Document O1VoxrKam07rYrQEk0EYLEv7p

1 because they didn't do what a reasonably prudent Page 3933 2 corporation would have done under the same or similar 3 circumstances. 4 They didn't give an adequate warning 5 because, you see, exposure to asbestos causes this in 6 small levels. It causes this, but you see warnings, 7 adequate warnings can prevent it. 8 That is Mr. Grewe's lung in May of 1993. 9 That is what it causes. 10 Now, when Mr. Anderson testified, he was 11 asked about this study, the Rohl study. This is what 12 he said. 13 Is it fair to say that Ford was -- this is 14 the question, unhappy with the Rohl study? Do you see 15 what his answer was? We were unhappy with the honesty 16 and presentation on the document. 17 They were unhappy with the honesty of the 18 findings in the document. Unhappy with the way it was 19 presented. 20 Did they take any warning? Did they make 21 any warnings? Did they take any precautions after