Document QM28QLa8eXwQZRbYr4OQm6w4v
Thelravelersj
The Travelers Companies 2270 Lakeside Blvd. Richardson. TX 7S0SI RO. Box 6600SS Dalas. TX 7S26B-OOS5
Kay 30, 1989
t/r
Dallas Omen
Mr. Art Cat! in
. j j ,...
General Manager
Genuine Parts Company; Inc.;;
Rayloc - Payson P. 0: Box 347
. ri;
Payson, Utah 84651
'
Dear Mr. Catlin:
~
The attached report will confirm the results of my industrial hygiene
air sampling survey conducted at your automotive replacement part
remanufacturing facilities on March 29, 1989. This survey was
requested by Rayloc division management to assess employees' potential
exposure to airborne asbestos fibers during typical Brake Department
operations. The areas evaluated during this survey included Debonding,
Delining, Disc Brake Riveting, Clutch Disc Drilling, and Receiving
operations.
Also during this survey, industrial hygiene air sampling was performed in the Cleaning Room to assess employees' potential exposure to perchloroethylene vapors during degreasing operations. 8oth personal and general area samples were taken to evaluate this exposure.
I would like to thank both you and Ms. LuAnn Wignall, Personnel
Manager, for your cooperation and the courtesies extended towards me
during my visit, if you have any questions regarding this Industrial
hygiene air sampling survey or the recommendations submitted, please
contact me.
.
Tours truly. -
.i
Joseph E. David, III
Engineering Specialist
.
Industrial Hygiene and Environmental Services Unit
214-470-8974
JEDrlm
';o;r.
i,
SCF-NAPA-3200
NAPA 038
NOVO20052
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, INC.', RAYLOC-PAYSON PAYSON, UTAH
MAY 30, 1989 PAGE 2
Distribution:
Orig: As Addressed
1 cc:
Ms. LuAnn Wlgnall Genuine Parts Company, Inc. Rayloc - Payson f: m
P. 0. Box 347 Payson, Utah 84561
1 cc: .
Mr. Thomas W. Wright Vice President & Treasurer Genuine Parts Company, Inc. 2999 Circle 75 Parkway, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30339
cc: Mr. John E. Adderhold Division Manager. Rayloc Remanufacturing Divis
600 Rayloc Drivers.W. Atlanta, Georgia430378
1 cc:
Mr. George Jehlen Alexander & Alexander, Inc. Two Piedmont Center 3565 Piedmont Road, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30305
1 cc: Atlanta, Engineering
1 cc: Salt Lake City, Engineering
1 cc: SAM Casualty Underwriting Home Office 10 MN Attn: Steve Grabble'^; '
1 cc: JED-File:Raylocpu.ltr/7
NOVO20053
J
%
. 'it
ENGINEERING REPORT for
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, RAYLOC - PAYSON 700 North, 500 East Payson, Utah 84651
INC.
'y
llielraveler^r ENGINEERING DIVISION
c 17162 R1083 Printed *o U.S. A.
i
NOVO20054
m!-
ENGINEERING REPORT
for
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, RAYLOC - PAYSON 700 North, 500 East Payson, Utah 84651
INC.
prepared by U
JOSEPH E. DAVID, III Engineering Specialist
Industrial Hygiene and Environmental Services Unit
2270 Lakeside Blvd. Richardson, Texas 75082
,
THE TRAVELERS ENGINEERING DIVISION
Industrial Hygiene
Survey-
.
March 29, 1989
;*v-'
Engineering Services Protecting iPeople and Property Since 1894
r 1 7 :A2 1 rtbRO Primed n U S. A.
. ; y
NOVO20055
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY:
ft 11.'
Introduction
.
Sunmary
Conclusions
Recommenda ti6ns
Technical Discussion
- Page - Page - Page - Page - Page
SECTION II APPENDIX: Exhibit 1: Industrial Hygiene Survey Data Sheets (6) Exhibit 2: Industrial Hygiene. Analysis Report Extensions Sheets (4) Exhibit 3: cTE^;Analyiis Results
Exhibit 4: OSHA; Asbestos Standard (1910.1001) Exhibit 5: Eight-Hour Time-Weighted Average
Calculations
a.ii;s r
:t* "oik'
NOVO20056
INTRODUCTION
During January 1989, I was contacted by Mr. KilTiara Wright, Jr., Loss Control Engineer with The Travelers Atlanta Office, to discuss industrial hygiene air sampling requested by Rayloc Remanufacturing division management. Mr. Wright serves as the Engineering Account Manager for Genuine Parts Company, Inc.
Rayloc division management requested an industrial hygiene air sampling evaluation at selected Remanufacturing locations to assess employees' potential exposure to airborne asbestos fibers during typical Brake Department/operations.
~ , I contacted Mr. Artr/gatlln, 6eneral Manager, to schedule an industrial hygiene sair sampling survey at the Rayloc Remanufacturing facilities in Payson, Utah, Location Code Z-5-121. On March 29, I conducted an Industrial hygiene air sampling survey-- at this location to assess employees' potential exposure to airborne asbestos fibers during typical Brake Department operations. Also, personal air /sampling was performed in the Cleaning Room to assess operators' potential exposure to perchloroethylene during cleaning operations.
During this survey, I reviewed the Hazard Communication Program which has been developed and Implemented. These results were submitted in a previous letter dated April 25, 1989. Ms. LuAnn Wignall, Personnel Manager, assisted me during my on-site survey.
This report documents v.the results of my Industrial hygiene
evaluation.
`
SUMMARY
An Asbestos Exposure Control Program should be: developed.. and
implemented in the Brake Department to comply with OSHA's Asbestos
Standard, 29CFR1910.1001, Operator exposure exceeded' the OSHA
Permissible Exposure Limit during Debonding, Disc Brake Riveting,
and Clutch Disc drilling activities. Operator exposure exceeded
the OSHA Action Level' diiring Dellriing (Chopping) activities, and
approached the "OSHAf^Afetion'-'5,'Level during Receiving (Sorting)
activities. '
"'"tiff'
A r c,y;;ji t:;
General area samples taken within the center of the Cleaning Room
indicated the presence of perchloroethylene vapors.
Actual
operator exposure was below the applicable hygienic standard. The
use of perchloroethylene as a degreasing solvent Is to be phased
out in the near future. Until f this time, a Degreaser
Maintenance/Inspection Program should^implemented to ensure that
these vapor degreasers are ! iiikirn't'ained in proper operating
condition.
' v '-
75*
NOVO20057
p.-i.
CONCLUSIONS
Personal samples were taken foi;;, operators while performing Oebonding, Delining (Chopping), .D^4r)Brake Riveting, Clutch Disc
Drilling, and Receiving (porting) operations. Eight-hour
time-weighted average (8-hour TWA) exposures to asbestos fibers,
for those operators sampled, were calculated based upon the
concentration of fibers identified as asbestos in each sample by
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis. The 8-hour TWA
exposure to asbestos fibers for all operators sampled approached or
exceeded the Action Level of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter of
air.
-v
The 8-hour TWA exposure to asbestos fibers for the Oebonding, Disc Brake Riveting, and Clutch Disc Drilling operators sampled exceeded the Permissible Exposure Level of 0.2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air as established by OSHA Standard 1910.1001.
A summary of the results is as follows:
OPERATOR
OPERATION
8-HOUR TWA
1. Wayne Jackman
r Oebonding /,v
0.2840 asbestos fibers/cubic centimeter of air
2. Glen Richardson v. "'Deliner t operator
0.1090 asbestos fibers/cubic centimeter of air
3. Calvin Brindley
Disc Brake ri veter
0.3892 asbestos fibers/cubic centimeter of air
4. Salvador Gonzalez 5. Tracy Hill
Clutch Disk: driller *' 'iV
Receiving 1 (Sorting) operator
v,0/2623 asbestos fibers/cubic bentimeter of air
0.0864 asbestos fibers/cubic centimeter of air
As a result of these asbestos sampling results, a formal Asbestos Exposure Control Program should be developed and implemented in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910.1001.
The calculated 8-hour TWA exposure to perchloroethylene vapors, for the Cleaning Room operator sampled, was below the applicable
hygienic standard. However, general area samples indicated the
presence of perchloroethylene vapors within the Cleaning Room
workplace.
'
Ms. Wignall indicated that perchloroethylene is to be phased out as a degreasing solvent, however, to reduce the potential for employee exposure to organic vapors during Degreasing operations, a formal Degreaser Maintenance/.Ip'spection Program should be implemented to
t! v
NOVO20058
ensure that these vapor degreasers are maintained in proper operating condition. Also, local exhaust ventilation may be required at these degreasers to move solvent vapors from the workplace at their source of generation.
RECOMMENDATIONS
IH 89-2
IMPORTANT - ASBESTOS EXPOSURE CONTROL PR06RAH: A formal asbestos exposure control program should be developed and implemented in .accordance . with OSHA Standard 1910.1001. This prograpjl'sHould address the following provisions.
1. Feasible engineering controls and/or work practices should be developed and Implemented to reduce and
- maintain employee exposure at or below the Permissible Exposure Limit. Engineering controls include isolation, local exhaust ventilation, process enclosures, dust collection systems, etc. Work practice controls include using wet methods^-- prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning activities, etc. Job' rotation is not an acceptable means of employee exposure control for asbestos.
2. Personal protective equipment must be provided and used by employees until engineering controls or work practice controls can be effectively implemented. Personal ... protective equipment required should include:
a. Approved, cartridge-type respirators - whichshould be provided for and used by employees. Also, a formal respiratory protection program in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910.134 should be implemented immediately.
b. Special clothing including coveralls, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings should be prov1dea;and used by employees immediately.
3. W&rii^T^igns Should be provided and displayed in each area where airborne asbestos fiber
' concentrations are in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit.
4. Affected employees should be notified in writing regarding the sampling results within IS working
days after receipt of these sampling results. This written notification: should contain corrective action being taken1';' bjrv the employer to reduce employee exposure';;to ait or below the Permissible Exposure Level wherever sampling results indicate
3
NOVO20059
art :.
c'r.-j; tv y K
, -sri ' V nUrtfi?
that the Permissible Exposure Limit has been
exceeded.
`;
-I V.
'
5. A medical surveillance program should be implemented
for all employees who are or will be exposed to
airborne concentrations of asbestos fibers at or
above the Action Level. Before an employee is
assigned to an occupation where exposed to airborne
concentration of asbestos, a preplacement medical
examination should be provided. This examination
should include, at a minimum, a medical and work
history, a complete physical examination of all
systems with emphasis on the respiratory system,
cardiovascular system, and digestive tract,
completion of the respiratory disease standardized
questionnaire, a chest roentgenogram, pulmonary
function tests to include forced vital capacity and
forced expiratory volume at one second, and any
additional tests deemed appropriate by the examining
physician. Follow-up medical examinations should be
provided on an annual basis.
~
6. Clean ;%hapge rooms with shower facilities and isplatedy,lockers should be provided for employees v'ho-work;>in areas where airborne asbestos fibers are presentat or above the Permissible Exposure Limit.
Also, laundering service for contaminated clothing should be made available, to all employees who work in these regulated areas.
7. A training program for all employees who are exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos rt-or-above the Action LeveT jshould be developed and implemented. This' training program should include
provisions for discussing the health effects associated with asbestos exposure, the relationship between smoking and exposure to asbestos, the quantity and location of asbestos, the specific
nature ..of, operations which could result in exposure to asbestos, engineering controls and work practices associated with employee's job assignment, proper use of personal protective equipment, the medical surveillance program, and the provisions of OSHA ' Standard 1910.1001. This training program should be repeated annually. Records should be maintained on file to document all training activities.
8. Resampling to evaluate employee exposure to asbestos should be conducted at least semiannually. Also, resampling ds suggested to ensure that any engineering controls implemented are effective in rqduc|:09spnployee exposure to asbestos. jslated'.I'fl.r-.
4
NOV020060
These are minimum' requirements of the OSHA Asbestos Standard. To ensure compliance with this legal standard,
a copy?ofsOSHAr Standard 1910.1001 has been provided in Exhibit 4- ofi.tlie Appendix to assist you with compliance.
IH 89-3 -
VAPOR DE6REASER MAINTENAHCE/INSPECTIQN PROGRAM:
To
ensure that all vapor degreasers are maintained In proper
operating condition, a formal maintenance/inspectlon
program should be developed and implemented. Scheduled
inspections/maintenance items should include temperature
controllers, condensation .coils, and slot ventilation
systems, if provided. 'These; controls are essential in
regulating and preventing degreaser solvent vapor from
entering the operator's breathing zone. Records should
be kept to document all vapor degreaser maintenance and
inspection activities. Also, written procedures should
be established regarding the cleaning and use of these
vapor degreasers during normal work operations.
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
I. Asbestos Sampling:
Air sampling was conducted in the Brake Department during typical brake remanufacturing operation. A personal sampling
strategy was used during this industrial hygiene evaluation.
During personal sampling, both the pump and collecting medium are attached diBKtly tg, the workers to sample the air to which they,`Sf.e`^ifrosed during the typical workday. This is the preferfed metWo'd since it takes into consideration those
times during' th|'?workday when employees are away from the areas of actuaT'eicposure.
The sampling apparatus consisted of battery powered air sampling pumps which draw air through a collecting medium at a predetermined flow rate. The flow rate was monitored by means of a rotameter calibratedj*j>fcibr to use against a primary standard mass .flow meter."?iiSAri ^open-faced, 25mm millipore filter was used to collect airborne fibers.
Details of sampling locations and sampling equipment are given
in the first five Industrial Hygiene Survey Data Sheets
contained in Exhibit 1 of the Appendix. Also provided in
Exhibit 2 of the Appendix are two Industrial Hygiene Analysis
Reports/Extension Sheets which present analytical data and
test results.
The analytical method used by The Travelers Laboratory to determine fiber concentration was Phase Contrast Microscopy. This method is consistent with NIOSH 7400 Standards. The NI0SH 7400 method does not distinguish between fiber types
5
NOVO20061
tieSHak
present. This method requires'that all fibers meeting the set criteria be counted. However, due to the presence of airborne particulates in the workplace, many samples taken were overloaded with particulate matter. Fibers were observed on these filters but an accurate fiber count could not be performed. Thus,employees* eight-hour TWA exposures were not calculated using the total fiber count.
To determine actual asbestos content of the air samples,
additional analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEN)
was required. Transmission Electron Microscopy allows for
identification of the type of fibers and the determination of
quantity present. These samples were sent to an outside
laboratory, Electron-Microscopy Service Laboratories,
Incorporated, for TEM analysis. Results of this TEN analysis
are provided in Exhibit 3 of the Appendix. The OSHA hygienic
standard for asbestos exposure provides for a Permissible
Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air and an Action Leyejyjf 0.1: fibers per cubic centimeter of air
calculated as;arj;*ei|jht-hour, time-weighted average.
--
The type of asbestos fibers present In each sample was determined to be chrysotile. Chrysotile Is a common form of asbestos used in automotive brake shoes. In some cases, non-asbestosform fibers were also found. This is expected
since many of the newer brake shoes are being constructed without asbestos-containing materials.
An eight-hour, time-weighted averaige concentration permits
excursions above the hygiehic standard provided they are
compensated for by equal excursions below the hygienic
standard during the workday. When analyzing the results
obtained for these personal samples, eight-hour, time-weighted
averages were calculated and compared to the applicable OSHA
hygienic standard; The concentration of asbestos fibers
greater than five microns in length in each sample was used to
calculate the eight-hour, time-weighted average exposure for
each employee sampled.
- - ...................
The following is a synopsis of the air sampling results by
department:
A. Oebonding:
In the debonding operation, the friction material bonded to the brake shoes is removed by a burn-in process. Special, bufrWin ovens . Have been installed for this operatibn;.e>MThe presorted, incoming brake parts are dumped^oft'icift^wofk "table within the Burn Room. These
parts are then; loaded into the burn-in ovens. After the burning process, the brake shoes are separated from the lining and the shoes are placed back into the original barrel for further processing. No local exhaust
6 '
ventilatipn^gystenf has been provided for the dump table
within the fBu'rn Room. On the day of sampling, only
automotive Brake shoes were being processed rather than
truck brake shoes.
,
B. Delining:
In the delining (chopping); operation, the friction
material bonded to the brake shoe Is removed by a mechanical chopping operation using a special machine. This friction material contains asbestos fibers. Two chopping machines are operated In the delining operation. A local exhaust ventilation duct Is provided near the point of operation, however, sampling results indicate that the ventilation arrangement is not adequate in removing asbestos fibers at its source. Cross currents Induced by floor fans used In the area also can be considered as a contributing factor to the airborne concentration of asbestos fibers at this operation.
C. Disc Brake Riveting:
In this department, new pucks are riveted onto disc plates. Mechanical rivet presses are used to install these pucks. Ho local exhaust ventilation Is provided In the vicinity of this operation.
0. Clutch-,D1 scf
'f" f'
i :; 1. , ,
In thisVopk1t??'ion. holes are being drilled into facings
on the clutdff disc. A mechanical drill press is used-for"-
these drilling operations. A local exhaust ventilation
duct is provided in the vicinity of the point of
operation for this machinery. A ventilated enclosure for
the point of operation or a Torit pump system may be more
effective in removing the asbestos fibers at its source.
E. Receiving (Sorting):
Incoming, used brake shoes are sorted on a table by type and model. Shoes are sorted on this table and then deposited into"barrels for further processing at Various other stations. No local exhaust ventilation is provided for this sorting area.
11. Perchloroethvlene Sampling:
Air sampling was conducted in the Cleaning Room during typical Remanufacturing operations. Both a personal and a general area sampling strategy was used during this industrial hygiene evaluation.
r
NOVO20063
f/'i'S'
During general area>sampling, the pump and collecting medium are positioned at a 'fixed location throughout the workday to determine the contaminant concentration within the workplace. If significant concentrations are found, then personal sampling would be required to assess actual employee exposure.
The sampling medium for perchloroethylene vapor was charcoal adsorption tubes.
Details of sampling locations and sampling equipment used are given in the sixth Industrial Hygiene Data Sheet contained in Exhibit 1 of the Appendix. Analytical data and test results and provided'iri-otlf^ third Industrial Hygiene Extension Sheet provided in Exhibit 2 of the Appendix.
'%;;
The applicable "hygienic standard for perchloroethylene Is 50 parts per million as established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH - TLV). The calculated eight-hour time-weighted average exposure for the Cleaning Room operator (Kenneth Ellis) was below this hygienic" standard. However, general ".'area samples were taken in the center of the Cleaning RoomY Perchloroethylene vapor was detected In both these,general area samples.
Part degreasing/cleaning is performed by use of vapor
degreasers. The vapor degreasers are equipped with vapor
condensation colls. Proper operation of these degreasers is
essential in controlling employee potential exposures. To
ensure that these degreasers are maintained in proper
operating condition, a scheduled '.maintenance/inspection
program should be established to review temperature
controllers, condensation coils, and slot ventilation systems,
if provided.
.
Limitations of the sampling performed should be noted. Samples taken during this survey are considered representative
of the worker's exposure to the specific contaminants measured on the day of the sampling. Results may not .adequately I reflect exposures on other days, when changes in operations, production levels, 'atmospheric conditions, or other conditions might, affect.:Ifithej airborne' contaminant ..concentrations._.an<L.. exposure tirndsi''
, Exhibit'-' . ' m?r i
. ii .
:.j! '.
', I
,;-v '.Vt..
8
NOVO20064
v i
$>r. sal' r\':hS
ENGINEERS
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY DATA SHEET (See inttructloni on rsnorsa tidal
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES HARTFORD.CONNECTICUT 06183
(Location 2-5-121)
CITSeie
LOCATION
PAGE
GENUINE PARTS CO., INC. - RAYLOC - PAYSON
700 North 500 East
awsie.a MMitl-------------------
Payson, Utah 84651
.
.
UB 168 T 3075
Q SAM/CAO CAM FIELD (AMO.I CLAIM CSSC OTHER (EXPLAIN)
i OF 6 March 29,
1989
HI FLOW SAMPLER
SERIAL NUMBER
TIC NUMBER
1017
3-81
INSTRUMENTATION
'
MOOlb
G1LIAN
HFS-113
REASON FOR SAMPLING - INCLUDE PROCESS OR OPERATION DESCRIPTION & CONTROLS
Division management's request to assess employees' potential exposure to aBbestoa fibers In the
10459
181-85
Brake Shoe Department during typical braka/clutch rebuild operations, such as receiving (aortlng).
1994'
25-82
delining (chopping), dlec brake riveting, clutch disc drilling, and debonding. (Reduced sampling
101-84
tine, due- to presence of dust whlch-can-lnterefera with fiber count).
r-1018
4-81
cbuiensw (inpuno}mibw
AHAkvtcs wswmco~
MILXPORE FILTER(MP) - OPEN PACED!
ASBESTOS FIBERS (Including TEKS Analysis)
-------------- IML&Bm ' P
" ' --
71C*1 -
INST .
SAMPLE
NO. *
SAMPLING location ' (INCLUDE EMPLOYEE'S NAME!
COLLECTION TIME collection
DURATION
Stiff
... (MINS)
-
FLOW
RATE TPM
b.
SAMPLER POSITION
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN AREA
EXPOSURE SHIFT TIME DURATION
(MINS) (MINS)
*. COMMENTS
246F Control Blank 01
'jl. . . -.
.-
- - " -- - . .
3-81 448F Wayne Jackman
0712 1006
174
2.0 PS
l
460
510 General ventilation
..
Debonding
3-81 446F Wayne Jackman Debonding
1006 1156 ' -
no
2.0 PS
l
460
510 General ventilation
NOVO20065
3-81
445F Wayne Jackman Debondlng
3-81
360F Wayne Jackman Debondlng
BP P ISC Salt Lake City
C-IBBJ6 Pilmod In U.S.A.
OABfi
1236 1417
*1417" 1530
"
101
73
2.0 PS 2.0 PS
Nontt a J. E. David, III
l
460
510 General ventilation
l
460
510 General ventilation
Cpsc
I
ENGINEER'*"',
,
INDUSTR . HYGIENE SURVEY DATA SHEET (Set Instructions on (averse.-ol
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06163
(Location 2-5-121)
VOCtTION
PAGE 2
GENUINE PARTS CO.. INC. - RAYLOC - PAYSON ouet MVMotafeuiM numki
700 North 500 East
Payaon, Utah 84651
UB 168 T 3075
B SAM/CAO O CAM FlLO (AMG J CLAIM CSSC OTHtS (EXPLAIN!
OF 6
iuuvIit fcllVk"
March 29.
1 1989
INSTRUMENTATION
HI FLOW SAMPLER
serial NUMBER
1017
TIC NUMBER
3-81
' G ILIAN
IIKS-113
REASON FOR SAMPLING - INCLUDE PROCESS OR OPERATION DESCRIPTION & CONTROLS
Division management's request to assess employees' potential exposure to asbestos fibers In the
10459
181-85
Brake. Shoe Department during typical brake/clutch rebuild operations, such as receiving (sorting).
-
1994
25-82
delining (choking), disc brake riveting, clutch disc drilling, and detrtm'ding. (Reduced sampling
5879
101-84
1018
4-81
eOtklCriON (lAMniHOl HtBI*
MILIPORE FILTER(MP)
time due
- OPEN FACED
to.pr&jjence ' , ' .-y\.
V. v ` " r'/ .
*
of duet which can lncerefere with fiber count)
ANALVIII SSOUKSa
''
ASBESTOS FIBERS (Including TEMS Analysis)
'
T-
-
'
TIC INST
NO.
SAMPLE
SAMPLINatOCATlON IINCLUOB BMPLOY.EE'B namei
COLLECTION TIMS COLLECTIOP
OU RATION
8 tin
End
(MINS)
101-85 362F Glen Richardson
0716 1015
179
PLOW RATS T W4
2.0
SAMPLER POSITION
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN ARIA
EXPOBURI TIME (MIN6I
BHIPT OJMVX
IMtNSi
1, ' COMMENTS
PS l 460 510 Local exhaust ventilation
Dellner (Chopper) '
181-85 441F Glen Richardson Dellner (Chopper)
181-85 444F Glen Richardson Dellner (Chopper)
1015 1152
97 2.0 PS
-
-
1240 1421 101 2.0 PS
l 460 510 Local exhaust ventilation i. 460 510 Local exhaust ventilation
181-85 422F Glen Richardson Dellner (Chopper)
1421 '
1527
66 2.0 PS
l 460 510 Local exhaust ventilation
NO V020066
Salt Lake City C-1S826 Printed In U.8.A.
R306
J. E. David, III
for
'vi
ENGINEER'- '
INDUSTR.. . HYGIENE SURVEY DATA SHEET |S initructiont on men*
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES HARTFORD.CONNECTICUT0SI83
. (Location 2-5-121) .
CWSTOHM
CENUINE PARTS CO., INC. - RAYLOC - PAYSON
700 North 500 East
Payson, Utah 84651
PAGE 3 OP fi flijr
March 29, 1989
UB 168 T 3075
D OSAM/CAD CAM DpieLOIAMO.)
CLAIM CSC OTHER (EXPLAIN!
HI FLOW SAMPLER
SERIAL NUMBER
TIC NUMBER
1017
3-81
10459
181-85
1994
o25i?2
5879
1018
;4t81
INSTRUMENTATION
HARvfaerv
GILIAN
HFS-113
REASON FOR SAMPLING - INCLUDE PROCESS OR OPERATION DESCRIPTION & CONTROLS
Division management1 a request to aaaeBB employees1 potential expoBure to asbestos fibers in the
Brake Shoe Department during'typical brake/clutch rebuild operations, such as receiving (sorting).
dellning (chopping), disc brake riveting, clutch/idiac drilling, and debondlna. (Reduced sampling
time due to presence of dust which can lntereferjClyith fiber count).
MILIPORE FILTER(MP) - OPEN FACD
ASBESTOS FIBERS (Including TEMS Analysis)
------- 1--mffmUETT ---------------------- 4--------
: tic
?\cNO.
sample NUjJJgER
101-84 453F
SAMPLING LOCATION (INCLUDE EMPLOYEE'S NAME)
collection time collection OJAATION
FLOW
Suit
find
(MINS)
`.tRATE1 - T PM--
SAMPLER POSITION
NUMBER OF PERSONS
IN AREA
EXP06URI 8HIPT . TIMS OURATtOf
(MINS) (MINS)
Calvin Brindley -
.0718 1007 169
210 PS
8
460
510
COMMENTS
General ventilation
Disc Brake Riveting
`
' "V.
.
101-84 423F Calvin Brindley Disc Brake Riveting
1007 1155
106
2.0 PS
8
460
510 General ventilation
r. ' . . ... ;-
101-84 432F Calvin Brindley ' Disc Brake Riveting
1242 1422
100
2.0 PS
8
460
510 General ventilation
101-84 320F Calvin Brindley Disc Brake Riveting
14,22 1528
66
2.0 PS
a
460
510 Ceneralvantila tion
NOVO20067
Salt Lake City
C-U626 P/lnud In Ua.A. R666
,
INOIMIB
J. E
David,
III
QAVS I0O
Z. .nr S-S/-8 9
J. t.
ENGINEER1
INDUSTRi. _ HYGIENE SURVEY OATA SHEET (So. In.tructlom on rev.ri -.)
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES Hartford. Connecticut06183
(Location 2-5-121)
LOCATION
PAGE 4 OF 6
nupvMrrgnr*
CENUINE PARTS CO.. poiict MVMoaa^clain vnh< UB 168 T 3075
INC. - RAYLOC - PAYSON
*V||M I^NIT t
700 North 500 East
Payaon, Utah 84651
3 SAM/CAO CAM FIELD IAMO.I CLAIM CSSC OTHER IEXPLAINI
March 29.
1989
HI FLOW SAMPLER
seniAt HUMBER
TIC NUMBSA
1017
3-81
INSTRUMENTATION MAgtfPACTVStl
Mien
CILIAN
NFS-113
REASON FOR SAMPLING - INCLUDE PROCESS OR OPERATION DESCRIPTION & CONTROLS
Division management' 6 request to assess employees' potential exposure to asbestos fibers in the
10459
181-85
Brake Shoe Department during typical brake/clutch rebuild operational such as raceIvina (sorting)*
1994
25-82
dellning (chopping), dlacibrake riveting, clutch disc drilling, and debonding. v;(Reduced aaraolinB
5879
101-84
time due to presenceJpf dust which can interefere with Fiber count).
v:~-
1018
4-81
COkLICTION (lMfUNO)MaOIA
MILIPORE FILTER(KP) - OPEN FACED
..
vmrsm, ' ASBESTOS FIBERS (Including TEWS Atialyeia)
T-
TIC
INST NO.
4-81
sample
9AMAUINO LOCATION-
COLLBCTlON TIMS COLLBCTlON UflATlON
NURPG" (INCLUDE EMPLOYBB'fi. N AMO Burl
find
440F Salvador Gonzalez C';. 0714 1014
180'
FLOW RATE T.W
2.0
SAMPLER POSITION
NUMBER OP
P6RBOM8 IN AREA
EXPOSURE ' 8HIPT TIME DURATION
(MINS) (MINS)
MA3 - *4- - . . COMMBNTB
PS
l
460
510;' Local exhaust ventilation
Clutch Disc Drilling
--
4-81 439F Salvador Gonzalez
1014 1153 99 2.0 PS
Clutch Disc Drilling
l
460
510 Local exhaust ventilaclon
4-81 442F Salvador Gonzalez
1240 1418 98 2.0 PS
Clutch Disc Drilling
l
460
510 Local exhauat ventilation
4-81 331F Salvador Gonzalez
1418 1528 70 2.0 PS
Clutch Disc Drilling
l 460
I
510 Local exhaust ventilation
NOVO20068
OPPlCS
Salt Lake City
C-16B36 Ptlnl.d In U.S.A. R506
J. E. David, III
OAYt II8MD
t.
7BP
S-3C-&?
ENGINEER1" '
INDUSTR. . HYGIENE SURVEY DATASHEET (Set Inmuction. on rev.TM
THE TRAVELERS insurance companies
Hartford, Connecticutosies
(Location 2-5-121)
A==asss=o^
kOCA/IOM
GENUINE PARTS CO., INC. - RAYLOC - PAYSON
700 North 500 East
M t UN
Payson, Utah 84651
PAGE 5 OF fi
=|117.UV <> +"=
Harch 29. 1989
UB 168 T 3075
Q SAM/CAD CAM GpiELOIAMO.I CLAIM G CSSC OTH8R (IXPLAINI
jssmb--an--saca--bmc--'
INSTRUMENTATION
HI FLOW SAMPLER
SERIAL NUMBER
TIC NUMBER
GILIAN
HFS-113
REASON FOR SAMPLING - INCLUDE PROCESS OR OPERATION DESCRIPTION & CONTROLS
1017
3-81
Division management's request to assess employees' potential exposure to asbestos fibers in the
10459
181-85
Brake Shoe Department during typical brake/clutch rebuild operations, such as recelvintt (aorcin#) .
1994
25-1&*
delining (chopping), diac brake riveting, clutch diactdrllllnft, and debondlnfe. (Reduced aamplina
5879
lOJrAVn
time due to presence of .dust which can interefereswleh fiber count).
1018
4.-81..L.,
eoucCTtoN |tMPUK)
MILIPORE FILTER(MP) - OPEN FACED
ANALflll HBaMINCO
"
ASBESTOS. FIBERS (Including TEMS Analysis)
.
. ... ,r-'-
.
/TIC JNST 23-82.
COLLECTION TIME COLLECTION
""HP" (INCLUDE EMPLOYEE'S NAME) Sun
OUftATION End (MINE)
450F Tracy Bill
;
0710 1010
180
FLOW
RATE T-PM
SAMPLER POSITION
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN AREA
EXPOSURE SHIFT TIME DURATYOP (MINS) (MINS)
2.0 PS
6 460 510
COMMENTS General ventilation
!/. Receiving (Sorting)
-i-
_ -i'
25-82 44 9F Tracy Hill
1010 1150 100 2.0 PS
Receiving (Sorting);
6 460 510 Cenaral ventilation
25-82 452F Tracy Hill Receiving (Sorting)
1248 1416
88 2.0 PS
6 . 460 510 Cenerail ventilation
NOVO20069
25-82
332F Tracy Hill Receiving (Sorting)
1416 1527
71 2.0 PS
363F Control Blank 02
Salt Lake City
C-16828 P.lnt.d in U.S.A. nsae.
J. E. David, III
6 460 510 General -ventilation
"
1
1
itMarURI A
;xn- 1 s-a/-aI OAT IIOMD
I
ENGINEER1N
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY DATASHEET (Sea Imtruelloni on reverts ildoi
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES Hartford.CONNECTICUT06183
(Location 2-5-1211
CUSIOMCN
lCari0N
GENUINE PARTS CO., INC. - RAYLOC - PAYSON
700 North 500 East
Payaon, Utah 84651
PAGE
OF
'- 1 1 J-L-
March 29, 1989
UB 168 T 3075
LOW FLOW SAMPLER
SERIAL NUMBER
TIC number
2739
16-87
1525
2-85
' SAM/CAO D CAM OpISLOIAMOJ CLAIM D .C8SC O OTHER IEXPLAINI
INSTRUMENTATION
MANUPaCTWM*
M0(l
CILIAN
LFS-113
REASON FOR SAMPLING - INCLUDE PROCESS OR OPERATION DESCRIPTION & CONTROLS
Assess employees1 potential exposure to perchloroethylene vapors in the Cleaning (DlaaaaenhlvV Room.
Perchloroethylene la used aa a degreasing solvent In a Vapor Degreasing Unit provided with vapor condensation colls.
~L----
eouxriOR (umpunsI Mien
CHARCOAL TUBE
sRAiMirntoviAta'
PERCHLOROETHYLENE
gXTJT ~--
~ TIC
INST
'NO.
SAMPLE NUMBER
SAMPLINO LOCATION (INCLUOE EMPLOYEE'S NAMEl
COLLECTION TIME COLLECTiOh
v/.gftd
DURATION (MINS)
FLOW
RATE
I'r /frfli
SAMPLER POSITION
NUMBER OP
PERSONS IN AREA
EXPOSURE SHIFT TIME OLAATlOt (MINS) (MIN6J
CT-O Control Blank____________
:. _
..'
COMMENTS
`, - --
- -. -
16-87 16-87
CT-L Kenneth Ellis
1000
Cleaning Room Operatoi
CT-2 Kenneth Ellis
1238
Cleaning Room Operatoi
16-87 CT-3 Kenneth Ellis
1415
Cleaning Room Operatoi
2-85 CT-4 Center of Cleaning'
1001
loom at center aup-. -
port
2-85 CT-5 (Same as above)
- 1250
1157 1400 1525 1250
1530
117 82 60 169
160
50 PR 50 PS
1
460
510 Genernl vpnr11 a firm
l
460
510 General ventilation
50 PS
i
460
510 General ventilation
50 GA r~ 12 460 510 General ventilation
1 50 GA /v?l2 460 510 General ventilation
Salt Lake City
C-1BB36 Prlnud (A U.S.A.
PSAfl
(ROIHII* J. E. David, III
...
-
.
i
NOV020070
hi \ \
T)
tnginoering
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ANALYSIS REPORT
AMA4.TSIS MO. 890277 (25-32)
kW#>L( SCnT er
CUSTOMS*
*
Gerulre f^rts/feyloc-feysan
AOOMCSS
cam: acccivco
tkC (ttWTO------- AMAiVSt
j. E. tevid
A/6/89
4/27/89
CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIT
teyson, Utah
.
TSS/JiyJOC/TIC/Mt
HP niters; Charcoal Tubes
SAMPLE NUMBER
AA8F
LOCATION (OR EMPLOYES)
Wayne Jadaran-detondlng
W
Vhyne Jadamn-detcrrtlrg
{
t' : :4;i :jii
SffiVEf DATE: 3/29/89
TEST RESULTS
'L 1
Tocal Fibers
*
' 1 ' Tbtal Fillers ; '
tlME.WEICHTEO AVERAGE
Wry
Vbyre Jadman-debadlng
; 4;i (; -i! e ' v' " wi\v.
Tbtal Fibers
ft
360F
Wayne Jadman-debondlng
Tbtal Fibers
*
362F
Glen RKtardaarv-dellner (chopper)
Tbtal Fibers
AA1F
Glen Rleharrtson-deliner (chopper)
Tbtal Fibers
HYGIENIC SYANOAROS
Asbestos OSHA PEL 0.2 fiber! Action Level
0.1 flba-s/cc
--
Wf A22F
53F
Glen RLchardacn-daHner (chopper) Glen Richardacn-dellner (chopper) Cblvln Brlrriley-dlac brake riveting
Total Fibers
Total Fibers t
Total Fibers
AMALT IICAL METHODS
special notes ^Sample overloaded; unable to perfbrm aarate fiber cxxnt.
Phase Contrast Wcrcsoopy/TODSI 7<*00
Gas OirciTatce-aphy Spectnrsetnr
All sanples have bear sent cut for TTaranissian Electron
Microscopy I7EF6I aralysis.
'
HIOSH 7A00 method does not distlrjish betveen the fiber types present. This method requires that all fibers meeting the set criteria be counted.
. Page lof 3
OEFINi (ION OP TERMS
N.D.L.T- 7 "none delected reported os o less thpn value" is the'Timit ol sensitivity ol the sampling methodology. Time*Weighted Average (TWA) - The employlre^i^eAposure averoged over 8 hours per day or 40 hours per week using this
equation:
.
' "4 ^f 1,-l:| t ' v' r^: Ji!?:
TWA equivalent " (^t) (Y|)*< (Cj) (Ty) *[,,. (C,) (Tn) . where C A concentration measured.
B h/j '
T r durotion, In hours, of exposure al concentration C.
The TWA evaluations of this report are based on the exposure time given on the corresponding "Industrial Hygiene
Survey Oata Sheet."
.
Ceiling limit (designated by o "C" in front o? the Hygienic Standard) "1 This is 0 maximum allowable concentration
which should never be exceeded.
<j :
Shod Term exposure limit (TLV) - This limit defines the maximum concentration of on oir contaminant to which an employee can be epo$cd lot o short period ol time.
Hygienic slondord is the oppliroble ollowoble level in oir, such os the TLV 01 PEL (permissible exposure limit), ond unless
otherwise specified is the current ACGIH - threshold limit volue (TLV).
.
CH-i>eS* **9 xatMfCO u.S.A,
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT *
j `
! NOVO20071
k
-*;yr*i>y
'[.in '"'`r
. /? ja-
Engineering
,,,
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ANALYSIS REPORT EXTENSION SHEET
nzn
CUJTQMCa Gernine Parts/Tbyloc-Payscn
Aooacss
CHEMICAL AMO CMVIOOMM0MTAI, SERVICES UNIT
teyson, Utah
NSUAMMBPELRE
'ey
.
LOCATION (or oMpUro) Calvin Brindley-disc brake riveting
TEST RESULTS
1
Tbtal Fibers
0.053 flbers/tx
TIMAEV-WEREAIGGHETED
SHTYACNIOEANRICO
432F
Calvin ft-indley-dlsc brake riveting
Total Fibers t
320F <*0F
Calvin fr-lndley-dlsc brake riveting SitodcrOamlra-clutcti disc drilling
Tbtal Fibers 0.057 flfcers/cc
Tbtal Fibers i
<*39F IMS 331F *<50F
Salvador Oanzalea-clutch disc drilling
Salvador Gonzalez-clutch disc drilling
Salvador Gonzalez-cUitch disc drilling
Tracy HIH-receiving (sorting)
-
Tbtal Fibers 0.133 flbars/cc
Tbtal Fibers 0.151 flbers/oc
Tbtal Fibers
0.211 flbers/oc
Tbtal Fibers e
--
W9F
J2F
332F
Tracy Hill-receiving (sorting). ' * f -y kk'*
Tracy Hill-receiving (sorting)
TTacy Hill-receiving (sorting)
Total Fibers 0.13*1 flbers/oc
Tbtal Fibers 0.083 flbers/oc
Tbtal Fibers 0.095 flbers/oc
-
C '
f^ i
, -i
1
SPECIAL notes
Please see rote, page 1.
C-IS<S9-I PIHfCC m U.S.A. P9QI
it rjt' .-i'-s
tegp Z TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES
HARTFORO. CONNECTICUT
NOVO2O072
Engineering
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ANALYSIS REPORT EXTENSION SHEET
ANAIVSIS MO.
890277
CUSTOMCM
Gemire Parts/ftayloc-teyson
.AMPLE NUMBER
CT-l
LOCATION (o*
Kenneth EUls-cleanlng roan operator
CT-2
'' Kemeth KlUs-cleanlng ran operator
CT-3
Kenneth ELUs-desnins reem operator
CT-A
Center of cleaning roan at canter support
.-5 Center of cleaning rcon at center support
The presence of isopropyl alcohol ves confirmed by OCA'S analysis.
CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIT
teyaan, Utah
TEST RESULTS
PCE ,24.2 ppm
TIUE.VEICHTEO AVERAGE
IPA* Present
POE 16.6 ppn
;IPa* ` Present
PCS 33.2 ppn
IPA* Present
PCS 6.90 ppn
IPA* Present
PCE 16.6 ppn
IPA* Present
TOA (CT-1, CT-2, CT-3) PCE 22.9 ppm
HYGIENIC STAHOARD
PerohlcroethylerE (PCE) 50 ppn SIEL 200 ppm
Isopropyl Alochol (IPA) 900 ppn STEL 500 ppn
SPECIAL NOTES
-
;r.-1*. '
fy ,
BNIOSH nethod requires that IPA be sarpled separately.
C*is49'< Miirco t u.s.a.
R9BI
P3& 3
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES
HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT
.
NOVO20073