Document QMMMJ49dBNzo8GmVZ3Yw5yZpE
FILE NAME Insurance Industry INS
DATE 1991
DOC INS007
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Draft of Medical Journal Article - Insurance
Reinsurance and Underwriting Names Liability for Asbestos Related Diseases
with Cover Letter
FRIERN HOSPITALHOSPITAL
Mr. Barry Castleman 1722 Linden Avenue
Baltimore Baltimore MD 21217
Friern Barnet Road
London N11 3BP
01-368 1288 Ext
Our ref
Your ref
Date 16th October
1991
Dear Mr. Castleman
Thank you very much indeed for your kindness in sending me copies which I look forward to studying and also details book which I have ordered
the photo-
of your
I am attending a conference on the topic in a day or two's time and
have sent in some questions as per the enclosed draft article which
has been provisionally accepted for publication by Medicine Science
and the Law
A much reduced version should come out next month in
the ALM Newsletter and
to yours to the British
I have also sent off a letter in Journal of Industrial Medicine
response
Yours sincerely
Malwen Well Dr. Malcolm P.I. Weller
Consultant and
Honorary Senior Lecturer
Enc
Insurance Reinsurance and Underwriting Names
Asbestos Related Diseases
Liability
for
Hampstead Health Authority
Insurance Reinsurance and Underwriting Names Liability for Asbestos Related Diseases
Introduction
The association between asbestos fibre inhalation and lung disease has been known for a long time and Pliny the Elder and Strabo described sickness in slaves who worked with asbestos
The modern history of the association and the serious cancer
complications are outlined
Twenty seven years ago encompassing
the average latency of five to ten years for asbestosis to
develop American legal safeguards based on inadequate sampling procedures specified maximal average levels which were 25 higher than the British during which the peak exposure which is the
critical factor could often exceed by official measurements
these average levels by over 400 times
Scientists and indus-
trialists were on record as appreciating that these levels were
too high for reasonable safeguard
As the term effects became better appreciated with lower
exposure levels leading to greater longevity the association with cancers of the lungs the lining of the lungs and the
abdomen became apparent
Hueper writing in 1951 stressed that
the actual connection between asbestosis and lung cancer
appears very likely
Hueper's views had been expressed earlier
Hueper 1943 in a paper that was considered by an executive of
the Mandofville Mandofville Corporation now Manville the largest
-
American asbestosis company Gardner 1946
The same concerns were expressed slightly earlier again in Canada Norway and France and a little later in Italy Desmeules et al 1941 Macklin and Macklin 1940 Wolff 1940 Lecoeur 1942 Mottura and Faggioano 1949
There is evidence that American manufacturers were negligent in
failing to protect their workforce from even the specified
maximal exposure or to inform them of the gravity of risk to
which they were subjected
The result has been a flood of
litigation claiming damages to compensate victims under the
general principles of liability in tort instead of the
previously used more limited and modest compensation provisions
of the Workmen's Compensation Acts
The high cost of litigation results in only 39 of a successful
claim eventually being paid to victims who may die before
settlement
The same issues are repeatedly considered by Courts
and the ensuing costs are sharply exemplified by Picher
Industries Inc now in bankruptcy proceedings whose litigation
and attorneys costs in 1989 for approximately 137,000 claims
pending against it were 119.7 million
Since 1982 10 other
major asbestos companies have filed for bankruptcy due to
asbestos claims
The Court rulings which cannot be appealed have lead to wide-
spread criticism
In essence there has been a shift to strict
product liability to third parties for a manufacturer once his
product has entered the chain of commerce and an opening up of general liability insurance policies many years after they were written to cover claims which at that time had not been
contemplated
The entire population has become potential
claimants critics assert to compensate retrospectively for
inadequate protective legislation practice and health care Yet
it is impossible to insure the entire population since it is
impossible to quantify the risk a prerequisite to setting
premium rates
The history of the recognition of the problem of asbestosis and
associated malignancies and the implementation of protective industrial techniques are informative and relevant to the fact
that the global results of Lloyds of London are in heavy deficit
and worse is believed to follow
British underwriting names have
been driven to bankruptcy some having debts of 750,000 on a
standard share in one beleaguered syndicate
There are central issues to insurers and reinsurers liablity that merit further study
Medical Issues
Asbestos is a combination of silicates of magnesium and iron
It
is a versatile substance which is incombustable is capable of
being woven into fabrics and can be impregnated with a variety of
substances
It is used in the manufacture of mattresses brake-
linings proofing material electrical insulation jacketing
boilers and steam pipes and in building products
It was used
for heat insulation in 1866 and asbestos cement was introduced a
few years later
There are three main types of which the blue
variety crocidolite is the most toxic
All three types are
strong with crocidolite being inferior in tensile strength only
to steel wire
Amosite is a naturally long fibre an important
variable in the relative industrial risk whereas white asbestos
chrysolite which constitutes some 93 % of the world
production is a very short fibre and less dangerous
When the insoluble fibres are inhaled they remain in the body and
cause progressive damage
Asbestosis a term first used in 1924
by Cook in a paper published in the British Medical Journal is a
slow insidious progressive replacement of lung tissue by
fibrous tissue incited by the destructive asbestos fibres
The
reserve capacity of the lungs allows the development of the
disorder over many years without severe symptoms until the
damage is well advanced
The pathological changes in the lungs
throws a strain on the heart which has to pump blood through the
damaged lungs and leads to congestive heart failure
1927
According to Dreesen et al whose
ations Public Health Bulletin No.
1938
241
report and
influenced
recommend-
subsequent
American legislation in cases uncomplicated by infection asbes-
tosis progresses by discernable stages similar to silicosis
generally
The increasing replacement of functional lung tissue
by fibrous tissue results in shortness of breath cough weakness
and chest pain which tends to impair working efficiency
As the
disease progresses further the sufferer does not appear well
usually being considerably underweight and appearing tired and
listless
The surviving functional lung areas generally the
apices become distended emphysema and the pathways to them dilated bronchiectasis and brochiolectasis facilitating
infection
At this stage detection of the condition by the
traditional clinical methods of inspection palpation percussion
and auscultation is generally possible
ray changes are more
sensitive to early pathology and progress from an exaggeration of the normal linear markings to granular changes caused by a fine
fibrosis within the tissue spaces aptly described by Merewether
1933 as ground glass a term often used subsequently
The
radiological changes are characteristically more apparent in the
bases of the lung unlike the pneumoconioses induced by other
silicates with the exception of mica
Later workers have
emphasised characteristic patches plaques of radiographically
opaque material on the lining of lung and thoracic cavity
pleural surfaces
A dry and non productive cough is common
Later severe paroxysms of coughing may produce highly tenacious
sputum sometimes streaked with blood
There is a blue tinge to
the lips cyanosis indicating inadequate oxygenation in the
latter stages of the disease
Reduced chest expansion and so
called clubbing of the finger tips and curving of the finger nails pathognomonic of lung and cardiac disease are present in
these cases
The asbestos fibres migrate to other tissues where too they
exert pathogenic effects particularly the induction of cancers
probably at least in part by binding carcinogenic substances such as the products of tobacco smoke so that smokers are at much greater hazard 1 The combined hazard is more than add-
itive so that the risk of lung cancer from asbestos exposure
uncomplicated by smoking is increased some five times over the
expected rate and the increased risk from smoking is probably
elevated eleven times but the combined effect of persistent
asbestos exposure and smoking is an increased risk of lung cancer
53 times
Hammond
above the
1966
levels prevailingin
the general population
ne
Stopping smoking can considerably lower the risk of lung cancer among those previously exposed to asbestos and this is an issue
that touches on contributory negligence that I believe has been
little explored
Two asbestos defendants have taken action
against the tobacco industry in complaints filled in Bell
v Manville Corp. No. C 80-3936 RFP U.S. Distric Court for the Northern District of Carolina and Robbins v Johns-
Manville Corporation No. C 319-073 Superior Court of the State
of California for the County of Los Angeles]
Footnote
1
Any durable fibre with a length greater than five microns
and a diameter less than three microns can induce cancers in
experimental animals Stanton and Wrench 1972 and the volcanic fibre in Karain in Cappadocia 1 with these characteristics does
so in man Baris 1980
The long latency between exposure and latant disease which may be as long as 40 years for some asbestos related diseases
creates difficulties in defining a relationship and a long tail
insurance claims
Knowledge of the adverse effects has been
accumulating and it is relevant to outline some aspects of the
literature on the subject
Growing Insight Into The Hazards
In the Annual report of 1898 of women inspectors of factories HMSO 170 the microscopic appearance of sharp glass jagged asbestos fibres was described and the effects have been found to be injurious as might have been expected
Auribault reported on numerous deaths in a French asbestos spinning and weaving mill between 1890 and 1895 publishing his
findings in the Bulletin of Work Inspectors
In Dangerous Trades edited by T. Oliver published by Dutton in
New York in 1902 Anderson included asbestos amongst the dusts
long known as injurious to man
Scapa reviewed 30 asbestos
workers who attended his clinic between 1894-1906 in his address
to the 18th International Medical Congress in Rome the
proceedings of which were published in 1908 and found rapidly progressive tuberculosis TB to be common
A case of pulmonary fibrosis was reported by Murray in 1907 to
the Committee on Industrial Hygiene in England with a history of
14 years work with asbestos
Series of cases of asbestosis were
subsequently described by a variety of observers including
Pancoast 1918 Pancoast and Pendergrass 1926 Cooke 1924
1927 who had earlier coined the term Wood 1929 1930 Haddow
1929 Simson Lynch and Smith 1935 Ellman 1933 Merewether 1933-1934 Lanza et al 1935 Donnelly 1936 McPheeters
1936 and Shull 1936
More definitive studies were conducted
by the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry in 1935 and
the U.S. Public Health Service and the North Carolina State Board
of Health in 1937.
The U.S. Public Health Service fully
documented the significant risk involved in asbestos textile
factories in a report by Dreesen et al in 1938 discussed
earlier and urged elimination of hazardous exposure
There is no cure and the utmost care should therefore be taken to
minimise inhalation
The situation was recognised early in the
UK initially in 1917 when The British Factory Department ordered improved ventilation and later with more stringent obligations
on manufacturers to control and suppress asbestos dust
established under the Asbestos Industry Regulations of 1931.
At
this time world production was in the region of 340,000 tons
In 1947 the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists a official body responsible for making
recommendations concerning industrial hygiene issued guidelines suggesting threshold limits of 5 million particles per cubic foot of air probably influenced by the recommendations of the Public Health Service nine years earlier Dreesen et al 1938
Disquiet continued and % of all deaths among insulation workers
were held to be due to asbestosis
The New England Journal of
Medicine published an editorial in 1965 vol 272 pp 590-591
insisting that certain industrial operations using asbestos can
be made safe by engineering control
In other operations this
may be so difficult that substitution of a safer material must be
considered
In 1968 the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists reduced their recommended exposure levels to 2 million
particles per cubic foot of air but serious doubt exists that
even the earlier less stringent standards were observed
In
one key case Borel v Fiberboard et al Sept. 10 1973 discussed further a worker described to the Court how despite his earnest attempts to limit exposure his clothes were stiff
with asbestos fibres at the end of a working day
Cancer and Asbestos Exposure
Malignancies are associated with asbestosis
In 1942 and 1943
Gloyne published abstracts of German papers linking asbestos with
plural cancer as well as lung cancer Gloyne 1943 1944
These
abstracts were reprinted alongside others making similar
points in the American Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxico-
logy and the Industrial Hygiene Digest a journal which was
circulated to Manderville and other asbestos companies who
were members of the Industrial Hygiene Foundation
In 1949 Merewether the Chief Inspector of Factories published
his annual report and his finding of lung cancer in 13.2 of
cases of asbestosis but in only 1.3 of cases of silicosis
Following his publication of abstracts of German papers Gloyne published his own findings in the Lancet in 1951 of lung cancer in 14.1 of necropsies on subjects with asbestosis against 6.9
in silicates
The increased risk of the lung cancer run by
asbestos workers was confirmed epidemiologically in the mid 1950s
in Britain Doll 1955 Epidemiological studies were hampered in
America because necropsies were rare and illegal in some states
In 1960 the previously rare tumour pleural mesothelioma was found to occur relatively frequently in South African asbestos workers and many subsequent studies have demonstrated a
relationship between asbestos and this tumour and also an
abdominal tumour peritoneal mesothelioma eg Newhouse and
Thompson 1965
Knowledge of the condition and the complications were widely
10
disseminated in generalist journals such as the Lancet the
British Medical Journal and the New England Journal of Medicine
and reviews and abstracts were often reported on both sides of
the Atlantic in broadly based accounts and abstracts of meetings
and seminars such as the conference entitled Biological Effects
of Asbestos held by the New York Academy of Sciences on October 19-21 1964 published in the Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences with abstracts in the Proceedings of the Royal Society
of Medicine in England
There was a steady stream of publica-
tions in specialist journals devoted to industrial health and
respiratory medicine at a rate of about 30-40 papers a year
during the 1960s when world production of asbestos had climbed
to around 3 million tons per annum the Trades Union Congress asked the
Dr. R. Murray representing
ea
Section of Occupational
Medicine of the Royal Society of Medicine in 1966 whether it was
certain that the proportion of asbestos being used in
\
| manufacturing processes justified the risks of asbestosis
bronchial
\
| use
carcinoma
and
mesothelioma
which were entailed by its
| \
\
The scientific knowledge of the time was matched by the insight
of industrialists
In 1964 Mr. C.G. Addlingley of British
Belting and Asbestos Ltd. Cleckheaton stated we do not believe
there is any safe limit
w e are always striving to get right
down to zero
there is no scientific basis for that limit
5mppcf whatever
John Wells of U.S. Rubber Co. Newnan Ga
repeated these views our own conclusion as we began seeing
11
what was happening in our own process was that the only safe
amount of asbestos dust was zero and that the efforts in terms of
achieving that lay basically in engineering and secondly in
education
But as far as a safe level of asbestos dust is
concerned there is no safe level
The safe level is nil and
anything above the safe level represents certain risks
A 1970 Senate Report on the Occupational Safety and Health Act
stated that Because nothing has been done about the hazards of
asbestos
2 0,000 out of 50,000 workers who have entered one
asbestos trade alone - insulation work - are likely to die of
asbestosis lung cancer or mesothelioma
Nor is the potential
hazard confined to these workers since it is estimated that as
many as 3.5 million workers are exposed to some extent to
asbestos fibers as are many more in the general population
In 1978 the U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare
estimated that between eight and 11 million workers were exposed
since World War 11.
The Commercial Union Insurance Companies
estimated that 13 million workers
have been exposed since the
1940s Special Project 1983
Initial American Legal Requirements
Despite the clear indications of serious industrial hazard workman's compensation laws long remained defective in the US and the legal requirements were inadequate to ensure the health of asbestosis workers Hueper 1965
12
As mentioned above in the review of the chronology of publications on this issue levels of 5.0 million particles per cubic foot of air for daily eight hour exposure was adopted by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists in
1947 and reaffirmed in their conference of 1964
These levels were established on the basis of abdominal
intraperitoneal injections into guinea pigs which may be
regarded tentatively as the threshold value for asbestos dust
exposure until better data are available
Other evidence using
the same experimental technique showed that this level was only
applicable to short fibre asbestos observations and the levels
were vigorous criticised as being inadequately stringent for
humans
For example Shall 1965 in a conference convened by the
New York Academy of Science pointed out that the industrial
plants studied manufactured textiles and the sampling procedure
impinger collection in ethyl alcohol and distilled water
included stone cotton and other dust particles and gave only a
very indirect measure of the risk of asbestosis because of the
relative importance of long fibres whereas the studies had predominantly been on supplies of the short fibre chysolite from
Canada
The sampling of subjects was biased the numbers very small and
the controls inadequate
The study was conducted for a mere five
years in 333 of the 511 employees investigated more than half of
13
whom were under 30 the lowest average age of any group studied
by the Public Health Service at that time for comparison the
average age was 37.8 in the foundry industry
The sick were
missing and the dead were buried
The 76 controls used for
comparison were office workers in the same factories who were known also to have been exposed to asbestos dust so great is the
toxicity that merely living in the vicinity of asbestos
processing eg Wagner Sleggs and Marchand 1960 Wagner 1963 or
handling the clothes of those who work in the factory eg
Hourihane Lessof and Richardson 1966 can lead to asbestosis
Further criticisms included the fact that the exhaust ventilation
systems were not standardised and were inappropriate for
scientific study
The dust count is conceived as an average but
in practice this average often encompasses an enormous range up to 211 million particles per cubic foot of air mppef being recorded and peak levels are probably highly significant because they overwhelm all defence mechanisms with huge lung retentions
The unsatisfactory protective provisions did not eliminate any
moral obligation upon employers or commercial prudence from
insurers to ensure minimisation of risk particularly in respect
of long fibre and blue asbestos and special precautions for the
particularly vulnerable population of smoking workers or their
elimination from the workforce
Certainly some companies were
alive to the problem
Hoffman 1918 pointed out the probable
hazards of asbestos dust and persuaded the Prudential Insurance
14
Company of Boston to discontinue issuing policies to asbestos
workers
Later an epidemiological survey of asbestos workers was
initiated by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of New York
Lanza McConnell and Fehnel 1936
The majority of industrialists were not responsive to the wide-
spread knowledge in the public domain to take proper precautions
to safeguard adequately the health of employers
Evidence was
adduced that during the period 1936-1969 no American manufacturer
of asbestos containing products ever warned contractors or insul-
ation workers of the dangers associated with inhaling dust or
informing them of the American Conference of Governmental Indus-
trial Hygienists's threshold limit values Borel v Fiberboard et
al Sept. 10 1973
Further Evidence of Hazard
Evidence of serious hazard continued to accumulate
In a survey
conducted of 115 deaths amongst asbestosis workers over the years
1931-1949 the mean age of death was 46.5 years
At that time
tuberculosis TB claimed many but pulmonary carcinoma affected
14.8 and abdominal malignancies 6.0 Wyers 1949
Following his published report in 1960 at the International
Congress on Occupational Health in 1963 Wagner reported on more
than 120 cases seen since 1956 Wagner 1963
The extreme
toxicity of the virulent dust is so great that more than half the
cases he described never worked in the asbestos indus ry but
15
simply lived near the mines and mills
As suggested by this
observation in Wagner's series tumours were found after
comparatively low doses probably because the survival from compromised lung and cardiac performance was longer in this
group
TB was becoming increasingly uncommon and the overwhelming
exposures seen in earlier days was largely avoided thus survival
was increasing and the incidence of cancers was becoming more
apparent
Accordingly in a later series of 71 deaths spanning
1957-1964 pulmonary carcinoma had risen to 36.6 and primary
malignancies of the lining of the abdomen the peritoneum had
risen from % in Myers 1949 report to 18.3 Smithers 1965
In a survey published in 1965 of 1522 men working in the
insulation industry it was concluded that asbestosis and its
complications are significant hazards among insulation workers in
the United States at this time
339 out of 392 workers in the
industry followed up for 20 years had asbestosis
Lung cancer
was 7 times higher and gastrointestinal cancer 3 times increased
Selikoff 1965
Selikof had emphasised the association in the
preceding year in a publication in the widely read Journal of the
American Medical Association Selikof et al 1964 and emphasised
that his data do not give an indication of incidence since he
had studied a group of men in the insulation trade with only intermittent exposure to materials containing limited amounts of asbestos in a trade with a short working week working in
16
variable conditions including the open air with results
relating to the relatively recent past
In the same paper he
and his colleagues drew attention to the hazard of environmental
exposure reviewing five papers from South Africa Britain and
Finland
Tighteneing of American Legal Requirements
In 1968 the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists revised their guidelines suggesting threshold limits of 2 million particles per cubic foot of air instead of 5
million
Discussion
In American law a seller has a responsibility to inform users
and consumers of dangers which the seller either knows or should
know at the time the product is sold
Manufacturers failure to
provide such warnings renders them liable to damages
It is estimated Einthoven and Kronick 1991 that despite nearly 15 of the gross national product being spent on health 40
million American citizens have no more than Third World care
Against the difficulty the average citizen has in obtaining care for chronic disorders with inadequate benefits from public assistance programs and the workmen's compensation system which would generally result in a disability pension based on a percentage of weekly income claimants have turned to the tort
17
litigation system in increasing numbers with up to 25,000
plaintiffs claiming off more than 260 defendants in 1981
The
tide I continues to rise unabated and has not begun to crest
Summary of the Report of the Judicial Conference 1991
Predictions have been made of 200,000 asbestos disease deaths
before the year 2000 and as many as 265,000 by the year 2015
MacAvoy et al 1982
American Courts have responded with awards against insurers for
asbestos related risks with interpretations of the original
policy wordings which stretch credulity and call in question the quality of justice which seems tainted by considerations of
social engineering
In essence there has been a shift to strict
product liability to third parties for a manufacturer once his
product has entered the chain of commerce and an opening up of
general liability policies seemingly to compensate retrospect-
ively for inadequate protective labour health legislation
practice and health care
The trials are complex and expensive
In the Cimino v Raymark
Industries trial in the Eastern District of Texas Civil Action
No. 86-0456 CA E.D. Tex during the pendency the court
signed 373 pretrial and trial orders there are 529 pages of
docket sheets and over 3,000 depositions were taken
The trial
transcript contained 25,348 pages 271 expert and 292 fact
witnessess testified and 6,176 exhibits consisting of 577
pages were received in evidence
58 lawyers participated in the
18
133 days of trial during which 488 of the original plaintiffs
died and at least seven of the defendants had declared bankrupcy
In a smaller case Reeves v American Export Isbrabdsten N.
Dist of Ohio Civil Action Nos C86-2330 C86-821 C86-2559
C86-4601 involving only four plaintiffs the smallest number
of lawyers in the courtroom at any one time during the trial was
41 and the maximum 58.
There were 100 lawyers listed as counsel
of record in the Brooklyn Navy Yard asbestos trial in the
Southern District of New York
Against these figures it is hardly surprising that the costs of litigation exceed victims recovery by nearly two to one and future claimants may lose altogether because of exhaustion of
assets
The picture is not a pretty one
Decisions concerning
thousands of deaths millions of injuries and billions of
dollars are entangled in a litigation system whose strengths have
increasingly been overshadowed by its weakness Hensler et al
1985
Underwriters twenty or more years ago apparently did not perceive
any great risks from asbestos related claims
Premiums were low
and reserves inadequate
This was despite the fact that
knowledge was available in the medical literature including
Journals of Industrial Medicine Proceedings of International
Conferences on Asbestos related diseases and in the General
Medical Journals despite the presence of legislation governing
exposure levels because of the perception of the problem by Governments in America and Britain and despite the knowledge of
19
industrialists and at least some insurance companies
Never-
theless they had no reason to expect that their policies were
going to be interpreted to mean that they were insuring the
entire population
Now the insurance industry is suddenly called upon to to cover
incurred and anticipated liability on the interpreted meaning
of the original wording
The U.S. Judicial Conference Ad Hoc
Committee on Asbestos Litigation 1991 lately reported that it
believes it to be inevitable that unless Congress acts to
formulate a national solution with the present rate of dissi-
pation of the funds of defendant producers due to transaction costs large verdicts and multiple punitive damage awards all resources for payment of these claims will be exhausted in a few
years
An essay focussed on a particular industrial hazard may well seem
to advance that problem to a more prominent position than is
merited
Historically other industrial hazards preoccupied
scientific and commercial interests amongst the lung diseases
tuberculosis coal miners pneumoconiosis and the general problem
of silicosis for a long time eclipsed the specific silicosis
problems of asbestosis
Bladder cancer in the chemical industry
and skin cancer in the cotton industry competed for peoples time
and attention
Nevertheless it is reasonable to expect that
those concerned with mining or processing asbestos should have been alert to the growing body of medical opinion that first
20
tentatively and then authoratively established links between
asbestos fibre inhalation and serious diseases
In 1964 Selikof
considered that his alarming results were tempered by the fact that they were obtained in an era when industry has been aware
of potential asbestos hazard
Similarly one would expect that
underwriters would take some interest in literature pertinent to
the risks they are covering
Intelligence gathering in medicine
is greatly facilitated by the excellent Index Medicus and it is
simple to consult this publication for a comprehensive annual
survey of the world literature
Journals of Industrial Medicine
might reasonably be consulted by the medical staff of major
concerns and one at least is known to have been subscribed to by
several asbestos producers
It is impossible to draw a sharp line in time to say when a
particular viewpoint has become ingrained in the consciousness of
those intimately concerned with the issue
What is clear
however from a reading of the major journals and abstracting
services is that a Nelsonian eye seems to have long been turned
towards the mounting evidence of industrial hazard
In his
evidence to the Court Dr. Clark Cooper an expert witness for the defence in Borel v Fiberboard et al 1973 testified as follows
Q The state of knowledge in the 1930's lets say in your opinion was asbestosis as a disease known about and recognized as a danger caused by inhaling asbestos dust
A. Yes 21
Q. And would you say that would have been rather common knowledge in the 1930's
A. Yes I would say that
The answer to that would be
yes
clearly indicating that the hazard was appreciated
One of the criticisms made by the Appeal Judges in Borel v Fibre-
board was that manufacturers did no research into the hazard no
manufacturer ever tested the effect of their products on the
workers using them
It would appear that their behaviour was
more reprehensible than this and it would seem that they actually sponsored research albeit properly on animals and then supressed publication of the unfavourable outcome Brodeur
1985 Huncharek 1990 Castleman 1990
Legal safeguards which sluggishly responded to the scientific
understanding seem to have been outrageously flouted
This is
the view of the Courts that have indignantly awarded punitive
damages to claimants very nearly 5billion dollars between 1980
and 1982 Rand Corporation 1984
In an asbestos case tried in
the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Autumn of 1990 the verdict in-
cluded a 25 million punitive damage award to one plaintiff
against one defendant
The total verdict was 26.3 million see
Washington Post B1 B4 November 29th 1990
22
The American Government accepted its culpability in the Naval
shipyards during World War 11 when the war effort condoned
unsafe practices of PPG Industries and Corning Glass Works
Distric Court for the Eastern District of Texas 1978
It seems
ironic that insurers should be called upon to pay punitive damage
awards that arise because manufacturers flouted appropriate safe-
guards and hazarded mens lives for commercial gain and worse
that they seemed to suppress proper research findings that went
against their perceived interests of Brodeur 1985 Huncharek
1990 Castleman 1991 thus seriously jeopardising their claims by breaching the principle of utmost good faith implicit in all
insurance contracts in the light of information obtained
through legal discovery proceedings in hundreds of asbestos law-
suits it is undeniable that leaders of the asbestos industry
conspired to misinform both the public and the scientific commun-
ity about the dangers of asbestosis Huncharek 1990
It is doubly unreasonable that reinsurers should be called upon
to meet the negligence of the primary insurers when they failed to ensure that their commercial interests were reasonably protected and themselves failed to heed the readily available
knowledge of industrial hazard
Most of all it is remarkable that Lloyds names should be held personally liable when so many on whom they rely appear to have failed in their duties of care
23
To exemplify the cavalier attitude to safety in the key case Borel v Fiberboard et al Sept. 10 1973 Borel was diagnosed
as suffering from asbestosis by a doctor employed by an insurance
company
Borel protested that basic safety equipment like masks
initially were not available and then had to be specially
requested and were intolerable for prolonged wear
He stated
that his clothes were stiff with asbestos dust at the end of each
working day when legal ventilation requirements limited dust
exposure to levels where this would have been impossible
Commercially it would have been prudent to have insisted on the
manufacturer adopting the necessary safety procedures and to have
excluded Mr. Borel from further cover as it would have been
prudent to have excluded all other employees so affected and particularly all those who were smokers Borel pitifully but
convincingly stated that he did not know what asbestosis was and
the Court concluded that the manufacturer's warnings were totally
inadequate
It is debatable whether reinsurers on the other side
of the Atlantic should be held liable if proper precautions
failed to be taken because the original insurers were negligent
in their duty
However until the Outhwaite syndicate recently
protested its reinsurance liabilites on the basis of inadequate
disclosure such matters have never been addressed
Outstanding questions regarding names liability are
i
if manufacturers well knew the inevitable consequence of
24
not complying with legal safeguards and yet failed to
do so should claims have been made on insurers since the outcome could not be regarded as fortuitous Indeed recent American judgements in relation to
pollution claims the Shell Oil trial in
California and the Diamond Shamrock trial in New Jersey reinforce the concept that a fortuitous outcome is a central requirement of a viable insurance
contract
ii if manufacturers failed to disclose information in their possession germane to the risk whether they have breached the fundamental requirement of utmost good faith and prejudiced their contracts of insurance
iii
whether primary insurers were liable for illegal
industrial practices and properly paying awards of
punitive damages
iv whether primary insurers sought to minimise their risk by insisting on prudent industrial practices and if they did not whether they exercised due diligence
v
whether insurers or reinsurers sought to stratify the known risks e.g by raising the premium for smokers and workers with already established lung disease or
25
excluding them from their policies
Envoi
It has long been known that workers with nickel carbonyl nickel refiners arsenic weed killers haematite quarry workers and persons working with chromates all have a high incidence of lung cancer and it is obvious that such workers too require very carefully controlled working environments
Malcolm P.I. Weller
26
References
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1964
Threshold Limit Values for 1964.
American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists Cincinnati Ohio
Baris Y.I. 1980 The clinical and radiological aspects of 185
cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma
In Wagner J.C. ed
Biological effects of mineral fibres Vol 12 Lyon
International Agency for Research on Cancer 937-47
Castleman B.I. 1991 Asbestos and cancer history and public
policy
British Journal of Industrial Medicine 48 427-432
Doll R. 1955 Mortality from lung cancer in asbestos workers
British Journal of Industrial Medicine vol.12 pp 81-86
Desmeules R. Rousseau L. Giroux M. Sirois A.
1941
Asbestosis and pulmonary cancers
Laval Medicina 49 14-27
Dreessen et al 1938 A study of Asbestosis in the asbestos textile industry Public Health Bulletin No. 241
Einthoven A.C. and Kronick R. 1991 Universal health insurance
through incentives reform
Journal of the American Medical
Association vol 265 pp 2532-2536
Ellman P. 1933
Pulmonary asbestosis its clinical
radiological and pathological features and associated risk of
27
tuberculosis infection pp 165-183
Journal of Industrial Hygiene vol 15
Gardener L.U. 1943 Letter to V. Brown and attached outline of
proposed monograph on asbestosis
24 February cited Castleman
1991
Gloyne S.R.
1943 Abstract of Nordmann M. and Sorge A. Lung
cancer from asbestos dust in animal experiments Z. Krebsfortsch
1941 51 168-82 in Bulletin of Hygiene 1943 651
Gloyne S.R.
1944 Abstract of of Wedler H.W.
Lung cancer in
asbestosis patients
Deutches Archiv fur Klinischen Medizin
1943 191 189-209 in Bulletin of Hygiene 19 362
Haddow A.C. 1929 in Report of Annual Meeting of British Medical Assoiation Manchester 1929. Lancet 2 230-231
Hammond E.C. 1966 Asbestos exposure cigarette smoking and
death rates
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences vol
330 pp 473-490
Hensler et al 1985
Asbestos in the Courts The Challenge of
Mass Toxic Torts iii Foreward Institute for Civil Justice of
the Rand Corporation
Hoffman F.L. 1918 Mortality from Respiratory Disease in Dusty
Trades
Bulletin of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics No. 231
Industrial Accident Hygiene Service No. 17 U.S. Bureau of
28
Labour Washington D.C.
Hourihane D. O'B Lessof L. and Richardson P.C. 1966 Hyaline
and calcified pleural plaques as an index of exposure to asbestos A study of radiological and pathological features of
100 cases with the consideration of epidemiology
British
Medical Journal vol 1 pp 1069-1074
Heuper W.C. 1943 Cancer in relation to occupation and environ-
ment
Bulletin of the American Society for the Control of Cancer
25 63-9
Hueper W.C. 1965 Occupational and nonoccupational exposure to
asbestos
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences vol 131
pp 184-195
Huncharek M. 1990 Asbestos a chronology of its origins and
health effects
British Journal of Industrial Medicine 47 845
Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation 1991 Summary of the Report Agenda 23 March
Kilvuoto R. 1960 Pleural calcification as roentgenologic sign of occupational endemic anthrophyllite Acta Radiol Suppl 194 1-67
Lanza A.J. McConnell W.J. & Fehnel J.W. 1935
Effects of the
inhalation of asbestos dust on the lungs of asbestos workers
Public Health Report vol 50 pp 1-12 Reprint no 1665
29
Lecoeur J.
1942 The study of occupational cancer
Medicale 50 415-18
Presse
MacAvoy P. et al Related Diseases
1982 The Economic Consequences of AsbestosYale University School of Organization and
Management Working Paper No. 27 January
Macklin M.T. and Macklin C.C.
1940 Does chronic irritation
cause primary carcinoma of the human lung Archives of Pathology
30 924-55
McCaughey W.T.E. Wade O.L. and Elmes P.C. 1962 Exposure to
asbestos dust and diffuse pleural mesotheliomas
British Medical
Journal 1397
Merewether E.R.A. & Price C.W. 1930
Report on effeccts of
asbestos dust on the lungs and dust suppression in the absestos
industry
H.M. Stationery Office London England
Merewether E.R.A. 1933-1934
A memorandum on asbestosis
Tubercle vol 15 pp 69-81 pp 109-118 pp 152-159
Murray M. 1907 In Report of the Departmental Committe on
Compensation for Industrial Disease
Minutes of Evidence
Appendicies and Index
London Wyman and Sons for H.M.S.O. C.d.
: 3496 3495
Murray R. 1990 Asbestos a chronology of its origins and health
effects
British Journal of Industrial Medicine 47 361-5
30
Mottura G. and Faggioano E. pathogenesis of asbestosis 140 1219-20
1949 Pathological anatomy and Rassegne Medicina Industriale
Muehleck E. 1943 Letter to WWF Sheperd Turner and Newall
00
March cited Castleman 1991
Newhouse M.L.and Thompson H. 1965 Epidemiology of mesothelial
tumours in the London area
Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences vol 132 pp 579-588
Pancoast H.K. Miller T.G. & Landis H.R.M. 1918 A roentgenologic study of the effects of dust inhalation upon the lungs American Journal of Roentology vol 5 pp 129-138
Pancoast H.K. and Pendergrass E.P. 1926 Pnemoconiosis
silicosis A roentgenological study
pp 155-156 Hoeber New
York N.Y.
Rand Corporation 1984 Annual Report 54 April 1st 1990- March 31st 1991
Selikoff I.J. ChurgJ and Hammond E.C. 1964 Asbestos exposure
and neoplasia
Journal of the Amarican Medical Association 188
22-26
Selikoff I.J. 1965 The occurrence of pleural calcification
among asbestos insulation workers
Annals of the New York
31
Academy of Sciences vol 131 pp 351-367
Shall J.R. 1936
Asbestosis A roentgenological review of 71
cases
Radiology vol 27 pp 279-292
Shall L. 1965 Present threhold limit value in the U.S.A. for asbestos dust A critique Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences vol 131 pp 316-321
Smithers Secular changes in asbestosis Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Special Project 1983 An Analysis of the Legal Social and Political Issues Raised by Asbestos Litigation 39 Vand Law Review 573 see 580 n.13
Stanton M.F. and Wrench C. 1972 Mechanisms of mesothelioma
induction in asbestos and fibnrous glass
Journal of National
Cancer Institute 48 797-821
Thomson J.C. Kaschula R.O.C. and MacDonald R.R. 1963 Asbestos
as modern urban hazard
South African Medical Journal 37 77-81
Wagner J.C. Sleggs C.A. and Marchand P. 1960 Diffuse pleural
mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the north western Cape
Province
British Journal of Industrial Medicine vol 17 pp
260-271
32
Wagner J.C. 1963 Asbestos dust exposure and malignancy Proceedings of 14th Congress on Occupational Health Madrid
Wolff A.
1940 Pulmonary asbestosis
Tidskrift 21 1-40
Nordisk Hygienisk
Wood W.B. 1929
Pulmonary asbestosis
Radiographic
appearances in Skiagrams of the chest of workers in asbestos
Tubercle vol 10 pp 353-363
Wood W.B. & Gloyne S.R. 1930 Pulmonary asbestosis vol 1 pp 445-448
Lancet
Wood W.B. & Gloyne S.R. 1934
Pulmonary asbestosis
of one hundred cases
Lancet vol 2 pp 1383-1385
A review
Wyers H. 1949 Asbestosis pp 632-638
Post Graduate Medical Journal Vol 25 25
Cases
Bell v Manville Corp. No. C 80-3936 RFP U.S. Distric Court for the Northern District of Carolina
Borel v Fiberboard Paper Products Corporation et al no.72-1492 US Court of Appeals for the fifth circuit 493 F.2d 1076 4ELR 20133 Sept. 10 1973 Rehearing and Rehearing en banc denied May
13th 1974
33
Manville Corporation No. C 319-073 Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles
PPG Industries and Corning Glass Works Distric Court for the Eastern District of Texas 1978
Reeves v American Export Isbrabdsten
N. Dist of Ohio Civil
Action Nos C86-2330 C86-821 C86-2559 C86-4601
Robbins v Cimino v Raymark Industries trial in the Eastern
District of Texas
Civil Action No. 86-0456 CA E.D. Tex
34