Document QVkG4yVpoDn0Q83Lpk7ZGpK6

FILE NAME Corning OC DATE 1981 DOC OC058 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Legal - Deposition of Ed Ames ie 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 00 9 10 1 11 1212 1313 1414 1515 1616 1717 1818 1919 2020 2222122221 2222122221 22221 2 21 24 2222125 26 2 A. 8 Q. A. Ed Atines depe 1151 , ern 42 . Yes the last sentence of that second paragraph Implied as a threat ar Yes e Well I'd say it is a very illy statement You notice that each of these paragraphs wayins with iE IE 10 20 it is speculation that is involved Do you recall what you were speculating on at the time that you wrote that report MR CALLAHAN If you recall THE WITNESS I can't recuil Do you want those together HR CARLSON Yes please Do you recall whether you ever diu distribute to any members of the Asbestos Worker Union copies of any U. S. Public Health bulletins on asbestos MR LONDONIO hokeu anu answered THE WITNESS No I did not MR CARLSON Next I am going to snow fr Ames what I will mark as Exhibit Eleven and I will just identify it for the record It kurports to be memo over the name Euwaru C. Ames to C. E. Gregory dated December 27 1943 and i will ask you to review that It is G. E. Gregory should_ Pardon me It looks like C but it is C. Gregory was-- Thereupon the document being aforementioned a Memo oated December 27 1943 consisting of one page was marked Deposition Exhibit Eleven pea. rr ... GULEL if? fAVE r. 251-3760 251-3760 1 2 3 4 S 6 22 11 12 13 14 15 16 222222 222222 222222 222222 222222 222222 23 24 25 26 27 28 for MR BONDONNO Objection the document document itself On page 10 of the document are the 40 spo^nu conclusions and the recommenuations THE WITNESS loquitur As you lawyers say res 15 HR NELSON Excellent THE WITNESS Did I answer your question HR CALLAIIAII two languages Thac's right You alu inueed i MR BONDOINO In first race Latin MR CARLSON Die you sua in response to any earlier question that you were familiar with this walle working at Owens Corning MR BONDONNO as vague and ambiguous Objection to the terma fumlllar THE WITNESS 1 km sure I must nave seell it HR CARLSON Now I am yoing to show you ay^...ll Plaintiff's Exnibit Four vnich was the January 7 1942 letter to E. J. Marshall and ask you to refer to the last sentence in the second paragraph up from the bottom HR JUBILIERER What was that again MR CARLSON Last sentence second from the bottom page 2. Have you reviewed that fir Ames Yes I wrote the memoranuum Okay Were you referring to the same Public Health Service report that we just marked as Plaintiff's Exnioit 10 in that sentence Now this says Public Healen Bullecin 1665--1 won't know + JANICE Y. THOMAS 415 254-3760 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 222222 222222 222222 222222 222222 222222 23 24 25 26 27 28 Let me see -- Examining the document | 41 | The numers uon't | | don't conform MR CALLAHAN That's good MR CARLSON As you can recall today can you remember whether there is any other U. S. Public Health | Service report on asbetsos that you might have been | referring to MR BONDONNO Objection for the sake UI the record That is a misstatement of the recoru I don'u believe there are any ocher public health bulletins on asbestosis Secondly I object to the question as argumentative as phrased also ambiguous MR CALLAHAN State the question aya~-n MR CARLSON Let me take a look at that Are you you other U. S. sit here today Mr. Ames you remember any | Public Health bulletins on asbestosis other than the one we are looking at by Lanza MR BONDONNO Same objection THE WITNESS I can't remember MR CARLSONI You can't remember any other one Unless it is one of these but there is no copy of some of these around here Q. In the-- Plic RISTENBERG Counsel what is the reference MR CARLSON Exhibit Four In that same sentence I just referred to in Exhibit Four coulu you tell me what you meant by that A. The second paragraph JANICE Y. THOMAS 415 254-3760 1