Document NDKgkkw8YoMjErj1Rz9NZwaQ
REPORT OF MEETING OF EUROPEAN PCB SUPPLIERS IN FRANKFURT 9th/l0th FEBRUARY 1970
CONFIDENTIAL
Present for Bayer :
Dr. Dr. Dr. Mr. Mr. Mr.
Hoehne Knust Wissner Joetten von der Forst Martin
- Plasticizers MTS - Fluids MTS - Manufacturing - Plast. Manufacturing - Fluids Manufacturing - Fluids Marketing
(Part-time) (Part-time) (Part-time)
For Caffaro
Dr. Marchetti Dr. Casale
- Director - R. & D.
(Part-time)
For Monsanto
:
H.N.Dahlstrom D.S.Cameron R.A.Lidgett H.A.Vodden
For Prodelec
:
P. Jay Mr. Steinmueller G. Crepy M. Gilon
For Progil
:
W.F.Smend
- R. & D. - Analytical - Marketing - Managing Director
- Director
(Part-time) (Part-time)
(Part-time)
DSW 201514
STLCOPCB4059581
2- -
SUMMARY
Objectives were to review current work, define what
technical information Monsanto and others could provide
and to develop a mutual programme for Europe.
Monsanto
summarized the commercial and technical developments,
with special reference to analytical techniques, leading
up to the present PCB situation.
Detailed technical
discussions under the headings of analytical, toxicolog
ical, degradation and disposal identified a number of
action points - these were mostly to gather and exchange
information for deciding upon possible joint actions.
There is no public concern yet in Germany, though Bayer
recognize the international implications and are"starting
to ftcfTeck th<5x uwn and their"major customers' plants, and
areraiso initiating analytical and toxicological 'programmes.
There--is no concern in eiLhei France~~or Italv~~and neither
Prodelec nor Caftaro have initiated any work on this
subject; their managements are not yet convinced of the
need to do so.
ThevEtench manufacturers of PCB's -
Progil and Kuhlmann - have not reacted following our
earlier meeting with ProHelecT!
"'
Date of the next meeting, when numbers attending would be much smaller, was fixed for 09.00 a.m. on the 14th May in Brussels.
DETAIL
('
Analytical
1) Monsanto gave details of its analytical methods
and agreed to circulate a written description
which would be followed by personal exchanges
either centrally at Ruabon or by Monsanto
visits to the individual laboratories.
There
was still need for improvements and refinements
in analytical techniques in order to increase
confidence in quantitative measurements and
isomer separation.
Confidence increases with
practice and it was generally agreed worthwhile
to exchange samples and compare results once
the exchange on methods had been accomplished.
DSW 201515
STLCOPCB4059582
-3-
2) It might be worthv/hile to contract out work
with, for example, Widmark at Stockholm
University, or the University of Utrecht.
Widmark was known to be working on low level
detection techniques down to 0.05 parts in
10^.
Bayer will check with Widmark and
r Monsanto with Utrecht and will report on \ "^possibilities at the next meeting.
3) Within the next few weeks Unilever are
expected to publish details of their analytical
method for PCB and chlorinated insecticide
residues in wild life tissues.
This technique
will separate the various chlorinated compounds,
and Monsanto will circulate details when they
become known.
4) Monsanto was asked what institutes in the
United States were working on analytical
methods.
Mostly this work had been within
Monsanto but we would check on outside instit
utes so as to avoid possible duplication if
work was to be contracted out to European
institutes.
5) (1 Monsanto has already started sampling effluent
I from some of it's major U.K. customers, and
will continue to do so.
Bayer, Prodelec and
Caffaro foresee difficulties in this area with
customer relations but, hopefully, will be
able to make a start.
It is important to
establish the source of leakages into the
environment, and to establish profiles of
the industries that are major PCB users.
Exchange of information in this area would
be worthwhile.
Prodelec may possibly start sampling fish
taken from the Mediterranean and off the
Rhone estuary, and also river fish taken
from the Rhone.
Monsanto could possibly
1 help with analysis if Prodelec's own facilit
ies were not able to handle them.
DSW 201516
STLCOPCB4059583
t -4
6) It was agreed desirable to exchange infor
mation on the various institutions working
on PCB residues in wild life in each others
domestic markets, paying attention to
industrial and commercial laboratories as
well as to government institutions and
universities.
Bayer know there are three
or four in Germany as a result of enquiries
received for samples; neither Prodelec nor
Caffaro are aware of any s\ich~~work in France
or Italy, '"though Prodelec were asked to
supply a sample of a purified isomer to the
University of Utrecht - but did not do so.
iEach company would define the situation in
| its own domestic market and report at the
I next meeting.
7) As an ultimate objective of the group it was
decided the European producers could fund a
complete survey on the presence of PCB1s in
the marine environment in different parts of
Europe.
This type of effort would be of
such magnitude that it could only be funded
and made statistically meaningful by the
combined resources of all PCB producers.
Toxicology
1) All recognized that proof of toxicity was a
difficult problem - the present indications
were there was no acute problem but possible
chronic effects were unknown.
Persistence
rather than toxicity was the crucial,,issue.
Investigation of possible chronic effects
was the area where the greatest amount of
work was needed.
Work with small mammals and birds was the
most important since it seemed evident that
there were no acute toxicity problems with
fish, except for certain shrimp species.
(Monsanto agreed to circulate its interim
results on small mammals.
These were two-
year trials and at the six-month stage
there were some slight indications of
chronic problems but these needed confirming,
iMonsanto would also define which other U.K.
and U.S. institutions were working in this
area.
DSW 201517
STLCOPCB4059584
)
-5-
2) Bayer is starting work with small mammals
nd~_wIT]r_CiTunl^rte_kIarEar_a^--Tt~5ecomes avail
able.
They also plan trials with PCB
paints on the inside of fish tanks, primarily
to check migration of PCB from the paint into
the water.
This investigation might possibly
be extended to monitor the build-up of PCB in
the fish and the effects of feeding these fish
to birds.
Bayer are concerned about the future of plastic
izer applications, which account for 20% of
their total PCB sales.
They have approval
from the German Ministry of Health for the use
of PCB in chlorinated rubber paints on the
inside of drinking water tanks, the important
factor being the very low solubility of PCB in
water.
A U.V.analytical technique with a
sensitivity down to 0.02 ppm was developed to
check the migration of PCB into the drinking
water, but none could be detected.
Bayer
/will circulate details of this technique.
3) Progil have a Pesticides Laboratory and hence
th^capability to carry out toxicological
' trials.
However, their management are not
yet convinced that these are necessary.
Trials carried out by Monsanto which might
show positive results will carry more weight
with them than similar results reported by
an institution riding on the pollution band
wagon.
4) Caffaro are not equipped for toxicological investigations and do not envisage becoming involved in this type of work.
5) Exchange of information would be beneficial.
Monsanto agreed to circulate the NERC report^
when it was issued and would also see if it
were possible to circulate relevant press
cuttings appearing in the U.K. press.
Basic
a details of Bayer's clinical investigation on
their plant~"operators have already been
hureportlicr-but the detailed report will be
\ translated and circulated.
DSW 201518
STLCOPCB4059585
r"',. *4_>
6- -
)
6) Again, longer term objective of the group
j J/ could be to contra.ct out toxicological ' sj workto'neutral institutions on an industry
basisJ
Before the scope of this work could
be defined all of the above points would
need to be clarified.
Degradation
1) A curious feature of published work was that
it was invariably the penta and hexa compounds
that were reported.
Hypothesis for this
were discussed.
Feeding trials should event
ually show whether the compound in the food
was the same as the compound found in the
animal tissue, or whether there had been some
metabolic degradation.
Data should be exchang
ed in this area but it was at present too early.
Controlled trials will not necessarily duplicate
nature, since stages in the food chain are
omitted.
For example, if Trichlor compounds
were fed and subsequently found in the tissue
it does not mean that the same would necessar
ily be true in nature.
2) Monsanto was working on what types of micro
organisms might be most effective but it was
too early to report results.
Bayer are doing
no micro-biological work but it is planned for
the future.
Monsanto reported that Unilever
claimed access to work purporting to show that
the toxicity of PCB is inversely proportional
to the number of chlorine atoms.
Disposal - (Transformer Fluids)
1. /Bayer incinerate mixed liquid factory wastes
/ "with "PCB-'-g' never accounting for more than 10%
/ of the mixture.
They also have facilities
to incinerate mixed. soli_cL_wastes in a rotating
tube furnace, without added fuel at~bhe~ same
temperature as used for liquids, 1000 - 1200 C.
Dry PCB wastes are mixed with readily combust
ible materials.
They are not checking flue
M gasses for PCB traces but will do so and \w report result.
qSNN 2A5A9
\
STLCOPCB4059586
7-
Bayer seem the most knowledgeable and
experienced in incineration techniques. Jilf required, they would be prepared to Apdiscuss details with Monsanto.
2) Prodelec incinerate liquid PCB effluent
with the help of fuel boosters as~~prev- ^
,arouglyr~reported - their unit handles all
chlorinated wastes - but ^solid wastes
such as spent earth are buried on ground
adjacent to the factory; MO si: of the
liquid PCB's for incineration are return
ed transformer fluids that are beyond
recovery, (about 20% of returns are in
this category).
Prodelec are analysing
flue gasses for PCB and will report
results.
3) Caffaro have no incineration facilities.
Solid effluent is buried, liquid effluent
is first barrelled and then buried.
In
1969, they received back about 80 tons
of transformer askarel for eclamation
(approximately 10% of the Italian market),
f and claimed that everything returned is 1' recoverable.
4) Prodelec repeated their position on the
rblamatibn~oF~transformer askarels in
France and urged the need for a broader
specification on recovered material,
particularly in terms of colour, loss
/factor and oil content, which they wish
I to increase to 2%. rOther companies will
* consider this proposal and report at the
next meeting.
Prodelec are also working
on a process to remove oil from transform
er askarel and, if successful, will disclose
details of it.
5) Bayer reclaimed transformer askarel for
their customers until ten years ago, when
they gave it up because of cost and quality
problems.
They have encouraged and helped
the larger transformer manufacturers to do
this themselves, and they have also helped
a small independent company into the reclam
ation business.
Bayer accept the returned
material for destruction.
Customer pays
freight only.
OSNN 20A 52
STLCOPCB4059587
6) Caffaro reclaim transformer askarel as reported above, and are investigating
^ the use of mobile regenerators.
7) In conclusion, it was agreed that the following are the long term objectives of the group under this heading :
(1) Prevent any arced material from being dumped.
(2) Exercise central control over disposal in each major area.
h (3) Provide economic incentive I for users to return material ' for reclamation.
(4) Loosen up specification of
returnable material to encourage
utilization of reclamation
services.
Develop common
specification.
Disposal - (Capacitor Fluids)
8) Disposal of waste arising in the capacitor
industry is a difficult problem.
Prodelec
repeated G.E.'s view that initial capacitor
failures could run as high as 10% with the
new Magvar designs whilst the manufacturers
became familiar with the new technology.
Hitherto, no-one had made recommendations
for the disposal of capacitor windings and
spent earth.
Monsanto would now propose
landfill; Bayer would recommend incinerat
ion; Prodelec would recommend incineration
under properly controlled conditions, other
wise landfill.
Municipal incineration
facilities in Germany are reported to be
good, but each company needs to investigate
further facilities in its domestic market
and r eport upon them.
DSW 201521
STLCOPCB4059588
r
-9-
9) Disposal of used containers was another
problem.
Prodelec suggested each company
should refuse to deliver to the electrical
industry except in bulk containers (i.e.
tote bins or tankers), but this was thought
impracticable in a number of markets.
The position in the plasticizer outlets was even more complicated due to the greater number and smaller size of customers.
Miscellaneous
1) Each company would appoint one person to act as the focal point for communication and co-operation.
DSW 201522
STLCOPCB4059589
HAV/RAL
HAV/RAL HAV/RAL HAV/RAL HND HAV/DSC HAV/DSC HAV/DSC HAV/DSC HND
HAV/DSC BTG/DSC HND
ACTION EY MONSANTO
Circulate details of analytical method; make follow-up visits to Bayer, Caffaro and Prodeloc or arrange combined meeting at Ruabon.
Circulate details of Unilever analytical method when this is published.
Arrange exchange of analytical samples and results.
Determine what analytical contract work the University of Utrecht could undertake if required to do so.
Verify which U.S. institutions are work ing with Monsanto and/or independently on analytical and toxicological problems.
Define which U.K. institutions (government, university, industrial and commercial) are working on wild life investigations.
Exchange information on industry profiles as they are developed.
Circulate interim (six months) report on Monsanto sponsored chronic toxicity invest igations on small mammals.
Define scope of known toxicological invest igations in the U.K.
Determine scope of known toxicological investigations in the U.S. and establish procedures for channeling this information to Europe on a continuing basis.
Circulate NERC Report when it issues.
Arrange exchange of press cuttings.
Verify what U.S. information is available comparing residues found in animal tissues following feeding trials with compounds that were added to the food.
20a523
OS^
STLCOPCB4059590
HAV/DSC HAV/FM HAV/DSC CRC/PJAM
Exchange data on nature of residues detected after1 feeding trials.
Determine need to seek Bayer advice on incineration techniques.
Investigate municipal incineration facilities in U.K.
Consider and report on specification for recovered Pyroclor.
DSW 201524
STLCOPCB4059591