Document NG2LM0Jgd6vradXOrX7w1JV2R

\\G1 O.E P.A. S. 7Ri? 1' !;i ! 2:27 SEPTEMBER 2002 SURFACE WATER MONITORING REPORT FOR WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY AND LOCAL, LETART AND DRY RUN LANDFILLS WASHINGTON, WV Date: November 2002 PU> ^ CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 Project No.: D6WW7423.01 18983635.20000 era c~>~o cn -~--uUirrnon 3zs. Opr, do 03 Surface water Monitoring Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 2.0 C-8 Analytical Reporting..............................................................................................2 3.0 Washington WorksFacility...........................................................................................3 4.0 Local Landfill................................................................................................................ 4 5.0 Letart Landfill............................................................................................................... 5 6.0 Dry Run Landfill............................................................................................................ 6 7.0 References..................................................................................................................... 7 Table 1.0 Table 2.0 Table 3.0 Table 4.0 TABLES C-8 in Surface Water - Washington Works Facility C-8 in Surface Water - Local Landfill C-8 in Surface Water - Letart Landfill C-8 in Surface Water - Dry Run Landfill Figure 1.0 Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2 Figure 2.0 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 3.0 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2 Figure 4.0 Figure 4.1 FIGURES Site Location Map - Washington Works Facility Surface Water Sample Location Map - Washington Works Facility C-8 Concentration Map September 2002 - Washington Works Facility Surface Water Site Location Map - Local Landfill Surface Water Sample Location Map - Local Landfill C-8 Concentration Map September 2002 - Local Landfill Outfalls Site Location Map - Letart Landfill Surface Water Sample Location Map - Letart Landfill C-8 Concentration Map September 2002 - Letart Landfill Outfalls Site Location Map - Dry Run Surface Water Sample Location Map - Dry Run Landfill W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 004)062 i Surface water Monitoring Report Table of Contents APPENDICES Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Washington Works Facility Appendix B Chain-of-Custody Records - Washington Works Facility Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Local Landfill Appendix D Chain-of-Custody Records - Local Landfill Appendix E Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Letart Landfill Appendix F Chain-of-Custody Records - Letart Landfill W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 000063 ii Surface water Monitoring Report Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION A multi-media consent order (Order No. GWR-2001-019) was entered into between the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources - Bureau for Public Health (WVDHHRBPH) and DuPont on November 15, 2001 (Consent Order). The Consent Order identified a series of requirements and tasks to be performed by the parties to determine whether there has been an impact on human health and the environment as a result of releases of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (C-8), CAS Number 3825-26-1, to the environment from DuPont operations at the Washington Works facility and the associated landfills (Local, Letart and Dry Run). The Consent Order established the C-8 Groundwater Investigation Steering Team (GIST) to oversee investigations and activities that will be conducted to assess the presence and extent of C-8 in drinking water, groundwater, and surface water at and around the Washington Works facility and the Local, Letart and Dry Run Landfills. An additional component of the Consent Order relates to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit sampling requirements. In this portion of the Consent Order, specific outfalls and outlets (outfalls) are to be sampled monthly for C-8 by DuPont. Pursuant to Attachment A of the Consent Order, three tasks will be performed by DuPont and evaluated by the GIST, Tasks A, B, and C. Task A: Groundwater Use and Well Survey/Groundwater Monitoring has been completed (DuPont, 2002a; 2002b). Task B: Assessment of Existing Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Data includes the compilation of historical C-8 data, monitoring all wells at the landfills and the development of a Groundwater Monitoring Plan (GMP) for the Washington Works facility. The first part of the task, the historical C-8 data compilation report has been submitted to the GIST for evaluation (DuPont, 2002c). The second part of this task, monitoring C-8 in groundwater at the landfills, began in December 2001 and was performed monthly for four months and quarterly thereafter. The third part of the task, the proposed GMP for the Washington Works facility, was submitted to the GIST for evaluation (DuPont, 2002d) and groundwater sampling on the Washington Works facility began in January 2002. Groundwater sampling at the Washington Works facility was conducted monthly for four months and continues quarterly. Task C: Plume Identification/Groundwater Assessment is ongoing. This report presents the results of the monthly (September 2002) C-8 surface water sampling that was performed in September 2002 at the Washington Works facility, and the Local, Dry Run, and Letart landfills. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE OOOOC4 1 Surface water Monitoring Report C-8 Analytical Reporting 2.0 C-8 ANALYTICAL REPORTING The analytical method, method detection limit, and laboratory utilized for C-8 analysis has changed over time. Prior to 1991, DuPont performed C-8 analysis at the DuPont Experimental Station in Wilmington, Delaware. In 1991, when the RCRA Verification Investigation was conducted, the analysis was contracted to the CH2MHill Laboratory in Montgomery, Alabama. Both labs used a Gas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detector (GC-ECD) based analytical method with detection limits for C-8 that ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 ug/1. CPLMHill conducted C-8 analysis for DuPont into the fall of 1998 when the laboratory ceased operation. At that time, DuPont had completed one round of analysis for the RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI). The analytical work was transferred to Lancaster Laboratories, Lancaster, PA, for the RFI second round analysis in March 1999. Lancaster Laboratories continued to conduct C-8 analysis using GC-ECD for DuPont until October 2001, when development and testing was completed on a new analytical method developed by Exygen Research, Inc. (Exygen; located in State College, PA) that utilizes Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). buPont adopted the regular use of LC/MS/MS for C-8 analysis in water in November 2001 and Exygen was contracted to perform the analyses for DuPont. Exygen reports C-8 results for the laboratory replicate of each field sample. These results are evaluated for precision by comparing the field sample result to the corresponding laboratory replicate result. If both results are less than the practical quantitation limit (PQL), the replicate sample for that analyte is considered to have passed the precision criteria. If one or both results are between one and five times the PQL, the replicate is considered to have met the precision criteria if the two results differ by less than the PQL. If one result is less than the PQL and the other is not, and if the two results differed by a value less than the PQL, the replicate is said to have met the acceptance criteria. Finally, if both results are at least five times the PQL, the replicate is considered to have met the criteria if the relative percent difference (RPD) between the two results is less than or equal to 20%. The RPD is the absolute value of the difference of two measurements divided by their average. When the precision criteria outlined above are met, Exygen reports the average of the field sample and lab replicate results reported by the laboratory. If criteria for precision are exceeded, Exygen reports the higher of the sample and lab replicate results. Finally, when one result (from the sample/lab replicate pair) is above the PQL and one below, the result that is above the PQLs is reported. C-8 results are recorded in the Corporate Environmental Database (CED) and are reported as FC-143 for consistency with historical results. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 000065 2 Surface w ater Monitoring Report Washington Works Facility 3.0 WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY Figure 1.0 shows the location of the Washington Works facility. On September 24th, 2002, six outfalls were sampled for C-8 (001, 002, 003, 005, 007, and 105). All of these outfalls collect process water and stormwater runoff. Sampling of these outfalls is required by the Consent Order and WV NPDES permit No. WV0001279. The locations of these outfalls are shown in Figure 1.1. Table 1.0 provides the C-8 analytical results for surface water. For each sampling point listed in the table, historical data is summarized with the most recent results listed first. Figure 1.2 presents the C-8 concentration map for the outfalls sampled in September. Laboratory analytical data reports and the Chain-of-Custody records are included in Appendix A and B respectively. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 000066 3 Surface wafer Monitoring Report Local Landfill 4.0 LOCAL LANDFILL Figure 2.0 shows the location of the Local Landfill. On September 30th, 2002, Outfall 101 was sampled for C-8. Outfalls 004(Old), 004(New), and 005(OId)/SSl 005(New) were not sampled due to no-flow conditions. Sampling of these five outfalls is required by the Consent Order and the WV NPDES permit No. WV0076538. These five outfalls collect stormwater runoff and process water. The locations of the outfalls are shown on Figure 2.1. Table 2.0 presents the C-8 analytical results for the September surface water samples. The table includes the historic data available for each location sampled. The data is presented with the most recent data first. Figure 2.2 provides the C-8 concentration map for the outfalls. Laboratory analytical data reports and Chain-of-Custody records are provided in Appendices C and D, respectively. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 000067 4 Surface water Monitoring Report Letart Landfill 5.0 LETART LANDFILL Figure 3.0 presents the Letart Landfill location map. On September 27th, 2002, sampling was conducted at Outfall 002, Outfall 003, Stormwater Runoff, and the Rt. 33 stream. Sampling of Outfalls 002 and 003 (both containing stormwater runoff) is required by the Consent Order and WV NPDES permit No. WV0076066. Two non-required surface water sampling points, Stormwater Runoff and Rt. 33 stream, were sampled because flowing conditions were observed. (Stormwater Runoff is named "Stormwater Runoff Around Pipe" on the analytical data report and the chain-of-custody). A third nonrequired sampling location, Cap Runoff, was not sampled during this event. The locations of the outfall samples are shown on Figure 3.1. The location of the Rt. 33 stream sample is near the property boundary to the west and is not shown in this figure. The C-8 results for the September surface water samples are presented in Table 3.0. For each sampling point listed in the table, historical data is summarized with the most recent results listed first. Figure 3.2 presents a C-8 concentration map for the outfalls for September. Appendices E and F present the laboratory analytical data reports and the Chain-of-Custody records, respectively. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 000068 5 Surface water Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill 6.0 DRY RUN LANDFILL Figure 4.0 shows the location of the Dry Run Landfill. On September 30th2002, sampling for C-8 was attempted but Outfalls 001, 003, and 004 were not sampled due to no-flow conditions. (Outfall 002 is a required outfall sampling location as stated in WV NPDES permit No. WV0076244. However, it was a temporary relocation of outfall 001 and no longer exists). Outfall 001 collects stormwater and leachate. Outfalls 003 and 004 collect stormwater only. Non-required sampling locations including Property Boundary, Stream Sampling Point #1, Stream Sampling Point #2, DR Leachate, and Pond Underdrain, were not sampled. The locations of the surface water sampling points and monitoring wells are shown on Figure 4.1. The data in Table 4.0 includes historical C-8 data available for each surface water location. A C-8 concentration map for this sampling event, Figure 4.2, is provided that shows the no-flow conditions at the outlets. In addition, there are no laboratory analytical data reports or Chain-of-Custody records for this sampling event because no surface water was sampled. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15, 02 Wilmington, DE 000069 6 Surface water Monitoring Report References 7.0 REFERENCES DuPont. 2002a. One-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Report and Ohio River Public Water Supply Sampling, DuPont Washington Works (December 2001February 2002) January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DuPont. 2002b. Two-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling, DuPont Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill, West Virginia (March-May 2002) August 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DuPont. 2002c. Compilation o fHistorical C-8 Data, DuPont Washington Works Main Plant and Landfills January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DuPont. 2002d. Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Planfo r Washington Works Facility Plant and Landfills January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. W W K Sept Monthly SW Mon Report - Text Nov. 15. 02 Wilmington. DE 000070 7 000071 TABLES 000072 Table 1.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water DuPont Washington Works Facility Washington, WV Sam ple OUTLET 001 OUTFALL 002 OUTLET 003 Date 9/24/02 8/27/02 7/23/02 6/25/02 5/20/02 4/16/02 3/19/02 2/5/02 1/17/02 12/20/01 9/24/02 8/27/02 8/27/02 (dup) * 7/23/02 6/25/02 6/25/02 (dup) 5/20/02 4/16/02 3/19/02 2/5/02 1/17/02 12/20/01 11/26/O r 10/25/01 9/19/01 7/11/01 6/14/01 5/31/01 4/11/01 3/21/01 2/14/01 9/24/02 8/27/02 7/23/02 6/25/02 5/20/02 4/16/02 3/19/02 3/19/02 (dup) 2/5/02 1/17/02 1/17/02 (dup) 12/20/01 I C-8 (ug/l) 2.15 2.94 8.63 17.9 22.4 19.7 21.4 9.43 10.9 3.720 2.14 2.56 2.51 2.29 3.86 3.81 4.13 2.45 5.85 4.66 4.23 1.980 4.84 2.8 0.118 0.558 0.594 0.436 1.5 8.54 1.74 0.317 0.268 0.291 0.175 0.503 2.76 2.91 2.81 1.33 0.956 3.99 0.713 | 11/15/02 1 of 2 000073 Table 1 O.doc Table 1.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water DuPont Washington Works Facility Washington, WV Sam ple OUTFALL 005 OUTLET 007 OUTLET 105 Date 9/24/02 9/24/02 (dup) 8/27/02 7/23/02 6/25/02 5/20/02 5/17/02 4/16/02 3/19/02 2/5/02 1/17/02 12/20/01 12/20/01 (dup) 11/26/01 10/25/01 9/19/01 8/30/01 7/11/01 6/14/01 5/31/01 4/11/01 3/21/01 2/14/01 9/24/02 8/27/02 7/23/02 7/23/02 (dup) * 6/25/02 5/20/02 4/16/02 3/19/02 2/5/02 2/5/02(dup) 1/17/02 12/20/01 9/24/02 8/27/02 7/23/02 6/25/02 5/20/02 5/20/02 (dup) * 4/16/02 3/19/02 2/5/02 1/17/02 12/20/01 C-8 (ug/l) 4.64 5.02 12.4 19.2 17.9 98.6 65.7 3.8 9.26 141.0 137.0 31.40 35.20 915 65.7 2.86 2.16 120 7.4 1.43 4.31 199 153 NQ (<0.05) 0.207 0.597 0.544 0.284 0.490 0.567 0.483 0.320 0.339 0.871 1.99 3.69 6.73 34.7 3.86 6.27 5.16 15.9 13.2 14.6 7.53 9.78 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). * Analytical duplicates' values were previously inadvertently omitted from the tables. 11/15/02 2 of 2 000074 Table 1.0.doc Table 2.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Local Landfill Washington, WV Sample OUTFALL 004 (New) OUTFALL 004 (Old) OUTFALL 005 (New) OUTFALL 005 (Old)/SS1 Date 9/30/02 8/26/02 7/1/02 6/13/02 5/21/02 4/29/02 3/26/02 9/30/02 8/26/02 7/1/02 6/13/02 5/21/02 4/29/02 3/26/02 2/20/02 1/24/02 12/13/01 9/27/2000 12/10/1999 6/3/1999 6/2/1998 5/29/1997 4/2/1996 2/16/1994 9/30/02 8/26/02 7/1/02 6/13/02 5/21/02 4/29/02 3/26/02 9/30/02 8/26/02 7/1/02 6/13/02 5/21/02 4/29/02 3/26/02 2/20/02 1/11/02 12/13/01 9/27/2000 12/10/1999 6/3/1999 6/2/1998 5/29/1997 4/2/1996 2/16/1994 C- (us/l) No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 11.2 9.29 No-flow conditions 14.5 14.6 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 11.6 10.0 No-flow conditions 15 1.54 10.9 11.4 No-flow conditions 4.73 7.1 3.06 12 13 13 11 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 34.3 16.0 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 32.1 27.3 No-flow conditions 40.9 39.0 46.0 51.4 No-flow conditions 13.3 34 6.8 39 41 39 35 11/15/02 1 of 2 000075 Table 2-0.doc Table 2.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Local Landfill Washington, WV Sample OUTLET 101 Date 9/30/02 8/26/02 7/1/02 6/13/02 5/21/02 4/29/02 3/25/02 2/20/02 1/23/02 12/13/01 9/14/2000 6/3/1999 6/2/1998 - C - * ( " g/l) 115.0 70.3 63.0 38.0 40.0 48.2 36.4 63.10 81.4 82.40 12 15 54 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). 11/15/02 2 of 2 000076 Table 2.0.doc Table 3.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Letart Landfill Letart, WV Sample 002(LEACHATE BASIN) 003 STORMWATER RUNOFF RT 33 STREAM CAP RUNOFF Date 9/27/02 8/30/02 7/30/02 6/28/02 5/30/02 4/30/02 3/28/02 2/19/02 1/25/02 12/14/01 11/27/2001 7/20/01 7/25/2000 4/3/2000 1/14/2000 10/21/1999 9/27/02 8/30/02 7/30/02 6/28/02 5/30/02 4/30/02 3/28/02 2/19/02 1/25/02 12/14/01 9/27/02 9/27/02 8/30/02 5/30/02 4/30/02 3/28/02 2/19/02 1/25/02 7/20/2001 7/31/2000 7/20/1999 7/23/1997 4/17/1996 8/30/02 6/28/02 5/30/02 4/30/02 3/28/02 2/19/02 1/25/02 C-8 (ue/l) 4.52 2050 1410 Not Analyzed* 1630 443 131 355 50.1 36.1 53.2 159 1350 1900 920 3240 0.170 No-Flow Conditions No-Flow Conditions Not Analyzed* 0.282 0.0653 0.198 No-Flow Conditions 0.148 0.390 50.9 2.24 No-Flow Conditions 1.570 0.845 1.26 3.92 1.9 2.01 0.573 2.23 2 1.8 No-Flow Conditions Not Analyzed* 371 279 Not Sampled No-Flow Conditions 119 I Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). * Samples were taken at the respective surface water locations. However, due to an error by the courier, the samples arrived at the lab warm and were not analyzed. 11/15/02 1 of 1 000077 Table 3.0.doc Table 4.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Dry Run Landfill Lubeck, WV Sample O UTLET 001 OUTLET 003 OUTLET 004 PROPERTY BOUNDARY STREAM SAMPLING POINT#1 Date 9/30/02 8/30/02 7/31/02 7/1/02 6/28/02 5/28/02 4/24/02 3/25/02 2/25/02 1/28/02 12/12/01 10/3/2000 12/29/1999 5/19/1998 4/9/1996 9/30/02 8/30/02 7/1/02 6/28/02 5/28/02 4/29/02 3/26/02 2/25/02 1/28/02 12/12/01 9/30/02 8/30/02 7/1/02 6/28/02 5/28/02 4/27/02 3/26/02 2/25/02 1/28/02 12/12/01 8/30/02 5/28/02 4/24/02 3/25/02 2/25/02 1/28/02 12/12/01 10/3/2000 12/29/1999 7/14/1998 4/9/1996 8/30/02 5/28/02 4/24/02 3/25/02 2/25/02 1/28/02 12/12/01 10/3/2000 12/29/1999 5/19/1998 I C-8 (us/l) No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 30.9 41 71.6 43.9 41.6 No-flow conditions 31.5 66 17 86 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 25.3 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 20.1 6.77 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 0.70 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 158 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 9.41 6.69 22.8 3.81 11.1 3.99 10.3 39 0.88 9.9 No-flow conditions 1.63 0.932 1.06 0.850 0.893 1.19 0.758 0.54 1 ! 11/15/02 1 of 2 000078 Table 4.0.doc Table 4.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Dry Run Landfill Lubeck, WV Sample Date C-8 (ug/1) STREAM SAMPLING POINT#2 8/20/02 5/28/02 No-flow conditions 51.0 4/24/02 28.9 3/25/02 66.6 2/25/02 24.3 1/28/02 42.4 12/12/01 20.5 10/3/2000 27.6 12/29/1999 5/19/1998 87 4.6 DRLEACHATE 5/28/02 150 4/24/02 237 3/25/02 334 2/25/02 256 1/28/02 398 12/12/01 109 10/3/2000 27.4 12/29/1999 34 5/19/1998 56 7/22/1997 62 POND UNDERDRAIN 5/28/02 4/24/02 67.4 33.4 3/25/02 66.7 2/25/02 37.1 1/28/02 12/12/01 29.3 35.4 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). 11/15/02 2 of 2 000079 Table 4.0.doc 000080 FIGURES 000081 000083 APPENDICES 000084 000085 APPENDIX A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY 00009$ V Proven Results. Analytical Results W ashington Works Sampling 9/02 DuPont Sam ple Identification APFO (ng/L) WWK-Z-Outfall-001 WWK-Z-Outfall-002 WWK-Z-Outfall-003 WWK-Z-Outfall-005 WWK-Z-Outfall-007 WWK-Z-Outfall-105 WWK-Z-Outfal!-005-2 WWK-K-EQBLK-1 2150 2140 317 4640 NQ 3690 5020 ND Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is appoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a leve! between the LOD and LOQ. Result is no't quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ < LOQ Results are calculated according to the following criteria If the sample and laboratory duplicate are greater than 250 ng/L, and the relative percent difference (RPD) is less than 20, the average value is reported. If the RPD is greater than 20, the higher value is reported. If the sample and laboratory duplicate are less tha 250 ng/L, and the absolute difference is less than 50, the average value is reported. If the absolute difference is greater than 50, the higher value is reported. 000087 3058 Research Drive State College. PA 16801, US/ ooooat APPENDIX B CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY OOOD&B CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS. REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sample Receiving " 3 1 1 7 Research Drive * State College, PA 16801, USA T: 814.231.8032 * F: 814.231.1580 - exygenresearch.com Page____ o f ___ _ PROJECT INFORMATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Client (name & address): / 'V ,x , a -.-,.. , /a'- -i *' .. Phone: Fax: Sampler: >r .. -- ` hr : / i.yc t >( a -'s / Project Manager (Name & E-mail Address): / ` < - <,. , { - /') Project Name: P.O. # : y .*. Quotation #: -/i-' \ r f . iv. / , , ... /. / '' . X v - \.r Please fill out this fo rm com pletely to ensure correct analysis and proper handling o f your samples. "J i ,,.`di f! 1, .Lni. j ill - u t V ' -.ii! -> >1 ExyLIMS# Client Sample Identification L >i ?c'\ - / ir I lic i n r liria- A -i_i. r K H - s i h'j( - > c .-r,rjf - 1 i .`'i `V*- `- f / s*i/ ^ L C't-jKv -Xs *v x / l ic i - y I Ah IICI (Till.V > - i x / / . / / C>ft5> K' I d ' / U f / Collection Collection D ate T im e O s M m - X'5 - S lnAajtaaS 13 MO y * JOAW a m X . o _o.E<d Ec 3O Z U Specify Matrix > --r c Comments `/S'**' ' / / <f ->-1'f ( `r .r ?/.* / z. v .nM 7 a / ('?i j ry 6 v r U / `/JAu 6>Wmh / c v i i , > C'i'f / />,-'t' i>>( r / ^ fy-.li ,-y * o \ m ( ; Relinquished by '!..I l l i n i Date Time Received by , ~ XT Date Time C)c\ o , r > /`V' i l i i! S li li I l i ' M A I II li I,u; U,1 . ,|;lV X K .Z. 1 2L I' V o I t ( V! y./ ! / t, 'J t1 >`, . l y. t i PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: 0 Sample results only n Add case narrative 1 I Add quality control summary I I Add calibration summary I I Add raw data Other 000031 APPENDIX C LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS LOCAL LANDFILL 000092 J Proven Results. R Analytical Results Local Landfill C8 Sampling 9/02 DuPont Sample Identification APFO (ng/L) LCL-Z-Outlet 101 115000 Limr of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is appoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected % NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ < LOQ Results are calculated according to the following criteria If the sample and laboratory duplicate are greater than 250 ng/L, and the relative percent difference (RPD) is less than 20, the average value is reported. If the RPD is greater than 20, the higher value is reported. If the sample and laboratory duplicate are less tha 250 ng/L, and the absolute difference is less than 50, the average value is reported. If the absolute difference is greater than 50, the higher vaiue is reported. 0007 000033 ,,,3058 Research Drive Stats College, PA 16801, USA I T: 814.272.1039 I L F : 814.231.1580 exygen.com 000094 APPENDIX D CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS LOCAL LANDFILL 000095 CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sample Receiving ` 3117 Research Drive * State College, PA 16801, USA T: 814.231.8032 F: 814.231.1580 * exygenresearch.com Page of PROJECT IN FO R M A TIO N ANALYSES REQUESTED C lient (nam e & address): / ' AV... a > ' . r , A ..., Phone: '".. A - , /W ' ; j '/:>- /.- / Fax: S a m p le r :... Project M a n a g e r (N am e & E-m ail Address): /A /. . ... /-*.<-./i . //-.. '/(./.t.. . . . . / <. - Project N am e: A " . / V....., f . : . 'A - - RO. S,J 4 stJ, .*4' U Q uotation # : Please fill ou t this form c o m p le te ly to ensure correct analysis and proper handling o f your samples. A K' N' ,<v rpv! I;:: n uh iv h s/< a- o . r \ t i ; J ..it, ExyLIMS# Client Sample Identification L ' h m -1 L s 't - -<'-// / /* / Collection Collection D ate T im e Irto 0.: QM sj oQ. .E -Q rt oEo E3 Oc z u Specify M atrix o-- A Comments (s `"/ `S 'O V' , / I s / '/ s ' s ' \ \ ON o o I o I Mi I /it cn ir. I .'il iti- I t i l i Iluvt A11< -I Received by ,1 IIN , .-oV-QU>< -- Date V .^ O tio Time s/c- <' ooooae PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: F I Sample results only 0 Add case narrative Q Add quality control summary 1 I Add calibration summary I I Add raw data Other 00009V APPENDIX E LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS LETART LANDFILL 000098 Proven Results. Analytical Results LeTart Landfill C8 Sampling 9/02 DuPont Sam ple Identification APFO (ng/L) LTL-Z-Outlet 002 LTL-Z-Outlet 003 LTL-Z-Stormwater Around Pipe LTL-Rt.33 4520 170 50900 2240 Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is appoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ < LOQ Results are calculated according to the following criteria If the sample and laboratory duplicate are greater than 250 ng/L, and the relative percent difference (RPD) is less than 20, the average value is reported. |f the RPD is greater than 20, the higher value is reported. If the sample and laboratory duplicate are less tha 250 ng/L, and the absolute difference is less than 50, the average value is reported. If the absolute difference is greater than 50, the higher value is reported. 0007 00003S .3058 Research Drive j State College, PA 16801, US/ I T: 814.272.1039 i' _ F : 814.231.1580 OOTOOO APPENDIX F CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS LETART LANDFILL 000101 CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM RESEARCH Exygen Research Sample Receiving 3117 Research Drive * State College, PA 16801, USA T: 814.231.8032 F: 814.231.1580 - exygenresearch.com P a g e _____ o f ______ PROJECT INFORMATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Client (name & address): / / / V V , . V {,,. ........ - ( ) , . y. , / /? '-> A" < ( .'// , .. > y Phone: A- / y . f r r - a -. Fax: v Sampler: ^ i XX Project Manager (Name & E-mail Address): A\, //c />-, , / . < , ( > J a - L . Project Name: . c i y - y .f r / ,, ...... j" . c/,.* RO. # : L i >..{*/. d X >oo Quotation # : Please fill out this form completely to ensure correct analysis and proper handling o f your samples. 4 \. j .t s \* \1 i '1. \ ExyLIMS# Client Sample Identification Collection Collection D ate T im e .Qnj O /. X' AY 1 L H / t ` - -3 / . / .v > i ' ; - A - .'.v ' y ' 1 .' 1 i ` rvm _ x - , ,, S Aro;iV, A 0 i(1vV*v- 'r - \*S 3 im sc X rr- * - r* ~ r^^ / 7if y K \ N ......... X*1 * V < ) 1 I M A Composite Number of Containers v\ X Specify M atrix Com m ents J i .-/Js- t .J V., J f 1o ! k W > >.i / ' </ s v r "> -V r .V- : V. i J 1 t/. t rrfr r, --. r *; ' / / ... r 7 >V -/ ; v > 7 v /T,~CZ v' ~/\>v t o s~7/,f y |--------------------------- 'V r 7.VS o s - / . t t t : ' V.1 S ' i / 6 v*"> ; v \ ,v 1> o c c I ! lisi: o lii'. ;; I; A ij y r, V w \.l Relinquished by Date Time ..... 7 '30 OA- \ ^ o _ K --------------------------------------------------- h u m ; n i l O R M A I l< Cooler ID # .. X n Received by SiftkVirucj /> kv. Cooler Temp. (C) &' Date Time CF\0O //(`J 0 .8 Ilf... VtlV 000102 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: I | Sample results only f~) Add case narrative I I Add quality control summary I I Add calibration summary 0 Add raw data 0 Other