Document OEzNqR2yjRyDboLe5QRVEQd9e
C.Hilton
Levunsoiin
181 HITCHCOCK COURT
ORANGE, CONNECTICUT 06477
CONFIDENTIAL
J. Wister It.eigs, [*'..D.,
Yale University School Of Medicine,
Dept, of Epidemiology and Public Health
60 College Street,
New Haven, CT O65IO
June 1, 1982.
Dear Wister,
I have attempted to make a start on the proposal to be submitted to the General-Electric Corporation for them to consider assisting in the further investigation of the six former employees identified as having died of malignant mesothelioma.
I have merely outlined the proposed study without going into great detail as 1 do not believe that G-E will require more than this in the first instance. I am sure that we will have to sit down with them to explain things in depth and to negotiate for funding.
Please make any amendments you think necessary and let me have your suggestions for improving the style and content of the proposal. The final draft should be presented in a more professional manner and typed on a better machine by proper typist!
I would be happy to come and discuss this matter with tou whenever it is convenient for you to do so.
kind regards,
sincerely,
UCC 010440
A0 1 973
CffK'rrB'^rrAfL
Epidemiologic Study of Mesothelioma Risk Factors in Selected Cases Employed by the General-Electric Corporation ; A CaseControl Study Utilizing Corporate Records and the Files of the Connecticut Cancer Epidemiology Unit. #**#******-***********#*********#*************************
PROPOSAL TC IE S'JLRITTED TC THE GENERAL-ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Submitted by: Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510
Date:
J.Wister Keigs, K.D., Clinical Professor of Epidemiology, 135 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510 (203) 436-8904.
A0 1 97 0
UCC 010441
1.
INTRODUCTION.
A study of the incidence of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura or peritoneum in the State of Connecticut has been made utilizing the records of the Connecticut Tumor Registry. The study outline has been described by Lewinsohn et al. (1). A further report was recently presented to the International Conference on Occupational Lung Disease sponsored by the American College of Chest Physicians in Chicago, IL in I.arch, 1982.(2)
As the result of the work done to date, it would appear that mesothelioma incidence in the state is attributable to occupational exposure to asbestos in eighty-five per cent of cases. Environmental exposure has not been shown to be associated with this disease in Connecticut by this in vestigation, although there is some evidence to suggest domestic contact in three cases linked to an asbestos plant.
Certain job titles and certain industries appear to carry a higher risk for the persons employed in them. Job titles which are in the higher risk categories are indicated in Table I and the industries in which significant risks exist are shown in Table II.
In scrutinizing employment data available from death certificates, case records on file in the Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR) and Price and Lee City Directories for cases and controls, an unusual cluster of six cases was identified as former General-Electric Corporation employees. In the rubber industry, where a significant risk was found, three companies account for the cases in the CTR files.
UCC 010442
A0jgsc
2.
PROPOSAL. The Connecticut Cancer Epidemiology Unit (CCE'J) wishes to
be permitted to conduct a case-control epidemiologic study to determine whether it can identify an etiologic agent or occupation associated with the cluster of six cases of malignant mesothelioma known to be recorded in the files of the CTR. It is proposed that such an investigation be conducted with the assistance of the General-Electric Corporation's Epidemiologist and staff. It is further requested that the Corporation assist in the funding of the contemplated study in an amount mutually acceptable to all concerned. A cost estimate is attached to this proposal. 01IECTIVES .
(a) To refine the employment data in the six cases known to have been employed by G-E and attempt to determine their job titles and descriptions of their duties with greater precision.
(b) To investigate any known exposure to asbestos at G-E and determine whether any one fiber variety was used predominantly.
(c) To determine if possible the levels of any exposure to asbestos discovered to have been present in the work place and attempt to quantify such exposure.
(d) To compare the six cases with an adequate number of control subjects matched for age , sex, geographic area and employment at G-E, to be derived from the lists of decedents on file in records of the CCSU.
AO 1 93?
UCC 010443
O'..:
3-
METHODS.
(a) G-E records will be reviewed. The records of roost inter
est are likely to be personnel records, industrial hygiene
records, manufacturing details for the time periods of employment
of the cases and controls and any available medical records and
radiographs.
(b) Death certificates of cases and controls will be reviewed
as part of the matching procedure. If G-E appears on the Death
Certificate as the employer then matched controls will be
selected from the CCEU files of Connecticut decedents which
are available for the relevant time periods. In those cases
where G-E is not mentioned on the Death Certificates but where
G-E was identified as the employer by means of City Directories
or hospital records on file in the CTR, then for the sake of
insuring a good match in all respects , an attempt will be made
to obtain matched controls by utilizing similar sources.
(c) The relevant data assembled will be reviewed and an
attempt made to reconstruct detailed work histories for cases
and controls. All jobs performed by each individual will be
itemized and an effort will be made to catalogue the site,
division, geographic area, department, period of employment in
each job, chemicals and other raw materials handled and used, the
product' manufactured, the wastes generated and the methods
of waste disposal in use. Interviews of co-workers and super
visors and other knowledgable persons will be conducted when
the record review does not yield sufficient information about
any of the abovementioned variables. If interviews are conducted
only fully trained interviewers will be used and standardized
techniques will be employed to avoid observer bias. All such
interviews will be conducted in person and no indirect methods
such as mailed questionnaires or telephone interviews will be
used.
AO 1 93
UCC 010444
U.
PERSONNEL Principal Investigator s J. Wister Meigs, MD.
Clinical Professor of Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 135 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510
Project Director
Consultant
: Hilton C. Lewinsohn, ME ECh., FCCP.. Lecturer, Department of Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 135 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510
It is proposed that the number of personnel directly involved with this project be limited to those listed above. Support will be drawn from the staff of CCE'J and G-E.
UCC 010445
A0 ) 933
REFERENCES.
(1) Lewinsohn, H.C., Meigs, J.W., Teta, M.J.: The influence of occupational and environmental asbestos exposure on the incidence of malignant mesothelioma in Connecticut. In Biological Effects of Mineral Fibres, J.C.Wagner, Editor, IARC Scientific Publications, Vol 2, No.30, pp. 655-660, 1980. Lyon, France.
(2) Teta.K.j . .Lewinsohn,H.C ., Meigs, J.W., '/idone, R.A.: Occupational asbestos exposure and mesothelioma in Connecticut. Presented International Conference on Occupational Lung Disease, March 24-27, 1982, Chicago, Illinois. Abstract to be published in "Chest", the Journal of the American College of Chest Physicians.
UCC 010446
AO 1934
Table I
Relative Risk of Mesothelioma Associated with Selected Job Categories
Job Title Engineers Brickmasons & Stonemasons Cabinetmakers & Carpenters Electricians Foremen Painters, Construction, &
maintenance
Plumbers & Pipefitters
RR 2.72 2.15 2.25* 1.29 1.57 1.39
3.87*
952 Cl (.85, 8.68) (.37, 12.50) (1.13, 4.48) (.39, 4.24) (.84, 2.94) (.52, 3.71)
(1.38, 10.82)
N' 11
5 35 14 50 20
13
*p <.05
In number of male cases and controls over 30 years old at death or diagnosis, born after 1875, who 'ever worked' in the category. Total N for each independently calculated RS was 611 (147 cases, 464 controls).
UCC 010447
AO 1 98S
Table II
Relative Risk of Mesothelioma Associated with Selected Industry Categories
Industry Title
Construction
Misc. non-metallic mineral & stone products
Electrical machinery equipment, & supplies
Aircraft & parts
Ship & boatbuilding
Yarn, thread & fabric mills
Rubber Product
Automobile repair 6 related service
RR 1.21
1.64
2.79 1.03 1.09
.57 5.08**
.65
95Z Cl (.60, 2.45)
(.15, 18.06)
(.86, 6.67) (.43, 2.49) (.35, 3.42) (.17, 1.92) (1.60, 16.11) (.08, 5.53)
N1 45
3
20 25 16 20 10
6
**p *~01
number of male cases and controls over 30 years old at death or diagnosis, born after 1875, who 'ever worked' in the category. Total N for each independently calculated RR was 611 (147 cases, 464 controls).
UCC 010448
A0 1 936