Document OEBvbXEkQ697Gk1Kr4J1m1z9L
ii r>it-h
ComDaivv B FGOODji r ( H ru iiitv. HENRY
L Ki !!L-`- '
:T :m,it oc h i nc . Pae: i
Session: 1 (IB-10- 92 Svslera: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
Calesorv: RECOMMENDATIONS
RpylsiOii: 0 10-2^-S1:
Dwr.fc'.
QUESTION
:.a:
;i. wwtp y-notci! vkir was not
; CALIBRATED.
'
:r; -;
REMARKS
I RECOMMENDATIONS
[ BY ;
COMMENTS
! 1. . CALIBRATE
: V.-JG ; 1 . 11/92: THE V-
[
; !NOTCH W'EIR IS TO BE :
; ;CHECKED IN
: :ACCORDANCE WITH
[
CHAPTER 6 OF THE
1
l ;EPS'S NPDES
;
! I COMPLIANCE
;
; !INSPECTION MANUAL. [
; :this will be
:
; ;PERFORMED ON AN
[
; :ANNUAL BASIS. A
[
' '.CALIBRATION CHECK
: :wiLL BE PERFORMED
[
: ;MONTHLY ON THE
I .'SECONDARY MEASURING ;
; [DEVICES AND THE
;
I !COMPUTER READOUT TO [
I [INSURE RELIABLE
[
[ [DATA. (SDJ.WJC)
[ [12/1/92.
[
2. THE RADIATION SAFETY OFFICER HAS NOT BEEN TRAINED AND THE PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED.
[P ;
/. TRAIN OFFICER
[ DF.C. [ 2 . 11/92: TRAINING [HAS BEEN SCHEDULED
[ [FOR D.E.GIFFIN THE [ [WEEK OF NOV 9TH TO [ [ATTEND THE TN [ [RADIATION SCHOOL. [ [ONCE CERTIFICATION [ [HAS BEEN OBTAINED [ [THE PLANT LICENSE [ [WILL THEN BE [ [AMENDED, t DEG) i [2/1/93.
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
[ [ [
3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT?
;
(IMPACT! ASSESSMENTS WERE NOT [
COMPLETED,
!
3. PROVIDE ASSESSMENTS
[ DMK [ 3 . 11/92: AI.L EA ' S , [
[ [AR'S, AND GPO'S NOW [
[ [HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL [
[ [IMPACT ASSESSMENTS [
[ [INCLUDED TO INSURE [
[ [THAT ENVIRONMENTAL [
[ [CONCERNS ARE
[
[ [ADDRESSED, COMPLETE [
[ [9/1/92
[
4. SCAFFOLDING WAS NOT INSPECTED QUARTERLY.
; !
----------------------------------------- - (
4, INSPECT
;deg[4. a pm maintenance ; [ [WORK ORDER HAS BEEN *, [ [GENERATED TO INSPECT; [ [THE SCAFFOLDING ON A[
NGC 12529
i 51
< >muiin v . bFCOODF; 1 CH F a t: i i 11 v : H E N H V
Se.!i:iior bvstora
Cat<`oi'v
1 06-10-92 1 MANAGEMENT GF CHANGE RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 1C - 26-9 >
Itwn.s
QUESTION
; a : REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
BY
COMMENTS
;quarterly basis, the '.PLANT PRESENTLY AND ;IN THE PAST INSPECTS ;PRIOR TO EACH USE OF ;the scaffolding [WHICH IS MORE lFREQUENT THAN [QUARTERLY. [(COMPLETE) 10/30/92.
Session: 1 06-10-92 System: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Bw<?f :
QUESTION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1 BY
COMMENTS
. THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT OCUMENTATION SUPPORTING STAGE I PROGRESS OF THE RESPONSIBLE ARE POLLUTION PREVENTION ODF, .
1. PROVIDE AN UP-TO-!DMK|1. 11/92: THE
!
DATE QUALITATIVE
[POLLUTION PREVENTION [
EMISSIONSINVENTORY.!
[CODE INVENTORY WILL |
;be updated and
;
'.SUBMITTED. (DMK)
[
[12/1/32.
2. EVALUATE
DMK|2. 11/92: AN
POTENTIAL IMPACT OF
1 EVALUATION OF THE
RELEASES ON THE
'.POTENTIAL RELEASE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND THE
1THE ENVIRONMENT AND
HEALTH AND SAFETY OF
ITHE SAFETY OF
EMPLOYEES AND THE
1 EMPLOYEES AND THE
COMMUNITY
[COMMUNITY HAS BEEN
I PERFORMED. THIS WAS
1 PERFORMED IN
|CONNECTION WITH THE
[REQUIREMENTS OF THE
I ILLINOIS CHEMICAL
[SAFETY ACT.
;(COMPLETE) 1/1/92
3. ESTABLISH PRIORITIES TAKING INTO CONCERN
DMK!3. 11/92: ONCE THE !PRIORITIES HAVE BEEN [ESTABLISHED,
POTENTIAL HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPACTS.
[MEETINGS WITH PLANT |EMPLOYEES AND THE
I PUBLIC WILL BE HEI.D
[TO RECEIVE THEIR [RECOMMENDATIONS.
[(DMK, PD) 6/1/93
4-4
NGC 12530
Vi'I T Pi
( onip.ir.v . BFCOUDRTCH r.u'il !l \ " HENRY
v-orkLhee
Pnnuuech Inc. ,'jne: 3
Session: 1 US-10-92
Kevision: 0 10-2l'-92
Svstem: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE
'.iteaorv: RECOMMENDATIONS
Liwac;
,--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- i--------------------------------------------------- i-------- t
QUESTION
!--! REMARKS
l REC0MMENDA75 ONS
;by ;
COMMENTS
14, PROVIDE
iDMK;4. UPDATE POLLUTION
! MEASUREMENT OF ON
; I PREVENT 1 ON CODE
1GOINC REDUCTION
*. 1 INVENTORY ANNUALLY.
ii it
PROGRESS .
: :1DHK1 ANNUALLY,
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- +------------------------- - --------------------<------- f--------------------------------------------------- i
Session: 1 0S-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 3 SOLID AMD HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg* ;
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -4-------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------*--------+---------------------------------------------------4
; QUESTION !a: (---------------------------------------------------------------------------, - 4
REMARKS
| RECOMMENDATIONS
;BY |
COMMENTS
;
,--------------------------- *---- +----------------------------*
|1. HAZARD WASTE MANAGEMENT W'AS;p;
IDE FICI ENT IN SEVERAL AREAS.
;|
',1. ALL SEVEN 1 SATELLITE
) DMK I 1. 11/92: THE PLANT ; !WASTE HANDLING
I ACCUMULATION AREAS
I PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN',
[ WERE NOT INSPECTED
THOROUGHLY REV I EVTED ;
;ON A WEEKLY BASIS. ;ADDRESS.
IWITH RESPECT TO RCRA
|GUIDELINES, BEG
;
;POLICY AND GMP SINCE 1
I THE AUDIT AND
;
1 CORRECTED | ACCORD I NC.L Y .
ALL
\
I SATELLITE I ACCUMULATION AREAS
|
;ARE NOW INSPECTED
;
1 WEEKLY BY AN S&E
;
I OPERATOR, THE
;
;production operators:
I ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR J
I MAINTAINING THE
)
iSATELLITE
;
J ACCUMULAT ION DRUMS 1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH
\
IRCRA REGULATIONS,
;
!(COMPLETE) 9/1/92. :
+-+
2. DRUMS OF
DHK ! 2 . PROCEDURES HAVE l,
HAZARDOUS WASTE ON
1 BEEN ESTABLISHED AND!
THE FLAMMABLE
1 TRAINING GIVEN TO
STORAGE PAD WERE NOT
JINSURE THAT NO
;
LABELED WITH THE
I HAZARDOUS WASTE IS 1
WORDS ''HAZARDOUS
;STORED ON THE
1
WASTE" OR THE
FLAMMABLE STORAGE
|
ACCUMULATION DATE.
JPAD. THE SAE
;
ADDRESS.
:OPERATORS ARE I RESPONSIBLE FOR
1
I RECEIVING ALL
!
;HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM 1
: I PRODUCTION'S
;
+-----------
NOC 12531
I', -ft
ompa:)\' scilitv
HI GUOOF. I Ch HINN'i
;.u !; .hee t
i'rmui t ech Inc. pjtii; 4
Session' 1 Ob-IC-SZ
Revision: n ! 0-Z G- 9 2
S> st em: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTF MANAGEMENT
Chleaorv : RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwgt :
QUESTION
;a;
remarks
+ - +--------------- -
RECOMMENDATIONS
[BY [
COMMENTS
+----------- ------------------------------------ -------------------- *---------- -t
OPERATIONS .
; ;lCOMPLETE I 9/l/9-.
. CONTAMINATED
IDMK;3. ALL DRUMS THAT
LATER IAL. CONTAINED ! !WERE HAZARDOUS OR
N DRUMS LOCATED ON ! !SPECIAL WASTE WERE
HE FLAMMABLE
! !LABELED ACCORDINGLY
TORAGE PAD, HAS NOT ! '.AND MOVED TO PROPER
EEN DETERMINED TO ; ;STORAGE LOCATION.
E A HAZARDOUS OR
! !(COMPLETE) 9/1/92
ONHAZARDOUS WASTE.
ESOLVE.
. ONE BULK ONTAINER OF WASTE AS IDENTIFIED AS CONTAINING A IAZARDOUS WASTE BUT WAS NOT LABELED AND DID NOT HAVE AN ACCUMULATION DATE. LABEL.
MK[4. THE BOX IN !QUESTION WAS LABELED !THE SAME DAY AND WAS iSHIPPED 8/21/92. '.THESE ARE [INDICATIONS THAT THE [MATERIAL PRESENTLY [BEING DISPOSED OF IN [THE CONTAINER IS NO [LONGER HAZARDOUS [SINCE THE MATERIAL [WHICH MADE IT [HAZARDOUS TS NOW [SOLD AS OFF-GRADE [PRODUCT. WE ARE IN [THE PROCESS OF [CHARACTERIZING THE [WASTE. (DMK, SDJ) [12/1/93.
5. A DRUM OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN THE LABORATORY SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREA WAS NOT CLOSED WITH A LID. REMEDY,,
DMK[5. PROCEDURES AND [CHECKS ABE IN PLACE [TO INSURE THAT LIDS [ARE CLOSED AT ALL [TIMES ON SATELLITE [ACCUMULATION DRUMS [EXCELPT WHEN BEING [FILLED. (COMPLETE) [9/1/92.
6. POTENTIALLY
DMKJ6. ALL DRUMS HAVE
REUSABLE MATERIALS WERE STORED IN DRUMS!
[BEEN LABELED [PROPERLY ACCORDING
LABELED "SCRAP" AND !
'WASTE" AT THE
|
[TO THEIR CONTENTS [AND MOVED TO PROPER
NGC 12532
.u ru-pc
k ihc-.'
rj malech Inc.
Company: B FOOODR 11' II Fji. llitv: H LNRY
Soss)on Svstem
I Oh-10 92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
(at ecor\ : RECOMMENDATIONS
i( 1
OUESTION
:a:
remarks
:
Dwgs : RECOMMENDATIONS
* ;dy ;
comments
;
;1
|FLAMMABLE STORAGE
;STORAGE AREAS.
J
::
'.PAD. CORRECT,
:[COMPLETE) S/21/92. |
2. WASTE OIL WAS SENT TO A FACILITY WHICH WAS NOT authorized by bfc.
;C|THE FACILITY
7, CORRECT
; 1 DISPOSED OF WASTE
!
; ;OIL AT AN OIL
:
; I RECYCLING FACILITY ;
; :that was not
:
; ;INCLUDED ON THE
;
; FACILITY ' S LIST OF
; :APPROVED TREATMENT, 1 ; :STORAGE AND DISPOSAL;
; ;(TSD) FACILITIES.
:
; DMK I 7. 11/92: PERMISSION!
IWAS RECEIVED FROM
;
ti ;jim lewis by phone ;
i i
;PRIOR TO SHIPPING
J
\
i
;the used oil to
;
i
;SAFETY KLEEN. THE
;
t '.DATE PERMISSION WAS ;
(t I GRANTED WAS NOT
|
i ;DOCUMENTED.
;
it I(COMPLETE) 10/27/92 . i
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: i DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg# .
QUESTION
a; REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
COMMENTS
11- SAMPLING RESULTS WERE NOT '.REPORTED TO THE STATE WITHIN : 30 DAYS.
: c:
',2. THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION ;THAT POTABLE WATER SYSTEM IS |"LEAD FREE"
;
:e;
i
t
ii
i i
ii
ii t ii ii ii ii
>
ii ii
>i ii
>* ti
i i
i<
41 11
(1
11
1C
4t
l
l1 1I
1) <1
\|
1 X1 11 (1 i\
\ 1 . RESOLVE 11
t 1 ! 2 GENERATE iDOCUMENTATION 11 t 4 11 1 11 1r at ii i < i l ii ti
ii
1
1
;dmk;i. 11/92: voc data ;
; |WAS SUBMITTED TO THE|
| lPUBLIC HEALTH
|
; :DEPARTMENT.
1
: ;(COMPLETE) 10/20/S9.I
|DMK|2. 11/92: NO RECORDS 1
; |ARE AVAILABLE TO
1
; |DETERMINE IF "LEAD |
I ;free" solder and
;
; :FLUX HAS BEEN USED 1
1 1 IN THE POTABLE WATER!
1
1 SYSTEM SINCE JUNE
|
1 |19, 1986. A
1
I `.MONITORING PROCEDURE!
; ;wiLL BE ESTABLISHED 1
; :FOR LEAD IN THE
;
1 POTABLE WATER,
I
: |NOTICE WILL BE
!
: |POSTED FOR POSSIBLE 1 : ILEAD CONTAMINATION \
: ;iN DRINKING WATER. !
1 ;PROCEDURES WILL BE 1
; ;ESTABLISHED TO
[
:
1 INSURE THAT "LEAD
!
; |FREE" PIPES, SOLDER,;
: |AND FLUX ARE USED IN!
; ;all FUTURE CHANGES :
NGC 12533
Ul'JT-l'C l
ri-itna1 i: T w.
Compam: BFGOODRICH t in; 11 11 \ : HENRY
Session: 1 QS-iU-D,::
Kfcvision: 0 10-26-92
System: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
i------------------------------------------------------------------------- i _*----------
QUESTION
a; REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
by ;
COMMENTS
'
11 %t 11 t1 t1
13. THERE WAS NO NOTIFICATION ;POSTED INFORMING PERSONNEL OF [THE LEAD CONTENT IN THE 1 DRINKING WATER.
:p:
)t >1
t1 t1
1 l
1\
11
[4. THE FACILITY HAS NOT 1 DEMONSTRATED THAT THE WATER
SYSTEM IS "LEAD FREE" .
* ',5. NON-POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
;p;
ii
t
il *
> t1
IS;p;
;not labeled
i li i ti tI ii li ii i i ii
tt
i
i* ii
t ii
; ;TO THE DRINKING
1
; '.water system, idmio ;
; :i2/3i/92.
:
: 3. POST NOTIFICATION !DMK[3. SEE ITEM 2 ABOVE.;
i ;i * ri ; : ; i i
: -i ADDRESS ii
;dmk;4. see item e above.;
;;
:
; > LABEL
it i
i \
; DMKJ 5 . n/92: A FLOW
[
; :DIAGRAM OF THE
I
; ;POTABLE WATER SYSTEM;
; [WILL BE DEVELOPED BY [
; ;s/3i/93. labeling is;
; 1 PRESENTLY BEING DONE!
; :to prevent
;
; ;INADVERTENT
|
: :CONSUMPTION OF NON- !
; ;POTABLE WATER. 1DMK)|
; ;3/3i/93.
;
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: S AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
:
QUESTION
a: REMARKS
1 RECOMMENDATIONS
[BY ;
COMMENTS
lI. THERE ARE NO WRITTEN 1 PROCEDURES FOR ENSURING AIR I POLLUTION SOURCE COMPLIANCE.
: p; 1 t1 1t 11 t t1 1 11 \t t* 11 11 11 11 11 11 tt (1 11 *1
1t 1i
1 11 < 11 1 *
11 11 1< 11
; i- ISSUE PROCEDURES ;DMK ;i. 11/92: ALL
;
i\ 1> 1 EXISTING WRITTEN
i
% 1
[PROCEDURES WILL BE i
i i
11 [CHECKED TO DETERMINE;
i i
11 1 IF PROCEDURES ARE IN[
i i
11 iPLACE TO INSURE
[
ti 11 [PROPER OPERATION OF [
1r [THE POLLUTION
[
ll [CONTROL DEVICES. ALL[
< i
[AIR POLLUTION
[
i
t i
[CONTROL DEVICES THAT[
i
i l
[ARE NOT INCLUDED IN [
i it [WRITTEN PROCEDURES
i >
ii [WILL HAVE A
[
tt
t 1
[PROCEDURE
I
ii
i i
[ESTABLISHED TO
[
t
i [INSURE PROPER
[
NGC 12534
Wort ,11v>_ i.
'.'inpai1.% ' B FCOOLR i (. F. (nr- 1 j t % : HESEi
leiSion. i Ub-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
5\stem : 5 AIR QUALITY MANAO.F'-'ENT
(.'ate^orv: RECOMMENDATIONS
Primatyc:: Inc Pane:
QUEST ION
RECOMMENDATIONS
; 111 ;
COMMENTS
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 6 COMMUNITY-RIGHT-TO-KNOW
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
'.OPERATION . RECORDS [OP CONTROL DEVICE
MAINTENANCE (WHERE [APPLICABLE) WILL BE '.MAINTAINED,
i HEG . JDK) S/31/93
QUESTION
A[ REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
COMMENTS
[1, THERE IS NO DOCUMENTAT ION 1 c [
[THAT SARA 302 [SUBMITTED.
NOTIFICATION WAS
| 1 1
1 I |
|1
l t> l 11 t*
------------------------------- +
[1. GENERATE
[DOCUMENTATION 1 1
\ t
1 t l t
;DMK;1. 11/92: A COPY OF : [THE SARA 302 [ [NOTIFICATION LETTER [ [SUBMITTED TO THE [ [SERC IS ON FILE IN [ [THE ENVIRONMENTAL ! [OFFICE. (COMPLETE) ; [5/6/S7,
Session: 1 QS-iO-92
Revision: 0 10-2C-92
System: 7 HAZARD COMMUNICATION
Cat egorv: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
4-4
i--------------------------------------------------i--------- *
QUESTION
'i A 'i REMARKS
1 RECOMMENDATIONS
;BY |
4-------------------------------------------------4--------- t
COMMENTS
1, BOXES OF PVC DISPERSION
1. CORRECT
DEG|1. THE GKON
STRAININGS HAD TWO CONFLICTING
|WAREHOUSE WILL BE
HAZARD LABELS.
;AUDITED FOR
'.NONCOMPLIANCE AND
;thf. packaging
[ LABEL1NG WILL BE
[CORRECTED. (MEG)
---------------------------------------- ------------------------------- -
[12/31/92.
Session: 1 OS-lO-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 8 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
------------------------------------------------------ *-------- 4
QUESTION
! A: REMARKS
: RECOMMENDATIONS
BY 1
COMMENTS
;i. APPROXIMATELY FIVE (51 [PERCENT OF TWA EXPOSURE !MONITOR!NG RESULTS FOR VINYL
CHLORIDE EXCEEDED THE PEL [WITHOUT RESPIRATORY
I. MAINTAIN FOLLOWUP DF.G [ 1. PLANT CURRENTLY
PROGRAM
[CONDUCTS BOARD OF [INQUIRES WHENEVER AN
[INDIVIDUAL EXCEEDS A
[PEL WITHOUT
NGC 12535
p (.
: i-i22tecl.
( ump^nv ; BFGOCDRICH Fi\c i i 11 v Ht'.SKY
Session: i 06-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: S INDUSTRIAL HYGIENL MANAGEMENT Cat ef|or\ : RECOMMENDATIONS
Dv.y s :
QUESTION [PROTECTION.
;a;
remarks
. PROCEDURE FOP "YELLOW
[P
LIGHT" ALARM DOES NOT ENSURE [
XPOSURES WILL BE LESS THAN [
'HE PEL.
!
3. THERE IS NOT A FORMAL HEAT [P
STRESS PROGRAM.
[
; RECOMMENDATIONS
:BY :
COMMENTS
!RESPIKATORY
I
[equipment. action
:
[ ITEMS DESIGNED TO
[ELIMINATE THE OVER- ;
[EXPOSURE ARE
[
[GENERATED AND
[
[FOLLOW UP OCCURS
[AS PART OF OUR HOI
[PROGRAM. (CONTINUING
[A COMPLETE I
2. CORRECT 3. ADDRESS
DEG[2. ALTERNATIVES ARE [DEINC INVESTIGATED [TO INSURE THAT [PERSONNEL ARF. NOT [EXPOSVRED TO GREATER [THAN THE PEL WITHOUT [USE OF A RE5PIRATOR [WHILE PERFORMING [WORK UNDER A YELLOW [LIGHT. iMEG/RDM) [3/1/93,
DEG[3. A PLANT SAFETY [POLICY WTI.L BE [ISSUED IDENTIFYING [THE CURRENT TRAINING [PROGRAM PLUS [ADDITIONAL [ADMINISTRATIVE AND [EQUIPMENT CONTROLS. [(DEG! 6/1/93.
4. DOCUMENTATION FOR INVESTIGATING STS'S WAS DISORGANIZED AND INCOMPLETE
[ I
4. ADDRESS
DEG[4. A PLANT PROCEDUP ; [WILL BE ISSUED : ;IDENTIFYING THE [ [ADMINISTRATION OF [ [STS'S AND HEARING [ [RRCORDABILITY. THE
[PROCEDURE WILL [ [INCLUDE THE [ [DOCUMENTATION [ [REQUIREMENTS. (DEG) [ [12/31/92.
NGC 12536
C Dl CuOI'T l CH f;u .lit-- : HLM;
1'i im.'iT r..
.'issK.'ii. 1 Svst-m: 9 i SDL' SIR I AT. SAFETY
(iiiec.Ol'. : Pi COtiriENDAT TOY,
R'". ii on : l! 11 0 1 - '3 2
GUEST I ON
;a;
1. SEVERAL .KMT SIGNS WERE NOT ! p;
I LH'M1N AT ED .
:!
2. PALLETS IN PVC SACK AREA WERE BOWED.
3. EYEWASH STATIONS WERE UNCLEAN.
:i `|
'
ii
* ii
ii ii
ii ii
i ii
r ii
ii ii
li ii
l
ii
\
i
V
; c;
i
t
ii
ii
i
i
i
i<
ii >i
i\
t<
ii
ii
i
i
*> >
t
*i
* >
ii i
<
t
i
ti ii
;p*
*i i ii < ii
ii ii
ii i
;;
;\ ^-
REMARKS
; recotiendaticns
1 BY :
COMMENTS
;
; I . G ."1PI.ETE EXIT : SIGN PROGRAM
l 1i
l 11 l l 1 i 1 1l
i 11
:DEC:1. THE PRESENT
[
: |PROGRAM TO REPLACE [
; [existing exit signs
: [THAT DO NOT MEET THE
: ; ILL U>1INA T T 0N
: `.REQUIREMENTS will BE
; :COMPLETED ALONG WITH
; [the auditing of exit
: :SIGNS THAT ARE
: :LOCATED ON THE
; [DOORS. SIGNS THAT
; [are not visible WHEN
! ;the door is open
: IWJLL BE RELOCATED.
! ( DEG 1 12/31/92.
2. ADDRESS 1i
1 DEG|2. THE WOODEN : ;PALLETS THAT WERE
'.BOWING IN THIS ! ;aPPLication have : lBEEN TAKEN OUT Of [ [ SERVICE. IN ADDITION ! '.THE SUPER SACKS ARE ; ;BEING STACKED IN A I [MANNER SO THAT
[INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT I [PHYSICALLY EXPOSED [ [TO A SECOND LEVEL OF [ [BAGS. (COMPLETE> [ [8/14/92.
[3. ADDRESS
l
I
1
;deg;3. each production [ [AREA WILL BE [ [RESPONSIBLE FOR THE [ [CLEANING OF [ [EYEBATHS. [ [LONG RANGE [ [THE PORCELEIN [ [EYEBATHS WILL BE [ [CHANGED OUT WITH [ [MORE MODERN NON-BOW [ [DESIGNS, (MEG/JDK) [ [12/31/92.