Document QXV2e41Y8N0r1O20B0ygxgrKR

FILE NAME: Early Asbestos Damage Suits (EADS) DATE: 1934 DOC#: EADS010 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Documents from Case of Helen Zackwiejz ... '>% i.f,>r> ' r !! : *ct r >v ; ; . 1 <.; -.1 ME,7 JERSEY SUER El COURT *_ i '1it.\ , ! m ....... ;/: ->! SOMERSET COUNTY * . ` r * n i ti ' ? tu Ve , i ~ iIELEN ZACIOYIEJZ, b y -n ex t f r i e n d , : h er-m oth er,' MARYrZ A C K W IE JJ& the 'p ~ * . * r>, ^ P l a i n t i f f , ' n o t in*f'crm'!i - J HrrH--- V-7 t h e : ACTION AT LAW ,-iriffs 'VMnnt', *o n - v s - d ho know !e.dge `o f vh m ta r c o f ti-.e- aid,*.-,; COMPLAINT, JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., a C o r p o r a tio n : iof> th e S t a t e oft?New -Y o r k ,.ty fcy th e d e f en-iau* * .Irene#-% * * * , 'D efendantnee o f t u e -d efen d an t ccmplar\?.d * 'The j p l a i h t i f f , tr e sid in g -:a :t M n vil-le/* Nev/j J e r l e y , | ( 'co m p la in s io f th e a b ove .-named'qlef en d an t,vai f.o r e ig .c o r p o r a tio n a s f 0 I I 0 7 /S : - 1) In rr.i 1] r : r . t c u~e r f M-rt1. e n ' i v t t to p r o v i d e : }. i T h e - p l a i n t i f f '- v / a s f i n the-'em ploy, o f t h e 'K le - fe n d a n t .`.c o r p o r a t i o n , a t i t s p l a n t i n M a n v i ll e , New J e r s e y , i n th e m onth o f May,- '1 9 2 9 , '' and- " fo r - s e v e r a l '-.years- p r i o r - ' v i d e :t heret o' . ` l a i . / ' ^ n o t Hr p l a n t , 2 .` ;The .d e f e n d a n t c o r p o r a t io n ''a t :th e t i n e I ';r . N ih e r e in s e t f o r t h 'w a s -.engaged:in'/.the-m annf a c tu r e Iof- - a s b e s t o s p r o d u c ts f o r comm ercial'-'`p u r p o s e s ' Id o s b ^ i i o a f ! '. - 3. 5 The s a id d e fe n d a n t em ployed th e p l a i n t i f f at th e tim e and p la c e above s e t fo r th in i t s m anufacture o f s a id a s b e s to s , p r o d u c ts , and th e s a id 'd e fe n d a n t'-n o t o n ly ore knew , b u t s h o u ld h a v e known, t h a t th e s a i d a s b e s t o s'1p r o d u c t s c o n t a in e d c e r t a i n d a n g e r o u s , in s id io u s -'a r id 'h a rm fu l0 -1 a g e n c ie s .com posed o f a s b e s to s f i b e r s and o th e r p a r t i c l e s ^ t h a t wBre d e s tr u c tiv e ' to- lif e " and h e a lt h In 'th e* human bod y : when b r o u g h t .in to ..'c lo s e d -c o n ta c t' w it h th 'sa n e1.'-1-''100 - 'l r0Qr 4* r The 'd e fe n d a n t n o t 1only*1k n ew ,r-but'' sh o u ld '7 h a v e of is as fo llo w s: * 1 * (a) In fa ilin g to use reasonable care to provide. ' ' :vt a1 f! -*T*'!*-**")*V the p l a i n t i f f w ith proper masks other appliances or safe A *" guards in sa id work. , (c) In f a i l i n g to u se r e a s o n a b le *ca re to p r o v id e it a proper v e n tila tin g system a t i t s p la n t, ' (d) In f a ilin g to use reasonable care to give ' proper warning, in fo rm atio n and knowledge about the . , dangerous c h a ra c te r of i t s work w ith the s a id asb esto s , f ib e r s and p a r tic le s to the s a id p la n tif f a t the time and p lace above m entioned. ' 7, The sa id asb esto s f ib e r s and p a r t i c l e s were in tro d u c e d in to th e p l a i n t i f f ' s body at th e time and p la c e a f o r e s a i d , so t h a t t h e p l a i n t i f f was p e r m a n e n tly i n j u r e d e x te rn a lly and in te r n a lly , in and about h e r head, body and lim bs causing the p l a i n t i f f great pain and su ffe rin g , both m ental and p h y sic a l, g r e a tly lowered her r e s is ta n c e to diset* and she became a v ic tim of tu b e rc u lo s is and so s e rio u s ly --'* ,,f>f t-h* snan and d u r a t i o n o f l i f e o f t h i s y o u t h f u l a 4m m m + l I \ / '01 * c; .h e r wage e a r n i n g s and a ls o th e c o n s id e ra b le amount o f medical expense involved in her e ffo rt to reta rd the su ffe rin g from th d ise a se and mend'th wrecking of her body, she w ill be caused to s u ffe r lo s s e s , expenses and damages t o t h e e x t e n t of* $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 .0 0 . J -, ' :, ` The p l a i n t i f f demands th e sun o f '$100,000.00 ` as d am ag es`.from t h e d e f e n d a n t . t ; *O>* V**/' C' . tr * . . . v .* t *'* ; Jj - l : H. ' ,* j J ji , Samuel G reenstone A ttorney.for P la in tiff. J; !i I * I -hHeErLENm oZthCeKr,V/INEAJRZY, bZyACnKeWxItEJfZr, ie n d ,! P lain tiff, -vsi . -, JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION **^*C*-^ A c tio n a t Law a sh . _ v.. Corporation o f the S ta te of. -. . I *. ` -- .*. . - , *. /-, *t . * r.- "YI-* * ~. New York, . . . ,, D efen d a n t. . ... . *. . V* !#A??* {. 'tV.* . l - *; > # . .... The d e f e n d a n t.., JOHNS-HANVULE CORPORATION ,r. a , i* ; c o r p o r a t i o n o f t h e S t a t e , o f New; Y o rk ,, h a y i n g , i t a p r i n c i p a l o f f i c e in New J e r f l e y i - . a t . l ^ y i l l e ^ ^ S o m e r p e t , C o i m t y ^ ^ B j ^ a , ; , ^ that t . I * c i ir : :>;c. dk;i .?L'& .K.'. FIR ST DEFENSE t Ul'T. ft- 1. I t d e n ie s paragraph. 1 , e x c e p t t h a t i t eayB t h a t w * v* the p l a i n t i f f was in i t s employ a t i t s p la n t in U anT ille, N. J*, from December 28, 1926, to th e month of Hay, 1929. 2. It denies paragraph 2, except th at it says that i t was and h a s "been engaged in th e m a n u fa c tu re o f a s h e s to E p ro d u cts f o r commercial purposes from December 28,1926, to t h e p r e s e n t t i m e . . . . , i .. , ^ <v l* 3.. ,It d e n ie s p arag rap h 3, except t h a t i t says tha i t employed the p l a i n t i f f from December 28,1926, to the month o f Hay, 1929. . , . 4. I t d e n i e s p a r a g r a p h s 4, .5 ,..6 ,..a n d t.7,..____ SECOND DEIEN33 The i n j u r y and th e d i s e a s e a l l e g e d In t h e o o m p la in t J -nero Cue to one o f th e r in k s of her employment u/jcumed by i the p la in t if f as part o f the tende of her co n tra ct of employment. THIRD DEFENSE The i n j u r y and th e d is e a s e a l l e g e d in. th e c o m p la t thu j i l a l n t 1i'f aa p / . r t o f tha tormo of h e r c o n t r a c t o f orii>lo,yiiiflnt In t h u t lh a p l a i n t i f f know, or by th a oxarolB of re a s o n a b le o are on her' p a r t Bhould have known, th e a lleg e d dangers of h o r employment. . ' ~ .-.-ft,-v ' The i n j u r y and the disease alleged in , t*h, e * com plaint^ . - * , * * * * % *j \ were c a u s e d b y c o n t r i b u t o r y n e g l i g e n c e , on t h e p a r t o f .'they- :.v- -vvv;: p l a i n t i f f . V," ;V ' y, ; x >s^"< r; . " : FIFT--H';-D--E-F--E--N--S-E ' The i n j u r y and ;th e fd is e a a e a l l e g e d " i n ' th e c o m p la in t were caused by c o n tr ib u to r y n e g lig e n c e on th e p a r t * o f t h a '; p la in tif f in th a t the p la in tif f fa ile d to exercise-.reason . * * *i. able care to p ro te c t h e rse lf against the a lle g e d 'dangers-o- - < ' ' Mr h e r employment *b y u s i n g th e mask, a n d '*o t h e r .^ai.p pt*l' i a n *c,,e*s'. : p r*o1*- * vided by the defendant fo r th a t purpose. . SIXTH DEFENSE .. 1 " -r ~ r' 1 1 ' 1 . V - > i = _ * * * * The i n j u r y and th e d i s e a s e a l l e g e d in th e c o m p la in t were due to n e g lig e n c e on th p a r t of a f e llo w - e e r v a n t o f t ' the p l a i n t i f f , in f a ilin g to warn and in s tru c t the p la in t: t o u se t h e mask a n d o t h e r a p p l i a n c e s p r o v i d e d by t h e ' *., * defendant f o r th e purpose of. p r o te c tin g the p l a i n t i f f - '/ ` ag a in st the a lle g e d dangers of h r employment., ` ' ; \ ` : SEVENTH DEFENSE P la in tif f 's action is barred because -' W i t was not coonenced and in s titu te d w ithin tw o-yeara-next.'after^t.he^ alleged cause of ac tio n accrued. EIGHTH DEFENSE P l a i n t i f f ' s a c tio n is b arred because i t was n o t commenced and i n s t i t u t e d w ith in two y e a r s a f t e r th e p l a i n t i f f ' s coming to o r being of f u l l age* y / /)s: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HELEN ZACKWIEJZ, b y n e x t f r i e n d , ) h e r m o th e r , MARY ZACKWIEJZ, i P lain tiff, * * * ) JOHNS-MANYILLE CORPORATION, a c o r - p o r a t i o n o f th e S t a t e o f New Y o rk , ) . * * Defendant. ) ORDER. * T his m a tte r coming on to be heard b e fo re m e,' in the presence of the a tto rn e y s of the p a r tie s (Samuel Greenstone appearing fo r the p l a i n t i f f and H obart & Minard appearing for the d efen d a n t), on the re tu rn of the ru le to show cau se allo w ed h e r e i n on 7 ^ day o f , 1930 why th e summons s h o u ld n o t b e q u ash ed and t h e c o m p l a i n t dism issed on the grounds sta te d in said fu le , and the co u rt having taken the testim ony of the p a rtie s in open co u rt, and i t a p p e a rin g th a t th e a tto r n e y fo r the p l a i n t i f f was p r o p e r ly r e t a i n e d and a u th o r iz e d to commence th e above a c tio n ; and the atto rn ey s fo r the defendant having consented in open co u rt to d ism issal o f the said ru le ; I t i s , on th is day of A pril, 1930, ORDERED, t h a t t h e s a id r u l e t o show c a u s e be and the same is h ereb y d ism issed w ith o u t c o s t s . ?U n ite d J s ta te s D i s t r i c t Court j Judite. 1 * UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U l't FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HELEN ZACKWIEJZ, "by n e x t f r i e n d , h e r m o th e r, MARY ZACKWIEJZ Plaintiff . vs. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, a C o r p o r a tio n o f t h e S t a t e o f New Y o rk , l I Defendant , fiction at Law. ORDER FOR DISCOJfTIXUAXCE. , r* Tibe above entitled cause having been settled between the parties thereto; i- It is ORDERED, that five same be, and it is hereby discontinued, without 0 A i to,either party as against the other. Entered JUH6 13, 10 34 On motion of ,, / j y ' t lr~ 0 L * sl d Jj\ Attorneys of defendant