Document Napm5ve7m7JXRqJgmGo8xkNg

INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION A: jl III I II I I II IAI I ! II II )l II I , ' I IK II 'AIM I M. i received OCT 1 1986 I I wra<5TFI l`;j. w ' I 11 ) J. L. Worstell R. J. Romagnoli F. L. Boggs L. H. DuPuy September LI, 1986 Environmental Protection Asbestos & Spent Solvents Jack & Ron: The title of this letter 6hould be, "What do asbestos and spent solvents have in common? Answer - They are both very close to being banned from Goff Mountain Landfill. The asbestos problem you are aware of because of previous communications. To update you further, we are close to banning not only asbestos, but all bulk shipments of insulation from disposal at Goff. We will not take this step without first having a fully implemented disposal alternative. If you will please refer to the attached E. L. Patton letter you will see that there is a viable disposal alternative in Parkersburg, and at $5.50/yd it is a bargain. We are currently exploring transportation and short term storage options with Barbara Toler. Please note that we will continue to take small quantities of chemically contaminated asbestos. However, if this load becomes unmanageable it too will have to go offsite at a cost much higher than the one shown above. The spent solvent ban hammer, as you know, becomes effective on November 8, 1986. Also, as you know, there are no implementing regulations in place to guide us. In the absence of these regulations and under the direction of legal council the Institute Plant is taking the following position with regards to the land disposal question. 006 6E UCC 013305