Document O1yDBrYxogDVYB62K2nn822EX

Briefing - 4. April 2023 Supporting an ambitious FGas Regulation The EU FGas Regulation is a landmark piece of European Union (EU) climate legislation for reducing emissions of fluorinated gases (Fgases), such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). Fgases are super greenhouse gases, hundreds to thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide (CO2), causing shortterm warming effects in the atmosphere. Cutting Fgas use is some of the most costeffective climate mitigation available. To date, the EU Fgas Regulation has achieved mitigation at a cost of just 6 per tonne CO2e .1 In April 2022, the European Commission (EC) issued a proposal to revise the FGas Regulation, including measures to speed up the HFC phasedown and introduce additional new equipment bans. The EC's proposal was based on proportionate action using currently available low global warming potential (GWP) technologies below a designated cost threshold.2 Tomorrow, COREPER will consider the Council position on the revision of the FGas Regulation. With support across the political spectrum, the European Parliament voted last week on a reasonable approach towards phasing out hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)-- many of which are also PFAS or `forever chemicals'--while safeguarding the objectives of REPowerEU and supporting European industry. We hope the Council will do the same, in particular by supporting the HFC phasedown and Annex IV bans in the Commission proposal. Please find the following argumentation for an ambitious FGas Regulation below: Importance of an ambitious FGas Regulation The Commission proposal will position European industry as global leaders in sustainable heating and cooling, providing certainty of investment to European manufacturers of sustainable heat pumps - many of them small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs). It safeguards heatpump deployment targets under REPowerEU by allowing exemptions to Annex IV bans and the HFC phasedown in Articles 11(4) and 16(4), respectively. Further Amendments of the European Parliament will be presented to Council for consideration and will: - require the Commission to annually assess the impact of the HFC phasedown on the EU heatpump market. - empower the Commission to allocate additional HFC quotas for heat pumps, if needed. - allocate revenue from the allocation price towards the heatpump sector. Any further weakening of the HFC phasedown and Annex IV bans is unnecessary and counterproductive to EU interests, and its primary impact will be to delay the transition in other sectors. It also risks shifting from Russianproduced gas dependency to foreign multinational HFC dependency. Switching to nonfluorinated alternatives will be the `winwinwin' situation for people, the planet and lastly profit and an ambitious FGas Regulation needs to ensure these wins. Briefing - 4. April 2023 Why ambitious Annex IV new equipment prohibitions for heat pumps and air conditioning are crucial Heat pumps are a key tool for the decarbonisation of heating in Europe. However, locking in HFC refrigerants in tens of millions of heat pumps will increase future climate impacts. Heat pumps using ultralow GWP (<5) natural refrigerant alternatives to HFCs not only reduce climate emissions through energy savings but also eliminate the climate impact of leaking refrigerant emissions from heat pumps. As the EU rapidly decarbonises its electricity grid, the climate impact of leaking refrigerants during use and at end of life will proportionately grow. EU manufacturers are global leaders in HFCfree heat pump technologies. Weakening Annex IV bans will open the door for Chinese and US subsidised HFC equipment imports. Viessmann, Europe's second largest heat pump manufacturer, which has committed to invest 1 billion heat pump and green climate solutions,3 told members of the European Parliament in January that Fgases are no longer needed for residential heat pumps up to 70kW and urged support of the EC proposal.4 Many other heat pump manufacturers already offer, or are developing, natural refrigerantbased hydronic heat pumps. These include AIT, Auer, Ecoforest, Bosch, Hautec, Hoval, Panasonic, Samsung, LG, Mitsubishi, Vaillant, Nibe, Wolf, Midea, and Clivet, as well as many SMEs from Spain, Portugal, Italy, Czechia, and Greece. In a clear indication that EU climatefriendly heat pump manufacturing makes business sense, Vaillant has just announced plans to double its production capacity to half a million units per year, with a new Slovakian manufacturing plant.5 It is merely a question of scaling up production, which can happen quickly. For example, lowerGWP HFC32 has swiftly replaced highGWP HFC410A in singlesplit airconditioning, going from near zero to 80% market penetration in four years in a sector that is much larger.6 New equipment bans support small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs) equipment manufacturers and equipment users alike. They provide clear market signals with little administrative burden and costs and are key measures for SMEs, as they offer innovation opportunities for manufactures and help endusers avoid unnecessary investment in HFC based technologies, which will come with everincreasing servicing costs as the HFC phase down becomes more stringent over time. Failure to act fuels HFC climate crime. Europe has suffered from record levels of HFC smuggling, often associated with serious organised crime.7 Countries on Eastern European borders often bear the brunt of this influx, placing excessive burdens on national enforcement agencies. Illegal HFC trade is driven by ongoing consumer demand to service HFCbased equipment. Banning new HFCbased equipment helps reduce these pressures by avoiding future servicing demand for HFCs. Why the phasedown should be protected The EC proposal to revise the FGas Regulation was finalised one month after the announcement of RePowerEU, allowing sufficient time to align both strategies. The EC has since revisited their assessment and have provided detailed modelling and analysis to parliamentary legislators to show compatibility between the two measures. Additionally, equipment manufacturers have a 70 million tonne (CO2e) bank of unused quota authorisations (almost double the entire annual quota allocation for 2027). Briefing - 4. April 2023 An ambitious phasedown avoids dependency on nonEU manufactured HFC imports. Many HFC producers are based in Asia. Weakening the phasedown and Annex IV heat pump bans risks shifting from Russian gas dependency to Chinese manufactured HFC refrigerant import dependency. Weakening the HFC phasedown will not guarantee quota for heat pumps as the quota system is economywide, covering all sectors. It risks delaying the transition in other sectors and increasing HFC quota demand for servicing in later years. This is why the ENVI Committee has proposed a specific annual heat pump assessment and exemption clause. Excluding Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) from the quota stifles innovation and goes against international obligations. The EC found that the current MDI exemption from the HFC phasedown has resulted in slow innovation in the sector and ongoing exemptions do not align it with international obligations under the Kigali Amendment.8 Fluorochemical producers have stoked fears that the anticipated entry to the market of lowGWP HFCbased MDIs from 2025 may not be fast enough to match the proposed HFC phasedown. However, readily available alternatives to HFCbased MDIs, such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft mist inhalers, offer opportunities to move a significant portion of the market away from HFCbased MDIs without undermining patient health. There are additional safeguards and further liaison with the medical community to ensure that the Regulation does not interfere with patient wellbeing. A strict regulation supports public health and environment concerns over PFAS Many low GWP Fgas alternatives to HFCs are PFAS. PFAS are known as `forever chemicals' due to their persistence in the environment. Since the EC's proposal, consumer awareness of the growing environmental and health risks posed by spiraling levels of PFAS has come to the fore. Recent findings show high levels of PFAS across Europe, with residents near 3M's PFAS manufacturing site in Flanders recently warned not to eat any homegrown vegetables due to high levels of ground water contamination.9 The ENVI Committee's amendments to ban Fgas in sectors where cost effective, energy efficient naturalrefrigerant alternatives are available reflect technological innovation and protect EU citizens' public health and support efforts to address PFAS via the REACH Regulation. In February this year, five EU Member States proposed amendments to the REACH Regulation which include banning the use of PFAS in refrigeration and air conditioning uses, except where national standards and codes prevent the use of alternatives.10 These measures have been facilitated by recent major changes to product standards in domestic airconditioning and commercial refrigeration which have unlocked the safe, efficient use of nonPFAS natural refrigerants such as propane. A strict regulation supports a PFASfree green energy switchgear transition Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), used as insulation gas in switchgear, is the most potent greenhouse gas on earth with a high GWP of 25,200.11 Switchgear for medium voltage levels ( 52 kV) and high voltage levels (> 52 kV) is available with futureproof, non fluorinated gases already, with several manufacturers providing marketready and reliable switchgear without the need for PFAS substitutes. Technology for high voltage level (> 145 kV) is under development and will be possible within the suggested SF6 phaseout timelines based on manufacturer's portfolio plans. The ENVI committee's proposed amendments to Deutsche Umwelthilfe Briefing -- 4. April 2023 Annex IV bans for switchgear ensures the transition to F-gas free alternatives thus avoiding the phase in of PFAS solutions that hold uncertainty in regard to future restriction, create outside-EU dependencies through patents and manufacturers, have higher climate impacts and pollute the environment. We ask for your support for an ambitious F-Gas Regulation. For more information, please be in touch: Christine Luetzkendorf Programme Manager Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. @duh.de 735 1oko-lnstitut (2022). Support Contract for an Evaluation and Impact Assessment for Amending Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 on Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases: Final Report. CLIMA.A2/ETU/2019/0016. Page 173 2 European Commission (2022). Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment Report. SWD(2022) 96 Final. 3 Kurmayer (2023) "Battle for dominance in heat pump markets reaches Europe" News item 25 May 2022 Available here https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/battle-for-domina nce-in-heatpump-ma rkets-reaches-europe/ Ingo Seliger Head of Public Affairs, Veissmann. European Parliament Speech January 12 2023. Documented here https://atmo.org/announcement/hydrocarbons21-com-atmo-europe-f-gases-no-longer-needed-forresidential-heat-pumps-says-viessmann/ Vaillant Press Release 10 March 2023 "Vaillant Group Opens Mega Factory for Heat Pumps" available here https://www.vailla nt-grou p.com/news-stories/vailla nt-group-opens-mega-factory-for-heatpumps.html14:--:text=The%20Remscheid%2Dbased%20heating%20technology,heat%20pumps%20from%20M ay%202023. 6 European Commission (2022). Impact Assessment. Page 204. Environmental Investigation Agency (2021) "Europe's Most Chilling Crime-The illegal trade in HFC refrigerant gases' available here https://eia-international.org/report/europes-most-chilling-crime/ European Commission (2022). Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment Report. SWD(2022) 96 Final. Page 18. Available here. Salvidge and Hosea (2023) "Revealed: scale of 'forever chemical' pollution across UK and Europe" News article: 23 February 2023. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/feb/23/revealed-scale-offorever-chemical-pollution-across-uk-and-europe 10REACH, (2023). 'Pre-publication of Annex XV report prior to consultation: Restriction on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of PFASs.' ECHA. Report and Annexes available here. 11IPCC, (2022). 'AR6 Working Group 1Report: Chapter 7 Supplementary Material'. Page 32. Available here.