Document O1xDOR8M8wjk4qqazDbzBYVRK
MonsantoJ149a copy*
MONSANTO MttAMCN CORPORATION / OAVTON LABORATORY I DAYTON. OMO 4(407
BASC-Dayton____________
Wn/MCNW
Analytical
IWI4BWI
RfTORT NO.: MM-414 JOSNSOJCCTNa: 463.24S0; 403.2460; 463.2470 6 463.24(0
DAT!: Dscabr 13. 1963 rtano covcsco*
TITU; ANALYSIS OF KRWMICR SOIL SAMPLES
AUTHORS: B. Mason Hughes Roy N. Noble
asstsact:
soil staples froa the Kni--rich plant were ana
lysed for their PCS. TCDO and Mercury content. Results of these analyses are shown In this report.
ANALYSIS OT KMMNMCII SOIL SAMPLES
T IT U :
4i
ii
Approval Date;
Center Service Project Manager
h\f%\
RXSTR1CBD DISTRIBUTION (see over) COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
HONS 022731
COrVHUMKB
1 W. L. Swill Inwrich 2 A. Quick Rruawrich 3 . r. Ivory 4 >. H. Rughee 5 . W. Hoblo Central Files T Technical Report
Library
ABSTRACT ONLY
R. N. Scott 02B . A. uoltomam
NOTE:
Distribution of this report is restricted. Requests for
additional copies should be nade through the principal
contact at the Monsanto location involved or the Manager, Environmental sciences Center, Dayton Laboratory, Dayton, Ohio.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Contributions of the following Dayton Laboratory personnel to this project are gratefully acknowledged:
Analyses: J. A. Giust B. H. Hughes R. W. Noble
< ' O V, A \ V C O \ H D [ '. f ! A .
When no longer needed, or upon request, return this report to Central Files, Qeyton.
HONS
022732
tro/a
t. IHTKOCUCTIOII
A total of forty-ooo (41) sanples, were received fro* the Unarich plant for analyaoa. Tha analyaaa to bo conductad were for poaalbla concantrationa of polychlorlnatad blphcayla (PCB)i 2.3,7,8tetrachlorodibensodioxin (TCDO) and aercury. All analyaaa wara conductad in accordanca to U.S. EPA approved or accepted proce dures . For internal purposes the samples were assigned me Log 1-43-07-18-02.
II. SUI1AAY
Tables 1-3 shows the results for the anslyses of the sanples for their PCB concentrations. Table 4 shows totsl organic carbon. (TOC) and phenol analyses conducted on specified sanples while table 5 shows the TCDO results requested on specific sanples. Table 6 shows the concentrations of nercury found in the specified sanples.
Ill . ANALYSIS RESULTS
3.1 PCB ANALYSES
3.1.1
SAMPLE EXTRACTION Solid sanples wara first visually inspected to deteraine general qualities, eg. wet, oily, containing plant notar ial etc. Four general types of sanples were received for analysis. They were: rocky concrete notarial, soil, sludge, and liquid. In general each saaple posed different analytical separation problems of which saaple homogeneity was considered to be aost critical. Rocky concrete aateria) required larger saaple weights in order to obtain a repre sentative saaplei soils and lagoon sludge required smaller
1
HONS 022133
mi/j
uljtii. Ihay wni rocky ceacnU material, toU. iliin, and liquid. In qunaral each saaple pouad diffarant analy tical separation problems of which saaple heaoqonoity waa considered to be mt critical, rocky concrete notarial required larger saaple weights in order to obtain a repre sentative sample: aoile and lagoon aludge required analler weights for analysis. The liquid saaple (priaarily wetar) required larger anounts due to lower levels of detection required.
The aeparation scheme for solids was as follows. An ali quot of the solid saaple was weighed into a 40 al Pierce vial with teflon faced caps in the following quantities: rocky concrete naterials, 10-20 g; soils approximately, 1.0 g; and lagoon sludge 0.1 g. The saaples were spiked with 100 |iL of 10 pg/nL pentechlorobenzene as a surrogate spiking conpound. 10.0 uL benzene was pipetted into the Pierce vial, and the saaples were then placed `nto an ul trasound bath for 30 ainutes.
The separation technique for liquids was as follows. 100 aL of saaple was added to a 125 aL separatory funnel. The saaple was spiked with 100 pL of 10 pg/aL pentachlorobenzene and allowed to equilibrate for 30 ainutes. The sam ple was extracted three tines with three 10 aL aliquots of aethylene chloride. The extracts were conbined in a grad uated centrifuge tube and the voluae was reduced to 1.0 aL under a nitrogen stream.
The extracts were then inspected for suitability for cap illary GC/EC instrumental analysis, and dilutions were made accordingly before analysis.
2 HONS 022734
mt/3
Mitin response (Mton wn calculated for the major Kt Isomers In tbo three formulations and tho capillary OC/EC data wore analysed using a different aet of raaponsa feetore for each fornulation. The presence of one or nore of the three Aroclor fonulationa waa confined by visual inapection of the GC/EC chromatograms and by using the table of concentrations printed out using the three sets of rela tive response factors of the characteristic PCB isoaers of the three Aroclor fonulationa.
3.1.3. RESULTS Tables 1-3 summarize the concentrations of Aroclor 1248. 12S4 and 1240 neasured using the above extraction and ana lysis protocol. Recoveries of pentachlorobenzene surrogate spiking compound are also reported in the tables.
3.2 TOC AMD PHEMOL AMALVSES
3.2.1 The total organic carbon (TOC) and total phenol concentra tions were detenined to U.s. EPA standard analysis (1)
3.3 TCDD ANALYSIS The aaaiples were analyzed according to the EPA Region Vll June 1983 nethod "Detenination of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in Soil and Sediment." ror quality control purposes KRC Method Humber 07-QAQC-R3 vaa followed. Briefly this nethod requires that for every set of sanplea of the sane matrix type a repli cate sample, a low (0.8 ppb in this case) spiked sample, a high (8.1 ppb in this case) spiked sample, and a method blank must be analyzed.
3.3.1
Preparation and Analysis Sanplea of 10 g were weighed out and spike with 2S.9 ng of carbon-13 labeled 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 10.8 ng of chlorine-37 labeled 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Ten grams of washed anhydrous sodium
3 HONS 022735
TABU 1. RESULTS OF CAPILLARY GC/EC ANALYSES OF KRUNMR1CH PI ANT SAMTLES
483.24618 and 483.24919_________________________________________________________________________________________Ao*ut 15, I--I SDlt Identification
Analyte Aroclor 12(1 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1250
Analysis Mathod
GC/EC
U.O.D.* 0.1
Gc/r.c
0.1
GC/EC
0.1
1 Soil
la Solid
2 Solid ) Liquid 4 Soil
4a Soil
.60 .21 .15
10.6
Concentration Iim/b)
*>
.146
22)
5.9
NO
.06
100
3.5
HD
.076
15.2
162 62 18
TOTAL AAOCLOA
GC/EC
IwrMtlt MlUM Comound NRUelorebMMM
Analyst* Method
GC/EC
0.1 teowit added (uo/Q)
0.1
1.04
20.0
ND
0.222
248.2
241.0
____________________________________McowrY (\)___________________________________
82
42
102
112
8
rncM* fll*
BP 108
BP 116
8P 111
BP 120
BP 124
122
btnet Dilation me catroctlaa Naobor
.
1:1 PC8 002
1:10
111
lilO
1(100
lilOO
PCS 002 KB 012 PCP 015 PCS 010 PCS 004
Kooola w.-blmM Itl
-
*L.0.0. Halt ot detection In m/1>
4.26
7.64
4.24
100
Sd MM 44UCM4 with detection Unit fivw by the L.O.D. valua (or tidi cnmpomi.
e8A wt analysed do* to aanpl* extract dilution.
8.7
6.10
HONS 022736
Anelyte Aroclor 1249 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1290
TABLE 1. (Continued)
Saanlc Identification
Analysis Method GC/EC
GC/EC
GC/EC
L.O.D.* 0.1 0.) 0.1
$ Soil
24.9 11.4
2.4
$a Solid 4 Soil 4a Solid 7 Soil
Concentration (uo/n)
370
2.78
12.4
3.4
340 1.02 5.4 2.9
340 0.49 3.1 7.D
Ta Solid
100 43 09.9
TOTAL AAOCLOA
lorranete toikina Conoound Pentaclorobensene
CC/EC
Analysis Method
CC/EC
0.1 taount added (MO/9)
0.1
39.3
1070
4.29
20.9
14.3
233.9
____________________________ (\)_______________________________________
73 NA 40 4 234 m
Process Pile
9P 135
DP 118 DP 110 DP 115
Bxtraet Dilution
1:10 It 1000 lil lilO
me extraction maker
-
PCD Oil PCD 005 PCD 009 PCD 001
IMapU . Citiictri (!
-
N.O.O. Unit of detection In 09/9.
7.03
9.99
7.34
7.7
No none detected with e detection Unit 9iven by the l.O.D. velue (or eech compound.
9m net analysed due to sanpl* extract dilution. ttifh recovery poeeibly doe to the presence of pentachloroberuene in soil sanple.
DP 119 ltlO
PCD 004 14.33
m &33 1*109
PCD OOP 10.01
MONS 022737
Analyte Aroclor 1249 Aroclor 12S4 Aroclor 1240
tabu. l. (Continued)
Sooolo Identification
Anolyaia --wtthod
cc/cc
oc/tc
GC/EC
7a solid (Du|>l icato
I.O.D.* 0.1
144
0.1 41.)
0.1 12
Method Blank
Method Blank
KS 059
NDb
Concentration (im/o) ND ND f<2.0
ND ND 2.1 ND ND 14. S
TOTAL AROCLOR
tarnuli SoUIm Compound Paataclorobenaene
GC/EC
Anolyaia Method
GC/EC
0.1 Aoount add'd <P/4>
0.1
2)7.)
ND
ND ID.4
____________________________ ntwn (%>____________________________
MAC
84
94 92
Proctor rile
BP 1)4
BP 109
P 1)2
DP120
Kvtroct Dilution IOC Kauaction Nunber
-
1:100 PCD 013
ltl PCD 008
li! ltl PCD 014 PCD OSD
BoooU'Wt. extracted to)
-
*L.O.D. * limit of detection in B9/9.
10
00
1.0
~
mm dotoetod with 0 detection Unit 91von by the L.O.D. value for each compound. MA not analysed duo to oanplo eatrect dilution.
MONS 022738
41).24711
Aiwlrta Aroelor 124S Jtroclor 1254 Aroclor 1240
TKB Lit 2. RT.CU1.TS 0*" CAPILLARY GC/EC ANALYSTS 0T KRW1PIOI PLANT SAMPLES
Aufuat IS, IMl
$4li Identification
Method Blank
KPS 1
KPS 2
KPS 3
KU KLS IM
Analysis Motbad
CC/EC
L.O.D.* 1
NDb
Concentrat l*> lua/t) ND ND NO 24
904
CC/EC
1
ND
ND ND ND 320 104
CC/EC
1
NO
NO HO ND 194 180
TCVftL ABDCLON
Mrrewt. (ptktM expound PootocloroOoMono
CC/EC
Analysis Method CC/EC
1
Aaount added (M/4)
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.344
1,400
____________________________________D.wnnr (%)___________________________________
107
90
7
95
200*
IM*
rneni ril.
BP 140
BP 142
BP 143
BP 144
htnet DU.tlO.
1:1
1:1
lil
lil
MC Batroetloo Nunber
.
PCS 052 PCS 051 PCS 054 PCS 055
Sooolo t. Entreeted ()
-
0
1.117
1.135
1.14B
*1.0.0. lUlt of detection Ia P4/<
*ND mm 4*toetod with dotoctloo Halt fivon by tho L.O.D. value for eeeb cceyoend.
%l4ii roeovory poesibly doe to the presence of penteclorobensene In ooU staple.
BP 179 It 10
PCS 047 0.119
BP 100 ItlO
PCB 040 o.Uft
MOMS 02273*
403.24518
Anolyto Aroclor 1240 Aroclor 14 Aroclor 1240
TABLE 3.
RESULTS OP CAPILLARY GC/EC ANALYSES Of KRUItlRICtl PLANT SAHPUS
August 15, 1903
S--nl Idsutificatiaa
oi j n (D)
KR 01
KR 01 ID)
KR 02
U 04
Analysis CC/EC
L.O.D.* 1
5.4
Conc.ntr.tlon (ua/a)
4.14
84
NO
HD
HD
CC/EC
5.0
4.40
90
12.5
10
1.45
CC/EC
1
5.4
4.28
200
2.9
2.9 7.45
lOTIL AAOCLO*
IlirrMtte tslklM Ctaoound
RMtacloroboAMM
CC/EC
Analysis Hsthod
CC/EC
1
Mount
a*kd
(in/0)
1
14 103
15.1
)74
15.4
licmrv 1%) 122 131 103
12.9
8.90
107 104
-
RfOCOM nu
BP 124
OR 1)4
P 104
BP 111
Kxtfoet Mistion me bUMtlM Mtipr
.
111 PCB 042
lil PCS 041
ltlO PC* 01?
111 PCB 023
Mlo t. tstrocud (9)
-
1.020
1.010
1.024
1.042
Vo*4> limit of tfotoctioo in pf/|.
No mm 4tocto4 witk dtetieA Halt 9Ivon by tho L.O.O. valuo (oi ooeh rnf puriI.
CMk Mt tMlytod.
BP 110 111
PC* 022 1.027
BP 12) 111
3l
HONS 022740
Analyte Aroclor 1249 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1290
TABLE 3. (Continued)
Sanole Identification
KR 04 (D) KR OS
KR 06
KB 07
KB 09
Analysis Method gc/ec
CC/EC
I.O.D.* 1
GC/EC
2-69 1.26 7.22
Concentration (uo/e) 1.1 2.9 l.SS
2.S
2.4S
1.42
9.2
.3 3.69 2.4 14. S
RR 00
RD 9.1 14.2
Km M0CL0A
Imrmti tolklag CaMd Pentaelorobensene
OC/CC
Analysis Method
GC/EC
1
Amount added W9)
1
11.16
3.9
9.93
S. 37
22.7
20.)
___ _________________________ Ueowrr IM____________________________
107
140C
109
113
107 Ill
Process Pile
BP 137
BP 13A BP 139 BP 140
Bxtract Dilution
1:1 1:1 111 ltl
I9K Bmtrectlon Motor
_
FC9 039 PCS 03S PC9 019 PCB 039
Maple t. Extracted (g)
-
1.047
1.039
1.029
1.01S
*L.O.D. > Unit of detection In ug/g.
*ND non# detected vlth e detection limit given by the L.O.0. value for eech compound.
High recovery poeeibly doe to the presence of penteehlorobensene in soil samples.
BP 121 111
PCB 0)9 1.001
BP IDS 111
PCB 019 1.00)
HONS 022741
iniiyU Arocior 1241 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 12(0
TAM* ). (Continued)
iMiyiii Method
oc/cc
L.O.D.* 1
nc/tc
1
CC/EC
1
KR 10
NO NO NO
SmdIi Identificotion
KR 11
KR 12
KR 1)
KB 14
KB 19
Concentrotion (tw/a) NO NO 3.1
1.7 NO
7.6
.96 NO
.96
m
li.i 10.9
MD .0) 1.1)
TOTAL ABOCLOO
tvrreaate toikina Coeeound Pooteclorobenteno
CC/EC
Antlyiii Method
CC/EC
l
Anount dded (M/9)
NO 112
2.66 16)
NO
11.66
22.0
Recovery (%) 106 109
117
1.00 110
mww rtu
BP 115
BP 119 BP 120 BP 141
UtrMt Dilution
lit 111 ltl ltl
MC BErection NwUr
.
PCB 02B PCB 0)2 PCB 0)3 PCB 01B
(Mill Wt. Sxtrected ()
-
al.OJ lialk I 4atetloA in vt/f.
1.03B
1.01B
1.0)7
1.009
S non detected with detection liait yiven by the L.O.O. viIim for eech ccapound.
*MA not enelyeed.
BP UP 111
PCB 029 1.000
BP 1U 111
PCB M 1.02)
HQNS QZZl*Z
Analyte Arocior 1249 Aroclot 12S4 Arocior 1290
TABIX ). (Continued)
Analysis "Bthod
GC/EC
L.O.D.* 1
GC/EC
1
GC/EC
1
KB 19
.7? 1.7 1.2
Ssnple Identification
KR 17
KR 17 (D) KR 19
KR 19
M 20
Concentration (no/a) NO NO MO 23 ND NO NO 24.7 NO ND NO 14.)
.90 .09 1.49
TOTAt AJCCU* lorroMU
Conoound
CC/EC
Analysis Method
l
Asmt Added (l*0/)
3.67
ND ND ND 44 3.22 Rccovary (\)____________________________
NOtKiMOteMtM
CC/EC
1
112
114
115
107
1)0
no
hum (11a
9 142
99 111
D9 145 99 144
Batrict Dilation IPC Bat(action MriNi
.
1:1 KB 021
til 1:1 lit KB 031 KB 030 9CB 024
IMU tft. Bstractad (4)
-
1.049
1.015
1.039
1.011
L.O.D. llait of dottction In 99/9.
MM 4*tetd vitb a dataetlan Halt 9Ivan by tha L.O.D. valua (or aacb caapound. V Mt aaalyttd.
99 122 111
KB 0)7 1.012
90 147 lil
VCD DM i.Ml
HONS 022743
Analyte Aroclor 1240 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1240
TABLE 3. (Continued)
Analysis Hsthod
GC/EC
L.O.D.*
GC/EC
GC/EC
1
KA 21
MD 1.2 1.73
KA 22
Sennit Identification
KB 33
Kft 24
Method Blank
Method Blank
Concentration (uo/a)
NO 2.3
-
NO 1.6
-
NO 1.9
-
NO HD M>
HD HD HD
TOTAL AMCLOIt
HHMIU totting Caapound Booteelorobensene
GC/EC
Analysts Hethod
GC/EC
1 toount added Cw/d)
l
2.43
NO
150 107
S.B -
Becovenr (%) 105 -
NO MD 101 105
ProctM rile
BP 109
BP 112 BP 114
-
btrnet Dilution
1:1
Itl 1:1
-
IK totractlon Donbor
-
PCD 020 PCS 025 PCI 027
-
ImpU Vt. btrected (J
-
1.009
1.004
1.003
-
*IhO.. 1UU of detection In H/g.
S * nono detected with detection llolt given by the L.O.D. value for eech compound.
eM not analysed.
BP 14B BP 125 111 ltl
PCS 043 PC* 044 00
MOMS 022744
Analyte Aroclor 1241 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1250
TAD!j: ). irot tnu<t>
ftMljriii Mthod
oc/cc
I.O.D.*
GC/EC
GC/EC
1
Method Blank
MD NO ND
Staple IdrntiflcetioM
Method Blank
Coocenlratlen iuaJm) NO NO NO
TOTAL AAOCLOft
fturrooate Soikino Ceaoound
NitUelorobtAUN
GC/EC
Analysis Method
GC/EC
1
Mount added (wo/a)
1
NO NO
________________________________Mcortnr (%)_______________________________ 101 111
Process rllo
BP 144
BP ISO
Batract 01lotIon
lil ltl
me IXtraction Haft
-
PCB 045 PCB 045
Malt n. btractod it)
-
00
Halt Of
ill H9/9.
Sd MOM# 4#kotod with 1 detection Uoit fivM by the t.O.D. value for Mb compound.
*A not analysed.
HOMS 022745
mlfit* wn tdM and thm lupin wri stirred, allowed to tind ind stirred fain, Iample* w*r ilnl again iamedlat*ly prior to addition or extraction aolvanta. m *xtraction process Involved the addition of IS nL of nethenol (all solvents sr* Burdick end Jackson 'distilled in glass* grade), stirring and the subsequent addition of 150 nL of hexene. The saaples were then shaken for 3 hours on a wrist action ahaker and the extraction solvent reaoved. The solvent was then successively extracted with SO uL of water, concentrated sulfuric acid (until clear), water, 20% potassium hydroxide and water. The hexane was then dried with 10 g of anhydrous sodiua sulfate. Each sanple was then placad on the head of a nixed phase column consisting of (top to bottom) 2 g of silica, 4 g of silica plus 40% sulfuric acid. 1 g of silica. 2 g of silica plus 36% potas sium hydroxide and 1 g of silica. The column was eluted dire.ctly onto a column containing 2.5 g of Woeln basic alumina. The alumina coluian was first elutnd with 10 mL of 2% methyene chloride/hexane (v/v) and this fraction dis carded. An additional elution was made with IS mL of a 5OX methylene chloride/hexane (v/v) mixture to remove the 2,3.7,8TCDD from the column.
For certain saaples it was necessary to conduct further cleanup of the samples either by a HPLC cleanup used a Zorbax-ODS 2S cm by 4.4 ID column using methanol at 2.0 aL/ minute as the eluting solvent. The eluate was collected in the 2.3,7,0-TCDD elution window and then extracted by adding 2 mL of 2% sodiua bicarbonate to the methanol and extracting with 2 mL of hexane three times. Option D in volved placing the samples on top of a column containing 1S% Carbopack C on Celite packed to a depth of a 2 cm in a 1.0 cm ID pipet. The column was eluted with 1 mL of hexane, 1 mL of 1:1 cyclohexane in methylene chloride, 1 mL of 75:20:5 methylene chloride/methanol/benzene and finally with
14
HONS 022246
2 al of toluene. the tolMM fraction vn collected to bo concentrated.
All inplu ha* SO pi of dodacana keeper addad to tkaa and than thay vara concantratad under a gentle etreaa of nitro gen and tubaittad for CC/MS analytic. The GC/MS analytea ware conducted on Hewlett/Packard S9B5B and $987 GC/MS inatruaantt. Saaplea that were not aubjected to Option 0 cleanup were initially ecreened on a 30 DB-S capillary. Following HFLC cleanup any poaitivea were then aubjected to analyaia on a 60 SP2330 capillary coluan along with all staples that ware prepared uaing Option D. The naac apectroewter waa operated in the eelected ion Monitoring ode analyzing for iona characterittic of both the native (unlabeled) 2,3,7,8-TCOD (n/z 2S7, 320. 322). chlorine-37 labeled 2,3,7,8-TCDD (n/z 328) and carbon-13 labeled 2.3,7,8TCDD (a/z 332, 334).
3.3.2
STANDARDS Standard aolutiona were prepared froa standards that had been cross validated with a standard provided as a check saaple by the EPA. Concentration of the internal standards conforaed to the levels specified by the aethod.
3.3.3
RESULTS The results of the analyses of the saaples are given in table S. The table also gives all pertinent QA/QC inforaation.
3.4 MERCURY ANALYSES The analyaia for aercury concentrations were conducted in accordance to the CO1 vapor atoaic absorption technique (Il
ls HONS 022797
ww
TABLE 4. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR KRUMMRICH PLANT SAMPLES FOR TOC AND TOTAL PHENOL
StNDl* ID Lagoon sludge Sangle No. 1 Saaple No. 2 Bangle No. 3
Reference Standards
PCS 35179 TOC PCS 162 Phenol
TOC. ng/q 17.1
4.6 4.1 7.6
Total Phenol. M/a i0.671
<0.39 <0.44
<0.32
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Observed Value, uq/q
True Value, ug/a
Percent Recovery
24.9 95
25.0 100
100 95
16 HONS 0227*8
TMU I
HU KfT
tin*
Mil MM Hit t-l* M-lt U-M N M I I* M-M i-t* lt HI* M-N HI* IHI Hint N*M HI* M M 1 11 M HI* M il HI* *1 HI* M il HI* m-m HI* n i hi* M M I I* M M HI*U Hit I f at-it t-r Hit HI* ' M<M HI* HM HI*M M il M-ll HI*M M-lt HI* M il nr Hit
M M l-t* M M M* HM t-t* M-M i n M-M HIT M il * M-l H*U Hit W M-lt HM M-lt t-r M-lt Ht *
-.E'et-F'*--.t.i- _ 11t 11i mtl/iMni
(.1 t.C I
IIl IMI*
IIIt tMl m 11 hi II II
It II
II tl
I#
t.c.t
tirni
t.r
M tl It It It M
It M
II tl
IIIt *1t
It *1 II tl It H It It
1-1t tttiiinnn
CM
- in
t.r.M
m t.r Ml
t.c.t it ti
It/ It
Minl
It M It It
It/ It t I It/It
t.c.t t.c.t
IMt IItt
t I It/It t I It/It
t.c.t It tl
It/It
t.c.t It tl
It/It
t.c.t M II
itnt
t.c.t M tl
itnt
t.c.t it n t.c.t
iimt/itt
t.c.t
t r it/it
Ittt it t tt Nil t M Ittt t U t tl im t tt t tt
mi t ti ntt t
iim ii t ii mi - i n Hit Ml t II
im in m
nt> tn t ti t*tt ti t at IIM t tl t tt IM) f ft Nit t M t tl Mtl t M tttl tM MU t t) IIM III
Mt t M tt ItM - t tt
IIM t tl IMl t It t tt ntt t ii t tt Ml t M t tl nit tt t at
mi t tt t IM! t tt
mi t ti mi - -
mi MM MM
mm MM INI till IIM IMt
IMt Ml* Mil
Mil
ItM
M tM t| M
t .nt m t ft
t tl t ft
1*1 t M I N t *1
IU t W t tt t ft IN IN
t tl t ft
II
CttrttIM tat imiMip tt atm i irw imiiki an tl M/i uii SmM M M tM UNlt
t Mailttt*
at* a at air n
I Mt
t.c.t CMIMimut#tMHMIMf
CtNm it atmt mNii MtM
liIMmift
IIM tMi t a * HM III
!m*
mt hi
mt MM (HI MM IHI
M I Ml Itit
im ani 11 a Ml) IHI mi hi
IMM MMt ttttt
M MMt ttm IMl*
itttt mtt
MMt ttm III MMt MMt *t lltM Itttt
HONS 022749
MS7/3
tulx t. usuin or multsis or nimua soil suras ro* kucvot
taaole ID
moi
M02 M03 KM4 MOS MOO M07
not noi
M10
Mil Ml 2
Ml 3
(pf/Orea)
ftn
n.t*
2.0 6000.0
13.6 3.1 l.S
1.4 10.9
7.6 <.3
<.*>
1.3 <0.3
0.3*
(0.3)
Sasli 10
(M/9raB) PPM
(13.7)
M14 MIS M16 M17 M16 M19 M20 M21 M22 M2 3
0.9 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 6.4 0.6 1.1 <0.6 0.6
*Reaultt for (KKOt) and (HU3)
are averaged values from diglieete staples enelysis
(0.3)
JC DATA
i. Qcnnuna ! Secovery-
97 end 96-
2. SAMPLE SPIKE (not)
Rtcovtry 66%
After 0i9estion I(mro)
Recovery 71%
is HONS 022750
MS7/J 1. U.l. ET Hathoda (or Chaaical Analnit of Motor and Moatoa,
A 400/4-79-020, March 1*79
HONS 022751 19