Document OJ8gGE2X0MkVxwV6Jy94wXavX

I this case and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Abex is currently involved m litigation with various insurers concerning the amount, scope and times of coverage. 42. If you or your insurance carrier have ever paid out money as a result of a court decree or jury verdict against you m a case m which the plaintiff asserted injury resulting from exposure to asbestos products mixed, manufactured, produced, processed, compounded, converted, sold, merchandised, supplied, or placed m the stream of commerce identify the: against you; (a) Court m which judgement was entered (b) Court docket number; (c) Plaintiff's name; (d) (e) Plaintiff's attorney's name and address; Amount of judgement; (f) Date judgement entered; entered. (g) Other defendants against whom judgement vas ANSWER: Abex objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, burdensome, lacks relevance to this case and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 43. Do you have a medical department that performs occupational studies or reviews of worker's health? If so, describe: -36