Document OZoxRmG0g5Zw9n3wYJJaVqmK

__ M* NIIHW. PM. 1 NHM^. M MM wrw YORK, X. Y. 1001T WU COM III Xnfonttl Mutiny ot Poruitylvtfti* Xoabort '3 tnd LXA't Cccadttoo on XoalUi tad SoToty ill - m Botrd So 292 Hodloon Avonuo Xov Tort, Xov Tort Jnur7 A, 1967 Tho aootlnj u wllod to ordor l 10s00 t.o. Ay Xr. Klaborloy tho Hm4 u chtirun. Emni J.H. Ww J. Bitlor U Cojon P. Copjxr*ci.O J. C-av.'.r&M 0. Wtit J. u-..-lht X. CIh mo B. Coot H. Ktlton H.E. KottolAarg V. Kun V. PUliot 5. Pior X. Bottrop* 1. Jtotonhorf J. Sovick J, Snydor A. Split C. Woloh L. Zohn D. tio|l*j> Bipnptei Isporiol X**l A Chooietl Coapony Cor.or*l Bailor/ A Coroai.0 Corporotloo Aoottlco Inc. Koilor-al Load Coapoay E.X. da Pont do Xoaourt A Coupon/ - Z.I. da Pont do Xoaourt A Coapony Kotlonol Lood Coepony P.P.O. Induotrtot (Ho mo ton Chonlcol Corp.) Kill A Krowlton, Ino. Tho Bro'non HUT Aooocloiod Sullort ft/. Ltd, Ethyl Corporation JUtlor-tl Load Coupon/ noctrio S'.or/,o Coltor/ Coaponjr. t: llouoion Chaolcol Corp. *t Control Bailor/ A Cortalt Corporation Boro & Coupon/ St. Jotopn Load Coapo/gr Klooirlo Storoco Colt or/ Coupon/ Boro A Coapony E.I. da Pont do Xoaourt A Ccopany Mill A Xnoulioa, Ino. CAD Bottorloo i#igS2||^* / ^ sj,.|wioaaiownH-' I'SH'. LIA11950 i <. - 1a U J.L. Kiefcrl*y, ExaeutlY* Vie* Prld*nt D.H. Borcins, Secretary And Treeeurar D.C. Fowler, Director, Health And Ssfety J.C. Pouass, Attlstsnt Director, Health And Ssfety S. Rad tie, International Load Zinc Research OrcanliAtion ,Ino, 0. Carr, International Lead Zinc Retearch Organisation ,Inc, for the b*neflt of the perton etvo v*r* not prcnt *t th* prorlou* Darting which vc* held on D*c*sb*r 9, 19W>, Hr, Ilcb*rl*7 pr**ntd th* following brief r*port of that aarllngt "Th* purpose of th* teetlng was to dltcut* th* court* of Action to b* taken by th* tlA end it* Pennsylvania Maborc a* a result of th* accaptanc* for public hearing by th# Pannsylvanla Air Pollution Control CoGnlssion of on aablcnt Air cuality criterion for l**d of } aierograas per cubic a*tor of *ir averaged omr a JO-dAy period. While thic 1* 4 Pennsylvania situation for th* present, it 1* poialbl* th*t W-.atever happen* In Pennsylvania could *t a pr*cdnt for Action in other ctcl**. -/ following discussion, it vst th* cor^pmru# of th# group on 0*ccb*r 9th that It wyuld b* dealrabl* to her*! 1) Or. leno* appear bfor* th# Pennsylvania Air Pollution Coenl talon a # An individual Arad not a * 4 representative of Any group. Kl purpot* in appearing bfor* th* CooRlAtion would b* to refute if pottibl* th# a*ihod u**d to calculate th# propo*d eril*rioo for lead tdviea hod b**n developed with th# ut* of K*ho* dot#, 2} All l#*d eonpanles in P*nnylYAnl4 abould b# pr***nl At th* hearings *nd should indicate cupport for Or, K*ho* if in agreement with hi# tateaentc. i 3) A ubecenitte* soaprieed of Ktttr*. Kesselberg, Dlgg# end* Fowler should ditcut* th* problem in advene# with Or, Ktho# And report beak through th* LXA. O Or. Fehoe, in advance of th* hearings, should Sa y * infomol dlMusslon# with Hr. Cutsoan, Or. Brandt And Or. ftehrenk* It w as ruggesled thsl h* spprosAh Hr. 8u **ma flr*t And arrange for *n informal meeting with All thro# of Vhes# pereona,* , h^pqipts^^ WIBBWWg'gpWf-I ^ "11111,1 i&H .H L IA11951 (3) ] / Hr. fowler reporlod thst, subsequent to the December 9, 1964 costing, hs discussed the probioa with Dr. Keho* who then hold separate lnfomel discussions with Hr. Sust-ien end Dr. Ererdt. It wss noted that, while the neotlr.gs between | Dr. Kohoo end Hr. Susannn end Dr. Brsndt wore friendly end informative, they were 1 essentially non-productive in that both of these gentlemen tAintelned their original ] poeltlor.e regarding the estahllehaent of the proposed standard. However, Dr. Brendt | .^did iwjvlee that he would be vllllng to consider eny additional dete thet eight be Offered, The following cas&ents were submitted by those present with regard to possible effects the proposed standard could here on operetlons cerrled on by their conpeniesi X.H. ideni - Imperial Motel end ChseAcel Company This eoc^sny hes e load smelting operstion in Pennsylvania. Wills no outside eir eaxples here been collected es yet, it is felt thet no serious problea will be encountered in meeting the proposed stenderd. the coapany will support eny ecilon taken by the other leed oocpenies in Pennsylvania. D, fierier - C t P gstterles So outside eir serplet hsve been collected ee yet| the device* rsooostinded by LU ere being investigated. ) I T. Cfprerelth - ritlor.sl l* si Co-perr Outside eir easples hsve been colleoted. This coapeny does not believe it is sseetin.*, the proposed standard st the present tine) however, it does not here sufficient dete to uxe s definite statement either wey, end therefor*, is not ebis to eveluete the effectiveness of its existing eir pollution control equlpaent. - 2~,t This ccepsny is currently ceding the proposed stenderd. Only one 2i-hour seeple hes exeedsd 5 sdcrogrscs per cubic cetere cf eir. L.titti Strt 1 S&iBin?*. This eocpany hes collected outside eir serples end hes obteined veluss cf . froa } to consldsrehly over $ cicrogrens per cubic sister cf eir. It is" felt thet the proposed stenderd sen bs net if considerable res cf coney ere spent on control equlpaent. Besed on existing dete, this coepeny could eeet e stenderd cf 10 sxlerograa* of lesd per cubic ester of eir evereged ever thirty days. The problee eppeers to be core free the steregc end hendling of raw neteriels then froa the fumecc emissions. V. Helton - (Brtvn Kill Atiocletsd g^Usrs. ftr.. Lid.. Auilnllt) rAC* T>.o JUstr*ll*A* do noi v%nt to mo tho Adoption of propOMd otondord la finni/gViAU o Iao o it could Mt a prMOdont* A  - LlA 11952 "N \ i n Tv ] .... nf'iinM^i'i^Mi na!i i .. * M / LO, ScrUk - St. Joc ?a kd.Sgsgani Although thl cocrss.y h*s no plants in Pennsylvania, it too 1 concerned with the possibility of a precedent being sot. Tn* sintering operations appear to b* the tost troublesome from this standpoint. An objection vu voiced to the single point Be4eure*ent specified In the proposed standard. It vis also noted that It would be exceedingly difficult for en ext rector plant to ceet the standard, ei the specified figure la sooetloes exoeeded due to loaaea caused by heavy winds. X.P. Eestrepo - Ce.neral Battery and Cere-nlc Corporation This company operates a secondary lead saelter in Pennsylvania, with operationa comparable to thoso of 3ra 4 Coepanr. A treat deal of coney baa been spent during the past ten years on air pollution control equipment. Air aaaplea have not ae yet been collected outside the plants, but it is axpacted that such studies will be cade in the near future. D.P. Pl/Jfs - E.I. du Pont de femurs * Coepanr Although thia company has no plants in Pennsylvania, it it concerned with the possibility of a precedent being eet for action in other states. L..g?f.a ,--Mn*rS?a .iTda Altho.g,4-. this company has no plants in Pennsylvania, it is concerned with the possibility of a precedent being set for action in other states. Kr. fowler advised that, based on data developed on four plants located out* tide the state of Pennsylvania, w would have e difficult tine In seeling the $ olcrograss standard. He advised, further, that Kr. Sustnan is anxious to hare the proposed standard to assist hia in conducting control work. Kr. Cleeeon presented an interesting discussion of the political situation in Pennsylvania.for the purpose of providing information on how this problm aay best be approacned. Ke suggested that LIA should be the epokesaan for all of tha aesher eospaniet in Penr.sylvanla and in other etatee v<-,re products used in Pennsylvania are cade, with a listing of the coapanies represented. It was further suggested that the testimony be llsdted to 5 or 10 minutes, with all additional pertinent information presented in writing for inclusion in the record of the hearings, Kr. Cleeson also suggested that real influence should be brought, to the aeahere of the Cccyaietlon with a nice covering letter, with everything kept aboveboard, and that there should be no indirect or secondary preseures on the aeoters of the Ccv...-ion. The approach suggested was *let ua halp you halp us halp you,* Ke /a further advised that the lead cowpajiies should support Dr. Xsivoe'o test loony, %JP however. It was noted that the itene in Dr. (shoe's testimony with which w* Agree should be ilealid for elarifleetlon and eephaaie. .Vi\ .. ... %ll fcfeu Qf,h-:-< J- * LIA1195 3 "Ss. , .. c------------ * - - i i / ....................... V.< !-<, (5) Dr. Dlrj; reported that du Pont engineering personnel ere working with Dr. Kehoe on an alternate proposal to be presented to the Cocnisslon, with the approach that t: ore is not currently enough information to set an ambient air standard for lsad. The alternate proposal is expected to be siailer to the etendards Adopted by the elite of Hew Jersey. ^ Hr. Fowler pointed out that ell coeper.y representetivee sho'ild sign in et the f hearing, without asking to be heerd but *ubaittlng statement* before the closing dete. He edvised thet our next step should be to see whet we cen get out of Dr. Kehoe, besed on du Pont1* engineering discussion with his, before deciding definitely ss to whet course of ectlon to tele ftt the heering. . It was decided thet the special cocnlttee, comprised of Messrs. Fowler, Diggs end Kosselberg, which was eetebliehed et the Decoaber 9, 1966 coating ehould ceinteln liaison with Dr. Kehoe on this setter end. In feet, confer further with his la advance of Jenuery 19. 5 r ;; The following cocpaniea will definitely heve representetivee st the Jenuery 1? heerlngi Ethyl Corporetior., C 4 3 Batteries, National Lead Cocpeny, Kleetrio Storage Battery Corpeny, Dare & Cospany, St. Joseph Lead Cocpeny, General Battery i j end Ceramic Corporation, Houston Chemical Corpor., E.I. du Font de Keaours k Cocpeny. jtn Addition, the l&perlel Xetal end Chesicel Cocpeny will probably send a representative j to the hearing. A a. (S' Jaaea C. Bouses A, 1967 s 3/' < \ l