Document NXxvZpZO1kpDLdQwV6yXDbzw
8510103*6
c
1 2 'WJ^WER:
See response to 5.19 above.
3
4
5
>
f
6
7
5.21 Do you contend that this court lacks jurisdiction S 9 over you on the grounds that there is an insufficiency of process
10 or an insufficiency of service of process?
11 ANSWER:
12
i. 13
14
15 5.22 If your answer to the preceding interrogatory is in
16 the affirmative, indicate the exact reason(s) why you believe that
17 process has been insufficient and/or why the service of process was
18 !insufficient. ! I-
19 j ANSWER: See response to 5.21 above.
20
I h
1.
21
22 *l` Ii
23
24
25
26 I ( PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGS., ETC. - 121