Document NG6vweowbbjGv2v2er649VVqw

CITATION IT. "1 TO: 2. Foseco-Minsep, Incorporated Mt. Braddock Plant Mt. Braddock, Pennsylvania 15465 3. CiUlion N'umUer 4. rc*. l of 5. J 6. TYPE OF ALLEGED VIOLATION(S): NONSERIOUS 7. An inspection was made on 9/2 to 11/13 19 _Z? of a place of employment located at: 8. Mt. Braddock Road. Mt. Braddock. Pennsylvania and described as folJo 57 Manufacture of hot toppings for steel mills On the basis of the inspection it is alleged that you have violated the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 197< 29 U.S.C. 651 el *eq., in the following respects: o. 1 lem number n. Standard, republic* or tcciior. of the Act eJlejcdly violated 12. Description of titered viol*lion 13- Date C^djJoUo- muit 1 1 9CFR 1910.1000 ormerly 9CFR 1910.93 Employee(s), in the following location(s), were exposed to material(s) listed in Tablets Z-3, _____, _____ of this section, and their exposures were not limited in accordance with the requirements of 29CFR 1910.1000(c), ( ), { ). Samples were obtained at the breathing zone of the employee(s): (a) Pre-mix area (b) Cement- mixing area (c) Pulper December 1976 Employee (s) at the preceding locations (S) to (c) inclusive, were exposed to respirable quartz in excess of eight-hour time weighted average. _ ______ :?9CFR 1910. loot*** peuiion signs, advising employee(s) of the December g) (1)(i) asbestos dust hazards, were not posted at all 1975 formerly ' 9CFR 1910.93a approaches to the following area(s), where airborne concentrations of asbestos fibers maji 9)(1)(i) have been in excess pf the exposure limits prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section: (a) Pro-call building 3 39CFR 1910.1001 g) (2)(i) formerly :19CFR 1910.93a 9) (2) (i) Caution labels were not affixed to asbestos containing materials or their containers, at the following locations, in accordance with the provisions of this section: (a) Pro-Cal Building December 1975 FOSECO 1782 FOS-a2-0S0O0B25fe5