.4 hp TA inch circular saw with a 71/4 inch plywood metal blade (Avanti) to cut a 1/ 4" to 72" section off the pipe taken at the end of the pipe. The air sampling information will be recorded on the IH air sampling chain of custody sheets for the study. H. The investigator will wear appropriate protective clothing, work apparel and air supplied respiratory protection equipment. I. The work practice will be performed under both ambient and high intensity lighting. J. The entire procedure will be videotaped with two separate cameras (Sony Handycam, model numbers HDR-HC3 and DCR-HC). During filming the high intensity lighting will be turned off and overhead lights turned on several times during the study. K. Fabric work clothes samples will be collected off of the investigator after each phase of the study has been completed. L. The field blanks will be opened inside the ECL for 30 seconds after each phase of the study has been completed. Study 3: Electric Sawing-Work Practice IV. Background, Area & Personal Air Samples A. Before the second electric sawing work practice study takes place, background air samples will be run in the ECL. Since this study will be run after the Study 2 electric sawing study, the ECL's ventilation will be elevated prior to the collection of the background samples for Study 3. The ventilation rate will be increased to 2000 cubic feet per minute for approximately 30 minutes. -4- B. For the background samples adjust and calibrate high volume area pumps to approximately 10.0 liters per minute and the background air samples will be run for approximately one hour. C. Set up four area air samples inside the ECL. Use 25 mm air cassettes containing 0.8 micron pore size mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters with a 5.0 micron backing pad. D. Locate the background air samples in each quadrant of the ECL at a height of 5.5 feet from the floor and a distance of approximately six feet from the work activity. E. During this study the four area samples located in each quadrant will be calibrated and run at a rate of approximately 2.0 liters/minute. These area air samples will be set up as described above. F. The investigator will be fitted with four personal air pumps and air cassettes (two on each shoulder) located in his breathing zone and calibrated at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 liters/minute. Study 3: Electric Saw Work Practice G. For this work practice the investigator will use a Skil 2.4 hp TA inch circular saw with a VA inch DeWalt masonry blade to cut a Vi" to VS" section off the pipe taken at the end of the pipe. The air sampling information will be recorded on the IH air sampling chain of custody sheets for the study. H. The investigator will wear appropriate protective clothing, work apparel and air supplied respiratory protection equipment. I. The work practice will be performed under both ambient and hiqh intensity lighting. J. The entire procedure will be videotaped with two separate cameras (Sony Handycam, model numbers HDR-HC3 and DCR-HC). During filming the high intensity lighting will be turned off and overhead lights turned on several times during the study. K. Fabric work clothes samples will be collected off of the investigator after each phase of the study has been completed. -5- # L. The field blanks will be opened inside the ECL for 30 seconds after each phase of the study has been completed. V. Laboratory Analysis A. All air sample cassettes will be analyzed by the NIOSH 7400 PCM method using A counting rules and all personal air samples and 50% of the area samples will be analyzed by the NIOSH 7402 TEM method. B. Fabric samples from the work clothing will be analyzed by the recommended EPA method. -6- SECTION 2 Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe Study 1: Hand Sawing M51855 Background Air S am ple Sample No. A-01-A A-01-B A-01-C A-01-D Sample Description IWA IWA IWA IWA Personal Air Samples Sample No. P-1-A P-1-B P-1-C P-1-D Sample Description Personal PLR Personal PLL Personal PLR Personal PLL Area Air Samples Sample No. A-1-A A-1-B A-1-C I A-1-D Sample IWA IWA IWA IWA PCM Fibers/cc <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCM Fibers/cc 5.36 1.66 4.87 2.48 PCM Fibers/cc 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 NIOSH 7402 0% 0% NIOSH 7402 97% 92% NIOSH 7402 PCME F ih p rs /rr PCME F ih(=rs/rr 5.20 1.53 PCME Fibers/cc Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe Study 2: Electric Saw, Fine Toothed Blade M51857 Background Air Samples Samle No. A-02-A A-02-B ..~ A-02-C A-02-D Sample IWA IWA IWA IWA PCM Fibers/cc <0.006 <0.006 0.006 <0.006 Personal Air Samples Sample No. P-2-A P-2-B P-2-C P-2-D Sample Description Personal PLR Personal PLL Personal PLR r Personal PLL PCM Fibers/cc 71.2 106.1 101.3 89.4 Area Air Samples Sample No. A-2-A A-2-B -2-C A-2-D Sample Description IWA IWA IWA IWA PCM Fibers/cc 50.5 46.2 I 49.2 71.0 NIOSH 7402 NIOSH 7402 100% NIOSH 7402 PCME Fibers/cc PCME Fibers/cc 71.2 PCME Fibers/cc Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe Study 3: Electric Saw, Masonry Blade M51863 Background Air Samples Sample No. A-03-A A-03-B A-03-C I A-03-D Sample Description IWA IWA IWA IWA Personal Air Samples Sample No. P-3-A P-3-B P-3-C P-3-D Sample Description Personal PLR Personal PLL Personal PLR Personal PLL Area Air Samples Sample No. A-3-A A-3-B A-3-C A-3-D Sample Description IWA IWA IWA IWA PCM Fibers/cc 0.011 <0.027 0.014 0.008 PCM Fibers/cc 88.8 137.9 148.7 52.6 PCM Fibers/cc 82.5 61.5 90.3 82.0 NIOSH 7402 NIOSH 7402 100% NIOSH 7402 PCME Fibers/cc PCME Fibers/cc 88.8 PCME Fibers/cc Hand Sawing Personal Samples Study I 6 5 ; Asbestos Fiber Levels PCM 3 __ 2 1 J-- 0 ---------J------------------------------------------ :-------1 - -------:................ 1 2 3 Samples Area Samples Hand Sawing Study I 1.8 i I Senesi Asbestos Fiber Levels PCM Samples Asbestos Fiber Levels PCM Power Sawing With Fine Saw Blade Personal Samples Study II Samples Power Sawing With Fine Tooth Saw Blade Area Samples Study II 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Samples Power Sawing Masonry Blade Personal Samples Study III 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Samples Electric Sawing With A Masonry Blade Area Samples 100 90 80 70 60 50 I Senesi 40 30 20 10 0 Samples M51855-012 A-1-D M51857-006 P-2-B M 51857-012 A-2-D M51863-005 P-3-A M51863-010 A-3-B SECTION 3 MAS, LLC. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Page 1 of 1 CLIENT: Motley Rice LLC CONTACT: Wm. Michael Gruenloh PHONE: (843)216-9563 CLIENT JOB NAME: Lathum-Ameron-Asbestos CLIENT JOB#: CLIENT DOC(S): Letter of transmittal FAX NUMBER: (843)216-9430 MAS# CLIENT ID VOLUME TYPE MATERIAL 001 asbestos mat LOCATION____________ 002 rope-llke yarn LOCATION 003 resin base flange LOCATION 004 resin base flange LOCATION MAS JOB: M42122 DATE RECEIVED: 2/19/2007 SUBMITTED BY: Wm. Michael Gruenloh TRANSPORT: FedEx RECEIVED BY: Nancy Sears CONDITION: samples not sealed MAS# CLIENT ID VOLUME TYPE MATERIAL 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, Georgia 30024 (770) 866-3200 (XY4 S William Longo, Ph.D. Materials Analytical Services 3945 Lakefield Court . Suwanee, GA 30024 February 16, 2007 MotleyRice Wm. Michael Gmenloh Licensed in SC Direct Dial 843.216.9563 Direct Fax 843.216.9430 MGruenloh@motleyrice.com Re: Wilda Jean Lathum, Widow o f Jerry H. Lathum, Deceased Dear Dr. Longo: Enclosed please find a sample of the asbestos mat that was manufactured at Ameron's Ardmore Oklahoma facility where Jerry Lathum worked. Also enclosed are: (a) One roll of small rope-like yam purportedly used as a gap filler prior to gluing flanges together. We suspect this may be crocidolite. (b) Two fiberglass-composite flanges. We suspect these may contain Union Carbide Calidria Resin Grade asbestos. As we discussed we would like you to analyze these samples and provide us with your opinion on the content and exposure given the attached testimony regarding the manufacture and use o f the materials by Mr. Lathum. Testimony has been given stating that Ameron used raw blue asbestos fiber and ore at their facility in Ardmore, OK in the manufacture o f the aforementioned asbestos mat. Inside the facility, Ameron employed the use of a hammer mill to crush the raw asbestos ore and fiber. This hammer mill was not closed off from the rest of the facility. Witnesses have stated that there was a cloud of dust surrounding the hammer mill and that asbestos dust would hang from the rafters like Spanish moss. Jerry Lathum worked for Ameron from 1963 until 1971 performing various duties. At the time of his departure from Ameron, Lathum worked in Quality Control and performed his d&ties; throughout the plant. I have also included a diagram o f the facility. The dimensions are ajpproximate. There are no enclosed partitions between areas. This case is scheduled to go to trial on September 10,2007. Expert reports are due April 16, 2007 and I expect defense will want to take your deposition sometime before May 16, 2007 (deadline for expert discovery). Please call me if you wish to discuss this case. WMG/sci cc: Dick Gann Motley Rice LLC Attorneys at Law 28 BRIDGMIDE BLYn p.O. Box 1792 Barnwell 1750 JACKSON St. PO. Box 385 Barnw ell, SC 29811 803-224-8800 803-259-7048 FAX P rovidence 321 south main st. P.O. Box 6067 Providence, HI 02940 401-457-7700 401-457-7708 FAX H artford A tlanta one Corporate C enter 20 C hurch St., tym Floor 600 West Peachtree St. Suite 800 Hartford. C T 06103 860-882-1681 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 404-201-6900 psdd 860-882-3682 `S e o fs s-Vn0 MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS Proj#-Spl# M42122- 001 Analyst W.B. Egeland Date 5/1/2007 ClientName Motley Rice LLC_______________________ ________ ClientSpI asbestos mat Location Type_B/lat _______________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ _ _ ________________________ Gross Blueish compressed fibrous mat. Orange granular silt and woody debris observed._____ Visual ___________________________________________________________________ _______ OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION Morphology Straight | Pleochroism blue/gray Refract Index 1.690/1.682 SignA negative Extinction parallel Birefringence low Melt no Fiber Name Crocidolite ASBESTOS MINERALS EST. VOL. % Chrysotile................................. Amosite..................................... Crocidolite................................ Tremolite/Actinolite............... Anthophyllite........................... OTHER FIBROUS CO M PO NENTS NON FIBROUS COM PONENTS Binder Description Comments Orange granular silt and woody debris observed. The method detection limit Is 1% unless otherwise stated. MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS Proj#-Spl# M 42122-002__________ Analyst W.B. Egeland Date 5/1/2007 ClientName Motley Rice LLC_______________________________ ClientSpl rope-like yarn Location _______________________________________________________________________ TypeJIflat _______________________________________________________________________ Gross Light blue yarn of blue fibers/bundles___________________________________________ Visual ___________________________________________________________________________ OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION Morphology Straight | Pleochroism blue/gray Refract Index 1.690/1.682 SignA negative Extinction parallel Birefringence low Melt no Fiber Name Crocidolite ASBESTOS MINERALS EST. VOL. % Chrysotile................................. Amosite..................................... Crocidolite................................ Tremolite/Actinolite................ Anthophyliite............................ OTHER FIBROUS COM PONENTS ...................... ...................... ............... 100 ...................... ...................... NON FIBROUS CO M PONENTS Binder Description Comments The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated. MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS Proj#-Spl# CiientName Location Type_Mat M42122-003 Motley Rice LLC Analyst W.B. Egeland Date 5/1/2007 ClientSol resin base flanoe Gross Broken 1/2 blueish "T" flange of compressed blue and white fibers/bundles with scattered black flakes. Visual dark damaged area observed. OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION Morphology Pieochroism Refract Index SignA Extinction Birefringence Melt Fiber Name Straight blue/gray 1.690/1.682 negative parallel low no Crocidolite straight none 1.620/1.605 positive parallel moderate no Anthophyllite ASBESTOS MINERALS EST. VOL. % Chrysotile................................. Amosite..................................... Crocidolite................................ 40 T remolite/Actinolite................ Anthophyllite........................... 20 OTHER FIBROUS COM PONENTS NON FIBROUS COM PONENTS Mica 3 Binder 37 Binder Description Amorphous material and non-tibrous accessory minerals Comments The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated. MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS Proj#-Spl# M42122- 004 Analyst W.B. Egeland Date 5/1/2007 ClientName Motley Rice LLC__________________________ __ ClientSpI resin base flange________ Location Type_Mat ________________________________________________________________________ _____ __ ___________________________________________________________________________ Gross Blueish "T" flange of compressed blue and wtiite fibers/bundles with scattered black flakes, dark Visual damaged area observed._____________________ ______________________________________ OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION Morphology Pleochroism Refract Index SignA Extinction Birefringence Melt Fiber Name Straight blue/gray 1.690/1.682 negative parallel low no Crocidolite straight none 1.620/1.605 positive parallel moderate no Anthophyllite ASBESTOS MINERALS EST. VOL. % Chrysotile................................. Amosite..................................... Crocidolite................................ Tremolite/Actlnollte............... Anthophyllite............................ OTHER FIBROUS COM PONENTS ........................... ........................... ...................... 40 ........................... ......................20 NON FIBROUS COM PONENTS Mica 3 Binder 37 Binder Description Amorphous material and non-fibrous accessory minerals Comments The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated. Project #: M42122 Vial #: ANALYSIS BY CRATFIELD METHOD Sample #: 004 Analyst: WB Egeland Date: 9/27/2010 MUFFLE FURNACE ASHING RESULTS Vial weight (A) Vial weight plus sample weight (B) Original sample weight (B-A) Weight of vial and sample after ashing (C) Sample weight after ashing (C-A) (Wl) (W2) 13.6595 13.8686 0.2091 13.7887 0.1292 Acid Dissolution Results (After Muffle Furnace Ashing) Polycarbonate filter weight (D) Filter plus dry sample weight (E) Sample weight after acid dissolution (E-D) (W3) 0.0160 0.1412 g 0.1252 g Percent weight of organic material ((W1-W2)/ (Wl))*100 Percent weight of dolomite/calcite ((W2-W3)/ (Wl))*100 38.2% 1.9% Estimated upper and lower percent asbestos by TEM scan Upper 85 Lower 65 Percent weight of asbestos (W3/W1)*Lower to (W3/W1)*Upper 38.9 to 50.9% SECTION 4 MAS ID: Client Name: Project Name: Logged By: MAS, LLC. PROJECT COC M51855 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta ECL AC Resin Pipe Cutting Hand Saw Stu ddmount Client Job No: Client PO: Date In: Client Code: 9/28/2010 MASCORP TRANSPORT INFORMATION: Subm itted By: Delivery By: Received By: Condition: Michael Mount, CIH Hand Delivery Nancy Sears good Documents: COC Comments for COC: CONTACT INFORMATION: Contact: Bill Longo Title: Mr. First Name: William Last Name: Longo Suffix W ork Phone: (770) 866-3200 Ext: Other Phone: Ext: Fax: (770) 866-3259 # 000 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 Client ID lab blank A-01-A A-01-B A-01-C A-01-D P-1-A P-1-B P-1-C P-1-D A-1-A A-1-B A-1-C A-1-D A-1-E FB-1-1 FB-1-2 SAMPLE INFORMATION: V o lu m e # 0 1704.3 1696.7 1715.7 1719.5 20.1 21 33 32.3 90.7 89.5 89.3 90 1160 0 0 Client ID SIGNATURES V o lu m e RECEIVED BY: INDUSTRIAL h r GIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY Page I__ o f ___ [ 22 5 F/H 14 F A 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259 DATE A in i/ SAMPLE NUMBER S A M P LE LO CATIO N SAMPLE M ED IA A N A LY S IS D ESIRED START TIM E 7 0 _ ^ ..... .... ........ O ...... \ / f) ----- --- ,--- ____ f * 1 - A (*> 4*-Y/- CL 4/w?/. ...N .......... _____ A H c v c / u m u A I ...s____ A i f c - __________ _ Q . % LVVW l C l r i m p 1 ." t ; 5 UJ O A H i ) y-, 7 } A O af***/ //'lW k / ChJ~, ^ ...I f t . u r Irr V fc ' J ______ 1 ? v o x - 2 .(3 S 2 i& 2 2 _ 7?C Q . s/ 2 ; i z cnn ' J n ' V n?- I--?) 4- . Duefo >4e'4 * f/x^lcL (' ^a-u {, 6>TCX/L- F-n-i-J1L Fa(YIw\H5C1.Pi"-5<20A><-cf'.+fc>/AN-C, ii:*os3 / __\ / ____iHChh <0fti>f./ fashi/rt c rife#(S>--x-C- . STOP TIM E ... . A 3 . .. ____ s / ______ L m 33^ J 2 L TOTAL TIM E M IN U T E S 4 * ?o \/ ______1 0 L_ PRE FLOW RATE LPM POST FLOW RATE LPM AVG. FLOW RATE LPM T o ta l V o lu m e L ite rs 14 - i_ 4 /1 2 ,o r 4 . '> % _ 4 3 ... me S .-3 S JL33- . ,,7../.03. 3JL tO T 2 lD 1.3(> 7 ^ 4 /4 t4 > 3 fr ,7 ? ? ) ! . j 2o, i M lO __..__J__LLL-.j1?,,73S1 ..49g.1.,3I0X..1. -3f^-iU2r3 -_..g1.3.g.02...V,.>..?..j>...... M s r 1 3 > __i __ ' AM J 01.. _JLJ&__ /ao _ l&t0 0 .0 LtSsQ r - o > o 2 & > __ ....... Q / CHAIN OF CUSTODY First Transfer by: Second Transfer by: Third Transfer by: NAME COMPANY /ft? ' 4-L>C^______ MODE OF TRANSFER LOG IN DATE 0 - 3 * - ( O .... RECEIVED BY COMPANY ...C D . J .__________________ Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 M AS Project:______________ Hand Saw______________ MAS Sam ple #: M51855-001 Client Sam ple ID: _______________ A-01-A________________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 00 00 00 1.6 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0.5 0 00 00 00 o n Notes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 7 40 100 P um p Flow Rate, Lters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) 8.97 _____ 190______ Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 1704.3 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 2 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) ___ ___0_____ __ ______ 1 ( 0 _____ A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field A rea, M M 2 (G FA ) ___ ____ 0 0 0 7 8 5 ___ C alc, o f F ib er D en sity (E ) in Fib ers/ m m 2 E= ' 2.Eyfib e rs /m m 3 C alc , o f F ib er C o n c.(C ) in F ib ers/cm 3 0.002 fib ers/cm Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range hauegreaterthan optimalvariability andare probably biased. Analyst: w, B. Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project:________ Hand Saw M AS Sample #: M51855-002 Client Sample ID: A-01-B________________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 P um p Flow R ate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am ple T im e, M inutes (T) 8.93 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 1696.7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) .PJL J00_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 1 0 1 0 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) _0_ J00 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 70 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA) __ 385__ 0.00785 3 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 80 D 0 0 0 0 0 C alc, of Fiber D ensity ( ) in Fibers/ m m = 3,8 fib e rs/ m m 2 0 o 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100_ C alc, of Fiber C on c.(C ) in Fibers/cm 5 3 0 3.0 0.002 fib ers/cm Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limitof Quantition (LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvariability andare probably biased. Analyst: W, B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M, Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 M AS Project:______________ Hand Saw______________ M AS Sam ple #: M51855-003 Client Sam ple ID: A-01-C___________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 00 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0 50 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 100 - 2.0 j 1.5 0.5 te a m a -tana Notes: P um p Flow Rate, U ters/M inu te (FR) S am p le T im e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 190 9.03 1715.7 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted; Blank(FLB) 2.0 ____ ____ o_____ ____ 10____ Area of Filter, m m 2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA) ___ 0.00785 C alc, o f Fiber D ensity (E) in Fibers/ m m 2.5 fibers/m m 2 C alc, o f Fiber C o n c.(C ) in F ib ers/cm J C= < 0 . 0 0 2 flbers/cm MediaType: 25 mmMCE Fitter LFiimbeitrocfoQunutasnotiutiotsnid(eLOthQe)1=007-1fib30e0rsf/imbemrs2/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimalvariability andare probably biased Analyst: W . B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 M AS Project:______________ Hand Saw______________ M AS Sam ple #: M51855-004 Client Sample ID: A-01-D___________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 00 00 00 00 0.5 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 00 0 0 0 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 c0 0 0 0 0 100 V -0 .5 0 0 0.5 0 C Notes: Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR ) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T ) _____ ,,JL9.__ __ _______ 9 - 0 5 _______ Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 1 7 1 9 .5 T'otal Fibers C ounted, S a m p le (F C S ) 1"otal Fields C ou nted, S a m p le s (F L S ) rotal Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B ) Total Fields C ounted, B lan k(F LB ) 0 -5 _______ ^ 2 P . -- ________1 0 0 _______ <\rea o f Filter, m m 5 (A F ) Graticule Field A rea, M M 2 (G F A ) ____ _ 3 9 5 _ ^ mu urn0* m. 0m 0mm7 8mm5, mm mm C alc, o f Fi ber D en sity (E ) In Fibiers/ m m E= 7 * , 0 . 6 fibers/m m 2 C alc, o f Fiber C o n c.(C ) in Fibers/cm * c- < 0 . 0 0 2 fibers/cm 3 MediaType: 25mmMCE Filter Limitof Quantition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm2range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project: HandSaW MAS Sample #: M 51855-005 Client Sam ple ID: P-1-A_________________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 3 1 2 8.5 1 0 .5 3 1 1 4 10 2 .5 0 0 1 4 0 2 5 3 1 20 0 1 1 2 2 1 1.5 1 7 1.5 3 0 0 3 3.5 2 0 0 5.5 1 5.5 6 40 2 2 4 .5 1.5 1 2 50 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (F C S ) Total Fields Counted, S am ples (F LS ) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted. Blank(FLB) 10 2.01 2 0 .1 101 ___ 4 6 _______ ___ _ 0 _______ _ ______ J i5_ __ 60 ) Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 3 70 Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA ) _____ O J 0 0 7 8 5 ____ D 0 80 C alc, o f Fiber D en sity (E ) in F ib e rs / m m 0 E= 279.7 fibers/mm 0 90 0 0 100 C alc, of Fiber C onc.(C ) in Fibers/cm 3 11 19 19 31.5 d ,,101.0, O Fibers/cm Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LFiimbeitrocfoQunutasnotiutlotsnid(eLOthOe)1=007-1fib30e0rsf/imbemrs2/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: w. B. Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 10/1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 M AS Project:______________ Hand Saw______________ MAS Sam ple #: M51855-006 Client Sam ple ID: P-1-B_________________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 10 1 0 0 0 30 1 2 0 0 10 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR ) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) ________ 2/1___ ________ 10_________ 54 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 Total Sam ple V olum e, Liters (V ) 21.0 71 1 2 3 0 10 0 1 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 3 1 1 40 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) Total Fields Counted. Sam ples (FLS ) 7 --^ ._ ... 100 4.5 0.5 0 4 0 0 4.5 2 0 0 2 0.5 5 0 5 0.5 1 1 2 0.5 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) __________0 _______ __ __ ___ 1 0 0 _______ 4 0.5 0 3 .5 0 0 60 1.5 0 0 0.5 0 1 4.5 1 1 0 2 0.5 70 Area of Filter, mm 2 (AF) Graticule Field A rea, M M 2 (G FA ) ______ _ 3 8 5 _ __ _ . _ ,,9^927TM ^!--. -- 22 0 0 0 0 5.5 2.5 0 0 3 0 r0 3.5 0 1 0 0 2.5 C alc, o f Fiber D ensity (E) in F ib ers/ m m 2 =| , 8 9 .8 |f lt M 3 r s f t T>m< 6 3.5 0 1 1.5 0 90 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 4.5 0 0 .5 1 0 3 00 1 8 .5 6 .5 21 14.5 1 - 1( 70.5 C alc, o f Fiber C o n c.(C ) in F lb ers/c m 3 . C= ........... 1 , 6 5 f e r s W Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter LFiimbeitrocfoQunutasnotiutiotsnid(eLOthQe)1=007-1fib3e00rsf/imbemrs2Anm2range have greaterthan optimalvariability andareprobablybiased. Analyst: W . B, Egeland D a te :_________ 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project: __________ Hand Saw______________ M AS Sam ple #: M51855-007 Client Sample ID: ________P-1-C_________ _ Ana|ysisDate: 9/28/10 1 9 10 4 0.5 0 6 .5 4 .5 1 2 .5 10 3.5 3 1 4 .5 2.5 5 2 8.5 1 6 20 0 2 2 2 4 1 5.5 4 2.5 2 30 40. Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M lnute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 3.39 10 33.9 1 0 1 ______ 30 3 5 0 To tal Fibers C ou nted, B lank (F C B ) ______ 0 _________ Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) ________ 3 0 , ______ 3 3 60 Area of Filter, m m 2 (AF) ____3 8 5 _______ 0 0 7 0 G raticule Field A re a , M M 2 (G F A ) _____ 0 0 0 7 8 5 ____ 0 428.9 0 80 C a lc , o t F ib e r D e n s ity (E ) in F ib e rs / m m E= fibers/mm 0 0 90 0 0 100 S ii 10.5 28 30 15 i 17.! M M C alc, o f F ib er C o n c.(C ) in F ib ers/c m 1 Iflb e rs /c m Media Type. 25 mm MCE Filter LFiimbeitrocfoQunutasnotSultosnid(eLOthQe)1=007-1fib30e0rsf/imbemrs2/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project: Hand Saw___________ MAS Sample#: M51855-008 Client Sample ID: P-1-D Analysis Date: 9/28/10 9,5 3.5 0 80 2 11 0 17 1 0 9,5 4 3.5 8 1.5 2.5 40 1 10 0 2 9,5 1 0 5.5 1.5 2 11 1.5 1 5.5 2 1 6.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f ------- 103.0 I 17 15.5 Notes: 3 1 1 5 0 0 1 11 0 1 1 1 3 0 1 6 4 2.5 0 2 6 1 2 0.5 6 28 31 2 0 10 0 4 20 1 0 30 0 1 40 2 0 50 1.5 0 60 70 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am p le Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 3.23 10 32.3 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS ) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA) * Ml**103 * KM 63 0 100 365 0.00785 80 C alc, o f Fib er D ensity (E ) in F ib ers/ m m 2 E= ;s 208,3 fib e rs /m m 2 90 100 11,5 103.0 I C alc, o f Fiber C onc.(C ) In Fibers/cm 5 C= 2,48 fibers/cm * Media Type. 25 mm MCE Filter Limit ot Quantltion (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range have greaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B, Egeland D a te - Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 10/1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 - MAS Project: HandSaW _____ MAS Sample #: M51855-009 Client Sample ID: A-1-A _________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 13 3.5 4.5 2 0.5 4,5 2 1 0 0 17,5 2.5 9.5 0 0 16.5 0.5 6.5 0.5 0.5 20,5 1 11.5 1 2 17.5 7 2.5 3 4 12 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8pi ScU 19 .5 44.5 6.5 Notes: 2 .5 1.5 10 5.5 8.5 20 5 1 30 40 50 60 70 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 9.07 ..... 10........... 90.7 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (F C S ) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) Area of Filter, m m 2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA ) 101.5 32 0 100 .........385......... 0.00785 80 C alc, o f Fib er D ensity (E) in Fib ers/ m m 2 e4 404,1 fib ers/m m 2 90 100 -- sliQil .5 C alc, o f Fiber C o n c.(C ) in F ib ers/c m 3 c- 1.72 fib e rs /c rrr Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LimitofQuant'ition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm* Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimal variability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 10/1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project:_____________ Hand Saw_____________ MAS Sample #: M51855-010 Client Sample ID: A-1-B________________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 Notes' 0 4 3 .5 0 0.5 1 1 3 .5 5 4 2 10 0 1 2 .5 1 5.5 0.5 2 5 2 0 20 0 0 1 3 0.5 1 1 3 1 5 2.5 3 30 1 0 12 4 .5 2.5 1 0 0 40 6.5 50 60 70 P um p Flow Rate, Llters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 10 8.95 89.5 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field A rea, M M 2 (G FA ) 101.5 _____ 4 1 _____ _____ 0_____ ____ J 0 0 _ 385 0.00785 80 C alc, o f Fiber D ensity (E ) in Fib ers/ m m E= 3 1 5 .4 flbers/mm 90 100 mm 10 13 .5 14.5 3 2 .5 13.5 27.5 C alc, o f Fiber C o n c.(C ) in F ib ers/cm 3 C= 1.36 fibers/cm Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantitlon (LOO) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project: HandSaW MAS Sam ple#: M51855-011 Client Sam ple ID: A-1-C_________________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 3 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 7.5 10 0 0 3.5 2.5 5 1 3 0 .5 0.5 3 20 0 .5 0 0 .5 4 2 1.5 0 0 6.5 1 30 0 4 .5 4 .5 1 5.5 1 3 .5 0 0 0.5 40 1.5 0.5 2 3.5 3.5 18,: 16 2.5 50 60 70 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) ____ 8 . 9 3 ____ _____ 1 0 _ ____ 89.3 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) _____ 4 7 ______ ____ _ 0 _______ ______ JH5- ___ 0.00785 ) 80 3 3 90 3 D 100 I: 101.5! 28.5 15 11 19 4 .1 0 1 .5 Notes: Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm 275.1 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Flbers/cm1 O 1,19 fib e rs /c m ' Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LimitofQuantition(LOQ) =7 nbers/mm2 Fibercountsoutside the 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthanoptimalvariability and areprobably biased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland D a te . Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 10/ 1/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 MAS Project:_____________ Hand Saw_____________ MAS Sample #: M51855-015 Client Sample ID: FB-1-2 Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 40 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 100 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) 0 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 0 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 0 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 e= |< 7 . 0 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cm3 0.0 NA fibers/cm5 Notes: MediaType: 25mmMCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: w. B, Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 10/1/2010 MAS CLIENT NAME: TEM ANALYSIS M51855-001 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta CLIENT SAMPLE ID: 7402 ANALYSIS Sample Area/ Volume: Filter Type: Pore size: 1704.3 MCE 25mm 0.8 Liters Date Analyzed: Analyst: Scope Number: 10/4/2010 A. Keeton 2 Effective Filter Area: Sample type: Analysis type: Grid Acceptance f 385 Air 7402 YES 3 % Accelerating Voltage: Indicated Mag: Screen Mag: Grid_box: 100 KV 25 KX 20 KX 7707 Number of grids: 3 Number of openings: 40 -------Average Grid Size: 0.012210 #1: 110 #3: 110 #2: 111 #4: 111 (---------------- , Total Area Analyzed: j 0.488 j Asbestos 0 Non-asbestos , % Asbestos Sir# NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD vSquarelD C6-B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 E7 E8 E9 E10 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 15 16 I7 C7-B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 H6 I k f':> P G i L ____ j ; ....................... 1 ; i 1 [ |l . 1 1 ................. [ ; ________ ! i ; ! _ ! I ....... / i , ,,_______ , __ . .v,. ~ ; .,,_ ______ - i L . . i ............... ..................... 1 1 j _,l _ .. .. .......... _ \ NSD H7 i NSD H8 L CO X NSD NSD mo r NSD C 8 -A 8 [ NSD A9 I NSD A10 I NSD D2 NSD D3 [~ NSD D4 NSD H7 ! CO X NSD # Grx; Op 40 M51855 001 Sample Comments NE background _____________ MAS CLIENT NAME: TEM ANALYSIS M51855-002 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta CLIENT SAMPLE ID: 7402 ANALYSIS Sample Area/ Volume: ; Filter Type: 1696.7 MCE 25mm Liters Date Analyzed: Analyst: 10/4/2010 A.Keeton Pore size: 0.8 Scope Number: 2 Effective Filter Area: 385 Accelerating Voltage: 100 KV Sample type: Air Indicated Mag: 25 KX Analysis type: 7402 Screen Mag: 20 KX Grid Acceptance j YES 3 % Grld_box: 7707 Number of grids: 3 Number of openings: 40 Average Grid Size: 0.012210 #1: 110 #3: n o #2: 111 #4: Total Area Analyzed: .....--,... , 0.488 f Asbestos 0 Non-asbestos 0 Stri' NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD NSD SquarelD' D6-A4 A5 A6 A8 A9 A10 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 F7 D7-F10 G2 G3 G4 G5 H6 H7 H8 % Asbestos I'll c r 'Ivp*' See 0 Moi'.'h S\KD NSD H9 [ __ NSD H10 L . NSD D8-B5 I NSD B6 NSD B7 1__ NSD D6 | ! NSD D7 | NSD D8 ! NSD D9 ; r NSD D10 | NSD gi NSD G2 j_ # Grid Op 40 M 51855 002 Sample Comments S background_____________________ MAS CLIENT NAME; TEM ANALYSIS .. M51855-005 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta CLIENT SAMPLE ID: | P-1-A 7402 ANALYSIS Sample Area/ Volume: Filter Type: Pore size: 20.1 MCE 25mm 0.8 Liters Date Analyzed: Analyst: Scope Number: 9/29/2010 A.Keeton 2 Effective Filter Area: 385 Accelerating Voltage: 100 KV Sample type: Air Indicated Mag: 25 KX Analysis type: Grid Acceptance \ 7402 YES 5 % Screen Mag: Grld_box: 20 KX 7707 Number ofgrids: , 3 #1; ` lip #3; [U 0_ Number of openings:, 40 #2: JU J M `. [ I l l Average Grid Size: 0.012210 Total Area Analyzed: | 0.488 J Asbestos ' f,z Non-asbestos 1 % Asbestos s96.88 S lit Sqj'trrli) | : mer lyp,. J Size Motpli SAKD 1 E6-B5 I Crocidolite 8.2 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole y 2 88 I liCrocWotite i 51 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole 3 B9 | llCrocidolite 14 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole y 4 ! llCrocidolite 5.5 0.8 Amphibole Amphibole 5 ( lAnthophylile 5.7 1 Amphibole Amphibole v 6 | j AnfRophyfiTe 9 0,45 Amphibole Amphibole >/' NSD C4 I r 7 C5 1 _A n th p pjiyiite__ __ 25 6 1.5 Amphibole Amphibole y 8 _ Anthophylite__ _ 17.7 0,3 Amphibole Amphibole 9 j |Crocidoli:o 6.5 04 Amphibole Amphibole 10 | CrocidoSiie 5.3 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole 11 lA n lh o p h y ilti^ 55 0.6 Amphibole Amphibole 12 ; Ani"OBhy.*.ft 13 C8 < Cro'ado rn 14 C9 Anthophylite 6 05 18 0,3 11.7 0.6 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole 15 .Anthophylite______ 58 0.8 Amphibole Amphibole 16 1 | A nthophylite 68 1 Amphibole Amphibole 17 [ llCrocidolite i 5.5 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 18 j 'Crocidolite ____ , 10.5 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 19 | Anthophylite___ , i 18 7 06 Amphibole Amphibole 20 C10 * Anthophylite j 59 21 D8 .Crocidolite __ ; 13 5 22 CrocidoJite | 24.3 23 i Anthophylite ` 10.8 24 Anthophylite __ , 9 25 NSD D9 26 10 Crocidolite ,, L. sa : . . . ___ . 22 5 ! 69 0.6 0 45 1 6 1.8 1,5 1 1 0 45 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Ambiguous Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Ambiguous 27 1 I llAnthophylite 5.7 0.6 Amphibole Amphibole 'i 28 [ . . . ,, it e t h o p M it e .. 29 E7 I llAnthophylite |( 6.7 5.2 0.3 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole 30 I IlCrocidolite 1 20.7 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole </ 31 E8 I liAnthophvlite ' 1 6.5 1 Amphibole Amphibole ,,, 32 L ... J lM b fip h y lte , _ 1 15.7 1.5 Amphibole Amphibole 33 L_ .J|A nthophylite ' ' 1 11.2 0.8 Amphibole Amphibole 34 I_____ liAnthophyiite .1 8.8 0.6 Amphibole Amphibole v-i 35 I jlAnthophylite ,, . 11 13 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole 36 L .......JlAnthophylite ............. 1 5.9 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole L .' 37 I jlCrocidolite ______ 1 9.6 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole <" 38 I IlCrocidolile I 32.4 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole j. 39 I_____ JCroc'dolitc.... _______ | 5.3 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole >7 40 E9 | ____ 'Crocidolite ___ _ ] 9.6 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole V 41 1 JlCrocidolite NSD E10 1 il J 5.2 0.8 1 Amphibole Amphibole 42 E7-B2 j liAnthophvlite 19 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole 43 1... I lf e n is B t o t iit e , ......... . 1 14.7 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole 7. NSD B3 1 If 1 n 44 B4 1 liAnthophvlite 1 9.8 1 Amphibole Amphibole 45 |____JtecasM fiiiLe . 1 6.5 1 Amphibole Amphibole 46 B5 | IICrocidoHte _ 1 14.7 0 45 Amphibole Amphibole 7 47 1 IlCrocidolite 1 6.3 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole 48 B8 ! IlCrocidolite 1 9.5 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole 49 B9 1 liAnthophvlite 50 L.... .JlAnthophylite 1 5.9 0.6 j 16.7 1 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole 51 1 liAnthophvlite 1 5.3 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole 52 B10 1 IlCrocidolite 1 7.1 . 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole L !L NSD D2 1 ji . 1 - : NSD D3 ___ . _____ . . ... ... . jf l ; 53 D4 1 j[Crocidolite 8 1 Amphibole Amphibole f ; NSD E1 1 if 1 ; - NSD E2 r i f " I ' NSD E3 ........ 1 ( NSD E4 t M ...... i 54 G3 1 slCrocidolite j 9.8 1 Amphibole Amphibole A NSD G4 1 if 1 55 G5 |_____ IlAnthophyJJte . . . . . J 13.1 1 56 L ___ iCrocidolile.. NSD G6 1 L . NSD G7 1 I i 6.9 0.3 ...1 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole 57 G8 I [Anthoghylite j 9 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole 58 | .Anthophvlite 1 40 5 1 Amphibole Amphibole 59 E8-B7 | . Anthophylite 1 103 1 Amphibole Amphibole 60 I ,'Crocidolite ... ........... ! 6.5 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole ? 61 1 Anthoohvlite 1 28.1 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole 62 l NA L | 13 04 Ambiguous Ambiguous NSD B8 1 1______ . ` '] NSD C2 1 u ...... J 63 G3 [ ____ ^Anthophylite . " J 11 2 0.5 64 1___ j|Crocidqli_te .... J 18 0.6 65 l NSD G8 'Anthophylite I9 0.4 :i Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole # Grid Op 40 M51855 J)05__ Sample Comments: rig h t C&unts C&j.ftts cs&dm* Owftfcs Couacs Count* C&ftts Osanti Ceynts Courts Cwwyfc* Ceuftt*  Lkem** 56933? ' M5ia53-005*06:>, Osanti"' :,2 $ 2.56 3.84 X*R*ye5n4e2rgy<KeV) 6.4 8.98 10.24 MAS CLIENT NAME: TEM ANALYSIS M51855-006 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta CLIENT SAMPLE ID: i P-1-B 7402 ANALYSIS Sample Area/Volume: | Filter Type: 21 MCE 25mm Liters Date Analyzed: Analyst: 10/4/2010 A Keeton Pore size: 08 Scope Number: 2 Effective Filter Area: 385 Accelerating Voltage: 100 KV Sample type: Air Indicated Mag: 25 KX Analysis type: 7402 Screen Mag: 20 KX Grid Acceptance ^ YES 3 % Grid_box: 7707 Number of grids: 1 Number of openings: 40 #1: 110 #3: T llO #2: 111 #4: 111 Average Grid Size: 0.012210 Total Area Analyzed: | 0.488 | Asbestos 22 Non-asbestos 2 - "---------------- -- ---- % Asbestos 91.67 ........... Str/ SquarelD' 1ii:er T \p .' j j Size I SAH1) f :)S NSD D9-B2 |j_____ _ _ J 1 B3 rL~, I-CrocicjoMe,, 18.1 0.9 Amphibole Amphibole y. NSD B4 I J NSD B5 ! il NSD B6 . ,, NSD B7 : NSD B8 NSD C1 2 C2 ; __ '.A n th o p h y liie ____ ...... ; 9 0.6 Amphibole Amphibole y NSD C3 I NSD C4 I NSD C5 LP : 3 C6 ijAnthophylite 9 0 45 Amphibole Amphibole y 4 C7 Anthophylit 7.3 0 45 Amphibole Amphibole * NSD C8 I 5 C9 r . _ lA n th o p h y lite __ 11.5 1 Amphibole Amphibole y 6 i Anthophyhle 14 3 2 Amphibole Amphibole s/ 7 Anthophylite 13.5 1.5 Amphibole Amphibole >/ 8 Anthophyliie 105 1 Amphibole Amphibole v'.. 9 __________ , 9 0 5 Ambiguous Ambiguous NNSSDD CG160 ( NSD G7 NSD 10 G8 D10-B2 A --0- ` V 9 5 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole i/ 11 i" 'Anthophyliie 13 06 Amphibole Amphibole 12 i [Anthephyi te __ 6 3 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 13 i Anihophylite 13 5 06 Amphibole Amphibole NSD B3 L i! _ . 14 B4 j jjAnthqpbyljte " 226 0.B Amphibole Amphibole ! i NSD B5 L ! I NSD B6 j ;; t i__ 15 B7 1 j!% s a p i .. 22.5 1 Amphibole Amphibole n 16 B8 ( NA ; I 15.6 0.4 Ambiguous Hohe u 17 B9 t.____ Anthophylfe............ I 18 1 Amphibols Amphibole :_i r ; NSD D3 I . JL . 1 v. i NSD F4 I 1 ................. | NSD E9-B1 i r t \ : : J L NSD B2 L . J ! ____ ... . ,,J 18 B3 {_____ iiAnthpphyfe_____ ' 10.2 2 Amphibole A m p h ib o le ; i 19 L J iA n ttio E liy lite ___ l 13.8 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 20 l . ifergcidojite__ _ _ _ H 5.2 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole kl 21 B4 f . . T j & f i M t e ....... ] 15.9 1.1 Amphibole Amphibole ! 1 22 1 7.2 0.45 A m p h ib o ls Amphibole [: NSD B5 L __ ll . ..... 1 u NSD B6 i i ( .................................. 1 NSD G2 ' 23 G3 1........ ....... ... 13.5 0.45 Amphibole Amphibole LJ 24 G4 1 . Crocidolite 11 3 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole 1 : NSD G6 l : : "" # Grid Op 40 MS 1855 006 (personal left Sample Comments; Regim es 119.7 Uvetim$10$. Count-; 5 .1 2 X-Ray Ene-ry (KeV) 6 .4 0 Cburit Rsftim? 86,2 vtlm f4Si*5OO$0O2u. M5t355--003n, C&tt 0>ufits Counts Uvtsm^ 5-2.3 M5l55'00$*805t. Rkim! .6 R**hm* 7 2 $ Coufits C.DO --y -- 1*28 2.56 --y 3.84 |.I. I My fciMiH iM 5.12 X-Uy E nry (KV) 6.43 7 .6 8 .... &.9t> 10.24 Rs*tm* Jo.G .. 7. |___________ _ _ t______ " M 5183S-0 0 6 -0 0.9. ~ "" "'" """"" ------------ ________________ ________________ ___ <s-S6 2&3 943 Si O Mftts K-fUy Zmrqy fUtetJtimlrtew 7872,.20 M5--1$5",l--S*-Q>m"O..$.--O..J..0....> SI Ctecvts 9 j e.QQ 1.28 X-R-ay Energy (<eV) 662 497 3 S 8,96 1Q.24 5,12 K-Rv Efeiyy (KeV) g 40 MAS ID: client Name: Project Name: Logged By: MAS, LLC. PROJECT COC M51857 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta ECL AC Resin Pipe Cutting Electric Saw ddmount Client Job No: Client PO: Date In: Client Code: 9/28/2010 MASCORP TRANSPORT INFORMATION: Submitted By: Delivery By: Received By: Condition: Michael Mount, CIH Hand Delivery Nancy Sears good Documents: COC -- Comments for COC: CONTACT INFORMATION: Contact: Bill Longo Title: First Name: Mr. William Last Name: Longo ...... ... ..... Suffix W ork Phone: (770) 866-3200 Ext: Other Phone: Ext: Fax: (770) 866-3259 # Client ID 000 lab blank 001 A-02-A 002 A-02-B 003 A-02-C 004 A-02-D 005 P-2-A 006 P-2-B 007 P-2-C 008 P-2-D 009 A-2-A 010 A-2-B 011 A-2-C 012 A-2-D 013 A-2-E 014 FB-2-1 015 FB-2-2 SAMPLE INFORMATION: V o lu m e # 0 460 448 445.5 455 3 2.9 3.05 3.25 10.2 10.2 10 10.8 900 0 0 Client ID RECEIVED BY: ,C V \ .'.e- SIGNATURES Q lA . ( f V o lu m e INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY MAS. 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259 COMPANYNAME / M S j L U C - P e p f - m ADDRESS: _________________________ --------phone: ---- Page o f __1 PROJECT NUMBER: <o3>i fa R tf' PROJECT NAME: .. P-t|m- (jjJfajr - Ui.in c, i&u t WORKAREA DESCnRIiPTIinONNT: }~C.L , - S4udy 2.- ! B fotU- PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE: M U ?* lih x u J T SAMPLING DATE: ? h i Ito -l( v r n S \ bc>'* TURNAROUND TIMES: DATE SAMPLE NUMBER SAMPLE LOCATION 7 J 4 - 6 uJ / A RJOJ A $i\ro/vs ) t CW .. T n n /T R. \i ' U a"'-5 -n+jCi. * Xml ...---$f/t- " T ' Ss S6) V \/ * m nfl--(2A-~...s~* F "l j - 1 / RfA _ /P/j U. 7tr/ Ja. LU Rt&xtK .. p/7-2 -2 . Js Jy 1 DAY SAMPLE MEDIA V 3 DAYS _______ STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS ANALYSIS DESIRED 4 W- . 7 7I Q X . 1VOX ..... 7 V 0 ^ . 7 ^ 2 ,. -7V-OX *7V O X ^ 7V0T. START STOP TIME TIME T ._ ./;$.... J i i X - .. s/ __S5i/ ,gr:*3L.. n j 1 \ -(/__ -----S/__ 1; 3 r m e TOTAL TIME MINUTES ___ _ A ./ S' \/ PRE POST AVG. FLOW FLOW FLOW FIATE RATE RATE LPM LPM LPM SsJv.... %..Z.. ^ 2 . 1 - .. d k . .f..L .fia i. il/ 1 J i i - , .C 5 . la V ffc<? .fi . ..iioP-- b3~ (5$^ *65 2,0V 2 , 0 0 L I^/O a,o A . it/f* %,2-i (O / o . Total Volume Liters Jth Q ___ ...k I L .. T .. 2 a > .... .. l i a ..... *.$...... 3.S ..?fe-i <3/.... ... J 0 . . 2 - . . J M ____ .................. O < D ..... FVR - 2 - 1 & k /'f A^ yV. -eJpoZ' --3/ Jy 3 -7 . J/ & HbfiC+rA PflhfiZ c 4/ y/' ' y. CHAIN OF CUSTODY First Transfer by: Second Transfer by: Third Transfer by: NAME COMPANY LAC, MODE OF T R A N S IR f o t * ..... LOG IN DATE RECEIVED BY j 1 COMPANY Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sam ple#: M 5 1 857-001 Client Sample ID: A-02-A Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 10 10 0 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 30 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 40 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 70 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 00 0 0 0 0 80 10 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 100 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 9.2 50 460 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 4 .5 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100 A rea of Filter, m m 2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA ) 385 0.00785 C alc, o f F ib er D ensity (E ) in Fibers/ m m 2 E= - 5 i7 fibers/m m 2 C alc, o f F ib er C on c.(C ) in F ib ers/cm 3 l Notes: 0 1 1 1 1.5 4.5 C= < 0 . 0 0 6 fibers/cm3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limitof Quantition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercounts outsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greater than optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: w. B, Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sample #-. M51857-002 Client Sample ID: A-02-B Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 0.5 0 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 I ~ 3.5 0 Notes: 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 0 Pum p Flow R ate, Liters/M inute (FR) Sam ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 8.96 50 448 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 3.5 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM5 (GFA) 0 100 385 0.00785 C alc, o f Fib er D ensity (E) in Fibers/ m m 2 E= 4.5 fib e rs /m m 2 C alc , o f F ib e r C o n c .(C ) in F lb e rs /c m 3 C= < 0.006 fibers/cm3 Media Type. 25 mm MCE Fitter LimitofQuantition (LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300 fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthan optimal variability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sam ple #: M51857-003 Client Sample ID: A-02-C Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 10 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 1.5 1.5 0.5 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 1.5 0 00 00 5 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 1 1.5 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 50 0 0.5 0 0 so 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 100 . 1 0.5 P um p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 8.91 50 445.5 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (F C S ) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 5.5 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100 A rea of Filter, m m 2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA ) 385 0.00785 C alc, o f Fib er D ensity (E ) In F ib ers/ m m 2 E= 7.0 fib e rs /m m 2 C alc, o f F ib er C o n c.(C ) In F lb ers/c m 3 c= 0.006 fib ers/crn 3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of Quantrtion (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal vanability and are probably biased. Analyst: W. B, Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sam ple#: M51857-004 Client Sample ID: A-02-D Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 0.5 0.5 00 10 0.5 0.5 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 l i:: la R 1 Notes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR) 9.1 0 10 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 50 0 1 20 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 455 0 0 30 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 4 0 <10 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 100 0 0 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 0 60 0 0 70 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 0 0 80 0 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= 5 .1 fibers/mm2 0 90 0 0 100 I 1 4 .C yisi Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cmJ c= < 0 . 0 0 6 fibere/cm3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limitof Quantrtion (LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthan optimalvariability and are probably biased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sample #: M51857-005 Client Sample ID: ______ P-02-A Analysis Date: 9/28/10 16.5 3 2 4.5 0 7 21.5 4 1 2 8 6.5 10 32.6 2 8.5 3 14 5 18.5 5 6 5.5 1 1 20 15.6 5.5 1 2 7 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) 0.6 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 5 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 3.0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 104.5 24 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 E= '554.7 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm1 Ili 04.5 19.5 18.5 17 30 19.6 104.5 C* 71.2 fibers/cm3 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LimitofQuantition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greaterthan optima!variability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sam ple #: M51857-006 Client Sample I D : __________ P-02-B Analysis Date: 9/28/10 41 28.5 24.5 31.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t.f- 6.5 8.5 2.5 2.5 20 16 3.5 4.5 10 34 4 8.5 6.5 5.5 24.5 9.5 3.5 7.5 6.5 27 5 4.5 10 3.5 7 20 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mmute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 0.58 5 2.9 30 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 125.5 40 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) mm * *2m0m mm at 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 60 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 0 100 385 0.00785 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 E= 799.4 fibers/mm2 90 100 20 125.5 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm1 C= 106.12 fibers/cm1 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit ofQuantition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthan optimalvariabilityand are probablybiased. Analyst: w. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: m. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sample #: M51857-007 Client Sam ple ID: P-02-C Analysis Date: 9/28/10 27 7.5 3 8.5 4 21.5 2.5 2 .5 7 3.5 4 6 10 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) 0.61 5 42 8 15.5 9 6 3 .5 35 .5 11.5 8.5 2 .5 3.5 9.5 20 Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V ) 3.05 0 0 30 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) 126 0 40 Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 20 0 0 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) 0 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 . 0 0 0 60 A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 0 0 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 0 E= 8 0 2 . 5 fibers/mm2 0 90 0 0 . s- . 100 f f l 126.0 29.5 29.5 27 17 23 126.C1 Notes: Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cm3 1 0 1 .3 Fibers/cm3 o Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthan optimalvariability andare probably biased. Analyst: w. B, Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 6 /2 0 1 0 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sample #: M51857-008 Client Sample ID: P-2-D Analysis Date: 9/28/10 34 6 30.5 4 9.5 7.5 2.5 8.5 4 6 6.5 10 10 31.5 9.5 7 4 6.5 4.5 22,5 1.5 3.5 5 3.5 9 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Nlinute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 0.65 5 3.25 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 118.5 20 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 ............. 100 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 ........ ......0 .0 0 7 8 5 ...... Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 E= 754.8 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Flbers/cm3 fdJJlitJsL 21 24 22.5 19 32 JJJLJL Notes: C= I 89.41 flbers/cm3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LlmifofQuantition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimalvariabilityandare probablybiased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: R e v ie w e d By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sample #: M51857-009 Client Sample ID :___________ A-2-A Analysis Date: 9/28/10 51.5 9.5 58 17 52.5 11.5 48 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s - 1521.0.0 50 9 13 10 10 9 13.5 9.5 9 10 8 6.5 15 11.5 16 7 7 6 20 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 2.04 5 10.2 30 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 40 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 210 20 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 60 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 0 100 385 0.00785 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= 1337.6 fibers/mm2 90 100 42 40 41.5 36.5 *210.0 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Flbers/cm3 C= 50.5 fibers/cm3 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LimitofQuantition (LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W, B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: m . Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s Sample #: M51857-010 Client Sample ID: A-2-B Analysis Date: 9/28/10 40,5 9 10.5 8 11.5 7.5 88 11.5 9.5 14 19.5 13.5 10 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) 2.04 5 40 10.5 6 37.S 10.5 8 9.5 4.5 9.5 6 6.5 6.5 20 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 10.2 0 0 30 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 192 0 40 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 20 0 0 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 0 60 . 0 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 385 0 70 Graticule Field Area, NIM2 (GFA) 0.00785 0 0 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 0 E* 1222.9 fibers/mm2 0 90 0 0 100 1 41.5 34 37.5 42 37 1 9 2 .0 1 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cnr' 46.2 fibers/cm3 o:> CM a% Notes: Media Type1 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthan optimalvariability and are probably biased. Analyst: w. b . Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sam ple #: M51857-011 Client Sample ID: A-2-C Analysis Date: 9/28/10 55.5 9 7 10 6 23.5 51 11.5 6.5 11.5 16.5 5 10 41 13 8 6.5 8.5 5 53 8.5 9.5 9 10 16 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) 2 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 5 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 10 O ; CM Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 20 0.5 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, BlankfFLB) _ 0 100 _ Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= 1277.1 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Flbers/cm1 ^ 0 .5 42 31 37 41 49.5 12QQ.5. C= 49.17 fibers/cm3 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LimitofQuantitlon(LOO) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvanabilityandare probably biased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sam ple #: M51857-012 Client Sample ID: A-2-D Analysis Date: 9/28/10 89 25.5 83 15 67 13.5 74 17.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 12 15 12.5 15 16.5 13 17.5 15.5 19 14 11 17.5 20.5 10 11.5 15.5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 P u m p Flow R a te , L ite rs /M in u te (F R ) Sam ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 2.16 5 10.8 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 313 20 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC B) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 ........... 100______ Area of Filter, m m 2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 385 0,00785 C alc, o f Fiber D ensity (E) in Fibers/ m m 2 E= 1993.6 fib e rs /m m 2 C alc, o f F ib er C on c.(C ) In F ibers/cm 3 1 3 .0 71.5 55 62 59.5 65 313.0 C= 71.1 fib e rs /c m 3 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit o( Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fiber countsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthan optimalvariabilityandareprobablybiased. Analyst: W , B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sam ple #: M51857-013 Client Sam ple ID: A-2-E Analysis Date: 9/28/10 0 .5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1.5 2 1 0 II* ' ' 1*7.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0 0 90 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 100 0 3 0.5 n 7.5 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (F R ) 10 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 90 Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 900 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 7 .5 O o Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100 A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber D e n sity (E ) in Fibers/ mm2 E= 9.6 fib e rs /m m 2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cm1 C= 0.004 flb e rs /c m 5 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantitlon (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B, Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sample #: M51857-014 Client Sample ID. FB-2-1_______________ Analysis Date: 9/28/10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 40 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 100 P um p Flow Rate, Llters/M lnute (FR) 0 S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) 0 Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V ) 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 0 .............1 0 0 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100 A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 385 0 .0 0 7 8 5 C alc, o f F ib e r D en sity (E ) in Fi bers/ m m 2 fibers/m m 2 o UIIJ C alc, o f F ib er C on c.(C ) In F ib ers/c m 3 0.0 0.0 NA fib e rs /c m Notes: Media Type 25 mm MCE Filter Limit ofQuantition (IOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthanoptimal variability andare probablybiased Analyst: W . B. Egeland Date: R e v ie w e d By: M Mount Date: 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 - m a s Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade m a s sam ple #: M51857-015 Client Sample ID; FB-2-2 Analysis Date; 9/28/10 00 0 0 0 0 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M lnute (FR) 0 00 0 0 0 0 10 Sam ple Tim e, M inutes (T) 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 0 10 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 40 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 2 ........... 100 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 . 00 0 0 0 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 00 0 0 0 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 70 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0,00785 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 Calc, of Fiber D ensity (E) in F ib ers/ m m 2 E= 2.5 fib e rs /m m 2 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 100 C alc, o f F ib er C on c.(C ) in F ib ers/c m 3 2.0 0 1 0 0 1 2.0 C= NA fibers/cm 3 N o te s' Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Lirrutof Quantition (LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range have greaterthanoptimalvariability and are probably biased Analyst: w, b . Egeiand D a te : R e v ie w e d By: M Mount Date: 9 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 9/28/2010 MAS | CLIENT NAME: TEM ANALYSIS M51857-005 M aterials Analytical Services Atlanta CLIENT SAMPLE ID: ! P-2-A 7402 ANALYSIS Sample Area/ Volume: [ Filter Type: Pore size: Effective Filter Area: Sam ple type: Analysis type: Grid Acceptance [ 3 MCE 25mm 0,8 385 Air 7402 YES Liters 5 % Date Analyzed: 10/1/2010 Analyst: Mehrdad Motamedi Scope Number: 4 Accelerating Voltage: 100 KV Indicated Mag: 25 KX Screen Mag: Grid_box: 20 KX 7809 Number of grids: V Number of openings: 22 Average Grid Size: ----- - -- -- - . ........... 0.011556 - ~ #1: J08 #3: 108 # 2 : 106 #4: 108 Total Area Analyzed: j 0.254 j % Asbestos 100 Asbestos j Non-asbestos ! 1' = -- Strrr. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MjUdD ! E1-F1 : F2 ; 1 1 f F3 1 F4 F5 1 1 F6 t . 1 [ F7 1 [ 1 1 j 1 j F8 1 F9 1 ' lit e r 'type jl Size I lAnthophylitfi __ , 36,5 0.5 ICfocidoMe i 19 0,4 ICrocidolite '6 04 llAnthophyiite 1 58 0.5 I n th o p h y lite ______j 8 06 Crocidoliia ,j 9 0,4 Anthophyiite 6,5 0.8 ;Croddoljle ,....... ...... 5.5 03 'iC rocidolite________ > 6 0,4 iCrocidolite 11 0,3 Anthophyiite 7 0.6 CrocidoMe ' 14 1 Arthnphylrc __ 14 0.9 C xadc.ite 22,5 0.5 . C r o c l d o l l t e ______ ; 15 0,8 fCrocidphte................... i 24 1.5 Anthophylite i 8.5 08 1'Anthophyiite 1 12 1 I Anthophv:ite B 0.8 'Crocidclite ! 31 08 iCrocidolite 1 14 0.7 rc ro c d o litc 20 0 5 I'Crocidol.te 8 0 4 Anthophyiite ! 12 1.5 'Anthoohvlite ,, 6 1 iCrocidolite . 13 1 ICrocidol te 6 04 Crocicol te 28 2 Morpii Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole SA KD Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole hite V V V V. y? / 1*/ ! 1 ! */ 29 1 IlAnthODhvlite 17 0.8 A m p h ib o le Amphibole NSD G10 i ..... li .... J 7 30 G9 1 IlAnthODhvlite ' 1 42 0.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole V. 31 1____ jlcrocidplite 1 16 3 A m p h ib o le Amphibole , 32 G8 1 1iCrocictollto___ . J 9 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 33 1__ JjC rocidolite _____ 1 5.8 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole [k. 34 1_____ llAnthophylite ......... 1 6.5 0.9 Amphibole Amphibole .7 35 G7 L ! Crocktolite____ _____ 1 9 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole 36 1 llAnthophylite 18 1 A m p h ib o le Amphibole N 37 [ ......... IjAnthophylite ..........1 11 1.5 Amphibole Amphibole lei 38 1 llAnthophvlite 16 0.8 Amphibole Amphibole itt'i 39 llAnthophvlite 1 6.5 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole N 40 1 liCrocidolite .......... 1 7 0.3 A m p h ib o le Amphibole iv i 41 G6 1 llAnthophvlite 1 6.6 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole K 42 1 JlCroddolite 18 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole Ij'l 43 G5 1 liCrocidolite 1 20 2 Amphibole Amphibole .-I 44 1 liCrocidolite 1 23 0.7 A m p h ib o le Amphibole ; 45 1...... llAnthophylite.. 1 5.7 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole lii 46 1 liCrocidolite ! 58 0,4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole r~T 7 O 47 1 llAnthophvlite 1 5.8 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole J 48 1 liCrocidolite 16 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 49 1,____ jjC racidolite J 11.5 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 7j 50 1 llAnthophvlite 17 0.3 Amphibole Amphibole -/ 51 G4 ( llAnthophvlite ! 28 0.7 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 52 1 llAnthophylite _____ j 12 1 Amphibole Amphibole i 53 1 llAnthophvlite '1 12 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole - 54 1 llAnthophvlite 1 12 1 Amphibole Amphibole 55 1 liCrocidolite 1 18 0.9 A m p h ib o le Amphibole :i 56 1 liCrocidolite 1 175 0.7 A m p h ib o le Amphibole ' 57 1 liCrocidolite 58 1 llAnthophvlite 59 E2-I4 1 IlAnthODhvlite 17 0.7 9 0.9 18 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole 60 f liCrocidolite ..........1 16 0.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 61 1 IlAnthODhvlite 19 0.8 A m p h ib o le Amphibole ' 62 1 liCrocidolite 19 0.6 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 63 1 IlAnthODhvlite 10 1.5 Amphibole Amphibole V 64 I5 1 liCrocidolite 18 1.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole V 65 1 liCrocidolite 1 12 0.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole ' : 66 1 liCrocidolite 1 12 1 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 67 [ _____ llAnthophylite _ _ _ J 6 0.9 Amphibole Amphibole 68 ! liCrocidolite 18 1 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 69 1 liCrocidolite 11 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 70 16 1 liCrocidolite 1 36 3 A m p h ib o le Amphibole V 71 [ llCrqcidol|te___ ............. 16 2 Amphibole Amphibole 72 I liCrocidolite 12 1.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 73 1 liCrocidolite 10 1 Amphibole Amphibole i r 74 I ....... C.rocirlniitn . i6 0.3 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 75 j _ ...... ; Crocidolite _ . ,, . 1 24.5 0.9 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 76 1 llAnthoohvhte " 1 10 0.6 Amphibole Amphibole 77 [ IlAnthODhvlite 17 0.9 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 78 I IjA n th o p h y lite 17 1.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 79 1..........liCrocidolite . 1 9.8 0.3 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 80 1 liCrocidolite 1 5.8 0.8 Amphibole Amphibole 81 IlAnthODhvlite _____ 1 8.5 0.4 Amphibole Amphibole 82 I IlAnthophvlite [ 10 0.6 A m p h ib o le Amphibole Ip : 83 I7 i _ _ __IC rggdpljte__________ | 12 0.8 A m p h ib o le Amphibole K, 84 I8 | IlCrocidolite | 24 0.34 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 12 85 L .,, __ llCrocido[Ite________j 10 0.6 A m p h ib o le Amphibole .1 86 I9 L .. llAnthpphyJile___ 7.5 04 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 87 I IlAnthophvlite I6 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole JP 88 I IlCrocidolite |6 0.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole m. 89 I IlCrocidolite | 14 0.8 A m p h ib o le Amphibole A 90 i llAnthophylite I 7.6 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole v': 91 l Croeidolite I6 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole m 92 I IlCrocidolite i 12.5 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 'Bi 93 ! llAnthoDhvlite 12 0.8 Amphibole Amphibole E&- 94 [ IlCrocidolite J8 2 A m p h ib o le Amphibole sj 95 I IlAnthophvlite I 6.3 0.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 96 [ IlCrocidolite J7 0.3 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 97 [_____ SlMh'ophyiite 1 22 1.5 A m p h ib o le Amphibole 98 1 icrocidoiite ~ 1 35 0.7 A m p h ib o le Amphibole & 99 | .....Anthophylite J 15 2 A m p h ib o le A m p h ib o le A 100 1 IlAnthophvlite 18 1 A m p h ib o le Amphibole yj 101 I IlAnthophvlite 1 7.5 0.4 A m p h ib o le Amphibole r>;! # Grid Op 22 M 51857 005 personal right Sample Comments: Cwmts Utftttow, * &2__k*_____ _____._..._...._..._.. _i_1_ -M--S--l-.$.--5.--`7J-ij--0--0-S----0--&-'-a--^-V-----r* .... )...... ' 529 1 396 Si : NShg ]j MSQO 1 .2 G 2,560 3.0*J0 5,120 6.400 7,080 0.900 10.040 #*R$y Eftsriiy (KeV) :Itili! 32,5, Utifflri3,7 Si |M S1887;005*04iV W X-Jty.aE.ninogy(,Km *,oo . ^ s U' n 4 m * *&>~*~i . : - .................... y r----------------- 1---------M---3-i-!-j-VrOOril>iOr'0Sil;" ' .......1................................... ' .................................'.............. ...................---------------- n w Si 853 see Q yjrits O.OO 1 ,2 t a l l i i jjl.t' iliil Ml .S 60 S, JU?t8itdfc!dltm!i 27t..4 - MSl9-?4oS'ti. .. :T*----------------------------------------------i"|--------------------------------------------------------- 11---------------------------------------------------------11.................................... -- ...................-,'"""J"lrf........ .. 1-- *-- 1......................... .......... r -- -- r " 5 f Si 3S 239 1 No|q | 1 flllk i t MH. , Ty"..,................... 1.280 .. zsto F8t 1 1 1 Hl i j F iiak jfl 3.840 .S.>20 - MOO. ' ' 7480 8.000 X-y ntm (KV> 129 O.S40 Ojftts 1...................... 1....................---------------------------------------------------- *TO ( :" /-V.,, Uyt|ini* 21,6 ' M58S7-05-SS8U; ....................... ......... 1.................................!------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------T-------------------------j------- t 720 480 Si N 11 240 M te 1l 1 1 1 0 ,0 0 0 ..... 1..............................t ......................... i ' i.280 2.360 3,840 X-R.jyEmwOieV) i .............................. I.............................. I...... ................... * .................. S.120 6.408 7,880 8.060 * " V JO,2 4 0 ''US'iilttimmft' *IS0,,1* n ........ ......... t...................... y............'....... T - - -- toSl*S?>S-089m- .s .......... T .......... .......... i i i , l . 1171 SI 878 1 1I SOS 1 292 L fM i Jm 0,600 7 M o . 2.S6 . 3.040 512ft 6,400 7,680 8.960 *0,240 X*RVEftfcr}?(KoV) 40,t U i i t t M i i s . i '____________ ____________ 'i . M318S,?-QO!}-010i; - 1 ' ' ' ' ' 1171 Si 878 Njig i 0,000 L2S0 2.3S0 - 3.840 X-Rv5E,n12<0jy (KV) 4.400 1 T .4 8 0 8 .9 0 10,240 <whu$ {Ultimi* 31,? W 5837-00^D 40ll Counts .Opiats: ' Osusts --Q -- ---- --- TM _ _ , --7 -- UTT----t-----f----w------,-'----1--,--0------------11------"-------*------"-- ii t--' r; < .... 1 --**"ir-'j"-w---..-.-.-..-.-.H-.-S.-.J-.8.-.-.-.7.-.--.j1-.B.-.-.S.-.--.0-..-8.-.-..-i.-l..-.........***' 1 ' * ' 1....""-".y"--------- -, ............................... * ' 228 Si Nata I iiilil 0.000 1.200 2.500 FB 3,040 X-fcsv5E4nt2rg0y (KV) 4 0 0 ?,6S0' 0.9$0 m 1 4 57 10.240 Osane *R4%6S38,9 . -tV.l.li.m..f.e..i.....7.,..1....... ^r~-- . SI . - t________ M S S 5 7 - Q a S l 0 p n . ' ' * 1 ' 402 489* 1 324 M gj I Na II 1 0.000 : 1,280 2.360 3,040 X-8*y 5,o!2?o0y{KV) 4.400 I 7,400 8,040 143 O .240 SECTION 6 MAS IO: Client Name: Project Name: Logged By: MAS, LLC. PROJECT COC M 5 1 8 6 3 _____________________________ Materials Analytical Services Atlanta ECL AC Resin Pipe Cutting Electric Saw ddmount Client Job No: Client PO: Date In: Client Code: 9/28/2010 MASCORP TRANSPORT INFORMATION; Submitted By: Delivery By: Received By: Condition; Michael Mount, CIH Hand Delivery Nancy Sears good Documents: COC Comments for COC: CONTACT INFORMATION: Contact: Bill Longo Title: Mr. First Name: William Last Name: Longo Suffix W ork Phone: (770) 866-3200 Ext: Other Phone: Ext: Fax: (770) 866-3259 # Client ID 000 lab blank 001 A-03-A 002 A-03-B 003 A-03-C 004 A-03-D 005 P-3-A 006 P-3-B 007 P-3-C 008 P-3-D 009 A-3-A 010 A-3-B 011 A-3-C 012 A-3-D 013 A-3-E 014 FB-3-1 015 FB-3-2 RECEIVED BY: SAMPLE INFORMATION: V o lu m e # 0 540 100 540 500 2.4 2.32 2.44 2.64 8.16 8.24 8.2 7.52 900 0 0 Client ID SIGNATURES V o lu m e INDUSTRIAL h . GIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY Page of Z\2CFp1 AP MAS. COMPANY NAME 0 / f c j . L L C ; 0<&pt H ADDRESS: 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259 PHONE: FAX: TURNAROUND TIMES: 1 DAY PROJECT NUMBER 3 DAYS STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS DATE SAMPLE NUMBER SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE MEDIA ANALYSIS DESIRED START TIME STOP TIME TOTAL TIME MINUTES PRE FLOW RATE LPM POST FLOW RATE LPM AVG. FLOW RATE LPM Total Volume Liters W E T A -C T -A <, / f) p- 8ixM <x K/ a, o d . . !\) TS ,S) Mix) K i> itJcfkp t' , R i %LAAVi f i l e r 7 4 0 0 ____ 1 7 ^ 0 *. -7 ^ ~79Q~^ SSL. i____ >W T O H ... _____ 1______ -- T ~-- ...5 . . ........ J & S L 7 ........ A.O ............... 0.0 /o. 1 .... ........... { V tf.n Z.o H.U .. i . ' . . A D , ? .... S 'H O .... 2.0 ~ 1 W I 0 l$ ..(S>,0.. Tr ro v -- ll c y 0 \y Mf)---3 - A >-.....'B A(VJ> . 6 v f ....... 7 I T * \X L. S i r. y\>wCi* ! ujt~ h)Z 1 --------------- t S r - , ------o*J-- >s a)U) / \ T o n W T W T iT T ^ 1 VXX- T - 1 f T v I t ? Z/ i j K , J , } / 2_ a .." \4 _____ ? y o A j J f j ____s 74& > W <4C^ ___Si f S.S 7C J-0 7 * */ 4 :3 r _____ ____ ..jJ T L , ... ..M ... -2 .0 , iE * *$>? m? /< ? X X .. i . t,^> *^* _JdL 2. to . 2u2L 2 2. t> n /O . z' ..i g ... -- R -li z * -- ',,fe>,,).... ... M l - . . . . ...iie__ y- 2 ,0 4 ? . ii* 2 ,0 ft ....... ........................ 2 ,0 $ - 2. 2- XJB L / ip f i O <D 5jrT-P.*!;..-*T...-.. t1-.. __ li o X C H A IN O F CUSTODY NAME First Transfer by: ji /O ^ ^ Second Transfer by: Third Transfer by: COMPANY MODE OF : TRANSFER c ..... LOG IN DATE RECEIVED BY 9 -2& -i ( o-JG . ---- .........g jrC--O---M*P---A--N---Y----------------- fVXV-Y O l Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 MAS Project: Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-001 Client Sample ID: A-03-A Analysis Date: 9/29/10 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 10 1 0 0 20 0 0 0 11 . 0 0 0 .5 0 0 0 .5 0 11 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 20 0 2 0 10 0 0 1 2.5 Notes: 0 0 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 2 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 1 90 0 0 100 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) 10.8 ______50_____ Total Sam ple V olum e, Liters (V) 540 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (F C S ) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 12.5 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100 A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 C alc, of Fiber D ensity (E ) In F ib ers/ m m 2 e=| - l . - r 1519 ftb e rs /m m 2 C alc, o f Fiber C o n c.(C ) In F lb ers/cm J C= < 0.011 fl:bers/cm3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantitlon (LOQ) = 7 fibere/mm2 Fibercounts outsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range have greaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: m . Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 MAS Project: Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sam ple#: M518635-002 Client Sample ID: A-03-B Analysis Date: 9/29/10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 40 10 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 . 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 100 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) 2 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 50 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 100 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 1.0 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 E= 1.3 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm3 fi` 1.0 Notes: 0 0 1 0 0 1.0 ] o < * 0.027 fibers/cm3 Media Type. 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300 fibers/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimalvariability andare probably biased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 MAS Project: Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-003 Client Sample ID: A-03-C Analysis Date: 9/29/10 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 0.5 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I;,- " I n 5.5 Notes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 30 1 1 0 0 40 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V ) Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple {FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 10.8 50 540 15.5 100 0 0.5 0 0 50 0 0 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100 0 3 60 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 A rea o f Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= fibers/mm2 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 100 1 1 4.5 15.5 1 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm3 C= 0.014 fibers/cm 1 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) * 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreater thanoptimal variability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland__________________________ D a te :_________ 9 /2 9 /2 0 1 0 Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-004 Client Sample ID: A-03-D Analysis Date: 9/29/10 11 00 00 20 00 20 10 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 0 ,5 0.5 00 00 ! 8.5 1.5 Notes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Pum p Flow R ate, Llters/M inute (FR) 10 0 10 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 50 0 0 20 0 1 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 500 8 .5 100 0 100 0 60 0 0 70 A rea of Filter, m m 2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 C alc, o f F ib e r Density (E ) in F ib ers/ m m 2 fibers/m m 2 * C alc, o f Fib er C on c.(C ) in Fib ers/cm 1 CO '2 1I 8.5' a c= p o CO fibers/cm '* Media Type- 25 mm MCE Filter Limit ofQuantition(LOQ) =7fibers/mm2 Fibercounts outsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthan optimal variability andare probably biased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-005 Client Sample ID :___________ P-3-A_________ Analysis Date: 9/29/10 29 21,5 19 22 8.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 $?> . .1 0 0 .0 2.5 4 5.5 5.5 3.5 21 6 5 5 .5 5 2 2 3 .5 12 5 1 4 3 25 Notes: 3 5.5 Pum p Flow Rate, Llters/M inute (FR) 0.6 5 2 .5 10 Sam ple Tim e, M inutes (T) 4 8 1 5 2 .5 20 Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 2.4 30 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) 40 Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 100 23 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 60 Area of Filter, m m 2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA) 0 . 100 385 0.00785 80 C alc, o f Fib er D ensity (E ) In Fibers/ m m 2 E= 553.9 fib e rs /m m 2 90 100 19 11.5 1 0 0 : 0 I C alc, o f F iber C on c.(C ) in F ib ers/cm 3 c= 8 8 .8 fibers/cm 3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of Ouantitlon (LOQ) = 7 flbers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthanoptimalvanabilityand are probablybiased. Analyst: W . B. Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-006 Client Sample ID: P-3-B Analysis Date: 9/29/10 28,5 7 7 6 5.5 32,5 8.5 5 8 7 41 6 11.5 7 8.5 28.5 6 7 3.5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5} . , IIM30.5 27.5 30.5 24.5 27 3 4 10 6 6 20 P um p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR ) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 0.58 4 2.3 30 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) 40 Total Fields Counted. S am ples (FLS) 60 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 60 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (G FA ) 130.5 20 0 100 385 0.00785 80 C alc, o f F ib e r D en sity (E ) in F ib ers/ m m 2 E= '831.2 fibers/m m 2 90 100 21 130.5 C alc, o f Fib er C o n c.(C ) in Fibers/cm s O 137.9 fib ers/cm s Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter LimitofQuantition(LOQ) =7flbers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibecs/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: w, B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-007 Client Sam ple ID: P-3-C Analysis Date: 9/29/10 3 6 ,5 37,5 3 3 .5 4 0 ,5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 1 448.0. 7 8 4 14 3.5 8 7.5 7 6 9 10 5 4 13.5 6 5 11 6 2 14.5 7 20 Pum p Flow Rate, Liters/M inute (FR ) Sam ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sam ple Volum e, Liters (V) 0.6 1 4 2 .4 4 30 Total Fibers Counted, Sam ple (FC S) 40 Total Fields Counted, Sam ples (FLS) 148 20 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 60 A rea of Filter, mm2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) 0 30 385 0 .0 0 7 8 5 80 C alc, o f F iber D ensity (E) in Fib ers/ m m 2 E= 942.7 fibers/mm2 90 100 31 25.5 26.5 40 .5 2 4 .5 148^0 C alc, o f Fiber C on c.(C ) In Fibers/cm J C= 148.7 fib e rs /c m 3 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quant'itkm (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm 2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimalvanability andareprobably biased. Analyst: W , B. Egeland D a te : Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 9 /2 0 1 0 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sam ple#: M51863-008 Client Sample ID: P-3-D Analysis Date: 9/29/10 15 2 1.5 9.5 2 22 2 2 8 3 0 7 10 13.5 3 5 0 15.5 6.5 2.5 3 2 3.5 3 0.5 20 9.5 2 1 4.5 2 0 6 .5 1 17.5 3 0 2.5 3 2 2.5 8 0 30 2 2.5 2.5 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 0.66 4 2.64 _ 102_ __36__ ___ 0___ _ ,,J00_ Area of Filter, mm (AF) Graticule Field Area, M M 2 (GFA) _ _385___ 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm E= 3 6 0 . 9 fibers/mm1 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cm' f 102.0 22 14 30 23 13 |l0 2 .0 C= 5 2 . 6 Rbers/cm1 Notes. MediaType: 25mmMCE Filler Limit of Quantltlon (LOO) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidetbe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased Analyst: W . B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9 /2 9 /2 0 1 0 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 - Electric Saw , Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M518 6 3 -0 0 9 Client Sample ID: A-3-A Analysis Date: 9 /2 9 /1 0 57 15 14 15.5 7.5 5 88.5 10 17.5 12.5 10 18.5 10 77 17.5 17.5 10.5 14.5 17 72 13.5 14.5 11.5 16 16.5 20 Pump Flow Rate, ters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 2.04 4 8.1 S 0 0 30 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 274.5 0 40 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 20 0 0 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 0 60 0 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 385 0 70 Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 0.00785 0 0 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2 st CO -st h 0 E= fibers/mm2 0 90 0 0 WS. 100 fir . L 2 7 4 J L 56 63.5 50 48 57 W S B & Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Flbers/cm3 C= I - 82.5 fibers/cm3 Notes: Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantitlon (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range have greaterthan optimalvariability andare probablybiased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-010 Client Sample ID: A-3-B Analysis Date: 9/29/10 44.5! 7.5 9 6.5 60.5: 8.5 7 8 56.5 13 9.5 9.5 45 9 11.5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11.5 17 20 10 8 16.5 14 4.5 20 30 40 50 60 70 Pum p Flow Rate, Llters/M lnute (FR) S am ple Tim e, M inutes (T) Total Sample Volume. Liters (V) Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 2.06 4 8.24 _ 2 0 6 .5 _ ____20____ ____ 0____ ___100___ __ 385___ 0.00785 80 C alc, o f F ib er D en sity (E ) In F ib ers/ m m 2 E = ||# "y -> ' 1315.3 fib ers/m m 2 90 Notes: 100 WXMk 38 37 30 49 52.5 206.5 C alc, o f Fiber C on c.(C ) In Flbers/cm ' , e T slib e rs/cm 3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greater than optimal vanabllity andare probably biased. Analyst: W. B, Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M, Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM M AS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M 5 1 863-011 Client Sample ID: A-3-C___________ Analysis Date: 9/29/10 68.5 16 15 20 7 10.5 81.5 11.5 19.5 15.5 18.5 16.5 10 81 19.5 17.5 15 17.5 11.5 71 13.5 19 17.5 11.5 9.5 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 2.05 4 8.2 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) _302 __ - .2 0 ,,_ _ _ 0 ____ ___1 0 0 _ _ Area of Filter, mrrr (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) ___3 8 5 ___ 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm E= 1 9 2 3 6 fibers/mm Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/crri* > 2 .0 Notes: 60.5 71 68 54.5 48 > 0 2 . 0 C=| - V "T ;9 0 .3 fibers/cm3 Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) - 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercounts outsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2range havegreaterthan optimalvariability and are probablybiased. Analyst: W. B, Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-012 Client Sample ID: A-3-D___________ Analysis Date: 9/29/10 62.5 18.5 6 17 14.5 6.5 60 12 19.5 10 6 12.5 10 64 10.5 15.5 12 8 18 66 16.5 8.5 18 10.5 11.5 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 1.88 4 7.52 251.5 20 0 0 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) 0 0 Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 100 .0 60 0 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 385 0 70 Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 0.00785 0 0 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) in FI bers/mm2 0 E- ..=1601,9 fibers/mm2 0 90 0 ........ --------- 0 100 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cm3 f e l 5 ' 57.5 49.5 57 39 46.5I 251.5 ] o 8 2 .0 Notes: Media Type' 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm5 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased. Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sam ple#: M51863-013 Client Sample ID: A-3-E Analysis Date: 9/29/10 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 Q0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 40 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 1.5 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 0 00 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 11 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 10 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 1 0 90 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 100 *s|\ 3 1 3.5 2 0.5 Notes: Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 10 90....... 900 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 1 0 ......... Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) ^ ^ r ^ 0 .... ....... ^ ,.^ .rrJPP______ Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= flbers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Flbers/cmJ o om C= fibers/em' Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit of Quantitlon (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm 2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300tibers/mm2rangehave greaterthanoptimalvariability andare probably biased. Analyst: W. B, Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 - Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M 51863-014 Client Sample ID; FB-3-1______________ Analysis Date: 9/29/10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II ' fc'0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 40 0 0 50 0 0 60 0 0 70 0 0 80 0 0 90 0 0 100 0 0 .0 Pump Flow Rate, Llters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T) Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) ............0 ............ 0 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 0 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 _____^_100______ Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0,00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= 7.0 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm1 c- NA fibers/cm' Notes: Media Type. 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehave greaterthan optimalvanability andare probablybiased Analyst: W. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sample #: M51863-015 Client Sam ple ID: FB-3-2 Analysis Date: 9/29/10 Notes: 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 10 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 20 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 30 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 40 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 50 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 60 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 70 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 80 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 90 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 100 Pump Flow Rate, Llters/Minute (FR) 0 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 0 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 0 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 0 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 100 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 0 100........... Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) 385 0.00785 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 E= < 7 .0 fibers/mm2 Calc, of Fiber Conc.(C) In Fibers/cm3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 C= NA fibers/cm3 jjlll o: di XI Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of Quantition (LOQ) 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidethe 100-1300fibers/mm2rangehavegreaterthanoptimalvanabilityand are probablybiased. Analyst: W, B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: M. Mount Date: 9/29/2010 10/4/2010 Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM MAS Project: AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade MAS Sam ple #: M 51863- Client Sample ID: Analysis Date: 0 .0 Notes: Pump Flow Rate, Uters/Minute (FR) 0 10 Sample Time, Minutes (T) 0 20 Total Sample Volume, Liters (V) 30 Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) 40 Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS) 0__ _ j o o ___ 50 Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB) 60 Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) 70 Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA) ___ o____ __ 3 8 5 _ _ 0.00785 80 Calc, of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2 -E 7,0 fibers/mrrr 90 100 J .O Calc, of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/cm5 C= < #D!V/0! fibers/cm' Media Type: 25 mm MCE Filter Limit o( Quantition (LOQ) = 7 fibers/mm2 Fibercountsoutsidetile 100-1300nbers/mm2range havegreaterthan optimal variability andare probably biased Analyst: w. B. Egeland Date: Reviewed By: m . Mount Date: INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY Page. of ; cm AP f MAS. 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259 COMPANY NAME !ih,} l l c { &fif IM. A D D R E S S :_________________________________ _____________ PHONE: FAX: TURNAROUND TIMES: ______ 1 DAY PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: P f i t P ,'C -e^ C l H / a I . z f e . C 'h ' r ^ W ORK - AREA- ^`s D---E--S--C--R---i-P-rTlOi "*** i s i , ? W i PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE: 1 { K e . Y f l SAMPLING DATE: i k zU( 3 DAYS STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS S /ffS J CHAIN o r CUSTODY First T ransfer by: Second Transfer by: Third Transfer by: NAME COMPANY MODE OF LOG IN DATE RECEIVED BY TRANSFER/ S 5 r 'q - S 6 - S > Op^ro-vyc>-IS COMPANY .. ( Y \ 'P T o INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY Page. of z . '-S * ... W k xu- M AS. ^ ADDRESS: 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259 PHONE: FAX: TURNAROUND TIMES: ./ 1 DAY ---i--t--- PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: P ft Pif}^ CJiAI SfUU W ORK AREA D E S C R IP Tio l: ^ PRO JECT REPRESENTATIVE: Yfi&l mOT___________ SAMPLING DATE: ? k j j/Q 3 DAYS STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS DATE SAMPLE NUMBER SA M PLE LOCATION SAMPLE M E D IA ANALYSIS DESIRED START T IM E STOP T IM E H ~7 A . - I W - . . % 144- --------- E y/ n .-- m ,E Z .,, h *#*1 tsm A. i i A) ir .d u M 1 U W * * j ..........-- ------------ J/ M j .......^ Aj l ) * tr flC z W f o . ' .......I ... _ 2,'' S S L . 7^a 1 1 11 7 W 5s >/ m _____ -- ...- 4 : 0% ? y o -^ s ft , n / ......U -- A Ql , l .r3tf - IT,,.. vA H --------- 2 - s. > \/ / -------------------------------- f A i / / "* ----------------- I. I ft- _-- *^ - T f) U- ________i-------------- L * - ____ \ 3j y tc W ' 1 CLv, i J 12 tTT ... T=V.L , Vi *MyVl- I -------------------- r. 1, ....................................... \/ *f n ... ___ s / s ;i> s y/ H -riT TOTAL TIM E M IN U T E S ^D Vf . ' J M L .-- PRE FLOW RATE LPM POST FLOW RATE LPM is J L . P / O . /A S 7 <L. O / / , s> AVG. FLOW RATE LPM l > ` % 2 ,0 Total Volum e Liters ------ -- ----------1 S TH O j O , V 7 0 ,/ /0 . 5 T 0 P ......... . Cf V 1T 3 t ls ~ . > (,0 . (oS? ..- ...k . ..2z. ,4 -f -fo i * ( n ( * .... 2* r ^ ..... h k$. 7 /6 2 . % - I l o . ...... 2 i & ^ _ ..... ^ . ^ s ___ im 1 0 . / > . ^ /- i > .... ..... o .. o p p E r*-- L ___ft <4___ A / ra -L rtfi 1P C - f e p t L - t k n i c . ` * / ............... .... ^ ______ ^ ^ ______ r ---------^5^ CHAIN OF CUSTODY F i r c t T r a n s f e r h v : ,/,, Q o rn n rl T ra n s fe r hv: Third Transfer by: NAME iTniT^ ---------------- COMPANY MODE OF TRANSFER m L / LOG IN DATE RECEIVED BY q - g f c - i ( \xj~cx^O~I5, COMPANY ---- ----------------------C...................................... (W rT O MAS CLIENT NAME: TEM ANALYSIS M51863-005 Materials Analytical Services Atlanta CLIENT SAMPLE ID: [ _ _ _ P-Z -A 7402 ANALYSIS Sample Area/ Volume: Filter Type: Pore size: Effective Filter Area: Sample type: Analysis type: Grid Acceptance 2.4 MCE 25mm 0.8 385 Air 7402 YES Liters 5 0 Date Analyzed: Analyst: Scope Number: Accelerating Voltage: Indicated Mag: Screen Mag: Grld_box: 10/1/2010 A. Keeton 2 100 25 20 7710 Number of grids: 3 Number of openings: 14 __________ Average Grid Size: 0.012100 #1: | 110 #3: 110 #2: | 110 #4: 110 i------------------- 1 Total Area Analyzed: | 0.169 j Asbestos Non-asbestos | ^ . _ | KV KX KX % Asbestos 100 Str#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SquarelD. Fiber Type- Size I A5-A2 jiA n th o o h v lIte 16.2 1.1 llAnthpphylile 21.4 0.6 IlCrocidoiite 8.7 0.6 1 | Anthophylite 13.5 0.5 llAnlhoobviite 14.8 0.4 I'Anthophylito 6.5 0.6 A3 I'Anthophylite " llAmhODrivlite ! llAnthoohviite | ||Anthophylite | llAnthophylile 1 Crocidolite !Anthophylite !.Anthophylite B10 1 lAnthophvlite 1 liAnthophvlite ! Crocicioliie 7.2 1.1 14 2 7.1 1 9 1.2 13 0.4 5.8 0.3 14 1.5 14.1 0.4 6.2 0.8 8.5 0.5 7 0 45 1 IjAnthopbylite 8 0.5 1 fcm cldoliie 12.1 0.3 . jiA m h o p h y jite _______ 14 0.5 j D2 ! pCrocidolilB Ifcroddoiite i 7.1 0.4 i 8.5 0.3 I i'Anthophvlite [ 22 5 04 j ||Anthophylite | 5.1 0.6 [ |[Crocidolite ___ j 17.1 0.8 1 nthophvllte | 18 2 i Anthophylite 67 0.4 ] Crocidolite 23.1 1.5 Morph: Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole A m p h ib o le A m p h ib o le A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le A m p h ib o le Amphibole SAED- Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole EDS' y y> y & y ?>/ y y; y yi Wt- j EI iil y - y 5 / 29 I AnthODhvlite J 10.2 0.5 30 I IlAnthophvlite J 9 0.5 31 i llAnthoohvllte J 68 0.4 32 [ IlCroddolite _ _ " I 11.3 0.3 33 l IiAnthophylite........... " 1 8.5 0.5 34 1 ilAnthophvlite J j 5.8 0.3 35 !..... iiAnthophylite_____ ,, J 15.5 2.2 30 1 iiAnthophylite 20.8 0.6 37 1 IlAnthophvlite I 13 2 36 1 IiAnthophylite . i 13.5 0.3 39 1 IlCroddolite H 13.3 0.6 40 D4 1 IlAnthophvlite 7 0.6 41 1 IlCroddolite _ J 10.1 0.4 42 1 IlCroddolite 85.5 2 43 1 IlAnthophvlite j 48.6 2 44 IlAnthophvlite 7 0.5 45 1 IlCroddolite Z 2 13.5 0.5 46 S_____ ]|Crpcidolite ___ J 18 5 0.4 47 G2 1 IlCroddolite 3 22.5 2.7 48 1 IlCroddolite " 1 10.2 0.3 49 ( jjcrocldollte 1 ] 5.1 0.4 50 1 IlCroddolite ] 31.8 0.3 51 G10 1 IlAnthophvlite _ J 23 1.5 52 1 IlCrocidolite __ I 17 1 0.3 53 1 IjCrocidolite . ....I 35.1 0.5 54 1 rAnthophylite ...J 5 5 0.6 55 ! IlCroddolite _ J 17.3 2 56 j IjCrocidolite - J R 35.1 0.6 57 1 IlAnthophvlite .J 9 0.4 58 1 IlCroddolite J 11.8 06 59 A6-A3 1 IlAnthophvlite j 16.3 1.5 60 [ IlCroddolite 9 0.3 61 1 IlCroddolite _ i 5.3 0.3 62 1 IlAnthophvlite I 118 0.4 63 1 IlAnthophvlite i 6.7 0.3 64 A4 1 IlAnthophvlite I 9 0.3 65 t IlAnthophvlite I 7 0.4 66 1 IlAnthophvlite J 5.8 0.5 67 C3 1 IlAnthophvlite , .J 9 0.4 68 1_____ ||Anthophy]ite _ j 13.5 1.1 69 j IlCroddolite _ J 13 1 8 70 I IlCroddolite ] 51 0.3 71 1 IlAnthophvlite J 11.2 0.5 72 j , JlAnthophylite____ ] 7 1 73 1 IlAnthophvlite I 7 1.1 74 j_____ IiAnthophylite __ ] 7.5 1.1 75 D8 1 J-Anthophylite 76 1 jlAnthophylite I 6.3 0.3 j 30 6 1 77 1 iiAnthophylite I 10 8 0.8 78 j_____ !lAnthoplwIite____ .. j 6.5 0.8 79 1 IlAnthophvlite i 18.6 05 80 1 __ j[Cragpolite I 14.8 0.8 81 F2 1 IlCroddolite I 6.9 0.3 82 1 JlAnthophylite_____ . J 9 1 Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole @ M N M fl H H M H H H t' il H M iaf R M e M m m H M y U! u M R R N R R 0 M R H R R li vl R I i I t ! ,, R R V; R . I 83 I liAnthophylite 1 6.7 0.8 1 84 i IlAnthophylite _____ 10.6 0.8 ~ J 85 A7-D6 [ IlAnthophylite 29.3 1 J 85 I ........llA o thoe hylie. . 22.6 0.6 87 L ,, . JlCrosjdpKte, ~3 7.5 0.3 88 i llAnthophvlite i 10.3 0.8 1 89 [ ____ IlCrocidollte...... .. ____ j 16.1 0.4 90 i llAnthoohvlite 18 1 91 ! tlAnthophvlite 1 6.5 1.1 'ZI1 92 f IfAnthophylite 6.8 0.3 i 93 l llAnthoohvlite 7 0.3 i 94 F7 I llAnthoohvlite _____ 6.9 0.5 95 | IlAnthophylite 1 7.1 1.1 ... j 96 I IlCrocidollte ! 13 0.4 97 I llAnthoohvlite 9.3 0.4 .. 98 I IlCrocidollte I9 0.3 99 I IlCrocidollte 72 1.8 1 100 C Z Z l& th o p h y lite ,, 13.8 0.4 1 101 1 IlCrocidollte 8.5 0.4 I 102 1 IlCrocidollte 17.1 0.3 # Grid Op 14 M 51863 005 jpgrsonal right Sample Comments: Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole A m p h ib o le Amphibole Amphibole Osants Co-uro? Qj&ts ' Ctmts Cauris ' Cojftt Counts Cofits Cmr.ts Owat Ceum Gttt&ts-v ,0o t - QwAtt I f B lM fc i lM I-- -- llp lti -- BBM Wtam 'm m W is. III y Ui * ,,* ^smf. Vw K. r '' I S|^ m Hf Wmmm WmSiM m pp' . tm '; ' : - ' : ' r. ,'' ' W ^ ' :M J P i P 1"1