Document QMGkLDp02RBXKRGB0DDyMxKE

'r EBASCO SERVICES v. ~ 3 SPO RATED VIA AIR MAIL Qstobar 9, 1999 Mr A A Woodward, Acting Chief Heeh--leal Tnglnee Pvblle Berries Cmyany of Colorado P 0 Box 9h0 Dan--r, Colorado CHnOKB 9TATIQV > M3T 10. 1 sTBAM onusiBo W J We attach tar your laftar--tion c-- copy of Babcock A Vileoac's letter of October 27, 1959. 1 & V state* that they he-- no objeeti-- to the installation of two retractable bio--re fran Uhlt t -- Boiler Vo. 1 in order to grsr--nt the possibility of r^f of the superheater beak shieh would --ceasitata -- outage for cleaning, lowersr, they state that they rill not at this tl-- order rep! s nonent units for Cheroh-- S. They wish first to obtain test data baaed on changes which he-- been nade during the prea--t outage to Unit 1 and if thin test data aad observation of the fouling of the superheater bank indicates that the tie-- are not regilred, then they would request that the-- bloeure be ranorad serf. installed -- Uhit 2 -- originally Intended. They further state that if it is required that the bio-- a-- --eded fbr Chit 1 they will order out two additional bio-- for unit 2 but after Uhlt 2 h-- go-- into operation they will consider the necessity of furnishing tee additional blowers for the superheater on Unit 2. They also eaatl-- that the emng--ant of the fUree-- surface aad screen at the antran-- to the supsrhea ter is different -- Uhlt 2. They do not belie-- that the aead far addltln--1 bio--re far the superheater -- Uhlt 1 will necessarily Justify ordering additional bio-- for the saae location on Uhlt 2 at this tl--. We trust pen arm In agree--at vith this suggested --aae of procedure. RRl/ia Knel ccj N N Koah A A Woodeard L K Roberts-- B A Snow I C Ysw/R R Ban--tt/J iC McCoy I L Loee/J t Ben--11/R J R Sadth/R 9 Oe--hi V o Karris Jr W Q Lauffsr Tory truly yours. ICTw Chief Mechanical lftnginoer a Bennett WAD00045