Document Nk7MR3Y1918jG70Od7NxLykg

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Appendix Respirator Approval and Acceptance Listings (This Appendix ia not a part of American National Standard Practices/or Respiratory Protection, Z88.2-1960, but ia Included for information purpaaea only.) Al. Approved or Listed Respirators The Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, and the Department of Agriculture pub lish frequently revised lists of respirators. Sam ples of these have been tested and found to pro vide satisfactory reapiratory protection against specific hazards or contaminants. A1.1 Respirators Approved by the Depart ment of the Interior, Bureau of Mines. A list of respirators approved by the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. AL2 Respirators on Lists Published by the Department of Agriculture. A-list of respira tors for respiratory protection against certain pesticides may be obtained from the Depart ment of Agriculture, Pesticide Chemicals Re search Branch, Beltsville, Maryland 20705. A2. Requirements for and Tests of Respirators Requirements and testing procedures for res pirators have been established and published by the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, and the Department of Agriculture. A2.1 Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Requirements and Tests. Requirements for approval of most types of respirators used have been established. These requirements are published as the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, schedules. A current list of these schedules appears in Section 11, Refer ences. These schedules are frequently revised and each subsequent revision is assigned a suc ceeding terminal letter (lor example, schedule 19B is a revision of schedule 19A). Copies of the most recent schedules may be obtained from the Publications Distribution Section, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 4800 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Penn sylvania 15213. The Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, approval on a respirator continues in ef fect even though the schedule under which the respirator was approved has been revised one or more times. If the user wishes to check the minimum performance he may expect from an approved respirator, he should consult the schedule which was in effect when the approval was granted. Certain respirators are upended by the manufacturer to meet the requirements of more recent schedules. In general, aach sched ule revision makes the requirements more se vere. A complete list of schedules and their effective dates, and a list of schedules under which each respirator has bean approved, will be found in the Bureau's list of approved res pirators. * Responsibility for testing and approval of pesticide respirators has been transferred to the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines. A2J Department of Agriculture Require ments and Tests. The Department of Agricul ture previously established requirements and tests for respirators intended to provide reapira tory protection during the application and han dling of pesticides. The requirements end teats are described in a publication of teats and re quirements for respirators designed to provide respiratory protection against pesticides. The publication may be obtained from the Depart ment of Agriculture, Pesticide Chemicals Re search Branch, Beltsville, Maryland 20705. In the Department of Agriculture's tests, pes ticides were dispersed as water epcaya, oil sprays, or dry dusts to simulate formulahone used in field applications. Chemical cartridges were tested for one hour and gas meek canisters for four hours. Insect bioaaaay methods were used to determine the efficiency of canisters and cartridges. The Department of Agriculture did not eval uate facepiece fit of chemical-cartridge respira tors or gas masks. It did not test respirators for protection against rodentickles, herbicides, and fungicides. 30 BRG 0315 APPENDIX I A3. Selection of Other Than Approved or Listed Respirators For special purposes the user may need to select a respirator which has not heen submitted to the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, or to the Department of Agriculture for testing, or cannot be tested by these agencies because it is outside their approval or testing authority. Among these are special-purpose res pirators for which U6er demand does not warrant submitting the devices for testing or approval. Z88.2 The user should compare unapproved respira tors with similar approved or listed devices to evaluate the facepiece and other parts to assure himself that the manufacturer, or other reliable organization, has tested the filters, cartridges, or canisters, that they are adequate for the re quired service, and that quality control during manufacture can be expected. He should make or have made suitable tests of the respirators' effectiveness which, as far as feasible, simulate tests made by the official testing agencies. 31 BRG 0316 American National Standards The standard In lhl booklet It on* of nearly 4,000 standards approved to dot* by tho Amorlcan National Standards Institute, formerly the USA Standard* in stitute. The Standard* Institute provides the machinery for creating voluntary stan dards. It serves to eliminate duplication of standard* activities and to weld con flicting standards into single, nationally accepted standards under the deslgne lion "American National Standard*." Each standard represents general agreement among maker, seller, and user group* a* to the best currant practice with regard to tome specific problem. Thu* the completed standards cut across the whole fabric of production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. American National Standards, by reason of institute procedures, reflect a national consensus of manufacturers, consumers, and scientific, technical, and professional organizations, and governmental agen cies. The completed standards are used widely by Industry and cbmmere* and often by municipal, state, and federal government*. The Standards Institute, under whose auspices this work Is being done, I* the United States clearinghouse and coordinating body for standards activity on the national level. It is a federation of trade associations, technical societies, profes sional groups, and consumer organizations. Some 1,000 companies are affiliated with the Institute as company members. The American National Standards Institute Is the United States member of lha` International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Electro technical Commission (IEC), and the Pan American Standards Commission (COPANT). Through these channels American industry makes its position felt on the international level. American National Standards are on Die In the libraries of the national standards bodies of more than SO countries. For a free list of all American National Standards, write: American National Standards butitute, toe 1430 Broadway Now York, N. Y. 10018 BRG 0317 HAZARD Outline (or selecting respiratory protective devices. BRG 0318 WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO SAY A. OSHA STANDARD EXPLANATION 1. SUBPART I PARAGRAPH 1910.134 "RESPIRATORY PROTECTION" (d) "AIR QUALITY" * (1) STDS. FOR COMPRESSED AIR, COMPRESSED 02, LIQUID AIR, AND LIQUID 02 (2) ACCEPTABLE SOURCES * (i) CYLINDER TEST STANDARD (ii ) COMPRESSOR STANDARDS (3) COUPLING STANDARDS (4) CONTAINER LABELING STANDARDS BRG 0319 > - * * , II. WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO 5AY A. OSHA STANDARD EXPLANATION 1. SU8PART I PARAGRAPH 1910.134 "RESPIRATORY PROTECTION" (e) "USE OF RESPIRATORS" * (1) STANDARD PROCEDURES * (2) SPECIFICATIONS * (3) PROCEDURES FOR DANGEROUS ATMOSPHERES (ij TOXIC OR 02-DEF1C I ENT ATMOSPHERES (n ) ATMOSPHERES IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE OR HEALTH 38 ( ii!) SAFETY HARNESS REQUIREMENTS * (4) RESPIRATOR INSPECTIONS * (5) TRAINING IN SELECTION, USE AND MAINTENANCE (i) FITTING (ii ) CORRECTIVE GLASSES (m ) CORRECTIVE GLASSES 5/ BRG 0320 . WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO SAY B. CHANGES IN TESTS UNDER 30 CFR TITLE II 1. PARAGRAPH 11.85-12(d) (REVISION). TO PERMIT AN INCREASE IN THE PERMISSIBLE C02 CONC. IN CERTAIN CLOSED-CIRCUIT S.C.B.A. 2. PARAGRAPH 11.90(a) (AMENDMENT) TO DELETE RECOMMENDATIONS TO GAS MA'SK USERS'OF THE MAX. CONC. OF GASES IN WHICH MASKS SHOULD BE USED. 3. PARAGRAPH 11.102.5(c)(i) (AMENDMENT) TO REQUIRE THAT CANISTERS FOR GASES, AMMONIA, ORGANIC VAPORS, CO, AND PARTICULATE, SHALL HAVE AN INDICATOR TO WARN AGAINST INABILITY TO REMOVE CO FROM INHALED AIR. 4. PARAGRAPH 11.93 (REVISION) COLOR AND MARKINGS OF ALL CANISTERS ETC. TO CONFORM WITH ANSI K 13.1-1973. BRG 0321 10892 RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 30--Mineral Resources CHAPTER I--MINING ENFORCEMENT AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION. DEPART MENT OF THE INTERIOR PART 11--RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE DEVICES; TESTS FOR PERMISSIBILITY; FEES the air contaminant concentration im-s use against specific contaminants and mediately dangerous to life and health, concentrations, particularly to Include and lower explosive limit; it was deemed provisions for specific testing of the advisable to eliminate the suggested various gas mask canisters for certifica maximum use concentrations. A joint tion for use against specific contami OSHA/NIOSH standards completion nants of Interest. In view of the extensive project Is underway to write a minimum number of specific gases and vapors. regulatory standard far each substance MESA and NIOSH consider this sugges Gat Masks and Self-Contained Breathing listed in 29 CFR 1910.93. These stand tion Impracticable at this time. Apparatus ards will provide respiratory protection Section 11.102-5(cHl). MESA and On June 4, 1974, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and the Department of the Interior, jointly pub lished a notice of proposed rulemaking In the Fedkrai. Register (40 FR 19783) to amend Title 3<L.Code of Federal Reg ulations, Part IliUo permit an Increase In the permissible, carbon dioxide con centration.in certain 'closed-circuit self- contained escape breathing apparatus bnd to delete recommendations to" gas mask users of the maximum concentra tions of gaseaTn which the masksshouid he ijsed. ...... interested persons were given an op portunity to submit comments on the proposed amendments and comments were received from the Industrial Safety Equipment Association. Inc. (ISEA); and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). The comments have been reviewed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Mining Enforcement and Safety Admin istration (MESA). The comments and principal changes are discussed below by Individual sections: Section 11.90(a)(2). The ISEA re quested deletion of references to "Type" N" gas masks on the grounds that It Is unnecessary to describe a mask" with only one difference from other gas masks. MESA and NIOSH agree, yet the capability under { 11.90(b) for approving such a gas mask was retained by Includ ing "Other gas(es) and vapor(s)" as an additional category of front-mounted or back-mounted gas masks. requirements lor compliance with the permissible exposure limit. Until such standards are published. Information on respirator selection and use can be ob tained from the sources designated in this amendment Because of the uncer tainly of respiratory protection against some toxic gases and vapors when ac tivated carbon is employed as the sor bent, and to assure that the user Is pro vided with a comfortable and efficiently fitting facepiece, NIOSH Is undertaking a research program to develop Improved approval test methods and equipment to assure that adequate protection will be provided the users of gas masks. Results of the Investigations will be available from NIOSH. The ISEA also commented that the proposed amendment would Immediately place many current users of gas masks In a position of noncompliance and admin istratively cause the equipment to be considered obsolete. MESA and NIOSH do not agree. The users of gas masks will not be In a position of noncompliance with regulatory standards since such standards will specify the maximum use concentration for a gas mask which, in most Instances, will be much less than the recommended maximum use con centration in S 11.90(b). To protect the user, such limiting factors as the facepiece fit of the gas mask, expected serv ice life of the sorbent, warning proper ties of the air contaminant, the lower explosive limit, and the concentration of the air contaminant Immediately dan gerous to life and health are considered Section 11.90(b). The deletion of max In establishing the maximum use con NIOSH agree with the suggestion of ISEA that the section be revised to re quire an Indicator only for carbon monoxide because it is undetectable by odor or taste. A change in the concentration ol nitrogen dioxide In Tables > and 7 was suggested by ISEA. MESA and NIOSH agree with the suggestion and the nitro gen dioxide requirements were removed for all gas masks because the 80., CL, tests are considered adequate for evalu ating the performance of acid gas canis ters. A requirement was Inserted In foot note 6 of I ll.goib) that the applicant advise users, through means of Instruc tion on labels, of the probability of certain gases and vapors not being re moved by sorbents In the canister to that degree Indicated by performance re quirements in Part 11. The ISEA alio recommended a per formance requirement to be added to Ta bles 8 and 7 which would be consistent with subpart L for chemical cartridge respirator approvals. The change would allow a reduction of service life require ments (or all gas masks designed to pro vide respiratory protection against two or more types (classes) of gases and vapors. MESA and NIOSH are of the view that such a reduction Is not In the beat Interest of the user's safety. The In consistency with Subpart L Is believed warranted because gas masks are for use against more hazardous atmospheres. Therefore, Part 11 is amended as set forth below, effeotlve April 14, 1978. Dated: March 5.1978. imum use concentrations of gas or vapor centration of a gas mask In a regulatory Thomas 8. Kleppe. in which a device could be used was standard. The deletion of the maximum Secretary of the Interior questioned by ISEA which stated that until Government research results are published Indicating that the vapor values are too high, the action of deletion could be Interpreted as being arbitrary use concentration will not administra tively cause the equipment to be consid ered obsolete since the maximum use concentration for a gas mask Is estab lished by a regulatory standard and not .Dated: January 23, 1978. Marjorie Lynch. Acting Secretary of Health. Education, and Welfare. and without proper foundation. In this regard. Investigations by the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, performed under the auspices of the AEC, and investi gations by NIOSH have shown that the service life of activated carbon varies considerably with both the specific sor bent and the type of solvent vapor by the suggested maximum use con centration In { 11.90(b). Changes were made In the categories under the three types of gas masks in the form of additions of gas masks for "Other gas(es) and vapor(s)" and for combinations of gases or vapors. This change was made primarily to Include, 1. In i 11.83-12, paragraph <d) Is re vised to read as follows: 511.83--12 Test for carbon dioxide In inspired gas; open- and closed-clivuil apparatus; maximum allowable limits. *1 adsorbed. Therefore, canister service life for purposes of clarification, types of gas id) In addition to the test require Is not adequate for many gases and masks previously listed In the footnotes. ments for closed-circuit apparatus set vapors If gas masks are used at the sug The AEC recommended that the forth in paragraph (b) of this section, gested maximum use concentrations. The specific offices to be consulted for selec gas samples will be taken during the joint American Industrial Hygiene As tion, use, and maintenance of gas masks, course of the man tests described In sociation/American Conference of Gov and for Information on safe use concen Tables 1, 2, 3. and 4. These gas samples ernmental industrial Hygienists Respira trations, be named along with their ad will be taken from the closed-circuit tor Committee has prepared a selection dresses and telephone numbers. MESA apparatus at a point downstream of the guide which recommends maximum use and NIOSH have adopted part of this carbon dioxide sorbent, and they shall concentrations for many gases and vapors. Because of these factors. In addition to such limiting factors as the heat of reac tion between gas or vapor and solvent, warning properties of air contaminants, proposal and clarified the sources where the information may be obtained. It was suggested by the AEC that In stead of the proposed procedures, there should be testing and certifying of vari ous sorbent canisters and cartridges for not contain more than 0.5 percent carbon dioxide at any time, except on apparatus for escape only, using a mouthpiece only, the sample shall not contain more than 1.5 percent carbon dioxide at any Uron. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOl. 4), NO. Si--MONDAY. MARCH 15, 1976 BRG 0322 RULES AND REGULATIONS 11.90 [Amcndl] 2. In 5 11.80, paragraph (ai is revised to read as lollowo: (a) Oas masks Including all com pletely assembUd air purifying masks designed (or use as respiratory protection during entry into atmospheres not im mediately dangerous to life or health or escape only from hazardous atmospheres containing adequate oxygen to support life are described as follows: 3. In 511.90, paragraph (a>(2) is de leted and paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) are redesignated as paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) respectively and the word "half-mask" is deleted from paragraph (a)(3). 4. In 111.90. paragraph (b> is revised to read as follows: (b) Gas masks shall be further de scribed according to the types of gases or vapors against which they are designed to provide respiratory protection, as follows: Type of front-mounted or back-mounted yal mask Acid gas*' * Ammonia Carbon monoxide Organic Vapor * * Other gas (eo) and vapor ia> 1 * Combination of two or more of ilie above gasea and vaporn.1 ' * Combination of acid gas, ammonia, carbon monoxide, and organic vnports/*1 * 3 Approval may be for acid gases or organic vapors as a cIosh or for specific arid goaea or organic vapors, 4 Not for use against gases or vapors with poor warning properties or which generate high heats or reaction with sorbent mate* rials In the canister. & Use of the gas mask may bo limited by fiveton* such as lower explosive limit, toxi cological effects, and facepiece lit. Limita tions on gas mask service life and sorbent capacity limitations, shall be specified by the applicant in Instructions for selection, use and maintenance of the gas mask. Eye protection may be required In cer tain concentrations of gases and vapors. Type of c/iln-sfyfc gas mask Acid gas *1 * Ammonia Carbon monoxide Organic vapor1 Other gas(es) and vapor(s) '* Combination of two or more of the above gasaj and vapors.31 Type of escape gas mask Acid gas*'** Ammonia * Carbon monoxide Organic vapor 34 * & Other gasfes) and vapor(ea) 14* Combination of two or more of the above gases and vapors.*4 * Norx: For information on aafe use con* centratlona and for Information governing the selection, use, and maintenance of gas masks, the gas mask user should refer to regulations issued by the Mining Enforce ment and Safely Administration .or by the Occupational Safety and Health Administra tion. and to other applicable regulations con cerning gas masks. Recommendation* baead on such regulations may also be obtained from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 944 .Chestnut Ridge Road, Morgantown, W. Va. 38505, Attention: Direc tor. TCL; or from the NIOSH Regional Con sultants for Occupational Safety and Health In the DHEW Regional Offices throughout the country. g 11.102-5 [Amended! 5. In 8 11.102-5. paragraph (cMl) is revised to read as follows: (c) < 1 > Front-mounted, and backmounted, and chin-style canisters desig nated as providing respiratory protection against gases, ammonia, organic vapors, carbon monoxide and particulate con taminants shall have a window or other Indicator to warn the gas mask wearer when the canister will no longer satisfac torily remove carbon monoxide from the Inhaled air, 6. In 8 11.102-5, Tables 5, 6. and 7 have been revised consistent with the amendments to 811.00 to read as fol lows: T.mim! ft. --f'Mwiefir broth trml* unit rwiuircMCHtM for froohinottolnl tnut tun k finmutrtl gnu musk van lulrr* IMfrit pi. ii.jubpi. T, we. iurr.| <*!:.iMrf >JM* _ T*l iiuUUun T*el ai tiM<9<|t-ra MiiUmmn Minimum ............. *r------------------------- allowable aer-vtoa <;w Cuncrfitm- Flow Numlnr penotrv Hi* of Hon (port* no* of lion (part* (minute*)4 Tnpof |r trillion) (liter* i*r loot* tor minute) million) A;-l<1 jnv . A.4 m-Hvdl.. HOi *l. Equilibrated. Hai*tt Ory.mtc vittmr........................ As recHved. CCb Equilibrated. CCb Ammonia..................................... As received. NH* (-nrlHin inofioiidf).. . Equilibrated. Nllt .. .. .. As rccolved. CO CO CO Combination of 2 or 3 of at*ovo................................. types.1 Combination cf all of etavetyjics.*................................. JO. 000 JO. 000 JU.OOO ^0,000 30.000 `41,000 30.000 30,000 41,000 0,000 a, ooo M 64 31 Si 64 33 M *2 >04 u * <3 3 r, 3 4 r. 4A 3A 40 3 00 4 60 J <*) 3 (> 1 (*) 11 It 13 It It 11 It 13 00 00 00 1 Minimum life will bo determined at Hie Indicated penetration. * Relative humidity or test almwphere will belfehSpct; temperalare of teet atmosphere wtil be 20db2.P O. * Maximum allowable CO penetration will be S&S cm* durine the ailnlruum Ufa. The penetration shall not nroeed 200 n/tn during this time. ' Relative humidity of lost nlmosplMTc wlU be 05jfc* pci; temporattir* of test atmosphere entertn* the test fixture willbeO+'iA* C -0*. * Teet conditions and requirement* will 1>a applicable as *hown above. 1 Test conditions and requirements will be applicable as shown above, except 11ie minimum service lives for add aa. organic vajior, and ammonia will be 8 min loetood of U min. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 41, NO. 51--MONOAT, MARCH 1J, 197* BRG 0323 WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO SAY C. NIOSH/OSHA RESPIRATORY DECISION LOGIC 1. OUTLINE 2. GOVERNMENT PRACTICE 3. UCC CSrP POSITION BRG 0324 11. WHAT THE LAM SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO SAY C. NIOSH/OSHA RESPIRATORY DECISION LOGIC 1. OUTLINE A. INTRODUCTION B. GENERAL DECISION LOGIC FLOW CHART 1. GASES OR VAPORS 2. PARTICULATES 3. COMBINATION OF GAS/VAPOR AND PARTICULATES C. SPECIFIC DECISION LOGIC CHART D. DECISION LOGIC CRITERIA f. SKIN ABSORPTION 2. POOR WARNING PROPERTIES 3. SORBERT EFFICIENCIES 4. EYE IRRITATION 5. IDLH CONCENTRATION 6. LFL AND FIREFIGHTING 7. PROTECTION FACTOR 8. VARIATIONS WITH 30 CFR I I * 9. ESCAPE 10. TANK CLEANING AND ENTRY INTO CLOSED VESSELS BRG 0325 D-9 ESCAPE WHERE ESCAPE RESPIRATORS ARE PROVIDED THEY SHALL BE SELECTED FROM THE ESCAPE CATEGORY IN TABLE 2. THE EMPLOYER SHALL PROVIDE AND ENSURE EMPLOYEES CARRY AN ESCAPE RESPIRATORY WHERE EXPOSURE MAY OCCUR TO EXTREMELY TOXIC SUBSTANCES (AN EXTREMELY TOXIC SUBSTANCE IS DEFINED AS A GAS OR VAPOR HAVING A RAT EXPOSURE MORTALITY LC5Q OF LESS THAN 10 PPM.) THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS ADDED TO THE INTRO DUCTION TO THE RESPIRATOR TABLE FOR THESE SUB STANCES: EMPLOYERS SHALL PROVIDE EACH EMPLOYEE WORKING IN AREAS WHERE **NAME** MAY BE RELEASED INTO THE WORKPLACE AIR WITH AN APPROVED ESCAPE RESPIRATOR AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 2. THE EMPLOYER SHALL ENSURE THAT EACH EMPLOYEE CARRY THE ESCAPE RESPIRATOR IN THE AREA WHERE **NAME** MAY BE RELEASED INTO THE WORKPLACE. BRG 0326 I I - WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO SAY C - NIOSH/OSHA RESPIRATOR DECISION LOGIC 2 - GOVERNMENT PRACTICE AUTHOR TYPE OF DOCUMENT SUBSTANCE W!;OM ESCAPE RESPIRATOR.' PROVISIONS NIOSH It It tt II CRITERIA DOCUMENT II II If If If If ft It OSHA II DRAFT TECHNICAL STANDARD tt t? BENZENE INORGANIC FLUORIDE PHOSGENE SODIUM HYDROXIDE XYLENE !V TOXIC SUBSTANCES; ALKYL BENZENES, CYCLOHEXANE, KETONES, AND OZONE TOXIC SUBSTANCES; KETONES ft PROPOSED STANDARD AMMONIA If it n BERYLLIUM II tt ti LEAD II it. it SULFUR DIOXIDE tt tt M TOLUENE II tt tf TRICHLOROETHYLENE REQUIRED tt tt ft ft REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED tt tl ft It If tl ft It REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED It EXISTING STANDARD ASBESTOS (1 ft tf CARC1 NOGENS tt If II VINYL CHLORIDE NOT REQUIRED II ft If II 1 1 BRG 0327 *- v ... < .'S'' i'.y I I WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND/OR PROPOSES TO SAY C. NIOSH/OSHA RESPIRATORY DECISION LOGIC 3. UCC C&P POSITION A. LETTER TO NIOSH B. EXTREMELY TOXIC VS LESS THAN EXTREMELY TOXIC SUB%STANCES BRG 0328 EXTREMELY TOXIC SUBSTANCE PERSONAL PROTECTION NORMAL COMPLEMENT OF PEOPLE EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ESCAPE SITUATIONS OCCASIONAL SUPPORT PEOPLE EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ESCAPE SITUATIONS'^""- STANDARD RESPIRATORY YES YES NO YES & NO EQUIPMENT STRATEGICALLY POSITIONED SPECIAL ESCAPE-TYPE YES YES NO YES RESPIRATORY EQUIPMENT iis 'I !.i LESS THAN EXTREMELY TOXIC SUBSTANCE * NORMAL COMPLEMENT OF PEOPLE EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ESCAPE SITUATIONS OCCASIONAL SUPPORT PEOPLE EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ESCAPE SITUATIONS STANDARD RESPIRATORY EQUIPMENT STRATEGICALLY POSITIONED YES YES NO NO SPECIAL ESCAPE-TYPE NO NO NO NO RESPIRATORY EQUIPMENT BRG 0329 VIOLATIONS A. TEXAS CITY 1. VCL - NO WRITTEN RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT PROGRAM B. INSTITUTE 1. MIX MATCHING 2. ESCAPE RESPIRATORS USE IDENTIFICATION TRAINING * BRG 0330 RECOMMENDED I. H. INVOLVEMENT A. SPECIFICATIONS AND SELECTION 1. PERSONNEL EQUIPMENT 2. SUPPLY EQUIPMENT B. TRAINING 1. LIMITATIONS 2. HAZARDS C. TESTING AND/OR FITTING 1. TECHNIQUE 2. VERIFICATION D. MONITORING 1. IDENTIFICATION 2. EVALUATION