Document NGEp8ZG0g7X2bpyLmExg6q9ZD

bcc S. P 2- //3/76 Ford Markci ng Corporation Ford Cusiumei jcrvito Division Srrvice finsoarch Ceirlur tST'S T Oaftwoad DWd Dearborn, Michigan 43121 February 13, 1976 Hr. K. Ku.icl Vice Fitniei t Tr'ipo FlJiJ1c13 Company T-lOO Corh.an Cleveland, 02 io *139 Feat* Kcu: i/o tia^'o r-virwed the January 6, 1976 Clayton | 'ivironmewtn.1 Consultants tost report on Tempo's uodel 75-0 aabestus dust vacuum cleaner. T'n rr*ulL3 w 're very encouraging with tho e-i 'n-t aam; tea well below the OJ A 1 ire diold limit valuta i'or airborne J"ih m. iowever, Clayton couclii ed Uicer report with tho following two lcuommeniiationn: 1. "'i tl'.ugl the vacuum cleaner and ita fIV f ui,;nn system nrpear to bo CLicc'j.v< in filtering out mbogtog riH'r: p>1 sent in brake duat ; .z '? eir E+r&sm, it is rec^rrs'-nd^'l i1 1 J vrthsr Industrial i .nluarions to conducted dunrv' f1 iirl use of the vacuum clcn >-3 in typical garage or shop environments to confirm the concln .ioaa presented in tiiio report." 2. "71 o 'cnclusionn presented in thia report no based on the assumption tlct uinlity control of vacuum clcnm-rri r" t filter hag sya terns is nd'-'qu te. It is therefore recommendi d th i a t*L|1< quality control prorr^m be developed to inaurc that rulrijiif to pcrCoi nance of the vacuum cleaner components, particularly Lhn tiitrnl ion olcmonts, is assured during largo 3calc production operationa." a. The first recomroondfition implies additional rlmp environment testing, while Uic second involves a production a unp3 ' ng I'-'nl pi ugmra. In. view of the no'urn of thi.3 project, wo would lik*' "unr wmal.i m of Tempo's intended oursu of action in regard to Clayton1a recommendations. Thank you for your usual fine cooperation, Cineere]y. ,1 1 'Iif I i ' A* K. Updofi-'--- 003917 105490 PRODUCED BY FORD