Document QXoqwE3J3X9jxK1OqXedgwwO5

Table 6.5. Summary of Published Data - Asbestos Emissions from Brake Lining Use Publication Sourcl' Lynch, 1968 ltat~:h, 1970 ltickish ond Knight, 1970 Bush E.! al., 1972 Jacko and OuChftrme, 1973 (contains sa.., datn as Jacko _ll ol., 1973) Method Used to Collect Emission or Debris Samples LaborAtory simulations utilizing brake-testing machines or dynamometers. Samples collected on 0.6 ~ pore eize membrane filters. II dust cloud was generated by using compressed air jete to remove dust fro111 brnke linings in an auto repair gnroge. Samples were collected by means of a hand pump locoted in center of dut cloud. Samples were collected directly from debris remaining as brake dust and from membrane filters exposed during brake cleAning operations utilizing compressed air. Filter pore si~ i not ~iven. Laboratory ~imulations utilizin~ n disc broke assembly 1!10Unt"d on nn inc rt I a 1 dyMmometer. Samrles were collected on suitable filter paper. Samrl<'R lol<'re ,:;on~ratcd by npcratlnr, a Atanunrd Aml!ricon cur on a dynRtnorneter aimuhtln~ driving conditions. Brnkc nnd clutch assemblies wore enclosed by specially designed coll~ctors. Sntnplea were collected from l) dropouts during usc, 2) dust retained in linin~: nAocmh tics, and 1) a! rborne sample a collected on membrane filters. l'lethod Used to Detennine Asbestos Content of Emission Debris Samples Electron micrographs full. a ta ted ~stated 1\sbutoa Partielt- She Dbtribution Not discussed Asbestos Content o Emission or Debris <1%, except under aevere-atreaa conditions 94% of fibers fell in 2-5 ~~~ lenp,th category. Only 6% were longer than 5 ~~~. '-l:t Not discussed 1.6% and leu Neutron activation Optical and electron microscopy Not d!scuued 30'% of fibers vere from 0.2S-D.50 um in len~tth; 60% were lon11cr than 0.5 ~m. ., '-44% (this ftr.ure is not accurate; see discussion in Section 6.4.1.1) 0.23% overall avera11e (nn independent check done by Datclle Labs gave a figure of 0.171%) ..,.. .r ~ "T1 e3n: e0n .~...... ....... "' I I I I I Table 6.5. Summary of Published Data- Asbestos Emissions from Brake Lining Use (Cont'd) Publication Source Rohl !.1;. Ill.. 1976 Als tl! !!! !.!. , 1976 Method Used to CollPct Emission or Dcbrls Samples. Ten samples of automobile bukr. drum dusts were collcctrd from wtintl'nonn shCips in the New York area. 11cthud Usud ln 11<tcrmlne /uo~UI~Alml Content of Eml11slon Debris Snmples X-ray diffrRctometYy Tranamiaaion electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction, and electron microprobe analyses Samples were taken from fresh and worn brake linings and fro~ the stmospherl! near a freeway. Electron microscopy ond electron diffraction 1\"htJlOH rart icle S l~e Distribution 80% or Cihcu were shorter th&n 0.4 ~m length, Majority wl!rc <2 ~Ill in maxiiiUIII linear diml!nsion, AabcAtos Content of Emission or Debris 2-15%1 averaae of 3-&% Consistent with, but lover than, quantitativi! determination made by x-ray diffractometry; no pl!rcenta,l!a are ..given No percent rtsure' ~ atvea; however, conclusion vaa that major effect of braking appears to be ln aeparatins bunrhe8 or fibn!R and reducina their ~erase lensth, but not ln altering their crystal structure t- ~~ '~ ., sen: 0 ~ c...o... .. ,_.. ;o '">mm' ~ :X: D :I Q.. '.,G-z<)\ gomn n .~ if 6o) \ Q ENVIRONMENTAL RES~ARCH 12, 110-128 (1976) TEXT Asbestos Exposure during Brake Lining Maintenance and Repair1 ARTHUR N. RoHL, ARTHUR M. LANGER, MARYS. WoLFF, AND IRVING WEISMAN Environmental Sciences Laboratory, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10029 Received December 10, 1975 Data obtained on asbestos exposure of garage mechanics during brake lining maintenance and repair work show that fiber concentrations frequently in excess of regulated limits are common. The presence of chrysolite. ranging from 2 to 15%, in brake drum dusts, was demonstrated by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy. selected area electron diffraction, and electron microprobe analyses. Unaltered chrysotile was found, both in fiber and fibril form, in air and brake drum dust samples. The chrysolite asbestos content of personal air samples. taken during automobile brake repair work, was measured both by optical and electron microscopic techniques. While a positive correlation exists between the types of measurements, the present technique of optically counting asbestos fibers may considerably underestimate the levels of total asbestos exposure. INTRODUCTION During the past decade, significant disease risk has been found associated with the inhalation of asbestos fibers in a number of occupational and environmental circumstances other than in asbestos mining, milling and manufacturing, where serious hazard was already known (Wagner et al., 1960; Newhouse and Thompson, 1965; Selikoff et al., 1964, 1965; Harries, 1968). . Such exposures were found in the construction industry and in shipbuilding, as well as in other industrial settings where asbestos products were used. More recently, asbestos exposure has been suggested to occur during automotive brake lining repair and installation work, and measurable concentrations of asbestos fiber were observed in the work environment of workmen involved in these opera- tions (Hickish and Knight, 1970; Hatch, 1970; Boillat and Lob, 1973). With limited data available, however, uncertainty remained regarding the type and extent of asbestos exposure during this work. Some investigators have questioned whether free asbestos fibers survive the high temperatures produced during braking action (Lynch, 1968; Hickish and Knight, 1970; Hatch, 1970) contending that asbestos decomposes as a result of the high point contact temperatures produced at the interface of the brake drum or disc and brake lining. We have sought to obtain information concerning asbestos exposure of work- men engaged in brake lining maintenance and brake shoe installation, by analysis of residual dusts recovered from brake linings and by direct measurement of the I .I 1 'This research was supported by Center Grant ES 00928 of the National Institute of Environmental . ,---Health Sciences of the U.S. Department of Health. Education and Welfare. Assistance was also provided in part by the Health Research Council of the City of New York HRC U 2329 and by the Ford Motor Company. Copyrigh1 1976 by Academic l'n:ss, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 110 i FMSI 05479 ------------------------------ -h------- ~~~~ ~~-i~~-~-- -- IlL free asbestos fiber content of workroom air in areas where these operations take place. In the United States, an estimated work force of at least 900,000 auto mechanics and garage workers is potentially exposed to asbestos in the servicing of both brake and clutch linings. Furthermore, much brake dust enters the general environment during automobile use (Jacko and DuCharme, 1973), to add more to the burden of asbestos air pollution (Selikoff, Nicholson, and Langer, 1972). Asbestos in Friction Materials " In the United States, an estimated 118 million pounds of asbestos is used annually for the production of brake friction materials (Jacko and DuCharme, 1973). After processing (cutting, grinding, punching), the asbestos in the material sold is approximately 103 million pounds per year. In addition, asbestos contained in automotive clutch friction materials amounts to 4.5 million pounds annually. Yor Constituents ofBrake Linings f A number of materials is commonly used in the manufacture of the three mlijor automotive brake lining components (binder, fiber reinforcer, and property mod- ifier). These are listed in Table I. Binder. The binders used in the automotive industry today are primarily phenolic-type resins, which are noted for high binding efficiency and ability to withstand pyrolytic breakdown. Other materials have been used, in varying pro-1 portions and in addition to resins, for binder improvement (Table 1). T: TABLE I CoMMON CoMJ'ONENTs oF AuToMOTIVE BRAKE LININGS" Binder and organic friction modifiers Fiber reinforcer Property modifier Phenolic-type resin Rubber Tire scrap Pitch Cork Gilsonite Cashew nutshell resin and particles Chrysotile asbestos'> (grades 4- 7) Unaltered Calcined Mixed fiber Lead compounds Zinc compounds Antimony oxide Iron oxide Copper metal Brass chips Clay minerals Barite (BaSO.) Drying oils Wollastonite (CaSi03) Quartz (Si02) Cryolite (Na.,AIF3) Rottenstone (Si02) Coke (C) Coal (C) Gilsonite (C) Graphite (C) Carbon black (C) Molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) Fluorspar (CaF2) a See Carroll, 1962;.Anderson, 1969; Anderson, 1973; Jacko and DuCharme, 1973; Bark,el a/., 1975. Chrysotile fiber constitutes about 50% by weight of most automotive brakes currently manufac- 1~C~O~P-Y-R~IG~H=T~----------------- --+-- --,tured in the United States. :I: ~ ~ ~ z ~ z ~ >wz ~ 0 t; 9 0 ~ 0 u lg5 0 z~ {; FMSI 05480 l I ! i I lI\:;<;z:; !' 0z !z~ !>,.... l ml ; o o '~ l.,>.:.0,0 :I D ,;:I 0.. ''.m-o,z<.., 0 6 C'l () ,0z.., 0 j ..... 0 ~ --------- r112 D - Fiber. For fiber reinforcement of the friction product, chrysotile asbestos isused almost exclusively. The mineral typically comprises from 40 to 50% of the -brake product. Fiber grades 4 through 7 are used, and occasionally, several sizesare admixed or even calcined to improve performance characteristics. 1 Modifiers. Perhaps the widest range of materials used in friction products are the property modifiers. Nineteen representative compounds are listed in Table 1. Modifiers are used for a number of purposes; they are included to increase brake shoe "density," making the brake surface able to withstand high pressures (e.g., barite); they are included as "lubricants" to reduce the coefficient of friction along the brake surface, and thereby prevent "grabbing" (e.g., lead compounds); they act as "friction agents" increasing the coefficient of friction and enhancin~ the braking action of the shoe (e.g., brass chips); they act as internal "abrasives," which help to "recondition" the braking surface and remove deposited decomposition products (e.g., rottenstone, quartz); they act as "heat sinks," reducing binder pyrolysis and fiber decomposition thereby extending the useful life of the lining (e.g., brass chips, metals, etc.). It is important to note that one major purpose of the reconditioning agents is to retard the formation of forsterite (a mineral not originally present in the brake material, but created by dehydroxylation and recrystallization of chrysotile asbestos at high temperatures) which may accumulate on the surface of the brake lining. The hardness of the forsterite (Mohs, 6.5-7.0) is such that it tends to score and gouge brake drums and discs (hardness 3-3.5), degrading them prematurely. Therefore, recrystallization of chrysotile to forsterite is an unwanted effect, hindered insofar as possible by the modifiers present in the matrix. Materials of Biological Interest Asbestos, quartz, and heavy metals are constituents of automotive brake linings, each warranting special consideration from the viewpoint of biological activity. The focus of this report is limited to the problem of chrysotile asbestos exposure. Mechanisms of Degradation of Brake Linings during Use Brake wear is dependent upon many factors, such as the temperature generated at the surface of the brake shoe during braking operations. At any one time, only a small percentage of the rubbing area is in contact with the wheel, with "hot spots" generated, ranging up to 800 to 1000C (Carroll, 1962; Anderson, 1969). It is not uncommon during moderate braking action, to attain temperatures as high as _500"C (Carroll, 1962). Some investigators have suggested that, in addition to bin~der pyrolysis, chrysotile completely dehydroxylates under these conditions and "reduces to powder" where it is swept off the brake facing (Carroll, 1962). How- .ever, this hypothesis is oversimplified, in that other important processes, besides !thermal wear, contribute to shoe breakdown, and brake shoe degradation. (Bur- well, 1957). For example, the effects of abrasive wear and macroshear have been linvestigated. When monitored by X-ray diffraction, chrysotile in brake materials displays structural strain and substructure fragmentation, caused by shear during !braking processes (Mizutani et al., 1973). This shear 'strain produces material fatigue which, Vl>'ith_ binde!"_ pyrolysis_._can Cf!l!SJ?J!rf:lke lining disin~egration at - -~~:.....- - - - - - - - - -- - - --=- ---- -- - - -- ------~-- -- - -- ~--------------------- 1-- COPYRIGHT I FMSt 05481 ,. ! I t -~!l~~p ---=---~ 113_ -temperatures far below those required for chrysotile .dehydroxylation. Therefore, brake lining disintegration may liberate partially altered, or unaltered, chrysotile -fibers. thermal Decomposition of Chrysotile ' Differential thermal analysis indicates that chrysotile undergoes dehydroxylation at 650 to 680C and recrystallizes (anhydrous magnesium silicate to forsterite) (Mg2Si04) at about 810 to 820C (e.g., Martinez, 1966; Daykin, 1971; Berry, 1971; Monkman, 1971; Harris, 1971). These temperature ranges are subject to great variation as a function of the chemistry of the fiber, particle size, instrumental variations, sample packing, etc. Also, forsterite has been noted to form, during prolonged static heating, at considerably lower temperatures (Bates and Comer, 1957; Martinez, 1966; Brindley and Hayami, 1965; Naumann and Dresher, 1966). In general, temperatures in excess of 570C are required for dehydroxylation and incipient forsterite formation in chrysotile. Extensive study of both the thermal behavior of chrysotile and brake lining composition and design. indicates that chrysotile fiber may survive in the decomposed lining dust. I i METHODS Analysis of Brake Drum Dust (Decomposed Lining) Ten samples of automobile brake drum dusts were collected and examined by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy with microchemical capability, for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of chrysotile.2 Optical microscopy, employing polarized light, was generally not useful for detecting asbestos in brake drum dust. A number of factors are .considered re- sponsible for this phenomenon including the low relief and birefringence of chrysotile and the nature of the matrix, consisting largely of road dust, resin binder, and pyrolyzed residue, which, in optical microscopic preparations, readily obscures the smaller asbestos fibers. . X-ray diffractometry, in the continuous and step-scan mode, was performed on all dusts. Chrysotile reflections (hkl = 002; 020; 004) were observed in all ten samples. Quantitative determination of chrysotile content was made by compari- son of unknowns with calibrations of chrysotile dilution standards. The weight occurrence ranged from about 2-15%, with an average ranging from 3-6%. Lead compounds, quartz, calcite, mica, clays, barite, graphite, and alpha-iron particles were identified as well. In several samples, weak, diffuse reflections suggested the ~'presence of forsterite, but positive identification coold not be made using this echnique. dentification of Chrysotile by Electron Microscopy Transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction, and elec- 1 .... - --. - - --!- . -------. - 2We acknowledge the cooperation of the United Automobile Workers, Local Union No. 259 and the, Automobile Dealers Industrial Relations Association in helping us obtain these samples in auto 1 maintenance shops in the New York area. Each sample was taken from "a typical job" under way . at the time. ___ ___ ' ] i ! - COPY-R-IG-iiT-- -------------- FMSI 05482 114))_~~=~ ~:.~~t - tron microprobe analysis of the brake dusts were carried out on each of the tensamples after preparation by a technique which disperses the dust particles in a -nitrocellulose film without altering particle size distribution. Free chrysotile fiberbundles and fibrils were observed in all ten samples (Fig. 1). Selected area electron diffraction analysis of representative fibers demonstrated the preservation of the chrysotile structure (Figs. 2A, B). Some patterns displayed arcuate reflections suggestive of interfibril rotation and intrafibril displacement (Figs. 2A, B). Occasionally, fibers were observed without characteristic chrysotile morphology, with r - - - - --- ------mottled "surfaces and obliterated fibrils, inc,licating partial or complete recrystalli- .zatiQll.__plec;t.ron diffraction patter-n--s--o1bt-a--i-n--e-d-- fro-m--th-e-se particles d-i-s--played ~ .... .,,;-~(r,:.f:7.~ ;/t;_~~: :, a: ,. .. m .I;Zs; ::z3 i; 3m: ~~ r- I1~ 1g; :> ':n:0 :I: lg a. Qz m 8 FiG. I. Electronphotomicrograph of large ch~ysotile bundle in brake drum dust (38,000x magnifica- portkl" ;ododo b;odMd T6G) CO:::,:~~ ph'"o~~,;, rood'"" dobri ~ .~~ ___ .('; ~ n 0 0 Q FMSI 05483 --------------------------------------------- ~ ! I FIG. 2. Selected area electron diffraction patterns obtained on fibers of chrysotile obtained during air sampling at brake repair shops. In A, the reciprocal a axis is marked a* as are the layer lines in the (OKI) series. Indexing of upper right quadrant yielded 16 reflections corresponding to single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of Whittaker and Zussman, 1956. Patte~n in (B) displays "smear- . ing" of reflections in a "clockwise" manner suggesting interplanar rotation. .I - polycrystalline characteristics of multiple random reflections or Debye-Scherrer rings rather than the distinctive single fiber chrysotile pattern (Fig. 2B). Microchemical analysis with a probe technique on the unaltered fibers showed them to possess the usual Mg:Si ratio of chrysotile. In addition to free chrysotile fiber bundles and fibrils, chrysotile was also frequently observed projecting from the margins of binder fragments (Fig. 3). Free asbestos fibers present in the decomposed lining dusts were sized at 42,000x magnification. The results, seen in Table 2, show that most fibers are too small to be seen by optical microscopy; almost all of them are shorter than 0.4/Lm in length; virtually aJJ are of respirable size (-5 ILm). Hatch (1970) in reporting on optical fiber counts obtained from brake cleaning operations with compressed air jet, found that 94% of the fibers feJJ in the 2-5 ILm length category, while only 6% were longer than 5 f.lm. Jacko and DuCharme (1973) made size distribution meas_urements of asbestos fibers in brake dusts generated during dynamometer tests, using both optical and electron microscopy. They found, at magnifications of 22,000x that 30% of the fibers were from 0.25 to 0.50 ILm in length and that 60% were longer than 0.5 ILm. Some discrepancies between our data and those of Jacko and DuCharme may be attributed to their use of the lower magnification (22,000x vs 42,000x), at which fibers shorter than 0.20 ILm may not be easily seen or identified on the electron microscopic screen. Thus, both the optical fiber count FPYRIGH_T___________data in -~ther studi~aJ1d th~ electron microscopic fiber size distribut!on _d_at~ ~ :tl ~I ~, ~....I z~ ~z ~ ~ w ~ 0 ig'5 8z 0 ~ .oC...):I 0 Mz : i'5 ------~----------------------------------------------------------------- FMSI 05484 t- ! __!__ ----------------. I f -I I j mz :S: z5 ~ mz ~ r;>0 m "'m )>n;>0 :I: 0 :I D.. IQ mz 8 5 0n 0 ~ 0 ~ ---------- FIG. 3, Electron photomicrographs of brake drum dusts, Chrysotile is present in both free fiber and fibril form. Opaque granular material is road dust or phenolic binder. a. x i0,800; b, x9300; c, ----lx30,000; d. x30,000. -, - . .. I indicate that the chrysotile fiber population generated by brake wear is a strongly skewed one, with almost all fibers concentrated in the smaller than 5 11-m region. No attempt was made to size the asbestos-binder particulates. Personal Air Sampling during Brake Repair Work Personal air sampling for asbestos exposure during brake lining maintenance and repair was carried out at franchised auto dealer garages, taxi fleet repair shops, and a municipal truck repair shop, all located in New York City. 3 Personal I1! lAssistance in providing opportunity for sampling was given by the Department of Air Resources, I' __ New York City. __ lCOPYRIGHr=----------------- -1 . ----~----------- FMSI 05485 .' 117 ' I TABLE 2 \l LENGTH DISTRIBUTION oF CHRVSOTILE FIBERS IN BRAKE DRuM DusT" i _I Sample 750-1500A N (%) 1500-2250A N (%) 2250-JOOOA N (%) 3000-3750A N (%) Total (%) 1 40 34 II II % 2 - --'3 - - - 4 32 20 ---- -- ~-26 23 25 37 32 25 26 ~-------- 87 70 7% 5 57 17 4 78 6 23 9 12 12 56 7 50 26 21 2 99 8 29 30 21 17 97 l9 6 41 18 10 10 II 6 31 31 s Fibers counted and sized ~~ 42,~~~~- fibers have diameters from 250 to 500A. 75 79 - -I air samples were taken during and after brake repair work and at varying distances from the work sites in other areas of the garages and shops. The latter samples were intended to provide information concerning levels of asbestos exposure which garage employees other than those doing brake work might experience. Asbestos Exposure during Automobile Brake Repair Work Air samples were first taken in the breathing zone of mechanics doing brake repair work. These peak exposure measurements were taken over periods of 3-8 minutes during which the workers were blowing dust from brake drums. The air samples, taken on membrane filters, were processed," and fiber counts made in accordance with the procedures which have been adopted bY the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the U.S. Department of Labor (Bayer, Brown, and Zumwalde, 1975). Essentially, the analysis consists of counting fibers 5 to 100 J.Lm, in a fixed area of a Parton graticule, using phase contrast microscopy at a magnification of 400x. This microscopic method enhances image contrast and allows large asbestos fibers to be readily seen and counted. When a vehicle is brought into a repair shop for brake lining. inspection or replacement, the wheel is removed and loose dust is removed from the drums and back plates, generally by means of a compressed air jet. A recent survey of brake repair establishments in Baltimore and Washington revealed that this is the stand;:trd method in those cities (<;::astleman et a/., 1975). A similar situation exists in New York City. The cloud of dust that is produced is visible for several minutes afterwards (Fig. 4). Table 3 shows that fiber concentrations- are high in the operator's area under these conditions (an average concentration of 16 fibers/ml), and that there are significant concentrations at least 20ft away. Background or area sampling during the same operation shows that, at least 14 minutes after jet air blowing and up to 75ft away, asbestos concentrations are still measurable even by optical microscopy. The data in Table 3 indicate that an asbestos concentration gradient, dependent on distance and time, is associated with this operation. It is evident that any person 65-75 ft away can be exposed. Current (interim) regula- tions of OSHA prohibit concentrations of5 fibers/ml or more, longer than 5 JLm, as +- . -- . -- +OPYRIGHT- --- - - -- :r: ~ .... ~ ~! oza~.:'''I >zw ' ~ 1: 0 ~ 8z 0 !.:! C) 9 0 lrl ~ l FMSI 05486 , _I 1l~~Q_-~-- I f 1 -----~---- ------------- --------- .I:JG. 4. Rem~val of dust from brake drum and back plate by pneumatic air blowing at auto111~_bi1~1 garage. l- 1 --l a time-weighted average for workers, and concentrations above 2 fibers/ml will be illegal after 1976. Regulations set a peak concentration (maximum excursion) of 10 fibers/ml of air. Newly proposed standards are designed to set a limit of 0.5 fibers/ml (500,000 fibers/m3), with a maximum excursion of 5 fibers/mi. It was generally found that there was minimal, if any, effort to control dust in most garages. Workmen do not use respiratory protection. There was little aware- ness of the potential hazard of brake dust. In a single instance, brake drum cleaning was not done with a compressed air jet, but with a dry hand brush. Fiber concentrations were somewhat less (2.5 fibers/ml) at the operator level, but background levels 12ft away were the same as with air jet cleaning. Asbestos Exposure during Truck Brake Repair and Installation Work Personal air sampling was also conducted at the New York Department of Sanitation truck repair shop, where various kinds of brake application and repairwork are performed. Used truck brake linings are salvaged by grinding the surface to remove grease and dirt, and new linings are ground to expedite break-in. The edges of new linings are beveled on a grinding wheel or arcing machine to avoid lCOPYRiGHT__________ , r__ noise problems. (Fig. 5). Holes are drilled or punched into the brake lining, whi<.;h ___ FMSI 05487 , ll~_ TABLE 3 AsBESTOS CoNCENTRATIONS DURING AUTOMOBILE BRAKE SERVICE a.b .Fiber concentration Operation Distance (ft) Number of samples (fiberslml) Mean Range Blowing dust out of brake 3-5 4 16.0 6.6-29.8 drums with compressed 5-10 3 3.3 2.0-4.2 air jet 10-20 2 2.6 0.4-4.8 Distance from operation (ft) Time lapse (min) Concentration (fibers/ml) Background samples taken 10 0 0.3 at varying distance and 20 0 0.8 lapsed times, after brake 12 5 0.2 drum blowing 50 5 0.1 65 7 0.1 75 14 0.1 Distance Number of Fiber concentration (fiberslml) (ft) samples Mean Range Cleaning brake drums with dry brush 1-3 2 2.5 1.3-3.6 Background samples taken 3 minutes after cleaning brake drums with dry brush 12 3 0.1 0-0.2 Fibers 5-100 p.m in length, counted by optical microscopy. 6 The new proposed Asbestos Standard of the U. S. Department of Labor records asbestos exposure in fiberslml, noting that a workman might respire approximately 8m3 of air per working day, retaining an unstudied proportion of inhaled fibers. The above table omits reference to air content of fibers < 5 p.m in length. ------;-- is then riveted onto a steel plate. Some of these operations are similar to those done during the manufacture of brake shoes. Table 4 summarizes the results of personal air sampling in the course of this work. During light grinding of truck brake shoes (Fig. 6), an average peak concentration of about 4 fibers/ml was found in the breathing zone of the operator. The data show that measurable fiber concentrations are found 25 ft or more away. At a distance of 25 ft, for example, a concentration of I fiber/ml (I ,000,000 fibers/mP) was. found. Much larger numbers of shorter fibers would simultaneously be inhaled. During the beveling of truck brake shoes on a grinding machine, very high concentrations of fibers were found in the vicinity of the operator. The average of five air samples was about 37 fibers/mi. Area samples, taken up to 30ft away from this operation, demonstrated the presence of airborne fibers. Jt was of interest to note that, at the time of this _sampling~ ~TOIJ] _eight_t~ I5 other_ S.<!!:age mechani_cs were working_ ~ithin this +OrviliGHT- _____... ------- j J: ~ i__, z~ : w~I! gZj' z>w i ~ g 0 9 0 zU1 0 u C) g 0 zM 0 FMSI 05488 12Q~) - -I- - I -- !I I -------1~'m F1c. 5. Beveling of truck brake linings at municipal garage. Arrow indicates accumulation of asbestos dust. ;;JO . 0z ~ . zm perimeter and were exposed to asbestos. Fiber levels for other kinds of operations at the truck garage are given in Table 4. >,.... Boillat and Lob (1973) have reported fiber concentrations measured during drilling holes for rivets and grinding. They found values ranging from 0.3 to 29.2 I~ ,U>mI ;;JO fibers/ml; four of the nine values exceeded 5 fibers/mi. A Comparison ofFiber Levels Visible by Light Microscopy and Electron Micros- () :I: copy 0 ::l In the ten brake drum dust samples examined, it was found that asbestos fibers 0.. shorter than 0.4 11-m predominated (Table 2). The OSHA Asbestos Standard does Qz m not require that short fibers (< 5 11-m in length) be counted or controlled. This oversight may have considerable biological significance in that small chrysotile ~ fibers readily produce asbestos disease (Holt, MiJls, and Young, 1964, 1965; _ Davis, 1965; Pott, Ruth, and Friedrichs, 1972; Wagner, Berry and Timbrell, 1973;_ R 0z !- --lCOPYRIGHi- -------- - - -- - 1 () 0,.... ~ FMSl 05489 .' HEAD TEXT 121 I t - ~- 1 I I .FIG. 6. Renewing of municipal truck brake linings by light grinding to remove grease and dirt. I -- I Hilscher et al., 1970). Attention has recently been again called to the potential importance of this question (Bouhuys, 1975). There is little published information on the numbers of, and sizes of, submicro'scopic asbestos fibers in occupational exposures. The present study afforded an 'opportunity tocoilect daia on the relationship between submicroscopicaliy~- and optically-visible fibers for this specific industrial exposure. Eight air samples were selected for both light and electron microscopic examination. Six of these were taken during brake drum dust removal operations with optical fiber counts recorded from 0.1 to 3.6 fibers/mi. The other two samples were taken during light grinding of automobile brake shoes. Preparation and Analysis ofAir Samples One square centimeter sections of the eight membrane filters were mounted, _+dusLside_ downt. OJ1 mi~!:_os_<;_opic sli~~and ashed in IQ~ !~!llpe~tur~_l!_ctiva~l ~- ----------- +- COPYRIGHT J: ~ w ~ ..... ~ w. 6~1I !!!:I Zw>,l ~ 0 '~>-~ 8z 0 ul l5' ~ ~ FMSI 05490 . r l l I j ! lm !~IZ~~~ ,.~- 1~ ;, >m ;~ i::J: Jo ':I D.. .Q z gm ;Cn> n0z 0 ~ I ___J - - - - - - ---- - - - - T122--D------------ ----------- TABLE 4 AsBESTos CoNCENTRATION DuRING TRUCK BRAKE SERVICE o Distance Number of Fiber concentration {fiberslml) Operation {ft) samples Mean Range Renewing used linings by grinding_ Background to grinding used linings Beveling new linings Background to beveling new linings Punching rivets into brake linings Chipping rust off used brake linings Sweeping floor around grinder Background to sweeping floor around grinder 3-5 10 25 60 3-5 8 12 30 3-5 3-5 3-5 15 10 3.8 1.7-7.0 2 1.5 1.2- t. 7 2 0.8 0.6-1.0 I 0.2 5 37.3 23.7-72.0 I 0.6 2 0.4 0.3-0.5 0.3 2 1.5 1.9-2.0 2.4 3.6 3.1 o Fibers 5-100}!-m in lengrh, counted by optical microscooy~ ------,- I oxygen to remove organic materials. The ashed residue was dispersed in a drop of nitrocellulose solution. The dispersal was accomplished by a "rubout" technique using the edge of a watch glass (Nicholson, Rohl and Ferrand, 1971). By this method large asbestos fiber bundles are broken into their constituent smaller fibrils and large agglomerates of inorganic materials, which normally obscure the presence of asbestos fibers, are broken into particles small enough to allow virtually all asbestos to be seen. By placing a second slide over the ground residue and nitrocellulose solution and then gliding the two slides apart, a thin film is produced. The dried film is cut into segments which are then floated off in water. The film is mounted onto Formvar-coated electron microscopic grids. Typically, four grids are prepared from each sample and one square on each grid is scanned in the electron microscope at 42,000x magnification to determine the quantity of chrysotile present. By estimating the length and diameter of each fiber, and assuming a cylindrical fiber geometry, the mass of chrysotile per grid square is determined. Representative electron photomicrographs of chrysotile fibers and fibrils are shown in Figs. 7 and 8. RESULTS A comparison of the optical microscopic fiber counts and the electron microscopic tota) asbestos mass calculations obtained from the eight samples is shown in Table 5. Figure 9, showing the same data, is plotted on logarithmic paper, and visual inspection indicates that a positive correlation exists between the optical _ ind electwn micwscopic_results, alth:uih-the dat~e limited and_the_ amcmt o~- RIGHT I- - - - - - - - I ---------------------------------- ------ FMSt 05491 HEAD ' FIG. 7. Electron photomicrograph of air sample taken during brake drum blowing (sae sample No.4, Table 5), Large numbers (71}.-100) of chrysotile, some of which are masked by granular particu- lates, presuma?Jy road dus! (65,000 total magnification). I I scattering precludes a regression analysis. For example, from these data it may be possible to predict that, during the grinding of new brake linings (Sample No. 8, Table 5), a worker could be exposed to about 0.5 mg of asbestos daily in _cir- cumstances in which the time-weighted TLV of 5 fibers/ml would not have been exceeded. Similarly, Fig. 9 shows that, since a microgram of asbestos represents on the order of I million fibers per cubic meter of air (of greatly varying diameters and lengths), extremely high concentrations of submicroscopic fibers are present up to 65ft away from brake repair work (e.g., Sample No.5, Table 5), even though fiber Jevets in such a case are barely detected, if at all, by the standard optical counting technique. These limited data indicate that the standard (OSHA) optical fiber counting method may be only a fractional indicator of total asbestos expo- sure, at least in the case of automobile repair work. They also indicate that the - -_total exposure is much higher than the OSHA technique records, in terms of !COPYRIGHT -~ - ~ ~-i~ -~- .:X: ~: WI VwJ I ~I ~~ Z, 0ex I ~~ w' "c0 0 f5 9 ~ 0 !:.! C) 9 0 ~ ~ FMSI 05492 . ,-' __ I 124 D _:t . ,... ,, -..' ~ ..; . ., .' ..~, . ~-- f' - ! '' f' l i I '! I ! 0.5 IJ ,, J' FIG. 8. Electronmicrograph of air sample of cluster of chrysotile fibrils in background sample (see sample No. 3, Table 5 (83,000x magnification). I -! I _ _ _____ __ ._ _ ____ -- __ 1 asbestos fiber number, mass, and surface area. Additional studies relevant to this and other kinds of asbestos exposure are needed to confirm and extend these findings, It is important to note that particles of asbestos-containing pulverized brake lining were not included in this mass determination. Their importance, in terms of biologic potential, is presently unknown. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (1) Chrysotile asbestos fiber is a major component of brake lining materials. -~Degradation of the lining is brought ab~~~~ by a co~~nation of factors, which! 2n COPYRIGHT 0 ~ - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - -- FMSI 05493 .. J - -! I 125 TABLE 5 COMPARISON OF OPTICAL AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC FIBER CoUNTS Operation Optical microscopy (fiberslml) Electron microscopy (Jl.glm3) 1. Blowing dust off drum with air jet (10ft away) 2.0 1.27 2. Background to blowing out brake drum (10ft away) 0.3 0.2 3. Blowing dust off drum with air jet (20 ft away) 0.4 1.1 4. Background to blowing out brake drum (20 ft "way) 0.8 0.1 5. Background to blowing out brake drum (~5 .ft away-7 ~ minutes after blowing stopped) .I 0.2 6._{:teanin1_b~a~_e drum with hand brush 3.6 6.5 7. Ught grindings of new linings before installation 4.7 53.0 8. Light grinding new linings before installation 2.7 66.0 ' include thermal stress, material fatigue, and shearing. Modifying agents are included in brake linings which lower the contact temperature between the lining and wheel interface; this, in tum, prevents binder pyrolysis and chrysotile fiber de hydroxylation. The amount of chrysotile fiber which survives the braking operation is related to a number of additional factors, including some which are external to the properties and quality of the lining itself. As a consequence, degradation may occur at temperatures signficantly lower than that required for the dehydroxylation of chrysotile, with the persistence of fibers. (2) Ten samples of dust were taken from automobile brake drums in New York City, and analyzed. Optical microscopy was of limited usefulness. X-ray diffraction analysis, using both continuous and step-scan modes demonstrated the presence of chrysotile in all dust samples. The proportion of chrysotile ranged from about 2-15%, and averaged about 3-6%. This included both free fibers- and . . . i .... -- .chrysotile which survived in pulverized binder as particulates. Forsterite, thTe ~g 1 1.0 !: :l ;;: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1'---"0'----_J...----~---~--0.1 1.0 10.0 1000 Microqroms PI' cubic. meter -electron mttOKCIPJI ~+ - - : : - - : - _ - - = - : - : = : - - - - - - - COPYRIGHT I I I i I i I j , :I: I ~i i' .... z~ ~ z ~ Wz> ,I 1!1 01 t; 9: : ol 51 9! 0' lzrl t; FMSI 05494 ... ~ I 1 I1m I~ :~ I~ IZ ~~ 1 .... I'.m,~.. J' n::0 I :::I: Q ::J ~ Q 1i-Zmn< .$2 8 t"i z0n 0 o6 -< -I 126 1:?- thermal transformation product of chrysotile could not be unequivocally identified-by continuous scan X-ray diffraction. (3) The presence of chrysotile asbestos in the ten dust samples was furtherverified by transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction and electron microprobe analyses. Chrysotile was found, both in fiber and fibril form, with unaltered structure and chemical composition. Its frequency of occurrence was consistent with, but lower th""itn the" quantitative determination made by . X-ray- diffraction analysis. HoweveT, it should be noted that X-ray- diffraction analysis is based on both free fibers and fibers present in clumps; the latter would obscure the presence of discrete fibers on electron microscopic study. In addition to unaltered fiber, partially altered and completely recrystallized fibers were also seen. (4) Size distribution analysis at 42,000x magnification in the ten samples indicate that about four-fifths of all chrysotile, in fiber form, is shorter than 0.41J.m in length. These fibers are too small to be seen by optical microscopic techniques. - (5) Personal air sampling was conducted during brake reparrwork in automobile garages in New York City. Standard optical microscopic procedures for fiber counting were used. In samples taken in the vicinity of repairmen blowing dust from automobile brake drums with compressed air, an average concentration of 16 fibers/ml was measured. Background and time-lapse samples indicate that measurable concentrations exist at least 75 ft from the work site and for at least 14 minutes after jet air blowing. (6) Personal air samples were taken at a municipal truck repair facility where various brake fabrication and application operations are performed. Grinding of truck brake shoes resulted in an average concentration of about 4 fibers/ml (4,000,000/m3). During beveling, an average fiber count of 37 fibers/ml was measured. Exposure levels during drilling, punching rivets, and cleanup were also measured. Background measurements show that fiber concentration gradients areproduced during truck brake repair and application work. During light grinding of truck brake shoes, measurable fiber concentrations were found 25 ft or more away, as well as up to 30 ft from brake beveling operations. The background measurements, during both automobile and truck brake work, indicate that many employees in garages other than brake lining workers are potentiallyexposed to asbestos, including other mechanics and shop management. (7) Eight air samples taken during automobile brake repair work were analyzed by other optical and electron microscopy. A positive correlation was found to exist between optical fiber counts ( > 5 ~J.m) and the total chrysotile mass calculations based on sizing all fibers at 42,000x magnification. These data indicate that standard (OSHA} optical fiber counts may be a useful-index of total free asbestos exposure during brake repair work. They also demonstrate that the total free asbestos exposure, in terms of fiber number, mass, and surface area is much greater than the optical counting techniques indicate. (8) Attention rs called to the fact that in addition to asbestos, other biologically active substances, including free silica and lead compounds, have been identified lo:::G:: warrant investigation.__ -I- ____ ______ Tin brake lining dusts. Their concentrations in brake work environments are not FMSI 05495 .... -~~~r,\o_-=:=- ~~- -:_ -- ,. 121 (9) Potentially hazardous asbestos exposure exists during automotive brake servicing. It has been reported that approximately 900,000 persons are employed - in such work in the United States. It is recommended that stringent industrial hygiene measures to control exposure be implemented as rapidly as possible. 1 ----------------- ' - - - - - ~--- ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank Drs. A. E. Anderson, R. L. Gealer, and I. Eichen of The Ford Motor Company for their r- -valuable comments -~---- in reviewing th-e--m--a-n-u--s-c-r-i-p-t. ------- ----- ---r REFERENCES Anderson, A. E. (1969). Wear in brake materials. In Proc. Amer. Soc. Metals Wear Conference. Anderson, A. E., Gealer, R. L., McCune, R. C., and Sprys, J. W. (1973). Asbestos emissions from brake dynamometer tests. Soc. Auto Engin. Meeting. Detroit, Michigan, 14-18 May, 1973. Paper No. 730549. Bark, L. S., Moran, D., and Percival, S. J. (1975). Chemical changes in asbestos-based friction materials during performance-a review. Wear 34, 131-139. Bates, T. F., and Comer, J. J. (1951).1n Proc. 6th Nat'! Conf. Clays and Clay Mineralogy, Int. Monog. Sec. 6, 237-248. Bayer, S. G., Brown, T. A., and Zumwalde, R. D. (1975). Document TR-84, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Insitute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio. Berry, E. E. (1971). Thermal analysis of~>arious chrysotiles using evolved water analysis techniques. In Proc. 2nd Inti Conf. Physical-Chemical Asbestos Minerals, Louvain Univ. 6-9 September~ 1971, paper 2:7 15 pp. Boillat, M.A., and Lob, M. (1973). Risk of asbestosis in workers employed in replac~n_s_~~Of1_10~~ brake iinings. Schweizerische Medizinisclte WochenschriJ; 103, (39), 1354-1359. Bouhuys, A. (1975). Fibers and fibrosis. Ann. Intern. Med. 83(6), 898-899. Brindley, G. W., and Hayami, R. (1965). Mechanism of formation of forsterite and enstatite from serpentine. Min. Mag. 35, 189-195. Burwell, J. T. (1957). Survey of possible mechanisms. Wear, l, 119-141. Carroll, W. G. (1962). The manufacture of brake linings. Brit. Plastics August, 414-417. Castleman, B., Camarota, L. A., Fritsch, A. J., Mazzocchi. S., and Crawley, R. G. (1975). The hazards of asbestos for brake mechanics. Public Health Rep. 90 (No. 3) 254-256. Daykin, C. W. (1971). A study of the infrared spectra ofchrysotile and related minerals. In Proc. 2nd lntl. Conf. Physical-Chemical Asbestos Minerals, Louvain Univ. 6--9 September, 1971, paper No. 2:6,7 pp. Davis, J. M. J. (1965). Electron-microscope studies of asbestosis in man and animals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 132, 98-111. Harries, P. G. (1968). Asbestos hazards in naval shipyards. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 11, 135-145. Harris, A. M. (1971). The effects of grinding on the structural and thermal properties of chrysotile asbestos fibers. In Proc. 2nd Inti. Conf. Physical-Chemical Asbestos Minerals, Louvain Univ. 6--9 September, 1971. Paper No. 3:2A, 6 pp. - _ Hatcih5,-2D9.. (-19-7-0)-. -Possib-le -alterna-tive-s- to--a--s-b- est-os--a- s--a f--rictlo~- m-ater-i-a-l-. A. nn. O-c- cu-p-.--H--y-g-.--1-3-,- Hickish, D. E., and Knight, K. L. (1970). Exposure to asbestos during brake maintenance. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 13, 17-21. Hilscher,W., Sethi, S.. Friedrichs, K. H., and Pott, F. (1970). Zusammenhange Zwischen Asbestose and Faserllinge. Natundssenschaften 57, 356. , Holt, P. F., Mills, J., and Young, D. K. (1964). The early effects of chrysotile asbestos duson the rat lung. J. Path. Bact. 87, 15-23. Holt, P. F., Mills, J .. and Young. D. K. (1965). Experimental asbestos with four types of fibers: Importance of small fibers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 32, 87-97. r:~~m:-~_c~~;,,_~"K<~r~.~~ .;Jacko, M. G., and DuCharme, R. T. (1973). Brake emissions: Emission measurements from brake and ' I I I I I :~:tI:l m..... z~ ~z 0 !i ~ 0 {5 o.o.... ~ 0 ~ C> 9 0 .~z {5 FMSI 05496 ., '~ ~ j 1 I 1 128 '1 ----1. -- ~- -_ -- l --Langer, A. M.. and Pooley, F. D. (1973). Identification of single asbestos fibers in human tisues./n of- Biological Effects of Asbestos (P. Bogovski, eta/. Eds.)pp. 19-25. I.A.R.C., Lyon, France. Langer, A. M., Mackler, A. D., and Pooley, F. D. (1973). Electron microscopical investigation of - asbestos fibers. Envir. Health Persp. 9, 63-80. Lynch, J. R. (1968). Brake lining decomposition products. J. Air Pollution Control Assoc. 18, 82~26. McConnell, J. D. C. (1967). Electron microscopy and electron diffraction. ln "Physical Methods in Determinative Mineralogy" (J. Zussman, Ed.), pp. 335-370. Academic Press, New York. Martinez, E. (1966). Chrysotile asbestos: Relationship of the surface and thermal properties to the crystal structure. Canada Mining and Metall. Bull. 69, 414--420. Monkman, L. J. (1971). Some chemical and mineralogical aspects of the acid decomposition of chrysotile. In Proc. 2nd Inti. Conf. Physical-Chemical Asbestos Minerals, Louvain Univ. 6-9 September, 1971, paper No. 3:2, 9 pp. Naumann, A. W., and Dresher, W. H. (1966). The influence of sample texture on chrysolite dehydra- tion. Amer. Mineral. 51, 1200-1211. Newhouse, M. L. (1965). Epidemiology of mesothelial tumors in the London area. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 132, 579-602. Nicholson, W. J., Rohl, A. N., and Ferrand, E. F. (1971). Air pollution in New York City. In "Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress. (H. M. Englund and W. T. Berry, Eds.), pp. 136-139. Academic Press, New York. Pott, F., Huth, F., and Friedrichs, K. H. (1972). Tumors of rats after i.p. injection of powdered chrysotile and benz(a]pyrene. Zbl. Bakt. 1. Abt. Orig. 155, 463. Selikoff, I. J., Churg. J., and Hammond, E. C. (1964). Asbestos exposure and neoplasia. lAMA 188, 22-38. Selikoff, I. J., Hammond, E. C., and Churg, J; (1968). Asbestos exposure, smoking and neoplasia. JAMA 204,(2), 10&-112. Selikoff, I. J., Nicholson, W. J., and Langer, A. M. (1972). Asbestos air pollution. Arch. Envir. Health_ 25, 1-13. Wagner, J. C., Berry, G.. and Timbrell. V. (1973). Mesotheliomata in rats after inoculation with asbestos and other materials. Brit. J. Cancer 28, 173. Whittaker, E. J. W., and Zussman, J. 1956. The characterization of serpentine minerals by x-ray diffraction. Min. Mag. 31, 107. ------T m::oa (II m )> n::oa :t: 0 ::I Q. ~~ I!Zm ~ I--+-------------- --- - ----- -- -----------.------ -- n f-0 -+C-O_P_Y_R_IG_U_T__________ -- ,,nZ !!o0 'Q FMSI 05497